David Cary Hart schrieb:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:16:06 +1300, Jason Haar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> opined:
I've been waiting for anyone else to bring it up - but no-one has.
If Spamhaus lose this lawsuit (which they are ignoring as they are
UK-based and this is some judge in Chicago), they may very
On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 12:43:32AM -0500, David B Funk wrote:
> Saw a FP on a shipping notice from newegg.com, largely due
> to PRIORITY_NO_NAME & RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID
I've also seen some problems with Newegg transactional mail, probably
the same rules. Stuck it aside to look at later.
-- C
Saw a FP on a shipping notice from newegg.com, largely due
to PRIORITY_NO_NAME & RCVD_IN_WHOIS_INVALID
Headers were:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Oct 12 00:09:59 2006 -0500
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from star.its.uiowa.edu (star.its.uiowa.edu [128.255.56.186])
by server0
On Friday, October 6, 2006, 8:48:43 AM, Noc Phibee wrote:
> Hi
> Actually, i receive 750 000 mails/days on my server, for best
> performance, i have a local Dccd server and now i want
> put a local rbl ..
> Anyone know what is the best rbl list that i can mirror in local ?
> i can put more rbl li
On Wednesday, October 11, 2006, 9:51:17 AM, sarahphia sarahphia wrote:
> I have also downloaded Spam from July 2006, which is being classified below
> 20% accuracy.
What rules are being hit? Can you show us some scores from the
headers?
Does your config have a trust path problem?
http://wiki.
> jdow writes:
> Besides, "can't be done" from within SpamAssassin. If you get REALLY
> imaginative you might be able to do it with procmail. But that falls
> back to the "why bother?" If the employer runs an older version or an
> ineffective version install a copy in a personal set of direct
Saw a FP on a message from myspace.com, due in large part to
FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL (score 2.9). The from address contained one
of those coded action things which hit that rule.
Headers were:
From XX|X|X|5h7rdl|_|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 11 22:54:21 2006 -0500
Return-Path:
Received: from vmta04.
Do not even bother with your 2.55 local installation. It's a waste of
effort and time to try to make it work.
Besides, "can't be done" from within SpamAssassin. If you get REALLY
imaginative you might be able to do it with procmail. But that falls
back to the "why bother?" If the employer runs an
My (large) employer runs SpamAssassin on all incoming mail. My local UNIX
account, managed by a separate technical support group, is on a machine which
also has spamassassin available. Running the local version removes the
headers added by the central version. While I can see good reasons for th
Monty Ree wrote:
> Hello..
>
> After I have installed SA 3.1.4, I would like to 3.1.5
> So after installing 3.1.5, I executed SA.
> But error messages like below...
>
> Starting spamd: [4562] error: spamd: spamd script is v3.001005, but
> using modules v3.001004
>
>
> I don't know which files are r
So thanks for your kind reply..
> t/bayesdbm..ok 33/48sh: line 1: 28824 Segmentation
fault
> /usr/bin/perl -T -w ../sa-learn -C log/test_rules_copy
--siteconfigpath
> log/localrules.tmp -p log/test_default.cf --spam data/spam
log/bayes.34
> # Failed test 34 in t/bayesdbm.
Hello..
After I have installed SA 3.1.4, I would like to 3.1.5
So after installing 3.1.5, I executed SA.
But error messages like below...
Starting spamd: [4562] error: spamd: spamd script is v3.001005, but using
modules v3.001004
I don't know which files are related with modules v3.001004.
a
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 18:16:06 +1300, Jason Haar
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> opined:
> I've been waiting for anyone else to bring it up - but no-one has.
>
> If Spamhaus lose this lawsuit (which they are ignoring as they are
> UK-based and this is some judge in Chicago), they may very well lose
> their ".OR
On Wednesday, October 11, 2006 at 3:11:17 PM, Suhas confabulated:
> Hello,
>
> I am running SA on windows platform. From where do I get ClamAVPlugin for SA
> to run on Win32 environment?
Someone has already commented on the ClamAVPlugin part of SA.
You can download a native ClamAV port for W
Look on the wiki under plugins, I believe. It's all perl. Now, how
you get ClamAV to work on a Windows is something I don't know. Maybe
check with the ClamAV folks. It should be possible. ClamAV is written
in perl, I believe.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Suhas (QualiSpace)" <[EMAIL
Chris Santerre wrote:
> US products? What is that? I think the last US proiduct I purchased was
> an american flag. Come to think of itit might have been made
> somewhere else!
Yeah, America R&D's everything; everyone else in the world just clones it.
--
Robert Blayzor, BOFH
INOC, LLC
rblay
Fabien GARZIANO wrote:
> Ok. I dun want to dive into a useless political debate... But personnally I
> don't trust either bush team as it appears to me to be a new kind of
> dictatorship. But the question is not 'should the US be trusted' but 'should
> something like the internet be under the co
Alright - I'll end the useless political debate with a short and very
reasonable solution.
