Re: Re[2]: [SOLVED] Re: rules_du_jour/curl suddenly broken?

--- Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Peter, > > Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 7:31:39 PM, you wrote: > > P> Looks like I had two problems simultaneously. The update issue was > not > P> causing the error it seems. The real problem I'm encountering > appears to > P> concern a

Re: MailScanner and SpamAssassin sitewide help!

@#$%^& dnsbl.sorbs.net i took dnsbl.sorbs.net out of my sendmail config sorry, and thank you At 7:21 AM +0100 1/12/06, Uwe wrote: Steve, People who would like the help you and using a Gmail Account will receive this : Technical details of permanent failure: PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 8

Re[2]: [SOLVED] Re: rules_du_jour/curl suddenly broken?

Hello Peter, Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 7:31:39 PM, you wrote: P> Looks like I had two problems simultaneously. The update issue was not P> causing the error it seems. The real problem I'm encountering appears to P> concern a particular SARE rule. I am running amavisd-new with SA and this P>

Re: MailScanner and SpamAssassin sitewide help!

Steve, People who would like the help you and using a Gmail Account will receive this : Technical details of permanent failure: PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 8): 553 5.3.0 Rejected 64.233.184.194 found in dnsbl.sorbs.net Nonsens ... Uwe

Re: [SOLVED] Re: rules_du_jour/curl suddenly broken?

m. That SARE rule seems to be barfing from it. I enclose it for those interested. -- Peter __ Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.caSubject: New Books from Visual Reference Publications MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

Re: [SOLVED] Re: rules_du_jour/curl suddenly broken?

nt-footnote-restart-page:0; document-footnote-type:numeric; document-footnote-initial:1; document-endnote-place-endsection:0"> application/x-abiword AbiWord Subject: New Books from Visual Reference Publications MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;

Re: Optimum home system setup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 11 January 2006 9:10 pm, jdow wrote: > On 2.64 I'm not sure what's the forking process. It may be modestly > painful. But an extra 3 seconds every hour and a half is no big tax > to pay on your machine's performance unless you're trying to

Re: Optimum home system setup

On 2.64 I'm not sure what's the forking process. It may be modestly painful. But an extra 3 seconds every hour and a half is no big tax to pay on your machine's performance unless you're trying to play precision timing games in the background. Heck, you could run raw spamassassin and not really se

Re: [SOLVED] Re: rules_du_jour/curl suddenly broken?

From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jdow wrote: From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter wrote: > False alarm. I wasn't aware I needed outgoing port 80 open for RDJ. Strange I never got these errors before. Does it only use curl when it detects (how?) an update is required? N

Re: MailScanner and SpamAssassin sitewide help!

On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 18:48 -0800, Steve Maller wrote: > OK, I've built and installed MailScanner 4.49 and SpamAssassin 3.1.0 > on a mostly stock Fedora Core 4 box. I'm running Sendmail with a > bunch of RBLs and TLS enabled. > > Email comes through MailScanner, but whatever I do, I do not seem

MailScanner and SpamAssassin sitewide help!

OK, I've built and installed MailScanner 4.49 and SpamAssassin 3.1.0 on a mostly stock Fedora Core 4 box. I'm running Sendmail with a bunch of RBLs and TLS enabled. Email comes through MailScanner, but whatever I do, I do not seem to get any mail to go through SpamAssassin. I tried manually st

Re: Optimum home system setup

On Wednesday 11 January 2006 7:06 pm, jdow wrote: > From: "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > I run SA 3.1 on a home system which gets about 200 - 250 msgs a day, > > the majority being spam of course. I have 768mb of ram with a swap of > > 6

Re: [SOLVED] Re: rules_du_jour/curl suddenly broken?

jdow wrote: > From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Peter wrote: >> > False alarm. I wasn't aware I needed outgoing port 80 open for RDJ. >> >>> Strange I never got these errors before. Does it only use curl when it >>> detects (how?) an update is required? >>> >> >> Nope.. it always nee

Re: Optimum home system setup

From: "Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I run SA 3.1 on a home system which gets about 200 - 250 msgs a day, the majority being spam of course. I have 768mb of ram with a swap of 612mb, an AMD Sempron 1.6GHz processor. This is how spamd is started fro

Optimum home system setup

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I run SA 3.1 on a home system which gets about 200 - 250 msgs a day, the majority being spam of course. I have 768mb of ram with a swap of 612mb, an AMD Sempron 1.6GHz processor. This is how spamd is started from the /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin

Re: [SOLVED] Re: rules_du_jour/curl suddenly broken?

