Re: qmail auth not recognized

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote the following on 5/24/2007 10:23 PM -0800: > Hi Daryl, > > you are speaking in riddles??? > > Wolfgang > > > > Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > > >>> Never mind, looking into this further there's no problem with the change >>> made in r447014. The issue is qmail should be ad

Re: Problems with spamassassin milter

On Wed, 23 May 2007, Doug Phillips wrote: > Hi all. I'm working with an issue that has been really driving me > crazy. I've searched the archives and not found anything that is really > pertaining to my problem, so I'd like to run this by the list and see > what I'm missing. > > First off, confi

RE: qmail auth not recognized

> > Never mind, looking into this further there's no problem with the change > made in r447014. The issue is qmail should be adding "with ESMTPA" and > not "with ESMPTA". > > Daryl What do you mean? Is there a prob between qmail or qmail accessories and SA that you have found? - rh -- Abba

Re: qmail auth not recognized

Hi Daryl, you are speaking in riddles??? Wolfgang Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: >> >> Never mind, looking into this further there's no problem with the change >> made in r447014. The issue is qmail should be adding "with ESMTPA" and >> not "with ESMPTA". >> >> Daryl >>

bayes_sql_dsn in local.cf not being read?

I've got amavisd (amavisd-new-2.5.0 (20070423)), which is configured to use SA (SpamAssassin version 3.1.8 / running on Perl version 5.8.8). I set bayes_sql_dsn in local.cf: bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::MySQL bayes_sql_dsn DBI:

Re: Disable logging - Whitelist functionality

asteddy wrote: > Hello, > I would like to know if I can disable spamassassin logging because I > think it's slowing down. > I would also know if there is a way to say to spamassassin that > whitelisted addresses don't need to pass all other rules. > If there was already a thred talking about thes

Re: qmail auth not recognized

Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, here is header lines from a mail that a qmail server received from autehnticated user: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on SuSE-101-64-minimal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_

R: Bayes problem: very large spam/ham ratio

> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Fletcher Mattox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Dan, > > Just to be clear, I took that dump before I learned the 500 hams. > Here is a dump after I learned the hams. It looks normal to me. > > 0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db >

Re: SA-Exim - not scanning local nets.

On Thursday 24 May 2007 14:28, Simon Avery wrote: > I have SA-Exim running and I want it to ignore any mail coming from > local domains (ie, a 10.0.0/24 etc) because the users within these nets > are complaining the sending delay is too big. > > I've tried following half a dozen rough guides, which

Re: SA-Exim - not scanning local nets.

Simon Avery wrote: > Hi > > Sorry if this is a FAQ but I've been playing the google game for hours > now and still haven't got it right. > > I have SA-Exim running and I want it to ignore any mail coming from > local domains (ie, a 10.0.0/24 etc) because the users within these > nets are complain

SA-Exim - not scanning local nets.

Hi Sorry if this is a FAQ but I've been playing the google game for hours now and still haven't got it right. I have SA-Exim running and I want it to ignore any mail coming from local domains (ie, a 10.0.0/24 etc) because the users within these nets are complaining the sending delay is too b

Re: RelayCountry

Daniel Aquino napisał(a): Does anyone know actually know where the: "Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::RelayCountry" module is actually ran ? I dont see anything in /usr/share/spamassassin/* that is doing it... I don't know about you, but I have: epsilon:/etc/spamassassin> grep RelayCountry * init.

Disable logging - Whitelist functionality

Hello, I would like to know if I can disable spamassassin logging because I think it's slowing down. I would also know if there is a way to say to spamassassin that whitelisted addresses don't need to pass all other rules. If there was already a thred talking about these arguments please tell m

Re: Bayes problem: very large spam/ham ratio

Andrzej Adam Filip writes: >Fletcher Mattox wrote: >> Hi, >> >> After years of stability, my bayes db is doing poorly. When I first >> noticed it, it was classifying lots of ham BAYES_99, I cleared the db >> and started over. Now it finds *very* few ham. >> >> 0.000 0 3

Re: What to do with spam?

Hi (Holã), This is how I try to manage spam: Bayes: --- - I have a local folder located on the LAN where people of my company can put ".eml" or mbox spam/ham files ( actually I am the only one doing it because others users use M* Outlook). - Every hour a cron script uploads all these fil

RE: So much spam

We saw an incoming spam increase by 50% yesterday, and are getting similar levels today. A bunch of new spambots? Cheers, Phil -- Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK > -Original Message- > From: Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 2

RE: So much spam

Sujit, No Bayes? Your only harnessing half the power of SA. Clay >>> "Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 5/24/2007 12:46 PM >>> Is it official now that 3.2 has come out that it would cut down on spam? I am still on 3.1.7 and noticed too much spam. Relying on all SARE rules plus Botn

RE: FuzzyOCR bypasses this gif file

Hello, I'm getting the same results as yourself and have not come to a conclusion to this as yet. My logs show: [21974] warn: FuzzyOcr: Timed out [21974] warn: FuzzyOcr: /usr/local/bin/gifsicle: cannot extract image#3 [21974] error: FuzzyOcr: /usr/local/netpbm/bin/giftopnm: Returned [32512], ski

RE: So much spam

On Thu, May 24, 2007 18:46, Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote: > Is it official now that 3.2 has come out that it would cut down on spam? > I am still on 3.1.7 and noticed too much spam. Relying on all SARE > rules plus Botnet.cf, imageinfo.cf - all to no avail. if i remember 3.1.7 have a number of

