Re: Low accuracy ?

[sarahphia]

Justin Mason wrote:
> 
> 
> worth noting that the public corpus is 3 years old now -- our rules
> are not designed to catch 3 year old spam ;)
> 
> --j.
> 
> 

I have also downloaded Spam from July 2006, which is being classified below
20% accuracy.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Low-accuracy---tf2423878.html#a6760317
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.