In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>> The question is does FreeBSD make binary package updates, or are security
>> updates source-patch only.
>
>From what I've observed, the base OS updates are source-patch only, at least
>until the next full FreeBSD release. A
From: "Ed Kasky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 05:36 PM Thursday, 4/6/2006, Matt Kettler wrote -=>
Ed Kasky wrote:
> Anyway, spamc continues to use the 5.0 score after the change and restart:
> Apr 6 17:19:34 yoda2 spamd[10978]: spamd: clean message (-101.1/5.0)
>
> My /etc/sysconfig/spamd:
> OPTI
> | http://geocities.com/VickieBarrett4208
> |
>
> FWIW,
>
> I have given geocities links a VERY high score. Just under my threshold
> mark.
>
>
So did I weeks ago with "/geocities/i" :)
Ruben
At 05:36 PM Thursday, 4/6/2006, Matt Kettler wrote -=>
Hmm, what are the permissions on /etc/mail/spamassassin and
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf?
Any chance either or both are owner-only and not readable by the spamd user?
I think I finally found what was causing the problem. I had used
sa
At 05:36 PM Thursday, 4/6/2006, Matt Kettler wrote -=>
Ed Kasky wrote:
> At 04:59 PM Thursday, 4/6/2006, you wrote -=>
>> Ed Kasky wrote:
>> > At 03:39 PM Thursday, 4/6/2006, you wrote -=>
>> >> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Ed Kasky wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I have the following in /etc/mail/spamassasin/local.
Interesting answers.
I'm using Solaris 10/X86. Sun Java Enterprise Messaging Server.
Integration is built in. easy to set up. Dead stable, but,then I
work for Sun.
jay
Bowie Bailey wrote:
Ask List wrote:
We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system
t
On Apr 6, 2006, at 6:13 PM, Ask List wrote:
I want to continue to run FreeBSD in production. However we are
currently
running nagios on freebsd and weve ran into a problem, we believe
its the same
issue as described at this link:
http://nagios.sourceforge.net/docs/2_0/whatsnew.html . Since
On Apr 6, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Ask List wrote:
I see RedhatEL,Fedora,CentOS is a common theme. Anyone not running
a RedHat
based distribution
I use FreeBSD exclusively on servers. But the best advice given here
is use what you are familiar with administering.
From: "Ask List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run
spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing list
so we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will have a different
opinion on the subject and some will
From: "Ed Kasky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 17:26
Subject: Re: required_hits not working?
At 04:59 PM Thursday, 4/6/2006, you wrote -=>
Ed Kasky wrote:
> At 03:39 PM Thursday, 4/6/2006, you wrote -=>
>> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Ed
From: "Patrick Sherrill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What is the best way to send spam candidates from Outlook and Outlook
Express to spamassassin for learning?
TIA.
Pat...
As a little investigation can show I use OE here. (I'm disinclined to
even touch Outlook.)
On our mail local server I use fetch
Ed Kasky wrote:
> At 04:59 PM Thursday, 4/6/2006, you wrote -=>
>> Ed Kasky wrote:
>> > At 03:39 PM Thursday, 4/6/2006, you wrote -=>
>> >> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Ed Kasky wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > I have the following in /etc/mail/spamassasin/local.cf
>> >> > required_hits 6.9
>> >> >
>> >> > Yet I just n
At 04:59 PM Thursday, 4/6/2006, you wrote -=>
Ed Kasky wrote:
> At 03:39 PM Thursday, 4/6/2006, you wrote -=>
>> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Ed Kasky wrote:
>>
>> > I have the following in /etc/mail/spamassasin/local.cf
>> > required_hits 6.9
>> >
>> > Yet I just noticed the following that started at som
>...
>Anyone else seeing these? These are really one of the very few things
>that are still sneaking through:
>
>How are you, Cathy Caparula
>
> ME dical Ree-fill for Cathy Caparula is ready.
>
>Please re-confirm your information.
