Gary W. Smith wrote:
Was the SA group listed by spamcop last month? I just now received
this for messages from October 26th.
Who cares?
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
209.209.82.24 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host
[140.211.11.2] blocked using
I sure hope you guys can help me out here. I am a non-techie that feels
like she's entering a tech world. I receive an e-news type of
deal daily through a reputable group in my line of business. I have
received these for at least 2 years now with no problem. Last week they
started getting i
John Andersen wrote:
On Monday 06 November 2006 15:02, Derek Harding wrote:
I suspect that the large amount of image spam that
contains just bayes poison poisoned my bayes DB.
Oh, I don't know...
I think the concept of bayes poisoning has been pretty well
debunked. Judging by the absence of
After working brilliantly for a long time suddenly the Bayes engine is
misclassifying messages and creating false positives.
Having a false positive every now and again is nothing new and I would
train on error when that would occur and correct the issue. The
problem I am seeing now is that when
At 09:24 PM 11/6/2006, you wrote:
Oh, I don't know...
I think the concept of bayes poisoning has been pretty well
debunked. Judging by the absence of false positives with high
bayes scores, it seems like a theory looking for a proof.
Where's Jamie Hyneman and Adam Savage when you need them?
On Monday 06 November 2006 15:02, Derek Harding wrote:
> I suspect that the large amount of image spam that
> contains just bayes poison poisoned my bayes DB.
Oh, I don't know...
I think the concept of bayes poisoning has been pretty well
debunked. Judging by the absence of false positives with
Title: mail bounce warning for the list
Was the SA group listed by spamcop last month? I just now received this for messages from October 26th.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
209.209.82.24 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [140.211.11.2] blocked
Derek Harding wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 15:49 -0800, Evan Platt wrote:
Just to clarify.. Yes, these would definitely be targeted addresses.
I grepped my mail log for common spam I get and I'll add those.
There is one problem with this approach though. All spam is learned. I
tried this and I
>...
>That's where the human tweaking is supposed to happen; if gobs of spam
>flag the 80% meter of some test while no ham does, and the 90% meter is
>almost never hit by anything, it should have a higher value than the 80%
>meter does. If the 90% meter has more ham than spam despite the 80% meter
Adam Katz wrote:
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/HowScoresAreAssigned
>>
>
> Thanks, that's what I was looking for.
>
>
>> The short version is that as far as SA and the perceptron (that which
>> generates the scores) are concerned, rules are independent
Adam Katz wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, John D. Hardin wrote:
>
>> The default scores are generated by analyzing their performance
>> against hand-categorized corpa of actual emails. If a rule hits spam
>> often and ham rarely, it will be given a higher score than one that
>> hits spam often and
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 03:21:40PM +1300, Simon wrote:
> 'tag'ing spam correctly. What do i do to have sa delete the message
> above a certain level?
>
> Is there a preference i can set somewhere?
Stand on your head and chant "SA only marks up messages". :)
ie: you can't have SA delete mails, yo
On Tuesday, November 07, 2006 3:21 PM +1300 Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We are running debian sarge, with postfix and SpamAssassin 3.1.3. We
have setup sa as a filter in postfix and it is now working and
'tag'ing spam correctly. What do i do to have sa delete the message
above a certain lev
Hi There,
We are running debian sarge, with postfix and SpamAssassin 3.1.3. We
have setup sa as a filter in postfix and it is now working and
'tag'ing spam correctly. What do i do to have sa delete the message
above a certain level?
Is there a preference i can set somewhere?
Thanks
Simon
On Thu, November 2, 2006 17:03, Randy Smith wrote:
> I use policyd and give my users the ability to optout (or optin depending on
> the domain settings) of greylisting if they choose. They can do it through a
> plugin in SquirrelMail so, if they choose, they can turn it off for a few
> minutes to
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/HowScoresAreAssigned
Thanks, that's what I was looking for.
> The short version is that as far as SA and the perceptron (that which
> generates the scores) are concerned, rules are independent. There is no
> "increase in severity", eit
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Evan Platt wrote:
> Ok, so just to get a second (and third and so on opinion), I created
> a user on my system, named it spambucket. Aliased the garbage
> addresses to spambucket in /etc/postfix/aliases, then at midnight run
>
> sa-learn --spam -u primaryuser --mbox /private
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Derek Harding wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 15:49 -0800, Evan Platt wrote:
> > Just to clarify.. Yes, these would definitely be targeted addresses.
> > I grepped my mail log for common spam I get and I'll add those.
