Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 04:36:24PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
Is there a way to set the required_score "on the fly" between each email
message test?
You haven't stated what you're trying to do, but you could update the
user preference between spamassassin/spamc runs, depe
Hardt, Jon wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Brian Moses [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 6/5/2006 9:55 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Cc:
Subject:Pyzor Issues
Everyone,
I'm pretty new to Spamassassin, so if I ask a dumb question please bear
with me a bit.
On Jun 5, 2006, at 7:22 AM, Steven W. Orr wrote:
On Monday, Jun 5th 2006 at 10:19 -0400, quoth Steven W. Orr:
=>I am upgraded to 3.1.2 and in my /etc/mail/spamassassin directory I
have
=>both v310.pre and v312.pre. Should I delete the v310.pre (no changes
were made
=>to it) or should it be
-Original Message-
From: Brian Moses [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 6/5/2006 9:55 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Cc:
Subject:Pyzor Issues
Everyone,
I'm pretty new to Spamassassin, so if I ask a dumb question please bear
with me a bit.
I'm trying to set
>...
>Paul,
>
>I've always thought of you as "chief scientist" among everyone on the spam
>assassin list... I've seen you dissect the inner mysterious workings of a
>spam like no other... uncovering the spammer's tracks like a superhero FBI
>agent meticulously piecing together data from the forensi
>...
>From: "List Mail User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> >...
>>>From: "List Mail User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
All of this would use up 6 bits and still leave 17 for any other
purposes you have in mind (assuming codes from 127.0.0.2 to 127.0.0.126).
>>>
>>>Uses up 6 of the 7 bits in that ra
Everyone,
I'm pretty new to Spamassassin, so if I ask a dumb question please bear
with me a bit.
I'm trying to set up Spamassassin to use pyzor, when I run
spamassassin --lint -D I get the following lines regarding pyzor:
debug: Pyzor is available: /usr/bin/pyzor
debug: entering hel
Paul,
I've always thought of you as "chief scientist" among everyone on the spam
assassin list... I've seen you dissect the inner mysterious workings of a
spam like no other... uncovering the spammer's tracks like a superhero FBI
agent meticulously piecing together data from the forensics lab.
Ho
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler wrote:
> David Goldsmith wrote:
>> A messages that just made it through to my mailbox had the following SA
>> headers:
>>
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13)
>> X-Spam-Level:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 requ
From: "List Mail User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>...
From: "List Mail User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
All of this would use up 6 bits and still leave 17 for any other
purposes you have in mind (assuming codes from 127.0.0.2 to 127.0.0.126).
Uses up 6 of the 7 bits in that range, Paul. Did you mean 127
>...
>From: "List Mail User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> All of this would use up 6 bits and still leave 17 for any other
>> purposes you have in mind (assuming codes from 127.0.0.2 to 127.0.0.126).
>
>Uses up 6 of the 7 bits in that range, Paul. Did you mean 127.0.0.2
>through 127.255.255.254?
>
>{o.
David Goldsmith wrote:
> A messages that just made it through to my mailbox had the following SA
> headers:
>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13)
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_40_50,
> HTML_MESSAGE,URIBL_SBL autolearn=
Craig Mead wrote:
Hello all,
Pretty much all I'm trying to do is setup on a per-user basis an auto
delete mechanism for mail if it receives > score XX.
If you throw MailScanner into the mix with SpamAssassin, you can do per
user prefs in combination with sendmail (not postfix) and splitting
From: "List Mail User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
All of this would use up 6 bits and still leave 17 for any other
purposes you have in mind (assuming codes from 127.0.0.2 to 127.0.0.126).
Uses up 6 of the 7 bits in that range, Paul. Did you mean 127.0.0.2
through 127.255.255.254?
{o.o}
>...
>Here's what I'm trying. I'm using MyDNS but added a few fields.
