Thanks for your help :)
Another question: Is there any way to dump the rawtokens that sa learned
from my corpus? I saw that there are only encoded strings.
regards,
Xueron
Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Xueron Nee wrote:
>
> > Hi, all:
> >
> > I am using sa-learn to train my
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
However,a different post was sent, accepted, posted to the list, was writtent to
the mbox. this was logged
Fine, that proves spam got through. Look for one that matches on
the "^X-Spam-Status: Yes" test. If no mails matched then the spam
is being filtered out before
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 10:54
Subject: ham writes to file, spam disappears
I am running SA3.0.4 FC3
currently all ham is written correctly to the mbox i have set up. spam, which i
am sure we are receiving, is disappearing. while this is fairly desirable,
> After upgrading to 3.1 from 3.0 we are starting to see the following
> error messages in our logs "prefork: server reached --max-clients
> setting, consider raising it"
Short version: try --round-robin on spamd.
We scan about 100k messages a day balanced (with -H) between two spamd
hosts. Tra
On 06/03/06 09:57 AM, Bret Miller wrote:
I am working to get SA 3.10 working on a Win 2000 server. I
had Sa 3.04 working well previous to this upgrade.
The problem I now have seems to be the CRLF problem that I
have found posting about.
There appears to be patch(es) for this problem, but af
Stewart, John wrote:
We've been running SpamAssassin with amavisd-new for years... still on an
old version, and been meaning to update for far too long.
Spam changes with time. An outdated version of SpamAssassin is no more
than a waste of CPU cycles.
If you take the time to upgrade, you wil
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 03:39:06PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> However,a different post was sent, accepted, posted to the list, was writtent
> to
> the mbox. this was logged
I'm afraid I'm not following the issue. Looking at your log, two mails come
in which seem to be ham, and they're de
Quoting Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:14:21PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > what does your log say?
> > the only items in my log is the messages about the ham that is being
> written to
> > the proper file.
> >
> > Sample:
> >
> > >From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The perl script is available at:
http://anfi.homeunix.net/perl/spamcop-ack.pl
*It is first public Beta*
It logs into spamcop.net account (via web) and makes spamcop send LARTs
about all spam previously submitted via SMTP ("spamassassin -r").
If you want to test/use it:
* write your spamcop.net lo
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Damian Saez Baldo wrote:
> Hello list:
> I'm using SpamAssasin 3.1.0 in a Windows server. I'm using
> spamassasin as follows
>
> c:\perl\bin\perl.exe -S -T c:\Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0\spamassassin -P -c
> c:\Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0\rules\ < C:\TEMP\Mail_TESTME.TXT >
> c:
Quoting Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:54:54PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > currently all ham is written correctly to the mbox i have set up. spam,
> which i
> > am sure we are receiving, is disappearing. while this is fairly desirable,
> I
> > would lik
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:54:54PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> currently all ham is written correctly to the mbox i have set up. spam,
> which i
> am sure we are receiving, is disappearing. while this is fairly desirable, I
> would like it for sa-learn purposes. This is my current procmai
I am running SA3.0.4 FC3
currently all ham is written correctly to the mbox i have set up. spam, which i
am sure we are receiving, is disappearing. while this is fairly desirable, I
would like it for sa-learn purposes. This is my current procmailrc file. Any
assistance would be appreciated.
Hello list:
I'm using SpamAssasin 3.1.0 in a
Windows server. I'm using spamassasin as follows
c:\perl\bin\perl.exe -S -T c:\Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0\spamassassin -P -c
c:\Mail-SpamAssassin-3.1.0\rules\ < C:\TEMP\Mail_TESTME.TXT >
c:\temp\Mail_assassinated.txt
The problem i'm having is
- Original Message -
From: "spamassassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 10:23
Subject: server reached --max-clients setting, consider raising it
Hello
I'm new to spamassassin and need some help.
First spamassassin is version 3.0.1 on mac OSX 10.3.9 running o
Hello
I'm new to spamassassin and need some help.
First spamassassin is version 3.0.1 on mac OSX 10.3.9 running on a
communigate server. I have an interface that we use call MPP which is
basically a webmin module to control spamassassin, clamav, mailshell,
and such. I have been getting som
John,
I saw several at Linux world but I think that the biggest problem is
that each one will require care and feeding when the day is done. The
only difference is they provide and instant on facility whereas you will
need to configure you're from scratch (which equates to an extra 30
minutes or
We've been running SpamAssassin with amavisd-new for years... still on an
old version, and been meaning to update for far too long.
The fact is, I just don't have the time to give SA proper care and feeding.
I know there are some commercial anti-spam packages based on SA. I'd like to
know if an
> grep the source of VHCS for spamassassin or required_score?
Unfortunately, VHCS does not come with SpamAssassin, it was installed after
as part of the following command...
apt-get install clamav clamav-daemon amavisd-new spamassassin
Which must have modified postfix at install time to invoke i
James Smith wrote:
Or to attack the problem from the other end, are there any files
on your system that contain required_score 4
>>>
>>> What would be the best way to find that out?
>
>> I have always just used a locate local.cf andlocate
>> user_prefs this will tell you al
> > > Or to attack the problem from the other end, are there
> any files on
> > > your system that contain
> > > required_score 4
> >
> > What would be the best way to find that out?
> I have always just used a locate local.cf andlocate
> user_prefs
> this will tell you all of the f
Quoting James Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Or to attack the problem from the other end, are there any
> > files on your system that contain
> > required_score 4
>
> What would be the best way to find that out?
>
I have always just used a locate local.cf andlocate user_prefs
this wi
> Or to attack the problem from the other end, are there any
> files on your system that contain
> required_score 4
What would be the best way to find that out?
--
Jay
> > On running 'spamassassin -D --lint' it claims to use those config
> > files, and does indeed (as shown by the TEST_E at the end of the
> > output) but it must be using diferent configs when invoked from the
> > mail server. My mail headers list tests not in this list, and only
> > requires
> I am working to get SA 3.10 working on a Win 2000 server. I
> had Sa 3.04 working well previous to this upgrade.
>
> The problem I now have seems to be the CRLF problem that I
> have found posting about.
>
> There appears to be patch(es) for this problem, but after
> searching, I am unable to fi
One of my users just received a totally empty message from a friend
(sent as a test message, but unwisely with no subject or body).
This hit EMPTY_MESSAGE and MISSING_SUBJECT for a total of 4.1 points.
Fair enough - I've seen plenty of empty spam (presumably due to buggy
spamware or as trial r
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Xueron Nee wrote:
> Hi, all:
>
> I am using sa-learn to train my bayes filter. And I collect many
> known spams from our honey pot.
>
> I found that there are so many mails with the same content in
> this spam corpus. Is it necessary to delete the repeated spams bef
27 matches
Mail list logo