>
>http://geocities.com/VickieBarrett4208
>
> Your order info a
Ed Kasky wrote:
> At 03:39 PM Thursday, 4/6/2006, you wrote -=>
>> On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Ed Kasky wrote:
>>
>> > I have the following in /etc/mail/spamassasin/local.cf
>> > required_hits 6.9
>> >
>> > Yet I just noticed the following that started at some point Tuesday:
>> >
>> > Content analysis deta
Gary D. Margiotta wrote:
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
I have been using FreeBSD in a production environment for almost 10
years now (since version 2.2.5!) and have absolutely NO complaints about
it. I've regularly had servers with uptimes in excess of 6 months, and
even those were
At 03:39 PM Thursday, 4/6/2006, you wrote -=>
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Ed Kasky wrote:
> I have the following in /etc/mail/spamassasin/local.cf
> required_hits 6.9
>
> Yet I just noticed the following that started at some point Tuesday:
>
> Content analysis details: (18.3 points, 5.0 required)
>
>
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Gustafson, Tim wrote:
I have been using FreeBSD in a production environment for almost 10
years now (since version 2.2.5!) and have absolutely NO complaints about
it. I've regularly had servers with uptimes in excess of 6 months, and
even those were just rebooted for kernel
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Ed Kasky wrote:
> I have the following in /etc/mail/spamassasin/local.cf
> required_hits 6.9
>
> Yet I just noticed the following that started at some point Tuesday:
>
> Content analysis details: (18.3 points, 5.0 required)
>
> It's true for all users. I double checked fro m
I can't say I'm a huge fan of Debian, but it is still my number one choice.
The biggest plus is the apt package system and the ability to mix 'stable',
'testing' and 'unstable' packages. You can leave the heart of the system
with tried and true (and constantly debugged) older stable packages and
Gary W. Smith primeexalia.com> writes:
>
> Better question, what do you want to run? This might better help us
> address the pros/cons.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: news [mailto:news sea.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Ask List
> > Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:54 PM
> > To: users
"Ask List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 04/06/2006 02:12:25 PM:
> We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system
> to run spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to
> the mailing list so we can have other opinions. I realize everyone
> will have a different
On Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 23:37 Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> It's worth noting that I've seen signed mails get regularly mangled
> when going through mailing lists,
That happens when the list filters certain types of "content-type" and
such sections. It's up to the list admin to fix that.
> whic
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:20:24PM +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> Not exactly on SPAM detection rate, but on GPG/sig acceptance. If SA
> could validate such sigs, there's a big benefit for *every* recipient,
> 'cause if somebody forges e-mails with wrong sigs, it's marked as SPAM
> and sorted
On Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 21:12 Ask List wrote:
> The operating systems
> I'm most interested in are Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Slackware,
Those are all Linux, use what you like or know best.
> FreeBSDs, and OpenSolaris.
I've heard FreeBSD should be secure, OpenSolaris I don't know at all.
Gene
I have the following in /etc/mail/spamassasin/local.cf
required_hits 6.9
Yet I just noticed the following that started at some point Tuesday:
Content analysis details: (18.3 points, 5.0 required)
It's true for all users. I double checked fro multiple local.cf
files and the user_prefs files.
The question is does FreeBSD make binary package updates, or are security
updates source-patch only.
From what I've observed, the base OS updates are source-patch only, at least
until the next full FreeBSD release. Anything that's in the ports tree
should be available as either a source update
| http://geocities.com/VickieBarrett4208
|
FWIW,
I have given geocities links a VERY high score. Just under my threshold mark.
On Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 23:11 Bowie Bailey wrote:
> And if a spammer decides to spoof that header? The client has no way
> to distinguish between headers added before or after it came to your
> server.
If SA runs it of course has to remove "old" such headers preexisting,
and insert it's own
Eric W. Bates wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>> Ask List wrote:
>>
>> FreeBSD - Never used it. Seems quite server ready, although I'm not sure if
>> they
>> do binary package updates, or only source-patches (like OpenBSD does).
>
> FreeBSD house for many years.
>
> Yes, you can install precompiled
Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 19:34 Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > I think the real question is: "Is there a benefit to doing this?"