>Basically I'm createing a white list and a black list. The while list
>merely prevents an IP from getting on the black list. An IP gets on the
>whitelist for 12 hours and on the blacklist for 4 hours. The idea being
>to prev
Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting
From:"jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Sun, 4 Jun 2006 17:43:46 -0700
To:
From: "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: IncrediMail (5002253) is not a real e-mail client. You'll
find yourself blacklisted by many p
On 6/5/2006 7:41 PM, Arias Hung wrote:
I've been having the issue lately of at least a few mails a day somehow
bypassing spamassassin via procmail entirely and showing up in my inbox.
Sometimes its more like a flood which forces me to inevitably to forward
my entire inbox through procmail thro
I've been having the issue lately of at least a few mails a day somehow
bypassing spamassassin via procmail entirely and showing up in my inbox.
Sometimes its more like a flood which forces me to inevitably to forward my entire
inbox through procmail through formail again to filter its spam.
If you throw MailScanner into the mix with SpamAssassin, you can do per
user prefs in combination with sendmail (not postfix) and splitting
messages with multiple recipients into single messages using sendmail's
queue group functionality. Alternately, you could do it in a pop3 proxy.
Ken A.
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 06:23:04PM -0500, Steven Stern wrote:
> I've run sa-update and have files in /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001001,
> 002, and 003.
>
> Am I supposed to move these somewhere?
I attempted to answer questions such as these in
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates
> Shoul
I've run sa-update and have files in /var/lib/spamassassin/3.001001,
002, and 003.
Am I supposed to move these somewhere?
Should all but the latest directory be deleted?
Is it necessary to run sa-update after installing 3.1.3?
--
Steve
On Mon, 5 Jun 2006, Duane Hill wrote:
> Sorry for blowing this thread way off its topic. :-|
alt.spamassassin.recovery?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZICQ#15735746http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #11174pgpk -a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
key: 0xB8732E79 - 2D8C 34F4 6411
jdow wrote:
From: "Marc Perkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) wrote:
Marc,
First, you should make a design decision up front... Are you going
to allow IP addresses of valid hotmail and yahoo DNS servers (for
example) which spew out a very high percentage of spams (esp
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:07:43AM +1000, Craig Mead wrote:
> Pretty much all I'm trying to do is setup on a per-user basis an auto
> delete mechanism for mail if it receives > score XX. I've read all the
You can't do this from SpamAssassin. You'd have to set something up
(procmail?) to do this
Hello all,
I've had a good look around but am unable to find an answer to this
exact scenario. I've had a bash @ using global settings on the
user_pref's file, but didn't appear to work, so figured I'd ask. If you
are aware of a reference to this that I've missed, I apologise.
Pretty much al
From: "Marc Perkel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) wrote:
Marc,
First, you should make a design decision up front... Are you going to allow IP
addresses of valid hotmail and yahoo DNS servers (for example) which spew out a very
high percentage of spams (especially nigeria
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 04:36:24PM -0400, Joe Flowers wrote:
> Is there a way to set the required_score "on the fly" between each email
> message test?
You haven't stated what you're trying to do, but you could update the
user preference between spamassassin/spamc runs, depending on your
configur
Is there a way to set the required_score "on the fly" between each email
message test?
I tried changing the required_score in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
but it is unsurprisingly not rescanned/reloaded between each message
that is tested. It would really be cool (not to mention extremely
What would keep SA from looking up entries in the mysql db for some
addresses, then successfully do it to others?
There are certain addresses the system does not want to whitelist because it
isn't looking it up in the database.
But I know it is working because it will pull other addresses out. T
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A messages that just made it through to my mailbox had the following SA
headers:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13)
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.5 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_40_50,
HTML_MESSAGE,URIBL
On 05.06.2006, at 18:40, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Christoph Reichenberger wrote:
[...snip...]
Not that I can think of. The next step is to look at the debug output
and see what is breaking.
spamassassin -D dns --lint
This will show you all of the DNS debugging info. If there is a
problem,
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 06:46:09PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > Yeah, the page is taking a little bit to mirror out.
