Hello,
I see Bug#4506 as well as
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=3042
I wonder why current implementations does not support to set the secondary
(aka supplemental) groups of the user?
I intend to use spamd where some users shall share certain data, e.g. Bayes
database and AWL,
Praise God Almighty!
We were able to spend more than a few seconds and many click on the
rulesemporium website.
Awesome.
As it says, was it moved over to vr.org ???
- rh
>
> As has been noted already, by Dallas, it's a problem with at least one
> of their network links being saturated by the DoS, not the DoS protection.
>
>
> Daryl
Daryl
Wouldn't you say the DDOS protection theory and/or implementation is broken
if topology and routing is not taken into accou
>
> The errors have nothing to do with the DoS protection, but saturated
> links. The insertion of a few seconds of delay between queries, or a 20
> minute delay in my case, will do nothing to resolve the issue.
>
> Daryl
Daryl,
Saturdated?
You gotta be kidding me...
In this day and age...
>
> As I said, we use a trick that makes the fetches work. It does not get
> us tarred by the DoS filter. So access to the web site is really easy.
> I also check "when I feel like it" rather than hourly as I've heard some
> "people" work. Weekly is more than enough unless you see a notification
>
Hi
Where is the spam log file located?
--
Sg
jdow wrote:
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow wrote:
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mike Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/09/07 5:15 PM >>>
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium
jdow wrote:
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Loren Wilton wrote:
Mike Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/09/07 5:15 PM >>>
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
jdow wrote:
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mike Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/09/07 5:15 PM >>>
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues
From: "Ken A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SARE Webmaster wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Loren
Wilton wrote:
Mike Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/09/07 5:15 PM >>>
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issue
jdow wrote:
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mike Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/09/07 5:15 PM >>>
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (via a browser).
From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Loren Wilton wrote:
Mike Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/09/07 5:15 PM >>>
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (v
From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mike Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/09/07 5:15 PM >>>
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (via a browser). So rarely th
From: "Robert - eLists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I can rarely get there (via a browser). So rarely the site is almost
useless.
Mike,
Almost???
Bwahh... that is a good one.
You are far too kind...
- rh
Gee, it just worked for me tickety-boo. But then I have fixed my tool.
which uses wget,
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 05:05:57AM -0500, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
And how, precisely, do you set the trust on the GPG key? I've tried a
number of methods, but I always end up having to either specify your key
or just throw caution to the wind and use --nogpg.
"trust" i
Some more info-
Spamc is returning an I/O error (communicates on the loopback interface) for
around 60% of the times it runs. Also a script I made, which attempts to
re-run spamc until it succeeds is failing too (ends up with over 50+ tries
until I kill it); sometimes it works, and will only on
Another approach that works really well for us:
We send all spam to a gmail account. Then every week we look to see
what google proclaims to be ham and forward it to our clients.
Our numbers tend to break down as follows:
10% Ham & sent to client
1% SPAM & sent to client
8.5% SPAM sent to gmail
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Skip Brott wrote:
> My procmail script is set up to junk all emails with a score over
> 10.0 and other "low spammy" emails are directed to a generic
> corporate spam email account for review.
Mine does per-user spam quarantine folders. Feel free to customize it
to fit your n
Bayes needs 200 ham & 200 spam to work.
You can read it's statistics by command "sa-learn --dump magic"
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just did a new installation of bsd 6.2
>
> With EXIM SA & CLAM, and I'm a little fried right now- everything is
> working except the bayes I have
Hi all,
I just did a new installation of bsd 6.2
With EXIM SA & CLAM, and I'm a little fried right now- everything is
working except the bayes I have enabled in local.cf use_bayes and
bayes_auto_learn ( set them bot to 1)
What did I miss?
BTW I'm running site-wide config
Jean-Pau
My procmail script is set up to junk all emails with a score over 10.0 and
other "low spammy" emails are directed to a generic corporate spam email
account for review. Depending on the volume of email, you may not want to
wait 3 months. I check mine weekly and typically have close to 2000 emails.
Getting a lot of these:
spamd: timeout: (100 second timeout while trying to TELL)
Can I change the timeout? And - a better error message should include
who it is trying tel tell what.
At 04:57 AM 7/10/2007, SARE Webmaster wrote:
Ok, so the word is that the telia link is saturated with traffic
from the ddos yet.. I'd like some traceroutes to
www.rulesemporium.com for anyone that is having problems.
From my Windows machine...
