[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running SpamAssassin version 3.1.7 with Postfix via amavisd on a
FreeBSD machine.
In the last few weeks, all of a sudden messages with the same 4 or 5
subject lines started coming through undetected for some reason.
So I decided to add patterns matching those
John Thompson wrote:
No. I use Thunderbird and just set the Junk filter controls to expire
junk messages after a couple weeks.
Interesting idea! Thanks for the tips! You have no idea how much time
and how many steps this is going to save me.
--
Mark Johnson
http://www.astroshapes.com/i
Matt Kettler wrote:
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
It doesn't use whois *instead of* dns. It uses both and attempts even to
detect any discrepancy between their responses.
How are these going to be different?? The information published to
whois has to match the information published to the auth
On 2008-01-24, Anthony Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Thompson wrote:
>>
>> Isn't that what "cron" is for? :-)
>>
>> I have a cron job on my imap server to regularly feed ham and spam
>> through sa-learn.
> I have a cron job that runs the learning process nightly. I was
> refering
On 2008-01-24, Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Thompson wrote:
>
>> Isn't that what "cron" is for? :-)
>>
>> I have a cron job on my imap server to regularly feed ham and spam
>> through sa-learn.
> Do you delete the messages from the IMAP folder after you learn them?
> If so, h
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 6:38 AM
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Right, it is.
The URIWhois does not detect the registrar. It detects the name and
the
address of the DNS- an
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Jeff Chan wrote:
Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
The only big difference I see at face value is it uses whois instead of
DNS to find the NS records.. that hardly seems efficient..
Whois is definitely the wrong protocol to us
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am fairly sure. The other subject lines started getting flagged
> when I added entries for them. And I sent emails from an outside
> account with a subject that matched one of the other patterns and
> it got flagged.
>
> Is there a more concrete wa
I am fairly sure. The other subject lines started getting flagged when I
added entries for them. And I sent emails from an outside account with a
subject that matched one of the other patterns and it got flagged.
Is there a more concrete way to determine whether 60_whitelist_subject.cf
is ac
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In the last few weeks, all of a sudden messages with the same 4 or 5
> subject lines started coming through undetected for some reason.
>
> So I decided to add patterns matching those to
> /usr/local/share/spamassassin/60_whitelist_subject.cf
Sill
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Mofo_Jones wrote:
> > spamassassin -D >
> > Where message.txt is containing the message to test.
>
> Sorry, What I meant was how do I send a email to the SA server
> that will be tagged so I can see it in the message.
If your SA is configured to add status headers, the comm
I am running SpamAssassin version 3.1.7 with Postfix via amavisd on a
FreeBSD machine.
In the last few weeks, all of a sudden messages with the same 4 or 5
subject lines started coming through undetected for some reason.
So I decided to add patterns matching those to
/usr/local/share/spama
Sorry, What I meant was how do I send a email to the SA server that will be
tagged so I can see it in the message.
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>
>> John, I have been looking everywhere for how to send a
>> test message that will show up as an RBL. Do you know hot
>> to test this? I have Googled my
> John, I have been looking everywhere for how to send a
> test message that will show up as an RBL. Do you know hot
> to test this? I have Googled my self to almost death.
>
> John D. Hardin wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Mofo_Jones wrote:
>>
>>> I am trying to setup my first SA and I can't
John, I have been looking everywhere for how to send a test message that will
show up as an RBL. Do you know hot to test this? I have Googled my self to
almost death.
John D. Hardin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Mofo_Jones wrote:
>
>> I am trying to setup my first SA and I can't seem to get
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Mofo_Jones wrote:
> I am trying to setup my first SA and I can't seem to get the SA to do a check
> on Spamcop. The following are my cf files and debug information. Can someone
> please tell me what I am doing wrong?
> [11631] dbg: plugin: loading Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::
I am trying to setup my first SA and I can't seem to get the SA to do a check
on Spamcop. The following are my cf files and debug information. Can someone
please tell me what I am doing wrong? Sorry for all the information given
below. Not sure what to do.
--Local.c
Michael Parker wrote:
On Jan 23, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
It's finally started to remove tokens, so I think I'm OK. We use SQL
bayes, so it was an easy matter to use
~ delete from bayes_token where atime > UNIX_TIMESTAMP();
to clean up the stuff from the future.
