Are there any optimizing options for SA (I mean the performance)? if we want to
run SA on our antispam system.
There are more than ten millions of messages coming into our system everyday.
>On Monday, January 23, 2006, 8:13:26 AM, Dan Bongert wrote:
>> I recently did an email server c
On 1/23/2006 12:10 PM, Kristopher Austin wrote:
After seeing all the SPF discussion lately I decided to actually ask you
guys about this problem.
I have many whitelist_from_spf entries where I usually keep my whitelist
entries. For some reason, I have never seen a hit on
USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST.
Markus a écrit :
> Hi all,
> Spam Assassin is working perfectly for my friend Jason. Our settings, email
> accounts, everything is identical. We have the same domain name at the end of
> our addresses, but I get the spam. He has implimented rules in the local.cf
> file to mark certain words as s
From: "Markus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi all,
Spam Assassin is working perfectly for my friend Jason. Our settings, email
accounts, everything is identical. We have the same domain name at the end of
our addresses, but I get the spam. He has implimented rules in the local.cf
file to mark certain
Hi all,
Spam Assassin is working perfectly for my friend Jason. Our settings, email
accounts, everything is identical. We have the same domain name at the end of
our addresses, but I get the spam. He has implimented rules in the local.cf
file to mark certain words as spam. I can send him my spam
I followed up with a way to do that in a subsequent email. Braces work.
On the other hand for processing efficiency I'd be inclined to only lock
each spam filter rather than the whole set of three. I'd also make sure
the markup from one filter is not included in the input to subsequent
filters if
Thank you for the fast reply,
But I need somethig a little bit more complicated:
I want to ensure the a whole .procmailrc execution will be completed before a
next begins.
I am trying to do a small experiment : In my .procmailrc I call to 3 different
spamfilter, and then I write the results to a
:0: general.lock
* < 50
{
# All email <= 500k goes through these rules.
# The rest of your procmail rules go here.
:0c: clone.lock
$home/mail/clone
# etc
}
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "galili assaf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thank you for the fast reply,
But I need
From: "galili assaf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hello all,
I am using spamassasin in .procmailrc (unix account).
my question is about .procmailrc:
is .procmailrc synchronized? I mean, if two new mails are coming to my accout, will the
first .procmailrc script execution finish before the second executi
Thank you for the fast reply,
But I need somethig a little bit more complicated:
I want to ensure the a whole .procmailrc execution will be completed before a
next begins.
I am trying to do a small experiment : In my .procmailrc I call to 3 different
spamfilter, and then I write the results to a
I am using spamassasin in .procmailrc (unix account).
my question is about .procmailrc:
is .procmailrc synchronized? I mean, if two new mails are coming to my
accout, will the first .procmailrc script execution finish before the
second execution will start?
I am trying to do something so the or
Hello all,
I am using spamassasin in .procmailrc (unix account).
my question is about .procmailrc:
is .procmailrc synchronized? I mean, if two new mails are coming to my accout,
will the first .procmailrc script execution finish before the second execution
will start?
I am trying to do something
You could write it as a header rule, like...
header ANNOYING_SPAMMER Received =~ /193\.95\.75\.135/
describe ANNOYING_SPAMMER Mark mail from 193.95.75.135 as spam
score ANNOYING_SPAMMER 5
If you have control over your MTA, you might investigate using its mechanism
to block mail from that IP. Fo
After seeing all the SPF discussion lately I decided to actually ask you
guys about this problem.
I have many whitelist_from_spf entries where I usually keep my whitelist
entries. For some reason, I have never seen a hit on
USER_IN_SPF_WHITELIST. I have received plenty of emails that I believe
s
On Monday, January 23, 2006, 8:13:26 AM, Dan Bongert wrote:
> I recently did an email server change/upgrade from Sendmail on FreeBSD (w/
> Spamassassin 2.6.4) to Postfix on RHEL 3 (w/Spamassassin 3.1). On both
> systems, Spamassassin is called from user's .procmailrc files--not every
> user wants t
Dan Bongert wrote:
> I recently did an email server change/upgrade from Sendmail on
> FreeBSD (w/ Spamassassin 2.6.4) to Postfix on RHEL 3 (w/Spamassassin
> 3.1). On both systems, Spamassassin is called from user's .procmailrc
> files--not every user wants to be running SA (I'm not quite sure why).
Hmm...
Yep, that's loaded. I'll dig in to see what it's hitting and not hitting
Thanks,
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: Regex help...confused about spaces.
| qq
I recently did an email server change/upgrade from Sendmail on FreeBSD (w/
Spamassassin 2.6.4) to Postfix on RHEL 3 (w/Spamassassin 3.1). On both
systems, Spamassassin is called from user's .procmailrc files--not every
user wants to be running SA (I'm not quite sure why).
I wasn't able to convert
Glen Carreras wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have searched through the archives and, although I did find a rather
> lengthy thread about DK, I didn't find my specific answer. Hopefully
> someone here can help me out. I've enabled the DK plugin (and applied
> the patch) and for the most part, I believe DK
Matt Kettler wrote:
Frank Bures wrote:
Hi,
I am running spamd with "-m 20" setting, yet I've seen multiple
entries like
these in the logs:
spamd[3098]: prefork: server reached --max-clients setting, consider
raising
it
What would be a good number for "-m" on a Quad Opteron server
processing
Suppose you address it as "foo.bar.baz". Then you can simply do a
"host foo.bar.baz" and get the address for that machine. That
becomes the only entry to "trusted_networks". Your "internal_network"
is a different proposition. In your case I might set it to 127.0.0.1
if you have exactly one machine
Hello,
I have searched through the archives and, although I did find a rather
lengthy thread about DK, I didn't find my specific answer. Hopefully
someone here can help me out. I've enabled the DK plugin (and applied
the patch) and for the most part, I believe DK is working but, the
followi
Hello everyone,
I want to block (or mark it as SPAM) all emails
that comes from a specific originate IP adress (because he send every time with
different email adress).
How can i make that with spamassassin
?
Thank you for your respond !
This is a header of an mail and i want to
block al
On Sunday, January 22, 2006, 4:38:11 PM, mouss mouss wrote:
> Larry Rosenman a écrit :
>> Jeff Peng wrote:
>>
>>>hi,Irina,
>>>rbldnsd is really a simple dns server.you can use it directly,no any
>>>need to bind.and,you can use rsync to download the rbl files.
>>>
>>
>> I have both rbldnsd and bi
24 matches
Mail list logo