Tracing route to www.rulesemporium.com [209.20
Be sure to have the rules apply to the email in the headers and then
just do a normal sorting on it?
François Rousseau
2007/7/10, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I want to reduce the setting number on my SA but I want
to be sure I'm not gonna be missing any legit emails
because of it. Is there a s
I want to reduce the setting number on my SA but I want
to be sure I'm not gonna be missing any legit emails
because of it. Is there a setup that you can do so
that you cam lower the setting and all of the emails
affected by that go into a folder, for say 3 months,
then you can look into the folde
Duane Hill wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 at 07:01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
At 04:57 AM Tuesday, 7/10/2007, SARE Webmaster wrote -=>
Ok, so the word is that the telia link is saturated with traffic from
the ddos yet.. I'd like some traceroutes to www.rulesemporium.com
for anyone t
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 at 14:15 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 at 07:01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
At 04:57 AM Tuesday, 7/10/2007, SARE Webmaster wrote -=>
Ok, so the word is that the telia link is saturated with traffic from the
ddos yet.. I'd like some
dendarii ~ # traceroute www.rulesemporium.com
traceroute to unknown.prolexic.com (209.200.135.151), 30 hops max, 38
byte packets
1 athena (10.1.0.254) 0.442 ms 0.258 ms 0.242 ms
2 * * *
3 P6-7.LCR-01.STTLWA.verizon-gni.net (130.81.35.128) 18.870 ms
18.744 ms 18.676 ms
4 so-6-0-0-0.
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 at 07:01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
At 04:57 AM Tuesday, 7/10/2007, SARE Webmaster wrote -=>
Ok, so the word is that the telia link is saturated with traffic from the
ddos yet.. I'd like some traceroutes to www.rulesemporium.com for anyone
that is having probl
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Ed Kasky wrote:
> 6 te-3-4.car3.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.68.110.113) 647.873
> ms 743.477 ms 1185.795 ms
> 7 ae-2-56.bbr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.68.102.161) 1186.617 ms
> ae-2-54.bbr2.LosAngeles1.Level3.net (4.68.102.97) 1187.442 ms
> ae-2-52.bbr2.LosAngeles1
SARE Webmaster wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Loren
Wilton wrote:
Mike Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/09/07 5:15 PM >>>
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (
Ok, so the word is that the telia link is saturated with traffic from
the ddos yet.. I'd like some traceroutes to www.rulesemporium.com for
anyone that is having problems.
# traceroute www.rulesemporium.com
traceroute to www.rulesemporium.com (209.200.135.151), 30 hops max, 40 byte
packet
At 04:57 AM Tuesday, 7/10/2007, SARE Webmaster wrote -=>
Ok, so the word is that the telia link is saturated with traffic
from the ddos yet.. I'd like some traceroutes to
www.rulesemporium.com for anyone that is having problems.
The issue with the html found in rulesets (the "0.1 refresh" pa
I recently was able to upgrade my SA install to 3.1.9 and get sa-update
working for the first time as a result. (Thanks, Jonn!) I just ran an
sa-update this morning with the -D and I am getting the following:
Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T switch at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.
I just performed a routine sa-update (just on stock SA rules, no SARE) and
the scores are no longer appearing in the message headers, and spam isn't
being filtered. The log shows the following:
Jul 10 09:26:39 mail spamd[37580]: spamd: result: . 0 - SARE_DIPLOMA2
scantime=0.6,size=40476,user=sim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This produces:
[20090] dbg: replacetags: done replacing tags
[20090] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
/var/lib/nobody/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
[20090] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
Here you have your problem!
Seems like you have messed up the file rights on
/v
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 05:30 -0700, Diptanjan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I want to make a copy of the entire SA setup, including cron jobs etc.
> This is not only for making backup of the setup, but also to be able to copy
> the setup to another server.
>
> Can anyone sugest me a way how to do this
Daniel J McDonald schrieb am 10.07.2007 12:05:
And how, precisely, do you set the trust on the GPG key?
I am running this command line once a day via cron as root:
/usr/bin/sa-update --channelfile
/var/lib/spamassassin/update-channels.txt --gpgkeyfile
/var/lib/spamassassin/update-channels-g
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 05:05:57AM -0500, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> And how, precisely, do you set the trust on the GPG key? I've tried a
> number of methods, but I always end up having to either specify your key
> or just throw caution to the wind and use --nogpg.