>
> There is one problem with this approach though. All spa
At 01:55 PM 11/6/2006, you wrote:
Create the user accounts (which is the simplest way to get it to start
accepting messages) and run sa-learn --spam against their mailboxes
from cron.daily.
Alternatively, create a single sa-honeypot user and redirect all your
targeted bad addresses to that acco
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 15:49 -0800, Evan Platt wrote:
> Just to clarify.. Yes, these would definitely be targeted addresses.
> I grepped my mail log for common spam I get and I'll add those.
There is one problem with this approach though. All spam is learned. I
tried this and I suspect that the la
At 03:15 PM 11/6/2006, you wrote:
Did you miss the word "targeted"? I took the original poster to mean
forward all the bad addresses _that you choose_ to sa-honeypot.
Thus your scenario is only a problem if you choose to forward an address
that's close to an actual address.
Oh, yeah, I did rea
Derek Harding wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 14:34 -0800, John Rudd wrote:
Alternatively, create a single sa-honeypot user and redirect all your
targeted bad addresses to that account, and then run sa-learn --spam
against that one mailbox from cron.daily.
And then an important email comes into th
On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 14:34 -0800, John Rudd wrote:
> >
> > Alternatively, create a single sa-honeypot user and redirect all your
> > targeted bad addresses to that account, and then run sa-learn --spam
> > against that one mailbox from cron.daily.
> >
>
> And then an important email comes into
jdow wrote:
From: "Chris Lear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Tony Finch wrote (05/11/06 17:43):
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Michael Scheidell wrote:
So? Build something better. Its open source. Don't use the RFCI scores,
drop them, stop bithing about somehting YOU can change.
Well, I've added a -2 for emai
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Evan Platt wrote:
Off the bat, I wouldn't want to do it for every bad e-mail address,
just a bunch of known bad ones, addresses that somehow got added to
mailing lists, or the such.
Any suggestions?
Create the user accounts (which is the simplest w
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, John D. Hardin wrote:
> The default scores are generated by analyzing their performance
> against hand-categorized corpa of actual emails. If a rule hits spam
> often and ham rarely, it will be given a higher score than one that
> hits spam often and ham occasionally.
That soun
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 04:58:37PM -0500, Adam Katz wrote:
> Why do default scores not increase with severity? For example,
> SpamAssassin 3.1.7 has inconsistent progression of default scores in
> html obfuscation, dates set in the future, and spf marking:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/HowS
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Adam Katz wrote:
> Why do default scores not increase with severity? For example,
> SpamAssassin 3.1.7 has inconsistent progression of default scores in
> html obfuscation, dates set in the future, and spf marking:
The default scores are generated by analyzing their performan
(re-sending this email, last one sent 10/30 15:19 EST and not posted to
list, despite that another message was sent to the list successfully
only half an hour later.)
Why do default scores not increase with severity? For example,
SpamAssassin 3.1.7 has inconsistent progression of default scores
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006, Evan Platt wrote:
> Off the bat, I wouldn't want to do it for every bad e-mail address,
> just a bunch of known bad ones, addresses that somehow got added to
> mailing lists, or the such.
>
> Any suggestions?
Create the user accounts (which is the simplest way to get it to
Running postfix /spamassassin called via procmail..
Can I do something useful with bad address spam, rather than rejecting it?
I don't know if this is a question for a postfix list or a
spamassassin list, but perhaps automatically report it, and
automatically learn as spam?
Off the bat, I wo
On 6-nov-2006, at 21:30, Rob Anderson wrote:
Leander Koornneef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/06/06 02:26PM >>>
As far as I
know, there is no configuration option for this.
>
Try this from the docs under "Template Tags":
_SCORE(PAD)_ message score, if PAD is inclu
>>> Leander Koornneef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/06/06 02:26PM >>>
On 6-nov-2006, at 19:59, Claus Westerkamp wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Id like to modify the Score output of spamassassin. I want 3digits
> display permanently (e.g. ***(Score002.3)*** or ***(Score102.3)*** )
>
> Is this possible? I wan
Magnus Anderson wrote:
Hi,
I have enabled AWL on my SpamAssassin configuration
- local.cf
# Store AWL in MySQL
auto_whitelist_factory Mail::SpamAssassin::SQLBasedAddrList
user_awl_dsnDBI:mysql:spamassassin:localhost
user_awl_sql_username spamassassin
u
On 6-nov-2006, at 19:59, Claus Westerkamp wrote:
Hello list,
Id like to modify the Score output of spamassassin. I want 3digits
display permanently (e.g. ***(Score002.3)*** or ***(Score102.3)*** )
Is this possible? I want it to be able to sort the spam-messages by
Score.
