On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Mike Sassaman wrote:
> % spamassassin --lint shows no output, so I'm thinking that means no
> problems in my local.cf.
Good, 'spamassassin --lint' should show no outout, it ony barks when
there's something wrong. Now 'spamassassin --lint -D' gives -tons-
of output, but any er
Hello srunschke,
Monday, January 16, 2006, 2:33:42 AM, you wrote:
sad> I'm currently trying to build up a new bayes DB here, ...
sad> ... yet it poses a problem to build up the ham part.
sad> ... Much of the inbound smtp mail either contains private or
sad> confidential information, so I cannot u
> ALTER TABLE bayes_vars MODIFY id SMALLINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL;
Whoops - doing that will prevent any new users from being created in
your Bayes database. Add auto_increment:
ALTER TABLE bayes_vars MODIFY id SMALLINT UNSIGNED NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT;
--
___
sounds like a business plan for turning underpants into profit.
btw: if anybody is interested ive had an experimental c# implimentation of
SpamD running about about a week now on Win32 with great performance on a
10mb global bayes database. If any interest is shown i might release some
code.
On Monday 16 January 2006 04:27 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Im curious if there are any intitiatives to collect pump and dump stock
> > symbols and names to check against incomming spam. I've looked around
> > but have yet to find anything. I think some sort of database would be
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"M.S. Lucas" writes:
> From: "Jason Frisvold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On 1/15/06, Andrew Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If you have fewer than 65,000 accounts you could halve the size of the
> > > id columns.
> > >
> > > That took 25% off my
Hi!
Im curious if there are any intitiatives to collect pump and dump stock
symbols and names to check against incomming spam. I've looked around but
have yet to find anything. I think some sort of database would be nice to
have to do lookups on and just have it check agains the body of the me
Hello everyone,Im curious if there are any intitiatives to collect pump and dump stock symbols and names to check against incomming spam. I've looked around but have yet to find anything. I think some sort of database would be nice to have to do lookups on and just have it check agains the body o
On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 04:09:37PM +0100, M.S. Lucas wrote:
> Could this be made a default with the small size of the id columns and a
> note in the installation file for the big users?
> There are more users of SA with less then 65k users then with more.
Does it mean '65k is the largest User-Num
It's more like "I know all machines in 10.2.3.xxx belong to my network
which is safe and which I trust, so I'll add 10.2.3.xxx/24 to
trusted_networks"
I don't think it's safe to add a external network like gmx to your
trusted_networks list.
But what is my internal network. I have one serv
> -Original Message-
> From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 3:24 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: spam scores low (Sendmail + smtp-vilter + SA )
>
>
> From: "Mike Sassaman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Mike Sassaman w
Markus Braun wrote:
> > The trusted_networks setting specifies which mail servers you trust
> > not to forge header information. Normally, this will just be the
> > servers that you directly control. You can either list your
> > mailservers individually, or you can list your entire network so
> >
From: "François Conil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Markus Braun wrote:
The trusted_networks setting specifies which mail servers you trust not
to forge header information. Normally, this will just be the servers
that you directly control. You can either list your mailservers
individually, or you can
Markus Braun wrote:
> > > About the rulesets in rulesemporium.com what can you suggest for
> > > me?
> >
> > I would suggest at least the "0" files for you, and probably the
> > "1" files. I suspect you get German-language email, and the SARE
> > rules are really only checked thoroughly aginst En
From: "Mike Sassaman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Mike Sassaman wrote:
> Thanks everyone for your suggestions. This is what I've done:
>
> required_score 4
> rewrite_header Subject *SPAM*
> add_header all Report _REPORT_
> use_razor2 1
> razor_config /etc/mail/spamassassin/
Markus Braun wrote:
The trusted_networks setting specifies which mail servers you trust not
to forge header information. Normally, this will just be the servers
that you directly control. You can either list your mailservers
individually, or you can list your entire network so that you
automa
Don Levey wrote:
Don Levey wrote:
Don Levey wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
Failed means it didnt work for some reason. No means it simply
didnt even try to autolearn (score wasnt high enough, spam/ham
threshold not reached, etc.) In short, failed points to a
potential problem, whereas no doesnt.
-J
The trusted_networks setting specifies which mail servers you trust not
to forge header information. Normally, this will just be the servers
that you directly control. You can either list your mailservers
individually, or you can list your entire network so that you
automatically trust any mai
Are you running German-language rules on 3.0.x? If so this is
(unfortunately) expected.
If you are only running English-language rules files, then this would
probably indicate that you had rules from 2.6x on a 3.x SA install.
I have spamassassin installed on a debian sarge version with
apt-g
Don Levey wrote:
> Don Levey wrote:
>> Jim Maul wrote:
>>>
>>> Failed means it didnt work for some reason. No means it simply
>>> didnt even try to autolearn (score wasnt high enough, spam/ham
>>> threshold not reached, etc.) In short, failed points to a
>>> potential problem, whereas no doesnt.
> On Fri, 13 Jan 2006, Mike Sassaman wrote:
>
> > Thanks everyone for your suggestions. This is what I've done:
> >
> > required_score 4
> > rewrite_header Subject *SPAM*
> > add_header all Report _REPORT_
> > use_razor2 1
> > razor_config /etc/mail/spamassassin/.razor/razor-agent.conf
>
Don Levey wrote:
> Jim Maul wrote:
>>
>> Failed means it didnt work for some reason. No means it simply didnt
>> even try to autolearn (score wasnt high enough, spam/ham threshold
>> not reached, etc.) In short, failed points to a potential problem,
>> whereas no doesnt.