RE: So much spam

Is it official now that 3.2 has come out that it would cut down on spam? I am still on 3.1.7 and noticed too much spam. Relying on all SARE rules plus Botnet.cf, imageinfo.cf - all to no avail. Regards Sujit Choudhury -Original Message- From: Rob Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

Re: qmail auth not recognized

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, here is header lines from a mail that a qmail server received from autehnticated user: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on SuSE-101-64-minimal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL,

FuzzyOCR bypasses this gif file

Hi there! I've been using FuzzyOCR 3.5.1 for some months now without problems at all. Lately we are getting some spam messages with images that are never handled by focr. these 2 lines are the only thing I get on the logs, and verbosity is set to 3 2007-05-24 17:27:23 [2035] Timed out 2007-05-24

Re: Disable logging - Whitelist functionality

On Thu, 24 May 2007, asteddy wrote: > I would also know if there is a way to say to spamassassin that > whitelisted addresses don't need to pass all other rules. If that's the case then you're looking at the wrong part of the tool chain. Whatever is calling SA should be made aware of those addres

Re: Catching and stopping 419 spam

I'd like to see other people's states as well. I'm using it to block and my 419 spam is almost completely gone. But I'm wondering what other people's experiences are. FPs here on emails that have been forwarded and have email addresses in the message body. These have all been from cox.net

Re: Disable logging - Whitelist functionality

asteddy wrote: > Hello, > I would like to know if I can disable spamassassin logging because I think > it's slowing down. > Are you using spamd? If so, this is handled through syslog. Tell spamd to log to a different facility using the -s parameter and configure your syslogd to not write that

qmail auth not recognized

Hi, here is header lines from a mail that a qmail server received from autehnticated user: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on SuSE-101-64-minimal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL au

DUL Lists?

I received this bounce this morning. "Delivery failed 20 attempts: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unexpected connection response from server: 421 mails from 74.254.46.133 refused: local dynamic IP address 74.254.46.133" Does anybody recognize the text of the message? I'd like to confirm that there are no pop

Re: Enable Spam box - cannot access spam box

On Thu, 24 May 2007, waltervp wrote: I tried to use this feature from my cPanel: Spam Box This feature allows emails identified as spam by SpamAssassin to be delivered to a separate mail folder named "spam". If this folder is not regularly checked and emptied, it may cause your email or file s

Enable Spam box - cannot access spam box

I tried to use this feature from my cPanel: Spam Box This feature allows emails identified as spam by SpamAssassin to be delivered to a separate mail folder named "spam". If this folder is not regularly checked and emptied, it may cause your email or file system quotas to be exceeded, resulting

Re: Problem installing SA 3.2.0 via CPAN on OPenSuSE 10.2 or SLES 10

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anthony Edwards schrieb: > On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 02:37:34PM +0100, Stephen Carter wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> I've tried to install SA 3.2.0 on both an unpatched and fully patched >> versions of OpenSuSE 10.2 and SLES 10 via CPAN but on all attempts I

RE: Disable logging - Whitelist functionality

On Thu, 24 May 2007, Randal, Phil wrote: Justin's already put an example in the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ShortcircuitingRuleset Thanks for the link! Just looked at it. I'll have to give it a try myself and see what results I get. We have two border servers that get a fair

Re: Problem installing SA 3.2.0 via CPAN on OPenSuSE 10.2 or SLES 10

On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 02:37:34PM +0100, Stephen Carter wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've tried to install SA 3.2.0 on both an unpatched and fully patched > versions of OpenSuSE 10.2 and SLES 10 via CPAN but on all attempts I receive > the following errors during one of the test phases. It would be gr

Re: Disable logging - Whitelist functionality

On Thu, 24 May 2007, asteddy wrote: Hello, I would like to know if I can disable spamassassin logging because I think it's slowing down. I would also know if there is a way to say to spamassassin that whitelisted addresses don't need to pass all other rules. If there was already a thred talkin

RE: Disable logging - Whitelist functionality

Justin's already put an example in the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ShortcircuitingRuleset Cheers, Phil -- Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK > -Original Message- > From: Duane Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 May 2007 11:41 > To:

bayes user DB

I have a userbase of 5 accounts. I had run previously with the bayes override username option in local.cf and have 12mil spam and 6 mil ham for our domain. I switched to per user (Mysql) configs and removed the bayes override username option so currently in bayes_vars there are 1 rows.

Re: Disable logging - Whitelist functionality

On Thu, 24 May 2007, asteddy wrote: Hello, I would like to know if I can disable spamassassin logging because I think it's slowing down. I would also know if there is a way to say to spamassassin that whitelisted addresses don't need to pass all other rules. If there was already a thred talkin

Re: So much spam

Rob Campbell schrieb: SpamAssassin version 3.2.0 I ran sa-update so I will see how that manages. Perhaps you additionally want to search the archives for: "botnet plugin" "rules du jour" "network tests", dcc, razor, pyzor ... Thanks -- hth MH Dont send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Disable logging - Whitelist functionality

Hello, I would like to know if I can disable spamassassin logging because I think it's slowing down. I would also know if there is a way to say to spamassassin that whitelisted addresses don't need to pass all other rules. If there was already a thred talking about these arguments please tell m