Quoting Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> [18696] dbg: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/blacklist-uri.cf
> [18696] dbg: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/blacklist.cf
>
> Ditch blacklist and blacklist-uri. These two are well known ways to
> kill spamassassin on all but the absolu
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 03:13 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, ram wrote:
>
> > Sorry I meant "like spamcop" .. I think I must proof-read my own mail
> > now before Ctrl-Enter :-)
>
> The problem with SpamCop is: the two step reporting process makes things a
> bear to
cpayne wrote:
>
>>
> OK, I am not getting anything in the headers still this is my test
Do you even have the pyzor and DCC plugins loaded?
ie: check your v310.pre and make sure that these lines aren't commented out:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Pyzor
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::P
Office of the Postmaster wrote:
> * 1.8 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76
> chars
>
> --=_NextPart_000_0001_47200277.05070052
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> message body
>
> =_NextPart_007_
* 1.8 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars
--=_NextPart_000_0001_47200277.05070052
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
message body
=_NextPart_007_9001_45c82de7.099C8585_B7D4--
I'm gettin
NFN Smith wrote:
> On the male enhancement spam that's hitting my spamtraps, I'm noticing
> that nearly all the messages (presumably a single spammer), are
> following a fairly regular pattern -- in particular, where either the
> first or second line of text shows some sort of colloquial greeting
>
Jonn Taylor wrote:
> Is it ok to send mail to salearn that has been tagged by spamassassin?
Yes, that's fine.
In fact, you *should* send them to sa-learn if they haven't triggered
the autolearner. Even if they've already hit bayes_99 there's still
likely to be some token information to be learned
Joey wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> I am currently running SA 3.2.3 compiled from cpan.
>
> I have a situation where CPU is just going through the roof on just a
> few messages and I really can’t tell what part of SA is the slow down.
>
>
>
> I’m not that familiar with all the config stuff, so I
On the male enhancement spam that's hitting my spamtraps, I'm noticing
that nearly all the messages (presumably a single spammer), are
following a fairly regular pattern -- in particular, where either the
first or second line of text shows some sort of colloquial greeting
(e.g., "hi there" or "
Martin Svensson wrote:
> Sorry for bumping this, but I still haven't found a solution. Any hints
> are most appreciated.
Isolate a sample email and send it to the FuzzyOcr list, or report it as a
possible problem in its bug tracker: http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/ .
[snip]
> Has anyone noticed
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 09:23 -0400, Joey wrote:
> I have a situation where CPU is just going through the roof on just a
> few messages and I really can’t tell what part of SA is the slow down.
Since this happens for a few messages only, I would start by checking if
these messages got something in
Sorry for bumping this, but I still haven't found a solution. Any hints are
most appreciated.
Thanks.
/martin
On 10/15/07, Martin Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I've just installed Fuzzyocr 3.5.1 with SA 3.1.9 on RHEL 5 (Gifsicle 1.48)
> and I've noticed some issues with gif
* Jonn Taylor :
>
> Is it ok to send mail to salearn that has been tagged by spamassassin?
Yes (Spamassassin tags will be removed from the mails before they are
learnt from).
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/LearningMarkedUpMessages
Emmanuel
Is it ok to send mail to salearn that has been tagged by spamassassin?
Jonn
First off,
Do an
sa-update -D
as soon as possible.
Cheers,
Phil
--
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
From: Joey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25 October 2007 14:24
To: users@spamassassin.
From: Pedro Correia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:35 AM
To: 'Joey'
Subject: RE: Help figuring our why SA is taking like 1.5 minutes to
filter...
Are you running SA on the same box as the mail server?
I transfered my SA instalation to a dedicated box and manag
Quoting Joey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am currently running SA 3.2.3 compiled from cpan.
>
> I have a situation where CPU is just going through the roof on just a few
> messages and I really can't tell what part of SA is the slow down.
[...]
> Here is a list of files in each of my SA folders as wel
I forgot to mention that I am also getting messages sent with no body &
subject, which is defiantly being stripped by SA, not sure why, this used to
work well.
Thanks!
Hello All,
I am currently running SA 3.2.3 compiled from cpan.
I have a situation where CPU is just going through the roof on just a few
messages and I really can't tell what part of SA is the slow down.
I'm not that familiar with all the config stuff, so I'm looking for some
help to figur
On 10/25/2007 9:13 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, ram wrote:
Sorry I meant "like spamcop" .. I think I must proof-read my own mail
now before Ctrl-Enter :-)
The problem with SpamCop is: the two step reporting process makes things
a bear to do. I understand the log
Shameless plug follows: ...
I've updated the doc and installation for SpamAssassin Caller to handle the
new SpamAssassin release. See http://www.visioncomm.net/sac for more
details.
Dan Barker
Intro: SpamAssassin is an excellent Anti-Spam tool for Unix/Linux users.
Using it with IMail (Ipswitch)
Thanks for all helpful replies regarding writing the header rule!
You are very right Karsten in what was the issue!
header FROM_EXAMPLE_COM Received =~ /from mail3\.example\.com/i
The ? mark was the issue, I replaced that with a . and now things works much
better.
Greets,
Chris
On 10/
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, ram wrote:
Sorry I meant "like spamcop" .. I think I must proof-read my own mail
now before Ctrl-Enter :-)
The problem with SpamCop is: the two step reporting process makes things a
bear to do. I understand the logic behind it, but once or twice I've
taken a couple hund
Christian Nygaard wrote:
> How do I write a local spamassassin rule that matches received from
> header mail?.example.com . I've tried
> writing a header matching rule but it doesnt seem to work. Can you
> show a short example
> of a working header matching rule for received from?
>
> Received: fro
ram wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> Really? It's that bad to add a single, very simple, body regex? Have you
>> looked at how many body regexes the stock SA configuration runs? Have
>> you looked at how many are hundreds of times more complex, just by
>> themselves?
>>
>>
>> For example 20_drugs.cf co
25 matches
Mail list logo
