Re: retraining bayes question (Was: bayes_99 matching since sa-update)

I don't personally use auto-learning, but I can't see anything wrong with the sort of things you have done in the configuration. The number of spam and ham learned is at least partially controlled by the auto-learn thresholds. I think these are bayes_auto_learn_ham and bayes_auto_learn_spam o

retraining bayes question (Was: bayes_99 matching since sa-update)

hello I have been trying to retrain my BayesDB to correct whatever strangeness had crept in to show a dramatically different numbers of spam and ham in the output of sa-learn --dump magic. As recommended below I collected 420 messages each of spam and ham and checked for wrongly assessed

Re: FuzzyOcr question

NFN Smith wrote: [snip] On the Pillz, there's one that looks like a Yambo one, and I finally tweaked my terms list enough that I'm getting a couple of FuzzyOcr points on that, but not quite enough to force a rejection. There's also one pillz that's pretty offensive (but fairly infrequent) --

Re: Crazy AWL score

Hey, Matt et. al. I deleted the AWL database (which seems to be corrupt) and I haven't seen the problem again. Thanx for your help! -Michael >>> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1/9/2008 6:36 PM >>> Michael Weber wrote: > Hello! > > I have gotten several emails over the past 3 weeks with a rea

RE: Googlepages & Livefilestore spams

> -Original Message- > From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 2008-01-10 05:14 > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: Googlepages & Livefilestore spams > > > Quoting Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Theo Van Dinter writes: > >> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at

Re: FuzzyOcr question

Loren Wilton wrote: Is decoder (Chris) still developing FuzzyOCR ? I haven't seen any changes recently, nor any discussion on the FuzzyOCR mailing list. But then I haven't seen a lot of OCR spams going by since the stock spams cut down in volume a while back. I'd say its a good tool to kee

Re: spamassassin eating lot of RAM

My server has 8GB of ram, around 4 GB is currently used by spamassassin (too many process of /usr/bin/perl -T /usr/local/psa/admin/sbin/spammng -c -C --max-children=1 start). Is this normal? Can I somehow limit the process concurrency of spamassassin or I could limit the amount of RAM it consu

Re: FuzzyOcr question

Is decoder (Chris) still developing FuzzyOCR ? I haven't seen any changes recently, nor any discussion on the FuzzyOCR mailing list. But then I haven't seen a lot of OCR spams going by since the stock spams cut down in volume a while back. I'd say its a good tool to keep around just to keep

Re: FuzzyOcr question

Is decoder (Chris) still developing FuzzyOCR ? Regards, -- --[ UxBoD ]-- // PGP Key: "curl -s http://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: F57A 0CBD DD19 79E9 1FCC A612 CB36 D89D 2C5A 3A84 // Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x2C5A3A84 // Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phon

FuzzyOcr question

A couple of months ago, I updated FuzzyOcr to the current package version supported in Debian Stable (2.3b-1). In the meantime, I notice that when there are hits on FuzzyOcr, the SpamAssassinReport.txt attachment is showing that I am getting hits on FuzzyOcr, and the number of points scored by

RE: sa-update v3.2.3 problems upgrading to channel ver 611787

> From: Sean Cardus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ok, update 611820 (just posted now) should be better. > > Thanks - When the DNS records have updated, I'll let you know how I get > on. Working fine now... [29571] dbg: diag: updates complet

RE: sa-update v3.2.3 problems upgrading to channel ver 611787

> From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ok, update 611820 (just posted now) should be better. Thanks - When the DNS records have updated, I'll let you know how I get on. Sean

Re: sa-update v3.2.3 problems upgrading to channel ver 611787

ok, update 611820 (just posted now) should be better. --j. Sean Cardus writes: > Hi, > > This afternoon I've noticed a few problems when upgrading to the latest > set up of updates for SA v3.2.3 via sa-update. > > Is anyone else seeing these problems? > > Here's an extract from an sa-update d

Re: sa-update v3.2.3 problems upgrading to channel ver 611787

ah, my mistake -- looks like I pushed out a broken update. I'll fix it. --j. Sean Cardus writes: > Hi, > > This afternoon I've noticed a few problems when upgrading to the latest > set up of updates for SA v3.2.3 via sa-update. > > Is anyone else seeing these problems? > > Here's an extract f

sa-update v3.2.3 problems upgrading to channel ver 611787

Hi, This afternoon I've noticed a few problems when upgrading to the latest set up of updates for SA v3.2.3 via sa-update. Is anyone else seeing these problems? Here's an extract from an sa-update debug log: [15388] dbg: channel: metadata version = 609701 [15388] dbg: dns: 3.2.3.updates.spamass

Re: Postfix Question with front end filtering [OT]

mouss writes: > This really belongs to the postfix list Yes it does! Please take this offlist, folks. There are perfectly useful postfix lists where this discussion is on-topic. --j.