>
> Ok, I see. I guessed you send it out only once it's up everywhere. BTW, it
Something like that. I update the front page after the release mail is sent
out so I can include
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Mon, 5 Jun 2006 12:42:13 -0400:
> btw, "spamassassin --lint -D uridnsbl" will just output the uridnsbl
> stuff. :)
Thanks for the info, Theo!
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Rob McEwen (PowerView Systems) wrote:
Marc,
First, you should make a design decision up front... Are you going to allow IP
addresses of valid hotmail and yahoo DNS servers (for example) which spew out a
very high percentage of spams (especially nigeria scams) on your list, or not?
The onl
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Mon, 5 Jun 2006 12:33:52 -0400:
> Yeah, the page is taking a little bit to mirror out.
Ok, I see. I guessed you send it out only once it's up everywhere. BTW, it
seems a simple http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi results in the
same output than using the revisi
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 06:38:51PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You may want to run a simple debug:
>
> spamassassin -D --lint
>
> and look if URIDNSBL gets used and throws no errors.
btw, "spamassassin --lint -D uridnsbl" will just output the uridnsbl
stuff. :)
--
Randomly Generated Tagl
Christoph Reichenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it's me once again. After all your help my BAYES is now running fine.
> Although I said, I wanted to wait a couple of days, the BAYES is
> running so fine now that I could not stand to go further.
> I already received a couple of spams that got BAYES_99, bu
>
From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
X-Rcpt-To:
Christoph Reichenberger wrote on Mon, 5 Jun 2006 18:30:53 +0200:
> I already received a couple of spams that got BAYES_99, but got
> a total of less than 5. All these mails are so suspicious that I
>
On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 06:26:55PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi?update=200606050750
>
> still lists 3.1.2.
Yeah, the page is taking a little bit to mirror out.
> btw, there's also no mention of 3.0.x versions on that page
Hrm, suboptimal! /me fix
Hi,
it's me once again. After all your help my BAYES is now running fine.
Although I said, I wanted to wait a couple of days, the BAYES is
running so fine now that I could not stand to go further.
I already received a couple of spams that got BAYES_99, but got
a total of less than 5. All these ma
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Mon, 5 Jun 2006 12:13:09 -0400:
> Downloads are available from:
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi?update=200606050750
still lists 3.1.2.
btw, there's also no mention of 3.0.x versions on that page
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conac
Apache SpamAssassin 3.0.6 is now available! This is a maintainance
release of the 3.0.x branch.
Downloads are available from:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi?update=200606050750
The release file will also be available via CPAN in the near future.
md5sum of archive files:
423eb1
Apache SpamAssassin 3.1.3 is now available! This is a maintainance
release of the 3.1.x branch.
Downloads are available from:
http://spamassassin.apache.org/downloads.cgi?update=200606050750
The release file will also be available via CPAN in the near future.
md5sum of archive files:
5f049f
Yossim wrote on Mon, 5 Jun 2006 03:12:33 -0700 (PDT):
> Where i disable the dns testing? i did not find any setting in the local.cf
Only disable it after you verified that your first ns is working! If it is not,
then remove it from your resolv.conf - maybe it's just plain wrong!
For SA you use sk
Ben Wylie wrote:
If you had the time to write a patch for this I would be very grateful, and
let me know what I would need to do to apply the patch, and if I would need
to make changes every time I upgraded.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4943
Daryl
Ben Wylie wrote:
Received: (from localhost [24.180.47.240])
by server. (NAVGW 2.5.2.12) with SMTP id M2006060503484615455
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:48:47 +0100
OK, we specifically skip received headers that start with "(" at line
387 of Received.pm. Annoyingly, we don't pro
Alejandro Lengua wrote:
Horde webmail has a spam reporting feature, however it
is a bit useless.
Why?
Because it sends the email (without headers) to an email
address (the spam admin). This way is very difficult to
feed the spam mail into spam detection software.
I wonder if somebody has done a
Marc,
First, you should make a design decision up front... Are you going to allow IP
addresses of valid hotmail and yahoo DNS servers (for example) which spew out a
very high percentage of spams (especially nigeria scams) on your list, or not?
