On Sun, 24 Feb 2008 02:15:24 +0100, Matthias Leisi wrote:
> Micah Anderson schrieb:
>
> | [surprisingly low scores]
> | The spams can be pulled from here: http://micah.riseup.net/spams
>
> Most (all?) of the samples are forwarded through some debian.org
> mechanism. In order for blacklists to take full effect, you should
> configure your trust path (trusted_networks etc) accordingly.
My trusted_networks is set to:
trusted_networks 202.12.162.
trusted_networks 10.0.
trusted_networks 10.8.0.
The first is trusting everything in that IP space, which we control, the
second is a private network, and the third is a private network. Am I
specifying those incorrectly perhaps?
I'm also short-circuiting on trusted-relay chained messages, using the
following:
meta SC_HAM (USER_IN_WHITELIST||USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST||
USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO||NO_RELAYS||ALL_TRUSTED||USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO||
USER_IN_BLACKLIST)
priority SC_HAM -1000
shortcircuit SC_HAM ham
score SC_HAM -20
But I log in the headers all short-circuit status, with the following
(and you wont see short-circuiting in the examples i posted):
status
add_header all Status "_YESNO_, score=_SCORE_ required=_REQD_
tests=_TESTS_ shortcircuit=_SCTYPE_ autolearn=_AUTOLEARN_
version=_VERSION_"
Do I have something misconfigured in my trust path? I do have a forward
from a debian.org email address that occasionally sends me legit email
(although it does seem like a lot of spam gets through there), but I dont
believe I have that domain in a whitelist anywhere.
thanks
micah
