I wonder if Vernon Schryver at rhyolite could tie fuzzy OCR into the DCC
(distributed Checksum) project. We operate one of the several hundred nodes
in the DCC network, and it has been a great tool in spam control. For
anyone who is not familiar with it, DCC is a network of public and private
René Berber wrote:
> Markus Eskola wrote:
> [snip]
>> dbg: diag: perl platform: 5.008006 solaris
>>
> [snip]
>> cpan> m DBD::mysql
> ...
>> INST_VERSION 4.00
>
> Both look alright.
>
>> Is there somehow I can check that all the other files are in place;
>> libgcc_s.so.1, ld.so.1 and mysql.so
Markus Eskola wrote:
[snip]
> dbg: diag: perl platform: 5.008006 solaris
>
[snip]
> cpan> m DBD::mysql
...
> INST_VERSION 4.00
Both look alright.
> Is there somehow I can check that all the other files are in place;
> libgcc_s.so.1, ld.so.1 and mysql.so (well I know they are there, I
> check
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Andy Dills wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, decoder wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> >
> > since 3.5.0 RC1 was released, we fixed many bugs, thanks to the many
> > testers and bug reporters :) so big thanks.
>
>
> I
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, decoder wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
> since 3.5.0 RC1 was released, we fixed many bugs, thanks to the many
> testers and bug reporters :) so big thanks.
I have something I'm curious about, having run FuzzyOcr in a medium s
John Rudd wrote:
Is there an SA function that will just return an array of Relays that
fit a given one of these criteria? Such as:
@relays = get_relays(options);
There are no accessors for it, you've got to access the arrays directly. :(
where options is a comma delimited string of words
Justin Mason wrote:
John Rudd writes:
Is there an SA function that will just return an array of Relays that
fit a given one of these criteria? Such as:
@relays = get_relays(options);
where options is a comma delimited string of words like:
Trusted - include a given relay if it is tr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
René Berber skrev:
>
>
> OK, try `spamassassin --lint -D` and look for a line similar to
> this one (near the top, around line 30 in my test):
>
> [2324] dbg: diag: perl platform: 5.008007
>
Ok, done that, and as I suspected:
dbg: diag: perl platform:
Markus Eskola wrote:
> René Berber skrev:
>> You are probably using two different perl versions, in one you have
> DBD::mysql,
>> in the other (perl 5.8.6) you don't.
>
> Yes, there are two versions of perl installed but only 5.8.6 is used
> (atleast in a SA perspective and CPAN/DBD) since I only
John Rudd writes:
> Is there an SA function that will just return an array of Relays that
> fit a given one of these criteria? Such as:
>
> @relays = get_relays(options);
>
> where options is a comma delimited string of words like:
> Trusted - include a given relay if it is trusted
>
Dave Koontz wrote:
> I am sure this is a long shot, but has anyone created a Win32 porting of
> this along with the necessary OCR utilities?
It works fine with Cygwin's perl. The other binaries are either available in
Cygwin or compile easily under that environment.
I haven't tried but a MingW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
René Berber skrev:
> You are probably using two different perl versions, in one you have
DBD::mysql,
> in the other (perl 5.8.6) you don't.
>
Yes, there are two versions of perl installed but only 5.8.6 is used
(atleast in a SA perspective and CPAN/DB
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Yeah, -notfirsthop is good for lists that list known zombies, open
relays, and crap like that. Generic dynamic lists are better off as
-lastexternal to avoid FPs (I know of lots of businesses that are forced
to smarthost their mail through Bell's MSAs due to SORBS
Markus Eskola wrote:
> I am running SA 3.1.1 on Solaris 8 (SPARC) today and have tried
> upgrading to later versions.
>
> Today I had another go trying to upgrade to SA 3.1.7
>
> So, I downloaded the source, ran make, make test and make install and
> restarted qmail (incl SA)
>
> But My logs st
I am sure this is a long shot, but has anyone created a Win32 porting of
this along with the necessary OCR utilities?
-Original Message-
From: decoder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 9:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: FuzzyOcr
Justin Mason wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
If you're
referring to jm's post, I think he just made those rules up as they're
not what we're publishing for 3.1.
It's the rules from SVN trunk.
Ah.