I'll do it.
I'll rule the Internet - it won't cost much, just 1 penny per day per IP
addres, from the owner of each IP address.
Think of it - I'm just, fair, conscientious, dislike all governments and
most
John D. Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, R Lists06 wrote:
Thoughts on avoiding bayes poisoning and looking for fingerprint tokens?
The only thought that comes to mind would be code that says, IF
email has an attachment of such and such a type, then do no
Tyler Nally wrote:
1- copy the fax images (detach the images from e-mail messages)
and store these images on that server (whether as a file
or put into a database as a blob)
If you're running Sendmail, you can use MIMEdefang
for this. It has a built-in function, action_replace_
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:48:28PM -0700, Vincent Li wrote:
> my $fh;
> open $fh, "<", shift;
> my @message = <$fh>;
>
> use Mail::SpamAssassin::Message;
> my $msg = Mail::SpamAssassin::Message->new(
> {
> 'message' => [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> }
FYI, new() accepts a file handle, an arra
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:24:46PM -0400, Tyler Nally wrote:
Now.. what I need help in understanding... is ... assuming that
I can handle each e-mail separately as it comes through, how do I
parse the e-mail (like the way Spamassassin does) to have th
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:24:46PM -0400, Tyler Nally wrote:
> Now.. what I need help in understanding... is ... assuming that
> I can handle each e-mail separately as it comes through, how do I
> parse the e-mail (like the way Spamassassin does) to have the
> ability to pull the component parts fr
Hello,
I've a project that I'm needing to solve. Fax machines (for a client)
have been replaced with the phone company's fax server that e-mails
the incomming fax (.tif) images to a specific e-address at the clients
place of business.
Just so happens, the e-mail passes through a mail server that
On 2006-10-11, Enrico Pasqualotto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi at all, I want to deliver mail marked from spamassassin with SPAM to
> admin address and not deliver to the user.
> Is possible?
> After I want to set this setup to specific email address not all user.
> I find in the docs and FAQ
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:09:55PM -0700, John D. Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, R Lists06 wrote:
>
> > > Thoughts on avoiding bayes poisoning and looking for fingerprint tokens?
> >
> > The only thought that comes to mind would be code that says, IF
> > email has an attachment of such and
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, R Lists06 wrote:
> > Thoughts on avoiding bayes poisoning and looking for fingerprint tokens?
>
> The only thought that comes to mind would be code that says, IF
> email has an attachment of such and such a type, then do not
> autolearn and/or send it to other conditionals
I
R Lists06 wrote:
One of the problems now with bayes is that image spam is causing bayes
to be useless. We need a new plan to avoid bayes poisoning. Poisoning is
caused when messages are learned where the text of the message is a
nonspam type text and the spam is in the image.
Bayes needs to be s
> One of the problems now with bayes is that image spam is causing bayes
> to be useless. We need a new plan to avoid bayes poisoning. Poisoning is
> caused when messages are learned where the text of the message is a
> nonspam type text and the spam is in the image.
>
> Bayes needs to be smarter
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 02:00:42PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:23:28PM -0500, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> > it's over with, the script umounts the share and sometimes that
> > reports
> >
> > umount: /var/spamtmp: device is busy
> >
> > No, it isn't sitting on /var/sp
We setup regular mail server for companies (mostly exchange servers).
Once we setup the mail server I want to send an e-mail from that new
mail server to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I want that email run through
all the SpamAssasin tests, then get sent back to the sender with all the
rules that were triggere
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 12:23:28PM -0500, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> it's over with, the script umounts the share and sometimes that
> reports
>
> umount: /var/spamtmp: device is busy
>
> No, it isn't sitting on /var/spamtmp - it previously did a "cd /".
IMO, the script should catch the failure,
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 01:05:36PM -0400, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Bob McClure wrote:
> > My client built a script that runs sa-learn for each user's (about 15
> > of them) spam and ham boxes.
>
> That's easy enough. I do that here as well.
>
> > We're having some problems with the
> > script that
Noc Phibee wrote:
> Hi
>
> on my logs, i have a big quantity of :
>
> @4000452cbf3c22278d9c prefork: server reached --max-clients
> setting, consider raising it
> @4000452cbf3c224d557c Cannot write to
> /var/qmail/.spamassassin/user_prefs: Permission denied
> @4000452cbf3e0dc71f5c pre
One of the problems now with bayes is that image spam is causing bayes
to be useless. We need a new plan to avoid bayes poisoning. Poisoning is
caused when messages are learned where the text of the message is a
nonspam type text and the spam is in the image.
Bayes needs to be smarter about wh
>
> Its a wiki, you can change it.