Personally, I think that it is better to NOT try to
> I wonder if somebody has done anything to make it work
> with the SA-Learn feature of Spam Assassin.
in squirrelmail there is http://www.squirrelmail.org/plugin_view.php?id=242
with is very usefull
Horde webmail has a spam reporting feature, however it
is a bit useless.
Why?
Because it sends the email (without headers) to an email
address (the spam admin). This way is very difficult to
feed the spam mail into spam detection software.
I wonder if somebody has done anything to make it work
w
Dear Anthony Peacok,
dear Sander Holthaus,
dear John DeYoung,
thank you very much for all your answers. I am pretty impressed about
your helpfulness. Thanks to your feedback, I think I am a big step
further now. I have completely rebuilt the Bayes database, and I now
see a file named bayes_
I'm experimenting with my own DNS Blacklist and it's working and in
testing right now. It's a list that is honeypot driven and only includes
traps that only spammers fall for. However, I'm trying to make sure it
never has a false positive. So - I'm looking for suggestions for best
practices.
Ben Wylie wrote:
> > > Received: (from localhost [24.180.47.240])
> > > by server. (NAVGW 2.5.2.12) with SMTP id M2006060503484615455
> > > for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:48:47 +0100
>
> > What broken-ass software is producing these received headers? "by
> > server." certainly isn
> Heute (05.06.2006/16:18 Uhr) schrieb Benny Pedersen,
>>> Thank you. I`m so stupid. ;) I`ve deleted (after update 3.1.1 =>
>>> 3.1.2) the v310.pre. I had only the v312.pre. Now works again.
>> try disable ALL plugins and run a
>> spamassassin --lint
>> if there is errors report this to debian mai
>> Received: (from localhost [24.180.47.240])
>> by server. (NAVGW 2.5.2.12) with SMTP id M2006060503484615455
>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 05 Jun 2006 03:48:47 +0100
>
> OK, we specifically skip received headers that start with "(" at line
> 387 of Received.pm. Annoyingly, we don't provide
Heute (05.06.2006/16:18 Uhr) schrieb Benny Pedersen,
>> Thank you. I`m so stupid. ;) I`ve deleted (after update 3.1.1 =>
>> 3.1.2) the v310.pre. I had only the v312.pre. Now works again.
> try disable ALL plugins and run a
> spamassassin --lint
> if there is errors report this to debian mainta
Hi Christoph,
Christoph Reichenberger wrote:
Hi Anthony,
I order not to swamp the list with my beginner questions too much
(thanks again BTW, that you take the time for your answers), I am
writing directly to you.
Please don't do that. I occasionally reply to list emails, I don't
provide one
> I am upgraded to 3.1.2 and in my /etc/mail/spamassassin directory I have
> both v310.pre and v312.pre. Should I delete the v310.pre (no changes were
> made to it) or should it be left
> there? Sorry if it's obvious.
you should keep both since the content is not the same in the files
On Monday, Jun 5th 2006 at 10:19 -0400, quoth Steven W. Orr:
=>I am upgraded to 3.1.2 and in my /etc/mail/spamassassin directory I have
=>both v310.pre and v312.pre. Should I delete the v310.pre (no changes were made
=>to it) or should it be left there? Sorry if it's obvious.
=>
Please ignore. I
I am upgraded to 3.1.2 and in my /etc/mail/spamassassin directory I have
both v310.pre and v312.pre. Should I delete the v310.pre (no changes were
made to it) or should it be left there? Sorry if it's obvious.
--
Time flies like the wind. Fruit flies like a banana. Stranger things have .0.
hap
> Thank you. I`m so stupid. ;) I`ve deleted (after update 3.1.1 =>
> 3.1.2) the v310.pre. I had only the v312.pre. Now works again.
try disable ALL plugins and run a
spamassassin --lint
if there is errors report this to debian maintainer
even when no plugins are loaded sa should not make lint
DAve wrote:
> Kenneth Porter wrote:
> > With SA 3.1.2 just released, 3.0.4 is archaic. It's like fighting
> > the Gulf War with WWII weapons. (And anyone using SA 2.xx is using
> > stuff from the 19th century.)
