Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>Screaming Eagle wrote:
>
>
>>All,
>>Emailing with outlook and from internal network is marked as spam:
>>pts rule name description
>> --
>>--
>>-1.8 ALL_TRUSTEDPassed thro
I second that.
> -Original Message-
> From: Daryl C. W. O'Shea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 8:29 PM
> To: spam mailling list
> Subject: Re: Internal email marked as spam...
>
> Screaming Eagle wrote:
> > All,
> > Emailing with outlook and from internal network
Screaming Eagle wrote:
All,
Emailing with outlook and from internal network is marked as spam:
pts rule name description
--
--
-1.8 ALL_TRUSTEDPassed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
1.1 MIME_H
All,
Emailing with outlook and from internal network is marked as spam:
pts rule name description
-- --
-1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
1.1 MIME_HTML_MOSTLY BODY: M
Dan wrote:
> Follow up question (even more odd than weight limits):
>
> I want to flag all messages as spam, then configure various rules as
> exceptions, marking them as ham. But how do I universally mark
> messages one way in SpamAssassin and then unmark them in the other?
>
> I realize this is
I tried sa-learn, but don't you need a sizable spam collection for it to
work? The docs say that you need to collect about a thousand of ham and
spam messages before the training starts to work. That sounds like a
pain in the neck. Or am I missing something?
I ran sa-learn on this one message, tha
Follow up question (even more odd than weight limits):
I want to flag all messages as spam, then configure various rules as
exceptions, marking them as ham. But how do I universally mark
messages one way in SpamAssassin and then unmark them in the other?
I realize this is unorthodox, but I
> Side-note.. what version of SA did you diff against?
I downloaded Mail-SpamAssassin-current from the ftp. I thought that was
a link to the most current version. I might have been wrong.
> All that said, you might be OK with debian's SA 3.0.2-3. While it's
> important to be fairly current on SA,
Thanks for such a quick reply. So upgrading would really be helpful in
terms of performance if nothing else. Ok, I'll give it a thought. Maybe
I'll find a Debian package with the latest version. Should be possible.
I installed SpamAssassin today for the first time and "The Ultimate
Online Pharmace
Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Got a potentially previously answered question. I have spamassassin
> 3.0.2-3, which is the current release with Debian. I wouldn't like to
> deviate from the official package and so I'm wondering if it's
> absolutely necessary to upgrade. I diffed the
Heute (11.04.2006/02:40 Uhr) schrieb Matt Kettler,
> The whole idea behind SA 0.1 through 3.0.5 was that if you needed new
> rules, you upgraded your SA version. Rule updates were previously very
> slow, due to the expensive mass-check process. New releases of SA code
> came out much faster than n
Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> Got a potentially previously answered question. I have spamassassin
> 3.0.2-3, which is the current release with Debian. I wouldn't like to
> deviate from the official package and so I'm wondering if it's
> absolutely necessary to upgrade. I diffed the
Hello everybody,
Got a potentially previously answered question. I have spamassassin
3.0.2-3, which is the current release with Debian. I wouldn't like to
deviate from the official package and so I'm wondering if it's
absolutely necessary to upgrade. I diffed the rules, they seem to be the
same.
I suppose I shouldn't be shocked by this but it surprised me to receive
some spam sent with Mailman.
I have a folder for catching all mailing list mail that doesn't yet have
its own procmail rule. The catch-all procmail rule looks for anything with
a List-Id header and dumps it in ~/mail/Lists
> I was having this problem for a while... then I added a confirmation block
> to my guestbook - so that any post had to be confirmed.
>
> Boom - spam stopped (I've never even gotten confirmation notices that they
> tried again).
I did basically the same thing. I hacked PHPBB a little to throw an
No, I'm saying 15 digits. That's *total* combined between integer
and decimal
places.
However, because the floating point is stored in a scientific
notation, you can
add a bunch of extra zeros to push those 15 digits around.
