there are two things I am attempting to do. What is the best approach
to both.
1) I am running spamassassin site wide. I'd like to move the mail
message identified as spam in ~/mail/Spam directory
2) If a user does not exist and there is an username entry
/etc/mail/virtualusers to forward
Hi there,
how do I track down and correct the following error. I have
spamassassin install on a FreeBSD machine.
Jan 7 23:29:26 typhoon spamd[62450]: spamd: still running as root: user
not specified with -u, not found, or set to root, falling back to nobody
# pkg_info | grep Spam
p5-Mai
Hi there list,
I installed the following spamassasin proggies on my FreeBSD machine and
receiving an error "auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock:
cannot create tmp lockfile"
Any clues what I am doing wrong?
# pkg_info | grep Spam
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.3 A highly efficient mail f
Stefan Suurmeijer wrote:
Hi list,
I'm trying to use spamassassin with per-user rules on a machine
running Linux with sendmail 8.14.2 and cyrus imapd 2.2.12.
I'm running into a small problem: it seems that spamd doesn't know
which user the mail is intended for and therefore always uses the
def
On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Stefan Suurmeijer wrote:
> I'm trying to use spamassassin with per-user rules on a machine
> running Linux with sendmail 8.14.2 and cyrus imapd 2.2.12. I'm
> running into a small problem: it seems that spamd doesn't know
> which user the mail is intended for and therefore alway
David,
> I want to give users control of the required_score variable.
> I am using Postfix // SpamAssassin // amavis.
...
> spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
>user=nobody argv=/usr/bin/spamc -f -e
>/usr/sbin/sendmail -oi -f ${sender} ${recipient}
If your
Hi list,
I'm trying to use spamassassin with per-user rules on a machine running
Linux with sendmail 8.14.2 and cyrus imapd 2.2.12.
I'm running into a small problem: it seems that spamd doesn't know which
user the mail is intended for and therefore always uses the default
settings:
Jan 8 00:47:2
Sven Juergensen (KielNET) wrote:
Hello Matt,
turns out that the script supplied by the
designers of the whole mess is, well,
suboptimal. I kicked it entirely and used
a single command line to run a per-recipient
checking.
Just for info: whenever spamc can't find
the $recipient or is lacking a '
On Mon, 7 Jan 2008, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Well, the problem is that if you run at MTA time, you can't really do per-user
> configs.
>
> "spamc -u" will work, if there's only 1 user. it won't work with multiple
> users, such as when there are several recipients for a single message, unless
> yo
oops, that looks like a bug. could you open an entry on
bugzilla.spamassassin.org?
On Jan 7, 2008 9:58 PM, David Gibbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Justin Mason wrote:
> > Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.4 is now available! This is a maintenance
> > release of the 3.2.x branch.
>
> I just updated to 2.3
yep, I need to fix that... it's minor, though.
On Jan 7, 2008 9:59 PM, Jason Bertoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday, January 07, 2008 12:20 PM Justin Mason wrote:
>
> >
> > - bug 5682: remove FH_HOST_ALMOST_IP, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D, due to
> > false positives and redundancy with RDNS_DYNAMIC
On Monday, January 07, 2008 12:20 PM Justin Mason wrote:
>
> - bug 5682: remove FH_HOST_ALMOST_IP, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D, due to
> false positives and redundancy with RDNS_DYNAMIC; remove
> FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB due to no hits
>
FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D is still referenced by FM__TIMES_2 and FM_SEX_HO
Justin Mason wrote:
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.4 is now available! This is a maintenance
release of the 3.2.x branch.
I just updated to 2.3.4 ... but when I tried to run sa-compile, I got
the following error ...
--
[18717] info: generic: base extraction starting. this can take a while...
Well, the problem is that if you run at MTA time, you can't really do per-user
configs.
"spamc -u" will work, if there's only 1 user. it won't work with multiple
users, such as when there are several recipients for a single message, unless
you can get the MTA to split the message up into multiple
David.Sharpe wrote:
> Within postfix/master.cf I have the following lines :
>
> smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
> -o content_filter=spamassassin
>
>
> This pushes mail through the following lines :
>
> spamassassin unix - n n - - p
I've got a few questions for everyone concerning load balancing Spam
Assassin.
I've currently got a 10 node spam assassin cluster, and have been using
round-robin DNS to load balance across them, but Im wondering what other
people recommend?
The benefit of DNS seems to be that spamc will try
Anything else is just being fancy. :)
-Aubrey
I thought that was why these guys properly trap signals in spamd. :-)
killall -s SIGHUP spamd
Sg wrote:
Hi
After modifying the configurations and scores should we restart
the SA. How to start the SA-3.2.3?
