What I copied and pasted into my message was the original spammy
message (the source of it) as IMP showed it. The posterior ALL_TRUSTED
occured because it has already been scanned and tagged by my servers.
But the main difference between the live run and the ones I did with
SA by itself (both as r
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 18:46 -0300, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
> OK, i?ve been googlin' around, and it seems like an issue between
> Amavis (or MailScanner, for waht I've found) and some unsupported
> versions of Net::DNS, because when I run the message through SA by
> itself, this comes out:
Whatev
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote the following on 6/8/2007 2:41 PM -0800:
If you've got the current update from updates.spamassassin.org you've
got a working set of rules for URIBL_BLACK and URIBL_GREY. It turns
out that they didn't hit for Raymond either, so you won't see them in
this case.
Daryl
OK, i?ve been googlin' around, and it seems like an issue between
Amavis (or MailScanner, for waht I've found) and some unsupported
versions of Net::DNS, because when I run the message through SA by
itself, this comes out:
Content analysis details: (9.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name
If you've got the current update from updates.spamassassin.org you've
got a working set of rules for URIBL_BLACK and URIBL_GREY. It turns out
that they didn't hit for Raymond either, so you won't see them in this case.
Daryl
Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
Well, right now I'm running these comman
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.964 tagged_above=-100 required=5
> tests=[BAYES_99=3.5, HTML_30_40=0.463, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
To me, it looks like enough tokens were seen to flag it as BAYES_99, but
that the host and IP it came from didn't trigger any RBL hits, which
left your point score well
Well, right now I'm running these commands to get updates:
sa-update --gpgkey --channel saupdates.openprotect.com
sa-update --gpgkey --channel updates.spamassassin.org
sa-update doesn't download URIBL_BLACK and URIBL_GREY
What am I doing wrong?
Luis
2007/6/8, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PR
Hi!
Hi, Raymond, I don't have any URIBL rules firing up (SA 3.2.0 from
source here, most of the other relevant info is in the header of the
mail I sent before to test). Where did you get them?
X-Prolocation-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
score=14.999, required 5,
Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
Hi, Raymond, I don't have any URIBL rules firing up (SA 3.2.0 from
source here, most of the other relevant info is in the header of the
mail I sent before to test). Where did you get them?
Run sa-update to get URIBL_BLACK and URIBL_GREY.
Daryl
Hi, Raymond, I don't have any URIBL rules firing up (SA 3.2.0 from
source here, most of the other relevant info is in the header of the
mail I sent before to test). Where did you get them?
Thanks,
Luis
2007/6/8, Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi!
> They aren't scoring very much here
Luis Hernán Otegui schrieb:
Hi, could somebody run this mail trough SA and give me the scores?
They aren't scoring very much here...
Hi, your mailing probably broke half of the email so these scores are
only an estimate - if you want me to try again attach the mail as a raw
text (or .eml as ma
Hi!
They aren't scoring very much here...
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@domain.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by nahuel.biol.unlp.edu.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660BE7B1FE;
Fri, 8 Jun 2007
What about MailZu as an add-on to Amavisd-New or Maia Mailguard. We use
MM for several virtual domains and about 100 users and works very well.
> I am trying to do something very similar. I have chosen to incorporate
> MailScanner and MailWatch with my SpamAssassin solution to offer users a
> l
> From: Doc Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> >
> > Does this fix the performance problems I was having, or does it just
> fix
> > the UTF errors showing in the logs with Perl < 5.8.8 ?
>
> You might try it and see if it helps with the performance. Since it
> do
I am trying to do something very similar. I have chosen to incorporate
MailScanner and MailWatch with my SpamAssassin solution to offer users a
login interface in order to manage their own spam. I have yet to
successfully complete the setup, we are actually doing as I write this.
I use Ubuntu (Fie
Hi all,
I might soon be able to replace a proprietary antispam-appliance with a
normal spamassassin-setup. However, the current solution quarantines
messages considered suspicious and offers a webinterface for the
endusers to access the special quarantine-store. While I don't like such
a setup at
On Friday 08 June 2007, jdow wrote:
>From: "Jonathan Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Sic the RIAA lawyers on them.
{^_^}
>>>
>>> What? And give them a chance to show they may have some redeeming
>>> quality? Not to those sharks, Joanne, ever.
>>
>> I think that they'd encounter the
Claude Frantz wrote:
However, one thing to recognize is that botnet does not parse the
Received headers themselves. Spam Assassin does, and puts them into
psuedoheaders. Those pseudoheaders are what botnet processes.
