>> Sietse van Zanen wrote:
>> > Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>> > > Kelly Jones wrote:
>> > > > To fight spam, I want to validate the address (not necessarily in
>> > > > real-time) of the a given email sender. Is there a Unix tool that
>> > > > does this?
>> > >
>> > > Postfix has exactly this built in
On Saturday 10 March 2007 8:56 pm, John Andersen wrote:
> > For some reason when this happens fetchmail will not delete the message
> > after downloading it therefore it just sits there and get downloaded over
> > and over again and prevents othere mail after it from being downloaded.
> > Could th
On Saturday 10 March 2007, Chris wrote:
> I noticed this evening at 8:00pm that two of my hourly syslog snippets that
> are emailed to me were missing. Looking at my mail via EL's webmail page I
> see that they were still there and looking at my log in /var/log/syslog I saw
> the above. Also goi
I noticed this evening at 8:00pm that two of my hourly syslog snippets that
are emailed to me were missing. Looking at my mail via EL's webmail page I
see that they were still there and looking at my log in /var/log/syslog I saw
the above. Also going with this was
Mar 10 19:08:53 localhost nam
In an ideal world, what you say would be true. All senders would have a valid
address at which they receive replies.
But like insisting that all incoming messages have valid sender accounts,
you're preventing your users from receiving some valid messages.
To include this in your scoring scheme
smf-sav is one sendmail milter which does this:
http://smfs.sourceforge.net/smf-sav.html
SAV v1.3.0 - console utility for e-Mail Sender Address Verification
(also at http://smfs.sf.net/ )
Cheers,
Phil
-Original Message-
From: Kelly Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 March 20
Sietse van Zanen wrote:
> Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> > Kelly Jones wrote:
> > > To fight spam, I want to validate the address (not necessarily in
> > > real-time) of the a given email sender. Is there a Unix tool that
> > > does this?
> >
> > Postfix has exactly this built in. It's the
> > "reject_u
Mário Gamito wrote:
[snip]
> [30747] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
> 'DCC_CHECK'
> [30747] info: rules: meta test SARE_SPEC_PROLEO_M2a has dependency
> 'MIME_QP_LONG_LINE' with a zero score
> [30747] info: rules: meta test SARE_HEAD_SUBJ_RAND has undefined
> depend
Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
What are the details of that score?
If you want more detail, save your complete message for instance as test.eml,
and run: spamassassin -x -t -D FuzzyOcr < test.eml
-
[30747] info: rules: meta
Kelly Jones wrote:
> To fight spam, I want to validate the address (not necessarily in
> real-time) of the a given email sender. Is there a Unix tool that does
> this?
[snip]
There are many milters that do exactly that (example
http://www.snertsoft.com/sendmail/milter-sender/). Of course milters
Mário Gamito wrote:
> I've just installed FuzzyOCR and it's really a great tool.
> Awesome.
>
> I think it just has a glitch (maybe may bad, that's why i'm asking).
> It gives very low scores to the messages.
>
> I sent this testing e-mail with this picture:
> http://www.gamito.org/teste.jpg
>
Yes, but you don't always want to reject such mails. NDR's, automated mails etc
are often send from empty or non-existent e-mail addresses.
You will want to score points, like other SA tests. Maybe a good idea to write
such a test, as it doesn't exist yet.
I know nagios has some tools that can
* Kelly Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> To fight spam, I want to validate the address (not necessarily in
> real-time) of the a given email sender. Is there a Unix tool that does
> this?
Postfix has exactly this built in. It's the
"reject_unverified_sender" restriction.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des
To fight spam, I want to validate the address (not necessarily in
real-time) of the a given email sender. Is there a Unix tool that does
this?
The basics are simple: to validate "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", I connect to
the MX record of wnonline.net and go as far as "RCPT TO" as follows:
host -t mx wno
Thanks for everyone's suggestions. I've taken most of them and done
some other tuning; I'll have to wait and see how much things have
improved. If they haven't improved much, I'll be back on Monday. :)
I'm a little late to the party, and this is sorta off-topic, but you may
want to check this
Hi,
Thank you for your answer.
What does a "spamassassin --lint -D fuzzyocr [EMAIL PROTECTED] cur]# spamassassin --lint -D fuzzyocr <
1173546266.26462.mail.telbit.pt\,S\=82421\:2\,
[26671] info: rules: meta test DIGEST_MULTIPLE has undefined dependency
'DCC_CHECK'
[26671] info: rules: meta
Well, start with carefully reading the documentation. It will give you better
understanding.
What does a "spamassassin --lint -D fuzzyocr
FuzzyOC does not score messages, it scores images.
If your message got a score of 6, that's probably due to the
auto_disable setting of FuzzyOCR.
FuzzyOCR
Hi,
Sietse van Zanen wrote:
FuzzyOC does not score messages, it scores images.
If your message got a score of 6, that's probably due to the
auto_disable setting of FuzzyOCR.
FuzzyOCR doesn't run when a message reaches that score. This saves
resources. To debug, make the auto_diable scor 100
On 3/7/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/2/2007 2:50 AM, Sandeep Agarwal wrote:
> any suggestions how to fix this or the reason for this.
It's probably being caused by bayes expiries. Disable auto expiry and
do the expiries via a cron job.
Daryl
thanks Daryl, the proble
FuzzyOC does not score messages, it scores images.
If your message got a score of 6, that's probably due to the auto_disable setting of FuzzyOCR.
FuzzyOCR doesn't run when a message reaches that score. This saves resources. To debug, make the auto_diable scor 100 or so.
-Sietse
From: Mário
Hi,
I've just installed FuzzyOCR and it's really a great tool.
Awesome.
I think it just has a glitch (maybe may bad, that's why i'm asking).
It gives very low scores to the messages.
I sent this testing e-mail with this picture:
http://www.gamito.org/teste.jpg
All the words are in FuzzyOCR.wor
21 matches
Mail list logo
