> Justin Mason wrote:
> >I've been thinking about this. It might be useful to offer a plugin
> >implementing this hashcash, since it'd offer a good way to come up
> >with an unforgeable FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK rule.
> >However, we'd have to be sure that the CSRI algorithm really is
> >sufficiently open, and not patent-encumbered, since this *is* MS we're
> >talking about :(
On 06.02.08 18:38, mouss wrote:
> and I'll add few points:
> - If BCC results in separate mail, then an MSA will get more mail. not
> critical, but this is not optimal. Also, there will be multiple
> responses of the MSA. given that it is already confusing when an MSA
> rejects few recipients (domain doesn't exist, .. etc), this will only
> add to the confusion ("should I resend to everybody or only to few
> people"...).
this can result in MUA eating more CPU when using Bcc:, thus lowering of
Bcc: usage. Of course it will cause the same problem to bots, but which
bots use Bcc? imho this would also cause more problems to users using Bcc
than bots...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Due to unexpected conditions Windows 2000 will be released
in first quarter of year 1901