>
> I had an idea of a *really big* benefit:
>
> If SA checks the sig, and inserts into the header whether it's valid
> or not, even clients *with
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Ask List wrote:
>
> FreeBSD - Never used it. Seems quite server ready, although I'm not sure if
> they
> do binary package updates, or only source-patches (like OpenBSD does).
FreeBSD house for many years.
Yes, you can install precompiled binaries if you prefer. However,
I have been using FreeBSD in a production environment for almost 10
years now (since version 2.2.5!) and have absolutely NO complaints about
it. I've regularly had servers with uptimes in excess of 6 months, and
even those were just rebooted for kernel updates and the like.
The ports tree is exce
On Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 19:34 Bowie Bailey wrote:
> I think the real question is: "Is there a benefit to doing this?"
I had an idea of a *really big* benefit:
If SA checks the sig, and inserts into the header whether it's valid or
not, even clients *without* any GPG installation can have a
> I see RedhatEL,Fedora,CentOS is a common theme. Anyone not running a RedHat
> based distribution
Our entire servers farm is FreeBSD-based. No complaints there, rock solid.
The ports-based critical components like SA, ClamAV, Postfix, amavisd-new
are very responsive and gives confidence that such
Ask List wrote:
> Ask List gmail.com> writes:
>
>> We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run
> spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing list so
> we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will have a different opinion
> on
> th
Better question, what do you want to run? This might better help us
address the pros/cons.
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ask List
> Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2006 12:54 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Which Operating System
Am Donnerstag, den 06.04.2006, 19:54 + schrieb Ask List:
> Ask List gmail.com> writes:
> Pros/Cons/Problems/Headaches/etc. The operating systems I'm most interested in
> are Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, Slackware, FreeBSDs, and OpenSolaris.
> >
> I see RedhatEL,Fedora,CentOS is a common theme. An
Ask List wrote:
We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run
spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing list
so we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will have a different
opinion on the subject and some will have none at all, li
My "personal" server runs FreeBSD along with Sendmail, procmail, and
Courier-IMAP. My employer's servers run Redhat Enterprise Linux along with
Sendmail, procmail, and Courier-IMAP. I'm much more comfortable with
FreeBSD, which is why I continue to use it on my own system. At work, we got
roped
Ask List wrote:
Ask List gmail.com> writes:
We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run
spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing list so
we can have other opinions.
I see RedhatEL,Fedora,CentOS is a common theme. Anyone not runn
We use OpenBSD. Works for us. Have absolutely no complaints.
Shane
From: news on behalf of Ask List
Sent: Thu 4/6/2006 3:54 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Which Operating Systems Do You Use and Why?
Ask List gmail.com> writes:
>
> We ca
Ask List gmail.com> writes:
>
> We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run
spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing list so
we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will have a different opinion on
the subject and some will hav
CentOS all the way for Servers
Jason
--
Jason L. Esman
VentureNet
1.866.863.8375
205.978.9230 x234
echo 16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D4D465452snlb xq |dc
> -Original Message-
> From: Ask List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
On Thursday April 06 2006 3:31 pm, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Ask List wrote:
> > We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system
> > to run spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the
> > mailing list so we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will
> > hav
Ask List wrote:
> We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system
> to run spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the
> mailing list so we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will
> have a different opinion on the subject and some will have none at
>
I think this was covered in the archives
last year. My opinion is use the one that you are most comfortable with. I
personally use RedHat Enterprise, not because it better than the rest because
that’s what I know.
I think that most of the headaches happen
around the MTA/MTU’s rather t
We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system to run spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the mailing list so we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will have a different opinion on the subject and some will have none at all, linux is linux and u
I created a script to auto learn spam every hour, I want the script to
auto start spamd if its not running.
Auto start line is:
ps -auxwww | grep spamd | grep -v grep >> /dev/null || '/usr/bin/
spamd -d --syslog=/var/log/spamd.log &'
Error I get when running and spamd is off is:
/usr/bin/lear
I created a script to auto learn spam every hour, I want the script
to auto start spamd if its not running.