Of course this
Gary V wrote:
This morning I received my copy of networkworld. Here is an
interesting article:
http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2006/103006buzz-spammers-dodging-ocr.html
Gary V
_
Add a Yahoo! contact to Windows Live Mess
Evan Platt wrote:
> At 11:45 AM 11/6/2006, you wrote:
>
> > when i run spamassassin --lint i get this error messages..
> >
> > C:\test>spamassassin --lint
> > Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
> >
> > Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
> >
At 11:45 AM 11/6/2006, you wrote:
when i run spamassassin --lint i get this error messages..
C:\test>spamassassin --lint
Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configurati
when i run spamassassin --lint i get this error messages..
C:\test>spamassassin --lint
Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping:
Failed to parse line
Hi,
I have enabled AWL on my SpamAssassin configuration
- local.cf
# Store AWL in MySQL
auto_whitelist_factory Mail::SpamAssassin::SQLBasedAddrList
user_awl_dsnDBI:mysql:spamassassin:localhost
user_awl_sql_username spamassassin
user_awl_sql_password
Hello list,
Id like to modify the Score output of spamassassin. I want 3digits
display permanently (e.g. ***(Score002.3)*** or ***(Score102.3)*** )
Is this possible? I want it to be able to sort the spam-messages by Score.
thanx
claus
Anyone seeing issues with rbl checks going to
sa-trusted.bondedsender.org & sa-other.bondedsender.org ?
Seeing some timeouts here this am.
Any known issues?
Ken A.
Pacific.Net
On Mon, November 6, 2006 17:46, Chris Santerre wrote:
>> home directory to do this, but can't seem to find out
>> exactly how to do it.
> edit the file? vi? pico is my favorite.
was the procmailrc on sitewide, then it does not help to do anything on user
basis
> Can you post the procmail file
jdow writes:
> From: "Chris Lear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >* Tony Finch wrote (05/11/06 17:43):
> >> On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> >>
> >>> So? Build something better. Its open source. Don't use the RFCI scores,
> >>> drop them, stop bithing about somehting YOU can change.
> >>
>
David Baron wrote:
Installed it off Debian Sid.
How do I get SA to make use of it?
less /usr/share/doc/razor/README.Debian
--
Chris
From: "itdelany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi :)
I successfully run spamassassin with bayes filter on my site and is working
really really fine. But, this morning i noticed that an email i receive
everyday from my server (It's from LogWatch application, it sends detailed
log information from past ev
So read the procmailex man page and figure out how to detect
the recipient's name. If the name matches the honeypot then
simply stop processing at that point.
The data is in there. It's not "obvious" of course.
I am betting my configuration is enough different from yours that
any methods I use w
From: "Geoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi (my first post here!),
I have a honeypot mailbox that I want to turn off the
spamassassin engine for. I need to stop spamassassin
completely from processing mail for this mailbox, so
setting rule scores is not the answer here.
Spamassassin is invoked from p
From: "Chris Lear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Tony Finch wrote (05/11/06 17:43):
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Michael Scheidell wrote:
So? Build something better. Its open source. Don't use the RFCI scores,
drop them, stop bithing about somehting YOU can change.
Well, I've added a -2 for email from Amazon
On Sat, November 4, 2006 19:33, John Rudd wrote:
> For the "wrote:" spams that come through here, I think all of them are
> being caught by my RelayChecker plugin (which I've posted in other threads).
i have this installed with imho do a very good job of stopping spam, thanks
for makeing it
--
On Mon, November 6, 2006 12:46, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Dunno. I wrote about this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and never got a
> reply.
maybe it sent to /dev/null in there end :(
i send mail to postmaster when i find a domain that does not handle things
right, newer got a usefull reply from hotmail.c
This morning I received my copy of networkworld. Here is an interesting
article:
http://www.networkworld.com/columnists/2006/103006buzz-spammers-dodging-ocr.html
Gary V
_
Add a Yahoo! contact to Windows Live Messenger for a chance
Hi,
Here's the global /etc/procmailrc file:
INCLUDERC=/etc/mail/spamassassin/spamassassin-default.rc
...and here's the included spamassassin-default.rc file
# send mail through spamassassin
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamassassin
So it doesn't get much simpler than that.
