Re: Received header not parsed

2006-06-04 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
On 6/4/2006 11:28 PM, Ben Wylie wrote: Received: from [127.0.0.1] by arkbb.co.uk with SMTP (HELO server.) (ArGoSoft Mail Server Pro for WinNT/2000/XP, Version 1.8 (1.8.8.2)); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 03:48:52 +0100 Received: (from localhost [24.180.47.240]) by server. (NAVGW 2.5.2.12) with SMTP id M2

RE: Received header not parsed

2006-06-04 Thread Ben Wylie
>Current versions of SpamAssassin won't fire ALL_TRUSTED if it can't >parse all of the received headers. > > Since you provided no current debug info, or even said what version you > are using, I can only guess at what you're problem might be. Are you > sure it's not parsing the header and isn'

Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread Evan Platt
At 05:43 PM 6/4/2006, you wrote: Top Posting is putting the textAnd fubars who complain of your reply above the quoted text. excessively about top posting Bottom posting (as I am doing) is get replies that are side putting your reply below the original posted. quo

Re: Received header not parsed

2006-06-04 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
On 6/4/2006 9:54 PM, Ben Wylie wrote: I have had a problem with a particular form of received header not being parsed correctly because it is malformed. I had a brief conversation on this list about a year ago with a glimmer of hope that in future versions this would be overcome. However a year l

Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread Duane Hill
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, jdow wrote: From: "Duane Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, jdow wrote: Wayne, it would be heartily appreciated if you stopped sending the cutsie-pie trash to this mailing list. Use plain text. You have NO IDEA how much I despise those "incredimail" smilies and

Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread jdow
From: "Duane Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, jdow wrote: Wayne, it would be heartily appreciated if you stopped sending the cutsie-pie trash to this mailing list. Use plain text. You have NO IDEA how much I despise those "incredimail" smilies and the trash they usually accompany.

RE: Received header not parsed

2006-06-04 Thread Ben Wylie
I have had a problem with a particular form of received header not being parsed correctly because it is malformed. I had a brief conversation on this list about a year ago with a glimmer of hope that in future versions this would be overcome. However a year later these emails are still being marked

Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread Jim Knuth
Heute (05.06.2006/02:52 Uhr) schrieb Duane Hill, > On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, jdow wrote: >> Wayne, it would be heartily appreciated if you stopped sending the >> cutsie-pie trash to this mailing list. Use plain text. You have NO >> IDEA how much I despise those "incredimail" smilies and the trash >> th

Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread Jim Knuth
Heute (05.06.2006/02:42 Uhr) schrieb jdow, > And YOU are trying to be a system administrator, Wayne? > Give me a BREAK! > {+_+} You are right @jdow - LOL -- Viele Gruesse, Kind regards, Jim Knuth [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ #277289867 -- Zufalls-Zitat -- Man umgebe mich mit Luxu

Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread Duane Hill
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, jdow wrote: Wayne, it would be heartily appreciated if you stopped sending the cutsie-pie trash to this mailing list. Use plain text. You have NO IDEA how much I despise those "incredimail" smilies and the trash they usually accompany. {+_+} That's why I love Pine. Strictl

Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread jdow
From: "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At 11:43 AM 6/4/2006, you wrote: The HTML must be from my email client. It doesn't send out any other way. There is nothing I can do about that. Top posting... I can only presume that means replying to one of the emails that were sent before?? Do I ha

Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread jdow
And YOU are trying to be a system administrator, Wayne? Give me a BREAK! {+_+} - Original Message - From: "WFGB Team" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jim Knuth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Peter P. Benac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Sunday, June 04, 2006 11:43 Subject: Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Hiring fo

Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread jdow
Wayne, it would be heartily appreciated if you stopped sending the cutsie-pie trash to this mailing list. Use plain text. You have NO IDEA how much I despise those "incredimail" smilies and the trash they usually accompany. {+_+} - Original Message - From: "WFGB Team" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread Jamie L. Penman-Smithson
On 4 Jun 2006, at 18:35, WFGB Team wrote: Yes, we have someone looking into that this Wednesday to give us a quote on that. However the original issue was SPAM assassin detecting our own emails as SPAM. That issue has been resolved and therefore closing out the thread. All uppercase "SP

Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread Jo
WFGB Team schreef: Hi, Please reread some of the comments you got. Your mails are delivered to other mail servers. These servers may also employ SpamAssassin. If your mails were being stopped or flagged on their way out by your own setup, think about their fate on the other side... Thunderbir

Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread Jim Knuth
Heute (04.06.2006/20:43 Uhr) schrieb WFGB Team, > The HTML must be from my email client. It doesn't send out any other way. > There is nothing I can do about that. > Top posting... I can only presume that means replying to one of the emails > that were sent before?? > Do I have control over wh

Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread Evan Platt
At 11:43 AM 6/4/2006, you wrote: The HTML must be from my email client. It doesn't send out any other way. There is nothing I can do about that. Top posting... I can only presume that means replying to one of the emails that were sent before?? Do I have control over where they post to? How

Re: SPAM-LOW: Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread WFGB Team
The HTML must be from my email client.  It doesn't send out any other way.  There is nothing I can do about that. Top posting...  I can only presume that means replying to one of the emails that were sent before??   Do I have control over where they post to? How do I control that?   Wayne    

Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread Jim Knuth
Heute (04.06.2006/19:35 Uhr) schrieb WFGB Team, > Yes, we have someone looking into that this Wednesday to give us a quote on > that. However the original issue was SPAM assassin detecting our own emails > as SPAM. That issue has been resolved and therefore closing out the thread. > > Wayne

Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread WFGB Team
Yes, we have someone looking into that this Wednesday to give us a quote on that.  However the original issue was SPAM assassin detecting our own emails as SPAM.  That issue has been resolved and therefore closing out the thread.   Wayne   ---Original Message---   From: Peter P. Bena

updating spamassassin, inserting blank lines after the X-Spam-Status header

2006-06-04 Thread Michael Grant
I updated from 3.0.2 to 3.1.1 (I also tried 3.1.2) and I'm now seeing blank lines (3 of them!) inserted after the X-Spam-Status: header. Has anyone else seen this? I can reproduce the problem easily on the command line simply by piping a message to the spamassassin command. I have a feeling this

Re: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread spectacularstuff
Thank you everyone for your quotes, efforts and time involved. We actually have this issue resolved now. Created a batch to interface in with Smartermail to bypass the SA checking. Wayne -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Hiring-for-Spam-Assassin-Troubleshooting-t1726230.ht

updating spamassassin, inserting blank lines after the X-Spam-Status header

2006-06-04 Thread Michael Grant
I updated from 3.0.2 to 3.1.1 (I also tried 3.1.2) and I'm now seeing blank lines (3 of them!) inserted after the X-Spam-Status: header. Has anyone else seen this? I can reproduce the problem easily on the command line simply by piping a message to the spamassassin command. I have a feeling this

Re: Stock Spams; aka Pump and Dump

2006-06-04 Thread DAve
Kenneth Porter wrote: --On Thursday, June 01, 2006 1:41 PM -0400 DAve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Currently 3.0.4 on the toasters, 3.0.2 on the MailScanner boxes. These may or may not get updates this month. I've never been fond of "update" as a solution to a problem unless I know the change in

Re: SPAM: Re[2]: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread Kai Schaetzl
WFGB Team wrote on Sat, 3 Jun 2006 23:22:07 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time): PLEASE STOP SENDING PICTURES AND HTML TO THE LIST. > 0.8 EXTRA_MPART_TYPE Header has extraneous Content-type:...type= entry > 0.1 HTML_TAG_EXIST_TBODY BODY: HTML has "tbody" tag > 1.0 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_28 BODY:

Re: Isssues after upgrading / updating SA

2006-06-04 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Yossim wrote on Sun, 4 Jun 2006 02:40:59 -0700 (PDT): > [5830] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule HTML_MESSAGE - > i add that in local.cf remove it [5830] dbg: dns: NS lookups failed, removing nameserver 212.150.48.169 from list that's the cause for your timeouts. fix the

RE: Isssues after upgrading / updating SA

2006-06-04 Thread yossim
Hi Chris, Thanks for your quick response. I run --lint in debug mode. what should i look for? I am not sp experince in SA. few cut and paste: dbg: diag: module not installed: Mail::SPF::Query ('require' failed) [5830] dbg: diag: module installed: IP::Country::Fast, version 604.001 [5830] dbg:

Re: Isssues after upgrading / updating SA

2006-06-04 Thread yossim
Hello Ken, Thanks for your quick response. OK here are the details. vmstat shows as follows: procs memory swap io system cpu r b w swpd free buff cache si sobibo incs us sy id 0 0 0 146252 55264 15596 3908421

Re[3]: Hiring for Spam Assassin Troubleshooting

2006-06-04 Thread Sanford Whiteman
Wayne, Pro bono, here's the way to get SmarterMail to bypass SpamAssassin for authenticated users. BACKGROUND after playing around with SM for a few minutes -- Like many/most MTAs, SM writes two spool files for every e-mail. One is the message header/body, the other is the message