Auto start line is:
ps -auxwww | grep spamd | grep -v grep >> /dev/null || '/usr/bin/
spamd -d --syslog=/var/log/spamd.log &'
Error I get when running and spamd is off is:
/usr/bin/lear
Bowie Bailey writes:
> I think the real question is: "Is there a benefit to doing this?"
>
> You are creating a rule with a negative score. Negative scoring rules
> are for the purpose of preventing false positives. Are you having a
> problem with signed emails being marked as spam? If not, th
Tristan Miller wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > FWIW: While this type of thing may sound like a good idea, it also
> > opens you to a remote abuse of resources. If I'm a spammer and I
> > want to annoy people, I'd start sending all of my mails wit
Tristan Miller wrote:
> I could just steal/generate a real signature from another source...
A digital signature is a guarantee that the document has not been altered.
It's therefore impossible to "steal" a signature from another document and
add it to your own; the signature wouldn't verify.
On Thursday, 6. April 2006 18:29, Matt Kettler wrote:
> If the guy is in your blacklist, can you just blacklist him at the MTA
> layer?
Yes, that would probably best. I just wanted to have any blacklists etc. in
one place (i.e. spamassassin) and not two.
> Erm, pre-process the message and feed o
I tried to do a makedb -u on the .spamassassin/auto-whitelist file, but
it failed with:
makedb: cannot open database file `/root/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist':
Invalid argument
Is there a handy way to manipulate this db manually (no pun intended)?
Thanks,
-Philip
James,
Our environment is a little complicated.
We call it directly from postfix.
In master.cf we have:
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=filter:
filterunix - n n - - pipe flags=Rq
user=filter argv=/etc/mail/spam
Michael Frotscher wrote:
> On Monday, 3. April 2006 16:35, Matt Kettler wrote:
>> Are the messages involved over 250k? Unless you pass -s with a different
>> size, spamc will bypass scanning for any message over 250k.
>
> I was wondering about the same thing: I want to filter mails with large
> a
Andrea Bencini wrote:
> I installed spamassassin-3.0.4
Why did you install an already outdated version? We're on 3.1.1 now...
> I would like to test if the e-mails, MTA receives, are spam using
> 20_dnsbl_test.cf.
> Suppose my MTA receives an e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the domain
> "thisisblack
On 06 Apr 2006, at 09:38 , Theo Van Dinter wrote:
SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is
not valid for "whitelist_from_rcvd", skipping: whitelist_from_rcvd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes, you're missing the domain part of the configuration option.
See the
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
Greetings.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> FWIW: While this type of thing may sound like a good idea, it also opens
> you to a remote abuse of resources. If I'm a spammer and I want to
> annoy people, I'd start sending all of my mails with fake signatures.
> Then the reci
I installed spamassassin-3.0.4
I would like to test if the e-mails, MTA receives, are spam using
20_dnsbl_test.cf.
Suppose my MTA receives an e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the domain
"thisisblacklist.com" is in the database of dnsbl.njabl.org.
How do I to see if my spamassassin checks in dnsbl.njabl
On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Patrick Sherrill wrote:
What is the best way to send spam candidates from Outlook and Outlook Express
to spamassassin for learning?
Here, I have a generic spam address on my border servers running SA.
For the users, I have them set up a rule to send tagged spam to that
ac
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 09:23:58AM -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I got this in my log today when a new voice mail message came in:
>
> SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is
> not valid for "whitelist_from_rcvd", skipping: whitelist_from_r
I added a whitelist entry for my vonage voicemail:
whitelist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got this in my log today when a new voice mail message came in:
SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" is
not valid for "whitelist_from_rcvd", skipping: whitelist_from_rcvd
[EMAIL PRO
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Philip Prindeville wrote:
>>>
> header L_INCOMPETENT1ALL =~ /\\r\\n/
>
> header L_INCOMPETENT2ALL =~ /\\r\\n\s?$/
>
> header L_INCOMPETENT3ALL =~ /\\
Theo Van Dinter writes:
> FWIW: While this type of thing may sound like a good idea, it also opens
> you to a remote abuse of resources. If I'm a spammer and I want to
> annoy people, I'd start sending all of my mails with fake signatures.