From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter wrote: > False alarm. I wasn't aware I needed outgoing port 80 open for RDJ. Strange I never got these errors before. Does it only use curl when it detects (how?) an update is required? Nope.. it always needs to go out over port 80. The "check

Re: [SOLVED] Re: rules_du_jour/curl suddenly broken?

Peter wrote: > False alarm. I wasn't aware I needed outgoing port 80 open for RDJ. > Strange I never got these errors before. Does it only use curl when it > detects (how?) an update is required? > Nope.. it always needs to go out over port 80. The "check for update" is done using HTTP "If-Mod

Re: Using SpamAssassin to fight comment spam?

From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "Ole Kasper Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, I am a developer on a fairly large community site (30-50,000 active users) with blogs, photo albums and forums. I spent yesterday tinkering with a spam prevension system which runs each new comment to a bl

Re: Using SpamAssassin to fight comment spam?

From: "Ole Kasper Olsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi, I am a developer on a fairly large community site (30-50,000 active users) with blogs, photo albums and forums. I spent yesterday tinkering with a spam prevension system which runs each new comment to a blog post or image in a photo album t

Re: dealing with SPF and external authenticated users

On Tuesday 10 January 2006 01:21 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> >What would be the correct way of dealing with this situation ? As a > >> > workaround I have used whitelist_from_rvc [EMAIL PROTECTED], which seems > >> > to be a great workaround, because I have rules in postfix that do not >

[SOLVED] Re: rules_du_jour/curl suddenly broken?

--- Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A couple of hours ago I started seeing errors regarding RDJ: > > exec: curl -w %{http_code} --compressed -O -R -s -S -z > /var/amavisd/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/rules_du_jour > http://sandgnat.com/rdj/rules_du_jour 2>&1 > curl_output: curl: (7) Fail

rules_du_jour/curl suddenly broken?

A couple of hours ago I started seeing errors regarding RDJ: exec: curl -w %{http_code} --compressed -O -R -s -S -z /var/amavisd/etc/mail/spamassassin/RulesDuJour/rules_du_jour http://sandgnat.com/rdj/rules_du_jour 2>&1 curl_output: curl: (7) Failed to connect to 208.42.148.125: No route to host 0

RE: rules better than bayes?

> -Original Message- > From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 1:49 PM > To: Chris Lear > Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: rules better than bayes? > > Chris Lear wrote: > > * Jim Maul wrote (11/01/06 17:48): > > [...] > >> i dont have

Re: SA 3.10 skipping some emails or errors in log??

Daryl & all: To help get around the problem of SA 3.1 dying here a friend wrote the following pair of shell scripts: spamw.bash - run from cron to make sure the spam.bash script hasn't stopped spam.bash - watched for spamd to be running and if it stops restarts it. Here they are, YMMV, no guara

Re: rules better than bayes?

Chris Lear wrote: * Jim Maul wrote (11/01/06 17:48): [...] i dont have any sa-stats.pl on my system, and i recall some confusion with different scripts named the same thing so im not sure. If you can provide me with a location to obtain the sa-stats.pl script you are talking about i'll try to

Re: spamd: pyzor: check failed: internal error

Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: On 03/01/2006 5:19 AM, Chris Purves wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting the errormessage below; Who can help ? Wolfgang Jan 2 09:25:58 saxophon spamd[13330]: spamd: connection from localhost [127.0.0.1] at port 40156 Jan 2 09:25:58 saxophon spamd[13330]:

Re: CPU utilisation

Robert Isaac wrote: > I have added Spamassassin 3.1.0 and ClamAV and MailScanner to our new server > running > RHESL-4 and Apache 2.0.52. > > When running 'top' I notice that spamassassin uses between 23% - 60% CPU. Is > this > normal? Depends on your rate of mail and how much CPU you have..