--
Sg
you really should be able to just type in "\usr\bin\spamd" at the
command prompt, and it will start. "man spamd" will show you the
switches involved.
I do this.
James Lay wrote:
New upgrade is running GREAT here :)
James
Same here, seems quite a bit faster!
Great job!
Rick
>> -Original Message-
>> From: James Lay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2008 1:54 PM
>> To: Spamassassin
>> Subject: Re: Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.4
>>
>> New upgrade is running GREAT here :)
>>
>> James
>>
Not so great here with MimeDefang/Sendmail. Imageinfo pl
Is a RPM available for Centos5 yet ?
Regards,
--[ UxBoD ]--
// PGP Key: "curl -s https://www.splatnix.net/uxbod.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: C759 8F52 1D17 B3C5 5854 36BD 1FB1 B02F 5DB5 687B
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net Key-ID: 0x5DB5687B
// Phone: +44 845 869 2749 SIP Phone: [EMAIL PR
New upgrade is running GREAT here :)
James
Apache SpamAssassin 3.2.4 is now available! This is a maintenance
release of the 3.2.x branch.
Downloads are available from:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi
The release file will also be available via CPAN in the near future.
md5sum of archive files:
2081c24c8b9064f9dd220e4f4
Greetings list!
I've been sitting on this one for a while, hoping an update would be
released in one of the sa-update channels... but it seems that users are
complaining about the continued high false negative identification of
spam messages containing only a google.com, googlepages.com, or
go
Little birdie just whispered that if you run sa 3.2.x, and add
util_rb_2tld googlepages.com
to local.cf, it will catch the spamvertized sites on googlepages
Birdie also mentioned this only works for queries against URIBL.COM
have fun
PS: ONLY 3.2.x - not lower
Hello Matt,
turns out that the script supplied by the
designers of the whole mess is, well,
suboptimal. I kicked it entirely and used
a single command line to run a per-recipient
checking.
Just for info: whenever spamc can't find
the $recipient or is lacking a '-u', it
falls back to the process o
Within postfix/master.cf I have the following lines :
smtp inet n - - - - smtpd
-o content_filter=spamassassin
This pushes mail through the following lines :
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
user=nobody argv=/usr
David.Sharpe wrote:
Hi, I want to give users control of the required_score variable. I am
using Postfix // SpamAssassin // amavis. I have read the document
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL and have the tests
working OKAY. /executing SQL: SELECT preference, value FROM userpref
WHERE
Some distros also have a spamd daemon, and so the spamd process would be
run by either:
service spamd restart
or
/etc/init.d/spamd restart
Regards,
Rubin
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 16:41 +0200, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > After modifying the configurations and scores
> > should we re
> Hi
>
> After modifying the configurations and scores
> should we restart the SA. How to start the SA-3.2.3?
/etc/init.d/spamassassin restart
That should work on all Linux systems. RedHad ans SuSE based have also a
service command, which can be used to it.
service spamassassin restart
Hi,
I want to give users control of the required_score variable. I am using
Postfix // SpamAssassin // amavis.
I have read the document http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL and
have the tests working OKAY.
executing SQL: SELECT preference, value FROM userpref WHERE username =
'[EMA
Sg wrote:
Hi
Thanks for your reply. I need to checck the body content only not
header. What are all the rules used to check only body content?
You already asked this question, and I already answered it in your
thread titled "Spam content checker":
--
There's hundreds
Henrik Krohns writes:
> Anyone running SA on Perl 5.10 already? Any hiccups? Speedups from the new
> regex optimizations?
It should work fine; I tested with bleadperl a few months back without
problem. At that time I noted a good speedup, but when I re-tested with
the released version of 5.10 I
Hi
Thanks for your reply. I need to checck the body content only not
header. What are all the rules used to check only body content?
On Jan 7, 2008 5:08 PM, Diego Pomatta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sg escribió:
> > Hi
> >
> > After modifying the configurations and scores should we re
On Fri, 2008-01-04 at 17:25 -0600, Fletcher Mattox wrote:
> Yesterday spamassassin started getting DNS timeouts from the DOB (Day
> Old Bread) server at a.support-intelligence.net:
>
> dbg: dns: timeout for URIBL_RHS_DOB, URI-DNSBL,
> DNSBL:dob.sibl.support-intelligence.net:akoucq.com after 3 sec
Sg escribió:
Hi
After modifying the configurations and scores should we restart
the SA. How to start the SA-3.2.3?
--
Sg
Yes, you should restart SA after modifying configuration or rules/scores.
SA comes with several control scripts that you can use to start, stop or
restart the spa
Hi
After modifying the configurations and scores should we restart the
SA. How to start the SA-3.2.3?
--
Sg
37 matches
Mail list logo