"trust" in terms of sa-update,
Hi Dip,
did you see http://oss.linbit.com/csync2/ ?
Most distros do supply csync2.
Ciao,
Giampaolo
> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: Diptanjan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Inviato: martedì 10 luglio 2007 14.30
> A: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Oggetto: Backup SA
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
Diptanjan wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I want to make a copy of the entire SA setup, including cron jobs etc.
> This is not only for making backup of the setup, but also to be able
> to copy the setup to another server.
>
> Can anyone sugest me a way how to do this.
>
Just write a document and stor
From: "Leon Kolchinsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I've never run amavisd-new in chroot, but may be you'll find some tips
here - http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.chroot Seems to me
like a resolver issue (probably need to configure FreeBSD a little
different than OpenBSD). Best Regards,
Well
Hello all,
I want to make a copy of the entire SA setup, including cron jobs etc.
This is not only for making backup of the setup, but also to be able to copy
the setup to another server.
Can anyone sugest me a way how to do this.
Thanks and regards
Diptanjan
--
View this message in contex
>
> What would a perl command look like to resolve a host? Because I think it
> is
> a perl issue.
>
> Helmut
I've never run amavisd-new in chroot, but may be you'll find some tips here -
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/README.chroot
Seems to me like a resolver issue (probably need to co
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Loren
Wilton wrote:
Mike Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/09/07 5:15 PM >>>
On 07/09/2007 04:01 PM the voices made Joe Zitnik write:
I can't get here:
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules
Is rulesemporium having issues again?
I can rarely get there (via a browser). So rare
From: "Helmut Schneider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[problems resolving a host]
Damn!!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# cat /var/amavis/test2.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
use Net::DNS;
my $res = Net::DNS::Resolver->new;
my $query = $res->search("www.google.de");
if ($query) {
foreach my $rr ($query->answer
From: "Leon Kolchinsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Stupid question, but $MYHOME = /var/amavis ?
Yes
Also you can try to debug it with strace.
Look for all the files you're missing in the jail and copy them into it.
(here is a little example on how to use strace to find requirements
outside the jail
>Run "sa-learn" as nobody!
>I.e.
>su - nobody
>sa-learn --dump magic
This produces:
[20090] dbg: replacetags: done replacing tags
[20090] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
/var/lib/nobody/.spamassassin/bayes_toks
[20090] dbg: bayes: tie-ing to DB file R/O
/var/lib/nobody/.spamassassin/bayes_seen
[
> >> I tried to set up SA with AMaViS in a chrooted environment
> >> ($daemon_chroot_dir = $MYHOME). I (thought I) copied all necessary
> files
> >> to
> >> the jail but when SA is starting I get an error:
> >> Jul 10 10:44:02 TEG /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[6817]: SpamControl:
> >> initializing
> >> M
From: "Leon Kolchinsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I tried to set up SA with AMaViS in a chrooted environment
($daemon_chroot_dir = $MYHOME). I (thought I) copied all necessary files
to
the jail but when SA is starting I get an error:
Jul 10 10:44:02 TEG /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[6817]: SpamControl:
init
> Hi,
>
> I tried to set up SA with AMaViS in a chrooted environment
> ($daemon_chroot_dir = $MYHOME). I (thought I) copied all necessary files
> to
> the jail but when SA is starting I get an error:
>
> Jul 10 10:44:02 TEG /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[6817]: SpamControl:
> initializing
> Mail::SpamAs
On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 02:51 -0400, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Diptanjan wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I would like to add a german ruleset: http://zmi.at/x/70_zmi_german.cf
> >
> > Should I put this into my channel file? and call a sa-update through a
> > cronjob so that is updated regularely?
>
Hi,
I tried to set up SA with AMaViS in a chrooted environment
($daemon_chroot_dir = $MYHOME). I (thought I) copied all necessary files to
the jail but when SA is starting I get an error:
Jul 10 10:44:02 TEG /usr/local/sbin/amavisd[6817]: SpamControl: initializing
Mail::SpamAssassin
Error cr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 02:53:56PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still getting bayes version 0 aborting error. can someone help with
this?
[...]
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
Thanks a lot Daryl,
indeed a very fast response..
I will do accordingly.
Diptanjan
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>
> Diptanjan wrote:
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I would like to add a german ruleset: http://zmi.at/x/70_zmi_german.cf
>>
>> Should I put this into my channel file? and call a sa-update t
55 matches
Mail list logo
