Greetings;
About an hour ago, based on some comments made that the bayes database needed
trained on ham as well as spam, and because it seemed to be forgetting some
of the stuff I'd fed it as spam, I re-wrote that filter rule in kmail to
launch it using one of my sorted directories from a maili
Andrea Bencini wrote:
I installed postfix-2.4.5-2.fc8, amavisd-new-2.5.2-2.fc8 and
spamassassin-3.2.3-2.fc8.
They are running.
I would like to test spam changing "score" in local.cf.
My local.cf is:
report_safe 0
use_bayes 1
use_bayes_rules 1
skip_rbl_checks 0
bayes_path /var/spool/amavisd/.spam
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 14:57 -0800, fchan wrote:
> I'm getting spam scores (ie No, hits=? required=?) from certain types
> of spam messages. Most of them have phishing links but I have no
> problem with most messages with links. I'm using qmail with
> qmail-scanner-2.01st on RedHat Linux ES5.
>
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 20:15 +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> Paul Douglas Franklin of Yakima UGM wrote:
>
> > I have noticed that spammers are putting dead giveaways into some of
> > the headers which are not checked with the body rules. Specifically,
> > I received an email with a sender name that was
Hi,
I'm getting spam scores (ie No, hits=? required=?) from certain types
of spam messages. Most of them have phishing links but I have no
problem with most messages with links. I'm using qmail with
qmail-scanner-2.01st on RedHat Linux ES5.
Below is excerpt of a message that I get with this:
On 02/04/08 16:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daryl C. W. O'Shea) wrote:
Christopher Bort wrote:
I have recently upgraded a SpamAssassin installation from
3.2.1 to 3.2.4. Since then URIBL hits have dropped to nearly
zero, where before there were several hundred per day.
Immediately after the upgrade,
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 12:32 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Let's record my 3.23 to 3.24 upgrade attempt.
>
> I untar Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.4 and of course read the file entitled
> UPGRADE.
>
> In it I find "Note for Users Upgrading to SpamAssassin 3.2.0".
> But I am upgrading to 3.24.
No, you
Paul Douglas Franklin of Yakima UGM wrote:
> I have noticed that spammers are putting dead giveaways into some of
> the headers which are not checked with the body rules. Specifically,
> I received an email with a sender name that was obviously spam.
How did you determine that the sender name
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 07:39:00PM +0100, Andrea Bencini wrote:
> Now I send an e-mail where there are the words "porno" and "sex" in the
> message body.
>
> Why there aren't FREE_PORN and LIVE_PORN scores?
Because the single words "porno" and "sex" don't trigger the rules. There are
few rules
I installed postfix-2.4.5-2.fc8, amavisd-new-2.5.2-2.fc8 and
spamassassin-3.2.3-2.fc8.
They are running.
I would like to test spam changing "score" in local.cf.
My local.cf is:
report_safe 0
use_bayes 1
use_bayes_rules 1
skip_rbl_checks 0
bayes_path /var/spool/amavisd/.spamassassin/bayes
score FR
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 20:00 +1000, David Hobley wrote:
> I have been trying to work out what is the core issue here, but I am
> still stumped. Can anyone offer any suggestions?
What don't you like about my reply sent just within a couple hours after
your OP a week ago?
http://mail-archives.apac
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 12:42:06PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone know where this plugin has the DNS servers set so you can
> change them?
The plugin doesn't set DNS servers. It queries the servers as listed in
resolv.conf, same as everything else.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
Does anyone know where this plugin has the DNS servers set so you can
change them?
> Justin Mason wrote:
> >I've been thinking about this. It might be useful to offer a plugin
> >implementing this hashcash, since it'd offer a good way to come up
> >with an unforgeable FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK rule.
> >However, we'd have to be sure that the CSRI algorithm really is
> >sufficiently open
On Feb 6, 2008, at 4:49 AM, Or Goshen wrote:
Is it possible to use libspamc.so to tell spamd that a message is
either spam or ham ?
ie, imitate "sa-learn --spam/--ham" using libspamc.so.
There dont seem to be any documentation about the library, all I
could find are comments in the header f
You have to tell spamd to listen to the IP address of the Ethernet port
on your linux box an not just on the loopback address:
netstat -lpn | grep 783
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:783 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 15865/spamd -q -x -
I believe it's the -i flag that tells spamd to listen on
Dear all,
I've a Ubuntu 7.1 server edition with SpamAssassin 3.2.4 daemon.
I want to use the spamc command to check for spam from my Windows mail
server.
When I try to test it, spamc tell me that he can't connect to the ubuntu
server.
How can I do this ?
Thanks a lot for your help.
--
View t
Valentin. wrote:
In old version:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on ...
In new version:
/usr/bin/spamc
How to print report after all Received .
It breaks DKIM to do that, so this is a very intentional change that is
not readily reversed. If you really wan
In old version:
/usr/bin/spamc http://www.nabble.com/report-before-Received-...-tp15334428p15334428.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Francesco Abeni wrote:
Good morning everyone.
I'm using succesfully SpamAssassin to filter spam. It is already good,
but there are still false positives. I checked their Spam Level one by
one and get a maximum of 6.7. So i increased "required hits" from 5.0
to 7.0, to eliminate false positive
Good morning everyone.
I'm using succesfully SpamAssassin to filter spam. It is already good,
but there are still false positives. I checked their Spam Level one by
one and get a maximum of 6.7. So i increased "required hits" from 5.0 to
7.0, to eliminate false positives, but of course this me
Michael W Cocke wrote:
>
> They use DHCP. Netops has to trace it, and I seem to be about 5Kth on
> the list.Ironic as hell, considering the effort I put into
> avoiding MIT netops about 20 years ago.
But you should be able to run tcpdump locally on your own machine?
Unless the addresse cha
Hi
Is it possible to use libspamc.so to tell spamd that a message is either
spam or ham ?
ie, imitate "sa-learn --spam/--ham" using libspamc.so.
There dont seem to be any documentation about the library, all I could find
are comments in the header file which weren't really helpful.
Or
23 matches
Mail list logo