>
> I would, without a moments hesitation, trade a M-16 for a M1 Garrand
> or an M-14.
Heute (05.06.2006/15:51 Uhr) schrieb JamesDR,
> Jim Knuth wrote:
>> Hallo und Guten Tag spamassassin-users,
>>
>> I suddenly get the following error
>>
>> spamassin --lint
>>
>> [8123] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: auto_whitelist_factory
>> Mail::SpamAssassin::SQLBasedAddrList
Hi All,
Prior to the recent update for the stocks rule on RDJ I hardly got any
stock spam through. Since the update it seems they all get through
now. Can we have the old rule back?
Kind regards
Nigel
> spamassin --lint
>
> [8123] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: auto_whitelist_factory
Mail::SpamAssassin::SQLBasedAddrList
> But the system works fine. I have no changes made
so please do :-)
> SpamAssassin version 3.1.2
> running on Perl version 5.8.4
> Amavisd-new 2.4.1
> Debian s
Jim Knuth wrote:
Hallo und Guten Tag spamassassin-users,
I suddenly get the following error
spamassin --lint
[8123] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: auto_whitelist_factory
Mail::SpamAssassin::SQLBasedAddrList
[8123] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: user_awl_dsn
DBI:
Hallo und Guten Tag spamassassin-users,
I suddenly get the following error
spamassin --lint
[8123] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: auto_whitelist_factory
Mail::SpamAssassin::SQLBasedAddrList
[8123] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: user_awl_dsn
DBI:mysql:spamassassin:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Reichenberger wrote:
> Hi Sander,
>
> thanks a lot for your analysis. Since you sent your original message
> with CC to my
> address, I even got the detailed report. Thanks a lot! But, what can
> I learn from that.
> I see that you have Raz
Hi Sander,
thanks a lot for your analysis. Since you sent your original message
with CC to my
address, I even got the detailed report. Thanks a lot! But, what can
I learn from that.
I see that you have Razor enabled as well as a couple of RBL servers,
what I have not. But even without thos
Hi,
Christoph Reichenberger wrote:
Hi,
thank you so much for your prompt reply and for your offer to look into
this and help me.
I have saved the full message in a text file and put it at:
http://www.ergonis.com/downloads/public/TheSpamMessage.txt
Also, I even saw in the header that it Aut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Reichenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thank you so much for your prompt reply and for your offer to look
> into this and help me. I have saved the full message in a text file
> and put it at:
> http://www.ergonis.com/downloads/public/TheSpamMessage.
Hi,
thank you so much for your prompt reply and for your offer to look
into this and help me.
I have saved the full message in a text file and put it at:
http://www.ergonis.com/downloads/public/TheSpamMessage.txt
Also, I even saw in the header that it Autolearned it as HAM - so
this may b
Hi,
Sander Holthaus wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Reichenberger wrote:
Hi,
I am pretty new to SpamAssassin, so I apologize, if this has been
posted in the past. I have SA integrated in Communigate Pro with
CGPSA, and it has already started to filter out a lot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Reichenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am pretty new to SpamAssassin, so I apologize, if this has been
> posted in the past. I have SA integrated in Communigate Pro with
> CGPSA, and it has already started to filter out a lot of spam
> messages ri
Hi,
I am pretty new to SpamAssassin, so I apologize, if this has been
posted in the past.
I have SA integrated in Communigate Pro with CGPSA, and it has
already started
to filter out a lot of spam messages right out of the box. However, I
am still
a bit unsure about how to train it.
I get
Hi Kai,
Thank very much for your assitence. I will take a close look on SA issues in
the coming days.
Where i disable the dns testing? i did not find any setting in the local.cf
Regards,
Yossi
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Isssues-after-upgrading---updating-SA-t172087
76 matches
Mail list logo