>>
>> -Jim
>
> That I und
Don Levey wrote:
Jim Maul wrote:
Do you have a copy of a message that causes the autolearn=failed? I'd
run it through SA with debug enabled to see why its
failing..permissions of the bayes files are a likely cause. It looks
to be failing only when it actually tries to do the autolearn so i'd
c
Jim Maul wrote:
> Don Levey wrote:
>> Don Levey wrote:
>>
>>> Messages coming in and autoscanned via spamass-milter/spamd all fail
>>> autolearn. To pick one example from this list (full headers
>>> available if it will help):
>>>
>>>
>>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
>
Group,
Does someone have an SA RH8 upgrade guide link? Please?
He's using RH8 and coming from SA 2.31-16...
If someone also speaks Spanish, please forgive my butchery of the
language. No translators were used -- it's all my fault.
Fabian,
Pardone me, pero mi Espanol es muy malo, y no tengo in
Don Levey wrote:
Don Levey wrote:
Messages coming in and autoscanned via spamass-milter/spamd all fail
autolearn. To pick one example from this list (full headers
available if it will help):
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
autolearn=failed version=3.0.4
X-Sp
Don Levey wrote:
>
> Messages coming in and autoscanned via spamass-milter/spamd all fail
> autolearn. To pick one example from this list (full headers
> available if it will help):
>
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
> autolearn=failed version=3.0.4
> X-Spam-Che
Daniel Quinlan a écrit :
> Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>http://gz8l9a2f7cg3/?ra=3DXXDD
>>http://kzbrdz2lj80ym/?ra=3DXXDD
>>
>>Clearly if it's just a hostname w/out domain it's not going to work
>>... So does this get parsed into something useful by some
>>MUA/browser/etc? B
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm currently trying to build up a new bayes DB here, since the autobuilt
> DB fubared (as expected, no need to throw things at me ;)). It's rather
> easy
> to build up the spam part, as we are getting right enough of it, yet it
> poses
> a problem to buil
Randal, Phil wrote:
> You might want to save yourself effort in reinventing the wheel and take
> a look at MaliScanner 4.50.x which caches spamassassin scores
> (http://www.mailscanner.info).
Thanks for the information. I had a look at the website but could not
find much information. Does MailScan
I just moved/upgraded my home server this weekend, leading to less hair on
my head and more ulcers elsewhere. While I've worked my way through many
problems in the past few days, this one seems to be eluding me and googling,
archives, etc haven't yet helped me. Here's the scoop:
Messages coming i
From: "Jason Frisvold" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 1/15/06, Andrew Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have fewer than 65,000 accounts you could halve the size of the
> id columns.
>
> That took 25% off my bayes_token data file and index. Since MySQL
> likes to keep indexes in VM, I think it w
Markus Braun wrote:
> > debug: tests=ALL_TRUSTED,MISSING_DATE,MISSING_SUBJECT,NO_REAL_NAME
>
> > Here is a BIG problem! You got an ALL_TRUSTED on this spam.
> > Assuming you fed in a spam that came from outside and the headers
> > are still there showing that, it shoudl NEVER get an ALL_TRUSTED
Hola a todos. Tengo la version (binario, rpm) spamassassin-2.31-16 en RH8 y
necesito actualizarla, alguien sabe como se hace?
On 1/15/06, Andrew Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have fewer than 65,000 accounts you could halve the size of the
> id columns.
>
> That took 25% off my bayes_token data file and index. Since MySQL
> likes to keep indexes in VM, I think it was worthwhile.
Excellent information, thanks
El vie, 06-01-2006 a las 09:55 +0100, mouss escribió:
> Paco Yepes a écrit :
> > Hello.
> >
> > Im using postfix 2.1.5 + spamassassin 3.1.0a-2 + amavisd-new
> > 20030616p10-5
> >
> > In the last weeks the size of false-negatives (fn) is grow
> > significatelly. All this fn do not have scores of t
You might want to save yourself effort in reinventing the wheel and take
a look at MaliScanner 4.50.x which caches spamassassin scores
(http://www.mailscanner.info).
Cheers,
Phil
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicolas
Hi,
I think that some part of spamassassin is highly user-specific (such as
BAYES, AWL or UNWANTED_LANGUAGE_BODY). But I receive some e-mails that
are sent to hundreds of our users, and I consider it is some waste of
CPU-time and bandwidth to run the same tests on the same message
hundreds of time
From: "Daniel Quinlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
http://gz8l9a2f7cg3/?ra=3DXXDD
http://kzbrdz2lj80ym/?ra=3DXXDD
Clearly if it's just a hostname w/out domain it's not going to work
... So does this get parsed into something useful by some
MUA/browser/etc?
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://gz8l9a2f7cg3/?ra=3DXXDD
> http://kzbrdz2lj80ym/?ra=3DXXDD
>
> Clearly if it's just a hostname w/out domain it's not going to work
> ... So does this get parsed into something useful by some
> MUA/browser/etc? Both were found in a spam with a
Hi list,
I'm currently trying to build up a new bayes DB here, since the autobuilt
DB fubared (as expected, no need to throw things at me ;)). It's rather
easy
to build up the spam part, as we are getting right enough of it, yet it
poses
a problem to build up the ham part.
Much of our mail comin
41 matches
Mail list logo
