On Saturday 17 February 2007 23:29, Jeff Chan wrote:
> I should have addded, we are removing the Harris Poll domain
> hpolsurveys.com from the blacklist.
Actually checking more closely, this domain is not on any SURBL
blacklists. If you got this result recently, then you may be suffering
from the
I should have addded, we are removing the Harris Poll domain
hpolsurveys.com from the blacklist.
On Saturday 17 February 2007 10:44, LuKreme wrote:
> On 17-Feb-2007, at 06:39, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: LuKreme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 1:26 PM
> >> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> >> Subject: HarrisPoll
> >>
> >>
>> Not quite. Those show how many times *others* have seen it, not how
>> many times *I* have seen it. Also, these have hysteresis so if you are
>> unfortunately to be at the start of the spam run and receive multiple
>> mails all with the same body then Razor, DCC and Pyzor might not
>> help. Th
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Doesn't SA have at least 3 of those already? Razor, DCC, and Pyzor.
Not quite. Those show how many times *others* have seen it, not how
many times *I* have seen it. Also, these have hysteresis so if you are
unfortunately to be at the start of the spam
On 2007-02-12, Sujit Choudhury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there an easy way to get everything needed for FuzzyOCR? Has
> somebody built a complete install, so that we don't have to go to
> various sites to built various bits of FuzzyOCR?
On FreeBSD when you install from the ports collection
On 2007-02-15, NIbbLLe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is that we are running spamassassin through plesk 7 and we are
> running it on a Windows machine. I went to the FuzzyOCR site, I see the only
> files that they have is .tar (for linux) . Do you maybe have any
> suggestions on how I c
On Saturday February 17 2007 03:01, Quinn Comendant wrote:
> How about an extensive statistics reporting tool, ..., that
> can show how well a current spamassassin installation is performing
> and where it needs improvements.
Well, not exactly by your words, but in the same spirit,
this time belon
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 06:56:28PM -0500, Tim B. wrote:
> How about a "How many times have I seen this message body" plugin...
>
> So each time SA see's the same or similar enough message body, it
> increases the score.
Doesn't SA have at least 3 of those already? Razor, DCC, and Pyzor.
--
R
Justin Mason wrote:
Theo Van Dinter writes:
I'm assuming that there will be a Google Summer of Code 2007 going on, and
that the ASF will be involved again. So it's a good time to start thinking
about things we'd like to put up as possible projects.
We still have a number of items from last
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Quinn Comendant wrote:
How about an extensive statistics reporting tool, possible
web-based, that can show how well a current spamassassin
installation is performing and where it needs improvements. It could
provide trends in different classes of spam and how each is
marked.
On 17-Feb-2007, at 06:39, Michael Scheidell wrote:
-Original Message-
From: LuKreme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 1:26 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: HarrisPoll
Where does the WS-SURBL info come from? I ask because the Harris
Poll email is get
Matt Kettler schrieb am 17.02.2007 15:08:
> David Obando wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I installed SA on a Debian Etch system together with Postfix and Amavis.
>> Strangely SA doens't score mails at all, but I don't see why.
>>
>> See the output of a spam mail I checked manually, When I run a chec
Michael Parker a écrit :
Sam Przyswa wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to export a Bayes DB from a server and then append (not
restore) it to others servers ?
No, you generally can't combine two bayes databases that way. Best bet
is to pick the most complete one and use it.
For more detail
Raul Dias writes:
**snip
> If I remember correctly spamd was using something between 2 to 5% of
> memory reported by top (45 process max).
>
> If it was really shared, it would have not collapsed.
>
> My bet is that the model used on Linux is copy on write. So after a
> fork, when the child spamd
Is there a consensus on this need? I deal with the seen db issue by
scheduled deletion of that file. That said, with SA becoming more and
more prominent all the time, I suspect the Average Joe will miss this
oddity until they wind up with a sluggish system, out of drive space or
other related is
David Obando wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I installed SA on a Debian Etch system together with Postfix and Amavis.
> Strangely SA doens't score mails at all, but I don't see why.
>
> See the output of a spam mail I checked manually, When I run a check on
> the same mail on a different machine, it is scor
Dave Koontz wrote:
> I am sure this has been asked numerous times before, but what is the logic
> in having auto expiry on the bayes DB, and not seen? Seems that once tokens
> have been removed from the DB there is little to no use for 'unlearning' any
> associated messages. Besides on a busy sys
> -Original Message-
> From: LuKreme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 1:26 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: HarrisPoll
>
>
> Where does the WS-SURBL info come from? I ask because the Harris
> Poll email is getting tagged with it. As far a
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 11:21 +, Justin Mason wrote:
> Raul Dias writes:
> > On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 02:07 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
> > > On Saturday February 17 2007 01:49, Matthew Wilson wrote:
> > > > I was/am primarily concerned with RAM usage for high-concurrency
> > > > situations.
> > >
Dear all,
I installed SA on a Debian Etch system together with Postfix and Amavis.
Strangely SA doens't score mails at all, but I don't see why.
See the output of a spam mail I checked manually, When I run a check on
the same mail on a different machine, it is scored:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]# spa
Raul Dias writes:
> On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 02:07 +0100, Mark Martinec wrote:
> > On Saturday February 17 2007 01:49, Matthew Wilson wrote:
> > > I was/am primarily concerned with RAM usage for high-concurrency
> > > situations.
> >
> > Ok. Still, in my experience about 30 (maybe 50) SA processes c
I am sure this has been asked numerous times before, but what is the logic
in having auto expiry on the bayes DB, and not seen? Seems that once tokens
have been removed from the DB there is little to no use for 'unlearning' any
associated messages. Besides on a busy system, this seen file gets la
23 matches
Mail list logo
