Hello Robert,
Thursday, December 29, 2005, 4:56:49 PM, you wrote:
RK> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4
RK> OS Linux Red Hat (I think)
RK> Is there a way to get SpamAssassin to send all suspected spam to a
RK> specific email address? I do not want to download any spam but I would
RK> li
> Is there a way to get SpamAssassin to send all suspected spam to a
> specific email address?
No. There is no way to get *spamassassin* to send mail *anywhere*.
Spamassassin is simply a filter that will tag the email with headers
indicating if it thinks the mail is ham or spam. *Something else*
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 04:56:49PM -0800, Robert Kidd wrote:
> Is there a way to get SpamAssassin to send all suspected spam to a
> specific email address? I do not want to download any spam but I would
Nope. SpamAssassin can't do anything but add markup to the message. You can
very likely add
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4
OS Linux Red Hat (I think)
Is there a way to get SpamAssassin to send all suspected spam to a
specific email address? I do not want to download any spam but I would
like to be able to check all spam via my webmail application for false
positives.
I u
You might try to manually install a little older version of Net::DNS
cd /usr/local/src
wget http://www.net-dns.org/download/Net-DNS-0.48.tar.gz
tar xzvf Net-DNS-0.48.tar.gz
cd Net-DNS-0.48
perl Makefile.PL
Do you want to enable these tests? [y] n
make
make test
make install
___
That loks like it, is there anyway of having a different report if the
mail is identified as spam cf identified as ham?
On Thu, 2005-29-12 at 20:16 +0100, Patrick von der Hagen wrote:
> tom wright wrote:
> > This dosnt seem to have solved the issue. I'm using the
> > exiscan-acl-4.42-27.patch (ht
tom wright wrote:
>> This dosnt seem to have solved the issue. I'm using the
>> exiscan-acl-4.42-27.patch (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan-acl/) so exim
>> send mails direct to spamassassin at smtp time. I'm no expert here but
>> looking at the code it seems that this passes the message direct to
It would be nice if someone actually could tell us what the deal is with
IPv6 on Debian Sarge.
Sorry I am getting off topic here, but:
Looks like if you do a fresh install with 'linux26' (to get the 2.6 kernel),
IPv6 is enabled. I personally have had issues (segfaults) after I to
upgraded fr
This dosnt seem to have solved the issue. I'm using the
exiscan-acl-4.42-27.patch (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan-acl/) so exim
send mails direct to spamassassin at smtp time. I'm no expert here but
looking at the code it seems that this passes the message direct to
spamd.
On Thu, 2005-29-12 at 08
Interesting, it looks like I could be calling spamassassin twice (both
through spamc). Once through exim and once with maildrop. I've turned
off the maildrop call and am waiting to see what happens.
On Thu, 2005-29-12 at 11:46 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> tom wright wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > First
Thanks for your help. I can't install IO::Socket::INET6.
The same thing happened on my (newer) Debian system. If you use IPv6, this
may be serious
and we'll need to find out why. If, like me, you only use IPv4, just
'force install IO::Socket::INET6'.
I think the big problem is it looks lik
tom wright wrote:
> Hi folks,
> First time posting here so thanks in advance for any assistance. Looking
> at my email headers it appears spamassassin is doing an excellent job of
> classifying my email but in the X-Spam-Status header, even when a mail
> is classified as ham I still get a summary m
Hi folks,
First time posting here so thanks in advance for any assistance. Looking
at my email headers it appears spamassassin is doing an excellent job of
classifying my email but in the X-Spam-Status header, even when a mail
is classified as ham I still get a summary message. I'm guessing this is
Hi Matt!
Thanks ! I'll Try and get back.
thanks
padma
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 10:58 PM 12/28/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a locate and there is no DNS.pm file. As this is my first experience
with Spamassassin, i'm clueless about What should be done??
Did you
Jochen Kächelin a écrit :
>
> For now I am. I justed registered wlanhacking.de and I think
> the next few weeks I will be spamed, too!
>
not necessarily. I have some addresses that never received any spam!
More surprising: one of these is used for many public mailing lists. so
either these maili
Keith Dunnett schrieb:
analyzer wrote:
Thanks for your help. I can't install IO::Socket::INET6.
Here the output:
The same thing happened on my (newer) Debian system. If you use IPv6,
this may be serious
and we'll need to find out why. If, like me, you only use IPv4, just
'force install
analyzer wrote:
Thanks for your help. I can't install IO::Socket::INET6.
Here the output:
The same thing happened on my (newer) Debian system. If you use IPv6,
this may be serious
and we'll need to find out why. If, like me, you only use IPv4, just
'force install IO::Socket::INET6'.
Reg
Keith Dunnett schrieb:
analyzer wrote:
Package: libnet-dns-perl
Versions:
0.19-0.1(/var/lib/apt/lists/ftp.tiscali.de_pub_debian_debian_dists_woody_main_binary-i386_Packages)(/var/lib/dpkg/status)
That isn't what we want, and it doesn't look like Debian woody offers
a suitable version, so
On Tue, 27 Dec 2005, Clay Irving delivered in simple text monotype:
The user isn't in a whitelist, at least that I can find.
<---snip--->
I'm having similar issues, where 99% of my false positives are due to being
whitelisted. Since my personal whitelist is practically nil after process of
19 matches
Mail list logo
