On Sunday 30 July 2006 22:37, Logan Shaw wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > If you know how to run SA to relearn the message, why not just use SA to
> > strip the headers off the message? It certainly knows how to do that,
> > and I'm pretty sure it will output the clean file.
>
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006, Loren Wilton wrote:
If you know how to run SA to relearn the message, why not just use SA to
strip the headers off the message? It certainly knows how to do that, and
I'm pretty sure it will output the clean file.
Because if I am understanding this right (not certain of t
Quoting the content of a recent spam:
Elimination from database is here .
Yep. No link. Not even a fake link. I guess I can't out of their
"database" even if I want to.
At least they are honest about it. :-(
Loren
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, John D. Hardin wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006, Loren Wilton wrote:
From: Rory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Barbra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Something like
header FROMFROM=~ /[A-Z]\w+ \[mailto\: \w+\.\w+\@/
There is a way to be more specific, but it costs considerably
postmaster account has been receiving many spam and its not being
blocked by SA, I have feed SA to learns hundred of similar spam
manually, but still not able to catcth up.
*X-Spam-Status:* No, score=3.8 required=5.2
tests=BAYES_99,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,
HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=d
If you know how to run SA to relearn the message, why not just use SA to
strip the headers off the message? It certainly knows how to do that, and
I'm pretty sure it will output the clean file.
Loren
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Beast wrote:
I have implemented site wide SA and it works pretty well except for this
kind of spam.
postmaster account has been receiving many spam and its not being
blocked by SA, I have feed SA to learns hundred of similar spam
manually, but still not able to catcth up.
I have implemented site wide SA and it works pretty well except for this
kind of spam.
postmaster account has been receiving many spam and its not being
blocked by SA, I have feed SA to learns hundred of similar spam
manually, but still not able to catcth up.
spamassassin --lint -D
...
[26113]
yeah I have a method of correcting bayes whereby I will send myself
the message id of the message and it will then use that using IMAP to
fetch the message and then relearn it using SA's API's at the perl
level but I'm just looking for something that can actually strip the
headers of the me
On Jul 30, 2006, at 5:18 PM, jdow wrote:
(You DO review your spam mailbox before
tossing the spam, don't you?
Sort of... what I do (at home) is:
0) MIMEDefang rejects anything that scores >= 10. MIMEDefang also
rejects anything that doesn't have a PTR record, or has a PTR record
that does
From: "John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jul 30, 2006, at 4:37 PM, jdow wrote:
From: "John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jul 26, 2006, at 5:23 PM, jdow wrote:
I am a bit of a heretic in this group because I take the nasty step
of taking rules that are almost always right (one error per thous
On Jul 30, 2006, at 4:37 PM, jdow wrote:
From: "John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jul 26, 2006, at 5:23 PM, jdow wrote:
I am a bit of a heretic in this group because I take the nasty step
of taking rules that are almost always right (one error per thousand
or more hits) and make sure the sco
From: "John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jul 26, 2006, at 5:23 PM, jdow wrote:
I am a bit of a heretic in this group because I take the nasty step
of taking rules that are almost always right (one error per thousand
or more hits) and make sure the score on the rule is designed to
push the score
From: "Nix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled:
My impression is that the perceptron tries to cluster scores NEAR 5.0
with as much spam as possible over 5.0 and as little ham as possible
over 5.0.
Well, it doesn't *try* to cluster, but since it'll keep tweaking
On Jul 26, 2006, at 5:23 PM, jdow wrote:
I am a bit of a heretic in this group because I take the nasty step
of taking rules that are almost always right (one error per thousand
or more hits) and make sure the score on the rule is designed to
push the score AWAY from 5.0 in the appropriate dire
On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] yowled:
> My impression is that the perceptron tries to cluster scores NEAR 5.0
> with as much spam as possible over 5.0 and as little ham as possible
> over 5.0.
Well, it doesn't *try* to cluster, but since it'll keep tweaking until
as many FPs and FNs as po
Zack Odell wrote:
Greetings
I have had much success using SA with amavis-new in blocking spam and any
other nasty email.
So the way my network looks is like this:
Server with SA/amavis-new & postfix receives all mail runs through any and
all tests and is then relayed to an internal mail server
Paul Dulaba wrote:
Hi all,
Running SA 3.1.0. I have been using the Bayes DB for 8-9 months now.
All of
a sudden it seems like a lot of Spam is getting through, and training it
with the new Spam does not seem to have any effect. There is a quirk
in the
following output:
spamassassin -D --li
Robert Nicholson wrote:
The issue for me is that I need to strip out the SA headers from the
message after it's tagged as SPAM. But the problem is always that you
cannot get the physical filename from the actual contents of the
message itself.
Use a special folder for false positives (.Filter
On Sunday 30 July 2006 09:22, Robert Nicholson wrote:
> The issue for me is that I need to strip out the SA headers from the
> message after it's tagged as SPAM. But the problem is always that you
> cannot get the physical filename from the actual contents of the
> message itself.
Why not move all
The issue for me is that I need to strip out the SA headers from the
message after it's tagged as SPAM. But the problem is always that you
cannot get the physical filename from the actual contents of the
message itself.
On Jul 30, 2006, at 11:46 AM, Robert Nicholson wrote:
So what is the b
So what is the best strategy to retag a false positive when the
server uses imap Maildir folders.
22 matches
Mail list logo