As yet there is no .procmailrc file
Title: RE: Completely disable spamassassin for a given mailbox
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 11:06 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Completely disable spamassassin for a given mailbox
>
>
> Hi (my fi
John Fleming wrote:
Real novice here - Would someone please explain how a stock spam was
able to use my whitelist to get a huge negative score? I do have a
whitelist, but the user shown below is not in it. I do have one
Italian (.it) domain in the whitelist, but it is a different/address
domain
John Fleming wrote:
> Real novice here - Would someone please explain how a stock spam was
> able to use my whitelist to get a huge negative score? I do have a
> whitelist, but the user shown below is not in it.
Check the Return-Path header.
Is [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your whitelist_from? If so, th
Hi (my first post here!),
I have a honeypot mailbox that I want to turn off the
spamassassin engine for. I need to stop spamassassin
completely from processing mail for this mailbox, so
setting rule scores is not the answer here.
Spamassassin is invoked from procmail on our system. I
believe I ca
Real novice here - Would someone please explain how a stock spam was
able to use my whitelist to get a huge negative score? I do have a
whitelist, but the user shown below is not in it. I do have one
Italian (.it) domain in the whitelist, but it is a different/address
domain. How did this msg ge
On Monday 06 November 2006 06:28, Maccie Roux wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm running Fedora Core 5 with Postfix Dovecot Open LDAP and spamassassin.
> Everything is working fine and spamassassin tags the spam correct, but
> I want to know how to move the spam mail to a separate mailbox.
You'll need a filter
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 02:57:30PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Installed it off Debian Sid.
> How do I get SA to make use of it?
The SpamAssassin wiki is your friend: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/
Here are just two of the many references to Razor.
UsingRazor: http://wiki.apache.org/spamas
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
>
> A better approach however would be to skip running those messages through
> SA
> at all, or to whitelist the sender address (read about whitelist_from_rcvd
> in
> Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf(3pm) manual page. Also, is the server in
> trusted_networks?
>
The server th
On Monday 06 November 2006 13:59, itdelany took the opportunity to say:
> I successfully run spamassassin with bayes filter on my site and is working
> really really fine. But, this morning i noticed that an email i receive
> everyday from my server (It's from LogWatch application, it sends detaile
Hi.
I'm running Fedora Core 5 with Postfix Dovecot Open LDAP and spamassassin.
Everything is working fine and spamassassin tags the spam correct, but
I want to know how to move the spam mail to a separate mailbox.
Hope someone can help me.
Thanks
Maccie Roux
M, <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> -> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Yes, hits=5.4 tag1=-999.0 tag2=5.0 kill=5.0
tests=BAYES_99, quarantine
spam-fd4fb4374df425aa3c2de2a2cf49e0d2-20061106-151933-32677-09 ([EMAIL
PROTECTED])
Nov 6 15:19:33 mail.edu.haifa.ac.il amavisd[32677]: (32677-09) BAD HEADER f
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 02:57:30PM +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Installed it off Debian Sid.
> How do I get SA to make use of it?
The SpamAssassin wiki is your friend: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/
Here are just two of the many references to Razor.
UsingRazor: http://wiki.apache.org/spamass
Hi :)
I successfully run spamassassin with bayes filter on my site and is working
really really fine. But, this morning i noticed that an email i receive
everyday from my server (It's from LogWatch application, it sends detailed
log information from past events, like users logons and postfix stat
Installed it off Debian Sid.
How do I get SA to make use of it?
* Benny Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> correct. if 100 happy amazon.com users complain to amazon.com about there
> listing in rfci, what will happend then ?
Dunno. I wrote about this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and never got a
reply.
> does amazon.com know there faults ?
Yes, they fixed the issu
On Sun, November 5, 2006 18:43, Tony Finch wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>> So? Build something better. Its open source. Don't use the RFCI scores,
>> drop them, stop bithing about somehting YOU can change.
> Well, I've added a -2 for email from Amazon, but I thought other
On 6-nov-2006, at 1:54, John Andersen wrote:
On Sunday 05 November 2006 15:48, Brian S. Meehan wrote:
Hi all,
Spam filtering is working, but I'm getting about half the spam in my
mailbox. Anyone have tips on adjustments I could make?
Here's what I have in the local.cf file:
rewrite_header SUB
* Tony Finch wrote (05/11/06 17:43):
> On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, Michael Scheidell wrote:
>
>> So? Build something better. Its open source. Don't use the RFCI scores,
>> drop them, stop bithing about somehting YOU can change.
>
> Well, I've added a -2 for email from Amazon, but I thought other people
>
From: "Marc Perkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What would cause all messages to score 0.5 on everything?
Mistrained Bayes database.
I betcha forgot to train spam and ham differently or trained
spam and ham with the same messages.
{^_^}
72 matches
Mail list logo