>
Heheh a wiki? I don't even make kewl webpages for myself (yet, just got more
help), how could I manage a wiki?
:-)
--
Robert - Abba Communications
Computer & Internet Services
(509) 624-7159 - www.abbacomm.net
Hi
on my logs, i have a big quantity of :
@4000452cbf3c22278d9c prefork: server reached --max-clients setting,
consider raising it
@4000452cbf3c224d557c Cannot write to
/var/qmail/.spamassassin/user_prefs: Permission denied
@4000452cbf3e0dc71f5c prefork: server reached --max-client
Bob McClure wrote:
> My client built a script that runs sa-learn for each user's (about 15
> of them) spam and ham boxes.
That's easy enough. I do that here as well.
> We're having some problems with the
> script that make the client think that sa-learn pushes some of its
> work into the backgro
> From: Balzi Andrea
>
> I've try it, but now I've the follow use:
>
> Tasks: 83 total, 2 running, 81 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
> Cpu0 : 0.0% user, 1.3% system, 1.7% nice, 97.0% idle
> Cpu1 : 0.0% user, 1.3% system, 0.0% nice, 98.7% idle
> Cpu2 : 0.0% user, 0.0%
Justin Mason wrote:
>
>
> worth noting that the public corpus is 3 years old now -- our rules
> are not designed to catch 3 year old spam ;)
>
> --j.
>
>
I have also downloaded Spam from July 2006, which is being classified below
20% accuracy.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.
My client built a script that runs sa-learn for each user's (about 15
of them) spam and ham boxes. We're having some problems with the
script that make the client think that sa-learn pushes some of its
work into the background. I know the script itself does not do that.
I told him I didn't think
Chris Santerre writes:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 11:06 AM
> > To: Martin Hepworth
> > Cc: sarahphia; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Low accuracy ?
> >
> >
> >
> > > > I¿m testing it
Title: RE: Low accuracy ?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 11:06 AM
> To: Martin Hepworth
> Cc: sarahphia; users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Low accuracy ?
>
>
>
> > > I¿m testing it on the s
I have a working SA
install using Bayes. My webmail users can "report spam" that makes it into
their inboxes, and those .eml files get copied into a mailbox that gets regular
scans by sa-learn. No problem so far.
However most of my
users are POP3 users. I know that if they just forward
Hello,
I am running SA on windows platform. From where do I get ClamAVPlugin
for SA to run on Win32 environment?
Warm Regards,
Suhas
System Administrator
QualiSpace - A
QuantumPages Enterprise
===
Tel India:
+91 (22) 6792 - 1480
Tel US:
+1 (614) 827 - 1
> > I¿m testing it on the spam assassin¿s public corpus (
> > http://spamassassin.apache.org/publiccorpus/ ) so I would suspect accuracy
> > would be high.
> >
> > Am I missing something that¿s hurting my accuracy?
> >
>
> checks the extra rules in www.rulesemporium.com, make sure you're
> r
Title: RE: Rulesemporium rules
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Findlay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 1:38 AM
> To: Dan Horne
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Rulesemporium rules
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 04:43:58PM -0400, D
sarahphia wrote:
Hi All,
I’m having a problem with Spam Assassin - I can’t get it to correctly
identify more than 20% of the spam emails I'm testing.
I downloaded 3.1.7 from Spamassassin.org and ran:
perl Makefile.pl
make
make test
make install
I didn’t have perl installed before, and download
Title: RE: unsubscribe
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
> and intended for use only by the individual or entity named
> above. If you are not the intended recipient or the employee
> or agent responsible for delivering this message to the
> intended recipien
Title: RE: Any comments of the SpamHaus lawsuit?
> Hi,
>
> quite frankly: mis-listings occur but if a domain
> remains blacklisted after a court case, it
> must be for a reason :)
> As an email user, I dont want to have to find out that reason :(
> As a non-american, I can see this as
Hi All,
I’m having a problem with Spam Assassin - I can’t get it to correctly
identify more than 20% of the spam emails I'm testing.
I downloaded 3.1.7 from Spamassassin.org and ran:
perl Makefile.pl
make
make test
make install
I didn’t have perl installed before, and downloaded only the requir
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 05:48:10AM +, Monty Ree wrote:
> I have sent before about "compile error at AMD(x86_64) based system.
> But this problem doesn't solve...
> Anyone who succeed to install and execute SA this system?
Yes. The problem is not SA.
> t/bayesdbm..ok 33/48sh:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, John Andersen wrote:
Jeeze, 3.1.7 is out already?
Seems like the screaming about 3.1.6 hasn't even died down yet.
I'm pretty sure the reason 3.1.7 is out is the same reason
that people were screaming about 3.1.6. :-)
- Logan
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote:
Anybody running something like this?