But now yo
On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Jeff Chan wrote:
> Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > The only big difference I see at face value is it uses whois instead of
> > DNS to find the NS records.. that hardly seems efficient..
>
> Whois is definitely the wrong protocol to use for automated
> testing
Karl Boyken wrote:
We're running SpamAssassin from MIMEDefang 2.63 on RedHat Linux
Enterprise Server 5. We recently upgraded SpamAssassin from 3.2.3 to
3.2.4. We'd configured sa-mimedefang.cf to use a local Spamhaus mirror
for __RCVD_IN_ZEN, RCVD_IN_XBL and RCVD_IN_PBL. I just copied over th
Guys
- Centos 5.0
- Perl 5.8.8
- SA 3.2.4 + sa-updates
p0f-analyzer.pm from
http://bl0g.blogdns.com/spamassassin/p0f-analyzer.pm
p0f-analyzer.pm is spitting:
Jan 24 16:49:18 inet3 spamd[11516]: Use of uninitialized value in
concatenation (.) or string at /etc/mail/spamassassin/p0f-analyzer.pm
On 24.01.08 09:22, Karl Boyken wrote:
> We're running SpamAssassin from MIMEDefang 2.63 on RedHat Linux
> Enterprise Server 5. We recently upgraded SpamAssassin from 3.2.3 to
> 3.2.4. We'd configured sa-mimedefang.cf to use a local Spamhaus mirror
> for __RCVD_IN_ZEN, RCVD_IN_XBL and RCVD_IN_P
We're running SpamAssassin from MIMEDefang 2.63 on RedHat Linux
Enterprise Server 5. We recently upgraded SpamAssassin from 3.2.3 to
3.2.4. We'd configured sa-mimedefang.cf to use a local Spamhaus mirror
for __RCVD_IN_ZEN, RCVD_IN_XBL and RCVD_IN_PBL. I just copied over the
"header" lines fr
On Jan 23, 2008, at 9:54 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
It's finally started to remove tokens, so I think I'm OK. We use SQL
bayes, so it was an easy matter to use
~ delete from bayes_token where atime > UNIX_TIMESTAMP();
to clean up the stuff from the future.
But now your bayes_vars table is
Matt Kettler a écrit :
Sébastien AVELINE wrote:
Hello,
You will find my top rules fired with spamassassin.
I have spamassassin on several boxes, each have his own bayes_db
files, I use razor, dcc_check, uribl, bayes We have hundreds of
thousand messages per day.
In my top rules for spam
Diego Pomatta wrote:
John Thompson escribió:
On 2008-01-23, Diego Pomatta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use Thunderbird. There are two files for that folder: Junk.msf (7k)
and Junk (53.172k). The msf file must be some kind of index. I just
feed the biggest one to sa-learn?
Yup. Use "s
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 6:38 AM
>
> Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> >
> > Right, it is.
> >
> > The URIWhois does not detect the registrar. It detects the name and
> the
> > address of the DNS- and whois-defined NS
John Thompson escribió:
On 2008-01-23, Diego Pomatta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use Thunderbird. There are two files for that folder: Junk.msf (7k)
and Junk (53.172k). The msf file must be some kind of index. I just feed
the biggest one to sa-learn?
Yup. Use "sa-learn --spam --mbox
Sébastien AVELINE wrote:
Hello,
You will find my top rules fired with spamassassin.
I have spamassassin on several boxes, each have his own bayes_db
files, I use razor, dcc_check, uribl, bayes We have hundreds of
thousand messages per day.
In my top rules for spam you will see a lot of "c
John Thompson wrote:
On 2008-01-23, Anthony Peacock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My intention was to manually feed the few spam messages that slip thru
undetected. By the time I get a hold of those, they are in the
recipient's mail client inbox, not in the server.
I was thinking, if I save the m
Hello,
You will find my top rules fired with spamassassin.
I have spamassassin on several boxes, each have his own bayes_db files,
I use razor, dcc_check, uribl, bayes We have hundreds of thousand
messages per day.
In my top rules for spam you will see a lot of "collaborative rules"
like
31 matches
Mail list logo