So you can have:
(15 digits) + (307 zeros).0
or
0.(307 zeros) +
Dan wrote:
>> The total range for the mantissa of a double-precision float is
>> 52-bits, with 1
>> bit for sign. This means that the range between your most significant
>> and least
>> significant digit of the final summed answer cannot be greater than
>> 2^51, or
>> you'll loose precision.
>>
>>
The total range for the mantissa of a double-precision float is 52-
bits, with 1
bit for sign. This means that the range between your most
significant and least
significant digit of the final summed answer cannot be greater than
2^51, or
you'll loose precision.
The total range for the expone
Dan wrote:
> Good approach Herb, thanks
>
>
> To anyone:
>
> 1) What is the highest weight value (in number of digits) supported by
> SpamAssassin?
>
> 2) What is the smallest weigh value (in decimal places) supported by
> SpamAssassin?
In current practice, the range is 1000 to 0.0001. The cod
Good approach Herb, thanks
To anyone:
1) What is the highest weight value (in number of digits) supported
by SpamAssassin?
2) What is the smallest weigh value (in decimal places) supported by
SpamAssassin?
These might look like:
10
.01
Thanks,
Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 5:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RERE:We want approve yours loan l42kr9
Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ca.geocities.com/nq92ra63ut5//
You have been approved for a $402,000 house
Hello; Our company newsletter is not getting to some of our subscribers. My guess is it is ending up in junk mail folders. We have a section on relationship tips and I am concerned some of the content in this section could be triggering spam filters. I am working on a script that runs SpamAss
JD Smith wrote:
> That is what I was beginning to suspect. Is there a way to untrain the
> emails I ran through it?
Feed them to sa-learn --forget.
>It was a pretty large selection.. A few
> thousand of both spam and ham.
>
> I turned on auto-learning so it should start to pick things up on it's
That is what I was beginning to suspect. Is there a way to untrain the
emails I ran through it? It was a pretty large selection.. A few
thousand of both spam and ham.
I turned on auto-learning so it should start to pick things up on it's
own without needing me to train it, no?
Training on a per
Forwarding, I ws replying directly to Martin for some reason.
-Original Message-
From: JD Smith
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 9:51 AM
To: 'Martin Hepworth'
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin Woes
Aye, that's in my lint so I guess I do have that turned on. :)
I don't have a 88_FVGT_headers.cf anyw
Forwarding this as I was replying directly to martin for some reason.
-Original Message-
From: JD Smith
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 9:14 AM
To: 'Martin Hepworth'
Subject: RE: SpamAssassin Woes
My boss wanted me to flag mail coming in that doesn't have a valid RDNS
as spam.
How do I t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JD Smith wrote:
> Greetings List:
>
> My name is JD Smith and I have been put in charge of setting up a spam
> solution for my organization. I have chosen to go with MailScanner +
> Postfix + SA + MailWatch.
>
> I have everything pretty much setup an
Greetings List:
My name is JD Smith and I have been put in charge of setting up a spam
solution for my organization. I have chosen to go with MailScanner +
Postfix + SA + MailWatch.
I have everything pretty much setup and it is working, however my spam
filtering is far from the 90th percentile..
On Sunday 09 April 2006 15:20, mouss wrote:
> No. white and black aren't colors. they are absence of colour:)
Well... according to physics... it really depends on what
is delivering the pigments...
When you paint.. and you combine a bunch of colors.. the colors
get darker and darker.. to the po
Hello,
I'm getting this strange error with my SpamAssassin lately.
I googled for soulution, but none of patches that I found applied
clearly so I reversed every tryed patch.
spamassassin-3.1.0-4
Integrated with exim-4.54 (exiscan)
Error:
Apr 9 22:56:54 spamd[17021]: prefork: syswrite(7) failed
[3086] error: Can't locate IO/Socket/SSL.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
which part of that error do you not understand?
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 12:12:25PM -0700, Ask List wrote:
>linux and unix is unix. So I would like to hear users experiences using
>different operating systems. Pros/Cons/Problems/Headaches/etc. The
>operating systems I'm most interested in are Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo,
>Slackware, F
32 matches
Mail list logo
