On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Jeff Chan wrote: > Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > The only big difference I see at face value is it uses whois instead of > > DNS to find the NS records.. that hardly seems efficient.. > > Whois is definitely the wrong protocol to use for automated > testing, especially for any high volumes. It was not designed or > intended for that purpose, which is arguably abusive.
There seems to be a desire for someone to set up a URIBL for domains registered with spam-friendly registrars. That's the logical way to go about it. Then the domains could be bulk-updated from the registrar feeds rather than abusing whois. -- John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED] key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- USMC Rules of Gunfighting #12: Have a plan. USMC Rules of Gunfighting #13: Have a back-up plan, because the first one won't work. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 days until the 41st anniversary of the loss of Apollo 1