What exactly contain the pseudoheaders ?
You could look at the code or
From: "Jonathan Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sic the RIAA lawyers on them.
{^_^}
What? And give them a chance to show they may have some redeeming
quality? Not to those sharks, Joanne, ever.
I think that they'd encounter the spammers and a really bizarre "good or
evil" loop would for
Daniel J McDonald schrieb:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 14:53 +0200, arni wrote:
Can you tell me what you thin i'm doing wrong?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Desktop]$ host 87.118.96.151
151.96.118.87.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer
ns.rds27912.i4e-server.de.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Desktop]$ host ns.rds27912
Heute (08.06.2007/14:34 Uhr) schrieb arni,
> Where do i find this botnet plugin?
> arni
http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/
--
Viele Gruesse, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ #277289867
--
Zufalls-Zitat
--
Schwerere als Luft? Flugmaschinen sind unmögli
Claude Frantz schrieb:
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at rds27912.i4e-server.de.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
137.193.10.37 does not like recipient.
Remote
Where do i find this botnet plugin?
arni
Devilish Entity wrote:
> Well, before all, here is my config :
>
> nowhere:~# linuxinfo
> Linux nowhere 2.6.18-4-k7 #1 SMP Wed May 9 23:42:01 UTC 2007
> One AMD Unknown 1300MHz processor, 2601.92 total bogomips, 95M RAM
> System library 2.3.6
> OS : Debian Etch
>
>
> I use qmail + jms patch (lastes
Hi!
Get more RAM. :)Seriously, 95M is not really enough for anything these
days, let alone resource intensive apps such as SA.
Well i assume that it is really few but it never was as slow... Plus
it's only about a little server i get at max 20 mails per day... So...
before it tooks about
diptanjan wrote:
> Hi Friends,
>
> I am getting an error when ever I am usinf sa-compile. can you please
> checkout and tell me the reason behind it?
>
> # sa-compile
> [4846] info: generic: base extraction starting. this can take a while...
> [4846] info: generic: extracting from rules of type
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 05:58:27AM -0500, Dallas Engelken told us:
> >do you have network tests enabled, especially URIBL?? If so it might
> >be due to the recent DDOS on uribl.com, which causes the scans to
> >take longer due to DNS timeout??
>
> There should be no dns timeouts for URIBL currentl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
diptanjan wrote:
> Hi Friends,
>
> I am getting an error when ever I am usinf sa-compile. can you please
> checkout and tell me the reason behind it?
>
> # sa-compile
> [4846] info: generic: base extraction starting. this can take a while...
> [4846]
Hi Friends,
I am getting an error when ever I am usinf sa-compile. can you please
checkout and tell me the reason behind it?
# sa-compile
[4846] info: generic: base extraction starting. this can take a while...
[4846] info: generic: extracting from rules of type body_0
100% [
As u can see lots of plugins are absent. Bayes.pm for example. Can
somebody explain this?
Sure. Lots of those things like Bayes weren't plugins before 3.2.0. Others
might have been plugins supplied by 3rd parties and not at that point
accepred into the main development stream. Others are si
Sven Schuster wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:26:38PM +0200, Devilish Entity told us:
On 6/8/07, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:15:35PM -0700, geist_ wrote:
One AMD Unknown 1300MHz processor, 2601.92 total bogomips, 95M RAM
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 12:26:38PM +0200, Devilish Entity told us:
> On 6/8/07, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:15:35PM -0700, geist_ wrote:
> >> One AMD Unknown 1300MHz processor, 2601.92 total bogomips, 95M RAM
> >[...]
> >> Any help should be useful
On 6/8/07, Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 03:15:35PM -0700, geist_ wrote:
> One AMD Unknown 1300MHz processor, 2601.92 total bogomips, 95M RAM
[...]
> Any help should be usefull...
Get more RAM. :)Seriously, 95M is not really enough for anything these
days
Hi.
There is an interesting difference between 3.1.8 and 3.2.0 releases.
Here is the ./Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0/lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin directory of
3.2.0
ASN.pm
AWL.pm
AccessDB.pm
AntiVirus.pm
AutoLearnThreshold.pm
Bayes.pm
BodyEval.pm
BodyRuleBaseExtractor.pm
Check.pm
DCC.pm
DKIM.pm
DNSEv
34 matches
Mail list logo