> Then the recipients, who use this plugin, will get to s
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:21:27AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> FWIW: While this type of thing may sound like a good idea, it also opens
[...]
Also, is this type of rule worthwhile? Yes, validly signed messages
are unlikely to be spam (currently), but are signed messages regularly
marked up as
On Monday, 3. April 2006 16:35, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Are the messages involved over 250k? Unless you pass -s with a different
> size, spamc will bypass scanning for any message over 250k.
I was wondering about the same thing: I want to filter mails with large
attachments from a guy who is in my
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 08:57:34AM +0200, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> I'd love to see this. For the moment, a simple check for an existing
> signature could be enough to set negative points. If spammers adopt and
> insert random pgp sigs, the real sig check could be activated. That
> would need a
I use OE to import Outlook msgs and then drag them to a SMB share on the
mail server and learn them from the eml files. It's hard to the full
headers but some it better than none. If you have an Exchange server
fire up evolution and connect with IMAP and copy them to a local mbox
and learn from the
Matt Kettler wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Philip Prindeville wrote:
> > > > header L_INCOMPETENT1ALL =~ /\\r\\n/
> > > >
> > > > header L_INCOMPETENT2ALL =~ /\\r\\n\s?$/
> > > >
> > > > header L_INCOMPETENT3ALL =~ /\\r\\n\s?\n/
> > > Ok, I tried #3 and
What is the best way to send spam candidates from Outlook and Outlook
Express to spamassassin for learning?
TIA.
Pat...
Quoting "Gary W. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
James,
Timeout is 600 seconds. If spamd doesn't have respond in that amount of
time them there is something else is wrong. I suppose that if all of
the spamd threads are clogged then you might find a waiting list but 600
seconds is a lifetime.
Th
On Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 10:41 Alex Broens wrote:
> Also the RASSISMUS_MAILS_* rules seems like extra boat which at
> wouldn't hit the msgs they were targeted for and could possibly cause
> FPS with scores that high.
Yes, I just inserted them some days ago, and forgot to adopt scores,
which I
On Donnerstag, 6. April 2006 10:17 Alex Broens wrote:
> FYI: file fell thru lint...
> [27121] warn: config: warning: score set for non-existent rule
> ZMIde_SUBFREEHANB
Hi, that was a last-second-change small typo, is corrected in actual
version already.
> and although announced as SARE rule,
>
On 06.04.2006 10:26, Jim Knuth wrote:
Heute (06.04.2006/10:17 Uhr) schrieb Alex Broens,
On 06.04.2006 09:52, Michael Monnerie wrote:
I'd like to inform you that my GERMAN ruleset has been updates. It's
available via RulesDuJour as ruleset ZMI_GERMAN, or directly from
http://zmi.at/x/70_zmi_
Heute (06.04.2006/10:17 Uhr) schrieb Alex Broens,
> On 06.04.2006 09:52, Michael Monnerie wrote:
>> I'd like to inform you that my GERMAN ruleset has been updates. It's
>> available via RulesDuJour as ruleset ZMI_GERMAN, or directly from
>>
>> http://zmi.at/x/70_zmi_german.cf
>>
>> I always up
On 06.04.2006 09:52, Michael Monnerie wrote:
I'd like to inform you that my GERMAN ruleset has been updates. It's
available via RulesDuJour as ruleset ZMI_GERMAN, or directly from
http://zmi.at/x/70_zmi_german.cf
I always update after new rules are applied, so the use of RulesDuJour
is great
I'd like to inform you that my GERMAN ruleset has been updates. It's
available via RulesDuJour as ruleset ZMI_GERMAN, or directly from
http://zmi.at/x/70_zmi_german.cf
I always update after new rules are applied, so the use of RulesDuJour
is greatly suggested.
Please, if you use my ruleset an
79 matches
Mail list logo