-lastexternal is exactly what they're asking for. In the case where the
client connects d
Hello all,
I have packaged fuzzyocr 3.5.1 for Debian ;
the name of the package is "fuzzyocr3" ;
I uploaded it into debian/experimental ;
it is also available at
http://tonelli.sns.it/pub/mennucc1/fuzzyocr
a.
ps: I previously uploaded fuzzyocr 2.3b-1
as "fuzzyocr"
signature.asc
Description: O
Greetings,
Got an FP on the Forged_Yahoo_received:
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: ler@lerctr.org
Delivery-date: Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:13:32 -0600
Received: from mail-relay1.yahoo.com ([216.145.48.34]:30422)
by thebighonker.lerctr.org with esmtps
(TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:
Phil Barnett wrote:
On Sunday 07 January 2007 08:22, Sander Holthaus wrote:
But, to get back on topic, the new PBL in ZEN marks mail originating
from ip's and netblocks which should not be running (mail-sending)
mailservers, such as dynamic ip-ranges for cable/dsl/dailup-access (at
least, that
From: decoder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ...omissis...
>
> > What are your thoughts about?
> The point is, if you use a digest, then you need an exact match, no
> matter if you digest the image directly, or any of the parameters,
> because digests are designed to not accept any tolerance. But t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
> From: decoder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Hello all,
>>
>>
>> since 3.5.0 RC1 was released, we fixed many bugs, thanks to the
>> many testers and bug reporters :) so big thanks.
>
> Excellent work. Thank you for your effo
From: decoder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hello all,
>
>
> since 3.5.0 RC1 was released, we fixed many bugs, thanks to the many
> testers and bug reporters :) so big thanks.
Excellent work. Thank you for your efforts in bringing it to us.
Anyway, I'm wondering why the image hashing is made that
On Sunday 07 January 2007 08:22, Sander Holthaus wrote:
> But, to get back on topic, the new PBL in ZEN marks mail originating
> from ip's and netblocks which should not be running (mail-sending)
> mailservers, such as dynamic ip-ranges for cable/dsl/dailup-access (at
> least, that is my understan
From: "=?utf-8?b?15PXldeo15nXqiDXkteV15zXk9eR16jXkg==?="
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: =?utf-8?b?
15fXmdeh15XXnCDXntec15DXmSDXnteq16DXlCDXnNeZ15zXk9eZ150=?=
These display as Hebrew
Couldn't figure out what to put in the subj so I just posted a portion of what
my syslog shows. The entire line is:
Jan 7 07:33:58 localhost named[3985]: FORMERR resolving
'89.167.203.200.sa-trusted.bondedsender.org/TXT/IN': 216.32.88.90#53
I'm seeing this a lot, however, I don't know how long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
since 3.5.0 RC1 was released, we fixed many bugs, thanks to the many
testers and bug reporters :) so big thanks.
Now, the version seems stable enough to replace the 3.4.x branch, and
I recommend everyone to upgrade to it :)
For those th
http://fuzzyocr.own-hero.net/ticket/20
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães escreveu:
I have also experienced some tmp files left ... but they are
left from FuzzyOCR plugin, not SpamAssassin itself.
Are you using FuzzyOCR or other SA non-default plugin ??
John Andersen escreveu:
On
I have also experienced some tmp files left ... but they are
left from FuzzyOCR plugin, not SpamAssassin itself.
Are you using FuzzyOCR or other SA non-default plugin ??
John Andersen escreveu:
On Thursday 04 January 2007 18:36, Andy Dills wrote:
I'm running amavisd (2.4.4) an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Phil Barnett wrote:
> On Saturday 06 January 2007 23:05, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 05:24:35PM -0800, snowcrash+spamassassin wrote:
>>> i regularly run updates via cron on the hour.
>>>
>> :)
>> :
>>> running it again, or at all
Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
> If you're
> referring to jm's post, I think he just made those rules up as they're
> not what we're publishing for 3.1.
It's the rules from SVN trunk.
> -lastexternal is exactly what they're asking for. In the case where the
> client connects directly to their MS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I am running SA 3.1.1 on Solaris 8 (SPARC) today and have tried
upgrading to later versions.
Today I had another go trying to upgrade to SA 3.1.7
So, I downloaded the source, ran make, make test and make install and
restarted qmail (incl SA)
B
31 matches
Mail list logo
