(re-sending this email, last one sent 10/30 15:19 EST and not posted to
 list, despite that another message was sent to the list successfully
only half an hour later.)

Why do default scores not increase with severity?  For example,
SpamAssassin 3.1.7 has inconsistent progression of default scores in
html obfuscation, dates set in the future, and spf marking:

score HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10 1.421 1.169 1.522 1.449
score HTML_OBFUSCATE_10_20 1.936 1.397 2.371 1.770
score HTML_OBFUSCATE_20_30 2.720 2.720 3.145 3.400
score HTML_OBFUSCATE_30_40 2.480 2.480 2.867 2.859
score HTML_OBFUSCATE_40_50 2.160 2.160 2.498 2.640
score HTML_OBFUSCATE_50_60 2.049 2.061 2.342 2.031
score HTML_OBFUSCATE_60_70 1.637 1.592 1.892 1.652
score HTML_OBFUSCATE_70_80 1.440 1.507 1.680 1.472
score HTML_OBFUSCATE_80_90 1.244 1.191 1.397 0.982
score HTML_OBFUSCATE_90_100 0 # n=0 n=1 n=2 n=3

score DATE_IN_FUTURE_03_06 2.061 2.007 2.275 1.961
score DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 1.680 1.498 1.883 1.668
score DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24 2.320 2.316 2.775 2.767
score DATE_IN_FUTURE_24_48 2.080 2.080 2.498 2.688
score DATE_IN_FUTURE_48_96 1.680 1.680 1.942 2.100
score DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_XX 1.920 1.888 2.276 2.403

score SPF_NEUTRAL  0 1.379 0 1.069
score SPF_SOFTFAIL 0 1.470 0 1.384
score SPF_FAIL     0 1.333 0 1.142

To keep this message on-topic, I am not commenting about whether the
scores are fair to message spaminess.  I am asking about their fairness
to other relative levels; HTML_OBFUSCATE_80_90 should be higher than
HTML_OBFUSCATE_20_30, DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_XX should be higher than
DATE_IN_FUTURE_12_24, and SPF_FAIL should be higher than SPF_SOFTFAIL.
There are a large number of sets of scores that seem quite arbitrary in
their assignment.  While I'm happy to see this no longer includes
Bayesian scores, it is still a huge surprise.

Is there an explanation guide online about how scores are chosen?  Is
this automated in some manner that seems to get incremental tests
weighted based more on frequency than on severity?  I try to keep my
rules tweaks minor, but my local.cf is getting bigger and bigger...  how
large is the typical local.cf for servers with 25-100 users?

Thank you,
Adam Katz

Reply via email to