Re: CPU utilisation

Depends on your hardware, rulesets and amount of incoming mail. Shane - Original Message - From: "Robert Isaac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Spamassassin" Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 1:11 PM Subject: CPU utilisation I have added Spamassassin 3.1.0 and ClamAV and MailScanner to our

CPU utilisation

I have added Spamassassin 3.1.0 and ClamAV and MailScanner to our new server running RHESL-4 and Apache 2.0.52. When running 'top' I notice that spamassassin uses between 23% - 60% CPU. Is this normal? Bob ___ Robert Isaac Director/Web Admi

Re: rules better than bayes?

jdow wrote: From: "Jim Maul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Chris Santerre wrote: > -Original Message- > From: jo3 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 2:28 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: rules better than bayes? > > > Hi, > > This is an observa

Re: Getting Exim to read SA MySQL AWL Database to reduce load

Marc Perkel wrote: Has anyone tried to get Exim to read the MySQL database of SA? The reason I'm asking is that I'm thinking that under load conditions Exim could read the AWL database and bypass SA on matches with very high scores (just rejecting them) and messages with very low scores (just

Re: Marked as spam when under required score

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:14:14AM +, Josh Berry wrote: > spamassassin -t examplemail > being sent from actinic catalogue). This gives the output: > Spam detection software, running on the system "ptb-cgirelay01", has > identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original messag

RE: Using SpamAssassin to fight comment spam?

Ole Kasper Olsen said on 11 January 2006 13:36: > Hi, > > I am a developer on a fairly large community site (30-50,000 active > users) with blogs, photo albums and forums. > > I spent yesterday tinkering with a spam prevension system which runs > each new comment to a

Using SpamAssassin to fight comment spam?

Hi, I am a developer on a fairly large community site (30-50,000 active users) with blogs, photo albums and forums. I spent yesterday tinkering with a spam prevension system which runs each new comment to a blog post or image in a photo album through SpamAssassin. I take the provided comm

Re: SA 3.10 skipping some emails or errors in log??

>On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:29:02 -0600, you wrote: >>On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:56:48 -0500, you wrote: > >>On 10/01/2006 8:17 PM, George R. Kasica wrote: On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:58:37 -0500, you wrote: >> If you can get a "strace -ftp PID" of the parent spamd process while this happens (alon

Re: Marked as spam when under required score

> required. Running > > spamassassin -t examplemail > > (where examplemail is the full headers and body from a message, which is > being sent from actinic catalogue). This gives the output: The -t option is "test" and says "always give the info as though it was a spam". Remove that option and try

Re: Ohya

On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Kristopher Austin yowled: > Well, scratch that on IE 6.0, but it definitely happens in Firefox 1.5 > with no extensions installed. > > I can watch Firefox try .com for any unknown URL before returning an > error. I've tested this on 4 machines to be sure. This is controlled b

Re: Marked as spam when under required score

Josh Berry skrev: > Hi there, > > I having a problem with one of our platforms that run spamassassin where > mail seems to be flagged as spam even though it does not hit the score > required. Running > > spamassassin -t examplemail > > (where examplemail is the full headers and body from

X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER Improper use of control character (char 0D hex)

Hello all Environement: I'm using Amavisd-new 2.2.1-5 (for Virusscaning) with Postfix 2.1.5 as MTA and Spamassasin 3.0.3 on a Suse linux 9.0 Host Normal message process: SMTP > Postfix > Amavisd-new > Postfix > Spamd > Relay Host Failure: When a special message is incoming (like below)

Marked as spam when under required score

Hi there, I having a problem with one of our platforms that run spamassassin where mail seems to be flagged as spam even though it does not hit the score required. Running spamassassin -t examplemail (where examplemail is the full headers and body from a message, which is being sent fro