Yep. Using MIMEDefang.
I have a special address for this. Mails sent (and accepted) to that address
are fed though SpamAssassin (with autolearning turned off) and a return mail
with the results are generated and sent.
This is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As a non-american, I can see this as a "vote with your feet" case
> stop buying US products
That seems a bit harsh a reaction to take towards the preliminary
decision in a case that hasn't been concluded yet, and can still be
appealed.
Besides, SpamHaus took on mo
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Fitzner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 5:32 AM
> To: SpamAssassin Users
> Subject: Concerned with scores for from rfc-ignorant.org
>
>
> I just upgraded from 3.0.2 to 3.1.7 today, as I noticed the
> amount of spam getting
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended for
use only by the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended
recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to
the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any d
On Wed, October 11, 2006 11:32, Kurt Fitzner wrote:
> Those are very high scores attributed to domains that blocked a
> postmaster@ or who's whois is private. I can understand some people
> being RFC purists, but this seems a little extreme.
why do you care about it ?
after all its not your dom
Cedric BUSCHINI wrote:
Yes it is !!
As Matt said we need to know what tools you use...
I run spamassassin with Postfix.
I 've set in header_checks file :
/^Subject: \[SPAM\]/
REDIRECT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
Hi at all, I want to deliver mail marked from spamassassin with SPAM
to admin address and not deliver to the user.
Is possible?
Yes it is !!
As Matt said we need to know what tools you use...
I run spamassassin with Postfix.
I 've set in header_checks file :
---
Enrico Pasqualotto wrote:
> Hi at all, I want to deliver mail marked from spamassassin with SPAM
> to admin address and not deliver to the user.
> Is possible?
Yes, but SpamAssassin itself can't do that. It has no direct control
over mail delivery. You'll need to configure some other part of your
m
> > Of course, the underlying sql engine has to support views
> (5.0, but I use 4.1)
> > and, most important, updates to a view. Maybe I'm wrong, but
> > this is something that mysql doesn't do. Besides, that's one
> > of the reasons for which I prefer much more postgresql.
> >
> But postgresql
Monty Ree wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have sent before about "compile error at AMD(x86_64) based system.
> But this problem doesn't solve... Anyone who succeed to install and
> execute SA this system?
>
> ## below is my system linux kernel 2.6.x (centos 3.x or 4.x)
> CPU : AMD opteron perl : v5.8.5 or
I just upgraded from 3.0.2 to 3.1.7 today, as I noticed the amount of
spam getting through was increasing lately. Very soon after my upgrade,
I received email from someone on yahoo and checked the spam score to see
what the new version was doing. Here it is:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 12:10, Enrico Pasqualotto wrote:
> Hi at all, I want to deliver mail marked from spamassassin with SPAM to
> admin address and not deliver to the user.
> Is possible?
> After I want to set this setup to specific email address not all user.
> I find in the docs and FAQ b
Hi at all, I want to deliver mail marked from spamassassin with SPAM to
admin address and not deliver to the user.
Is possible?
After I want to set this setup to specific email address not all user.
I find in the docs and FAQ but I don't discover anythig.
Is there a solution?
Thanks in advantage
Hi
I'm try to change the message in to Spam-Report message.
In to the mail detected like a spam I found the follow header.
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system
"srv-relay.arthis.it", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original
message
Ok. I dun want to dive into a useless political debate... But personnally I
don't trust either bush team as it appears to me to be a new kind of
dictatorship. But the question is not 'should the US be trusted' but 'should
something like the internet be under the control of 1 country. My answer
I think I see what you're trying to do. You want to set up a server
which you can use to see how spamass processes individual mail
messages. A sort of mirror that you can use to see what your message
looks like after it passes through spamass.
Unfortunatly, the only possible use I can think of
Email Lists wrote:
->
-> What is wrong with the following instructions taken from :
->
-> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MailingLists
->
-> "Subscription: send mail to users-subscribe -at- spamassassin.apache.org
-> Unsubscribe: send mail to users-unsubscribe -at- spamassassin.apache.org"
>And there's more of a push to move ICANN's functionality
>to an international organization and out of US hands.
OMG... as much as despise the scumbags that are suing SpamHaus, moving ICANN
to an international organization is about the worst idea possible. The
majority of nations are dictatorship
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 09:46, Gregory Zornetzer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm installing the new spamassassin 3.1.7 on an SGI (IRIX 64 version 6.5).
> I ran into a problem running 'make' on the distribution. Where make would
> not properly create the first file file (Dns.pm, I believe). Using GNU's
>
> And the UK gets to look good. And the US government gets to look stupid
> in front of the world court of opinion (like that's anything new, given
> our current administration).
And there's more of a push to move ICANN's functionality to an international
organization and out of US hands.
> Wher
73 matches
Mail list logo
