Have a lokk at Maia Mailguard:
http://www.renaissoft.com/maia/
Basically it's an enhanced version of amavisd-new and also allows the
users to maintain their own whitelists.
David Benigni schrieb:
Hello,
I've been searching for an application to manage per user quarantines
with SA. Current
I'm having a problem getting spamassassin up and running. When a message comes into postfix it seems (from the logs) to get passed to spamassassin, BUT, then the message never gets to the local delivery, instead it keeps on (what seems to be) getting passed back to the mail queue and then filte
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Steven Stern wrote on Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:55:59 -0600:
>
> > I'm doing this via spamass-milter at the MTA stage.
>
> Then the milter have to split all incoming messages in one per recipient
> and only check then. If it doesn't do this you are stuck at thi
On Mon, December 19, 2005 12:30 pm, Jean-Paul Natola said:
> That was my thought, as all my users are windows users---
>
> I guess the question would be phrased as, "can someone guide me , or
point me in the direction of building a script/utility that would grab
the file from a network locatio
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Chris wrote on Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:37:05 -0600 (CST):
>
>
>>What would cause SA (sa-spamd) to core (perl) when there are rules in
>>mail/spamassassin (recently downloaded from rulesemporium)?
>>
>>If however, I leave the above dir empty, Both Amavis and SA startup
>>with
Hello,
I've been searching for an application to manage per user quarantines
with SA. Currently, the setup I have running is a external mail gateway
running SA. Each individual has a procmail recipe to create a
quarantine of sorts, and the rest of the email it forwards on to an
internal server.
Mouss wrote on Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:33:42 +0100:
> infinitely sorry.
No need to, but please let's stop the FQDN debate, thanks :-) Have nice
holidays.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
That was my thought, as all my users are windows users---
I guess the question would be phrased as, "can someone guide me , or point
me in the direction of building a script/utility that would grab the file
from a network location , then copy the entries into said cf file".
-Original Me
Chris wrote on Mon, 19 Dec 2005 09:37:05 -0600 (CST):
> What would cause SA (sa-spamd) to core (perl) when there are rules in
> mail/spamassassin (recently downloaded from rulesemporium)?
>
> If however, I leave the above dir empty, Both Amavis and SA startup
> without issues.
Well, because
Kai Schaetzl a écrit :
>
>>>That is unusual, but it doesn't violate 2821.
>>>
>>
>>
>>Can you cite which part of rfc2821 this violates?
>
>
> I suggest you read my answer again.
oops. I obviously misread it! infinitely sorry.
Hi fellowship!
I having some trouble. I am using exim4, spamassassin and
squirrelmail. When I disable the spamassassin scanning at the exim4.conf
my browser keep thinking less than 13 seconds, but when I enable the
scanning my browser takes more than a minute to send the email.
I´m cal
List Mail User wrote on Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:40:35 -0800 (PST):
> Whose "reverse DNS record"?
The client's.
>
> Actually, I think checking that if rDNS exists, it matches is not
> a bad idea;
it's not a bad idea. But it's not RFC-compatible and bound to FP quite often.
But the actual proh
A file called for instance "whilelist.cf" is a text file. You could have
one of those that users could edit in the SA site rules directory, but it
would generally be a bad idea.
If users have shell accounts, they could I believe put whitelist entries in
user_prefs in their .spamassassin directori
Hi all,
I was wondering how I can go about having SA reference a file for
whitelisitng.
In other words , instead of manually editing the cf file, can I have a text
file on the network that users can go to , enter the address and domain they
are whitelisitng and have SA reference that ?
Does
-François Conil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: ->Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>De: François Conil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>Fecha: 19/12/2005 17:14>cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org>Asunto: Re: Newbie question>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:>> I'm using SpamAssassin 2.6, Postfix and Amavis>> -François Con
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using SpamAssassin 2.6, Postfix and Amavis
-François Conil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: -
>Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>De: François Conil
>Fecha: 19/12/2005 16:27
>Asunto: Re: Newbie question
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Sorry, what I want is to discar
I'm using SpamAssassin 2.6, Postfix and Amavis-François Conil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: ->Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>De: François Conil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>Fecha: 19/12/2005 16:27>Asunto: Re: Newbie question>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:>> Sorry, what I want is to discard all messages RECEIVED
What would cause SA (sa-spamd) to core (perl) when there are rules in
mail/spamassassin (recently downloaded from rulesemporium)?
If however, I leave the above dir empty, Both Amavis and SA startup
without issues.
Any ideas would be helpfull.
Some specs:
FreeBSD 6.0
Perl:
Version - 5.8.7
Sorry, what I want is to discard all messages RECEIVED to adresses like TEST_nnn or TESTnnn (where nnn may be any numeric sequence from 000 to 999).[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: ->Para: users@spamassassin.apache.org>De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>Fecha: 19/12/2005 16:13>Asunto: Newbie question>>Hi All,>I'
Hi All,
I'm traying to write a rule to discard all mesages sent to adresses like
TEST_nnn or TESTnnn (where nnn may be any numeric sequence from 000 to
999). Can anybody help me?
Thx
Javier
On Monday 19 December 2005 11:22, Liviu Lalescu wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>I have problems with the attached e-mail. I am attaching the
> spamassassin processed e-mail, and the original version of the
> e-mail (this is obtained from the processed e-mail by removing the
> spamassassin part).
Looking at t
Thank you very much for your quick response! I will tell the person to fix his
date problem.
On Monday 19 December 2005 14:39, Paolo Cravero as2594 wrote:
> Liviu Lalescu wrote:
> > Spamassassin is reporting it as spam, with a score of 5.6, but it is
> > surely not spam. I have also used a "sa-l
Liviu Lalescu wrote:
Spamassassin is reporting it as spam, with a score of 5.6, but it is surely
not spam. I have also used a "sa-learn --ham" on it, but even after that the
message is still flagged as spam. I have done "sa-learn --ham timetabling"
and after that "spamassassin -t < timetablin
Dear All,
I have problems with the attached e-mail. I am attaching the spamassassin
processed e-mail, and the original version of the e-mail (this is obtained
from the processed e-mail by removing the spamassassin part).
Spamassassin is reporting it as spam, with a score of 5.6, but it is surel
>...
>On the contrary. That's exactly what it asks for. The key for understanding
>the
>requirements here is "client identity".
>
>If we rewrite it this way:
>
>> So we find it is actually not only *not* contained with RFC2821
>> any requirement that the HELO/EHLO argument match the reverse DNS
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 05:06:27PM -0500, Brian Kendig wrote:
> On Dec 15, 2005, at 4:50 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >SpamAssassin tools in general default to creating bayes and AWL
> >directories
> >relative to the current user's homedir.
>
> I think this is a bug in SpamAssassin 3.1.0, because i
Mouss wrote on Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:31:32 +0100:
> so? which section of the rfc says we must reject dynamic IPs?
> fqdn
(snipped the rest)
"mouss", you try to argue about things nobody said and you try to argue
about words instead of meaning. This is bound to fail, I won't continue.
Kai
--
K
List Mail User wrote on Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:04:28 -0800 (PST):
> or a CNAME that refers to one of
> these
No. It clearly says a CNAME is not allowed for EHLO. You quote it just a few
lines above. We are talking mainly EHLO here.
> So we find it is actually not only *not* contained with RFC2821
Mouss wrote on Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:11:03 +0100:
> > That is unusual, but it doesn't violate 2821.
> >
>
> Can you cite which part of rfc2821 this violates?
I suggest you read my answer again.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conact
Mouss wrote on Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:04:45 +0100:
> Prove it.
I don't need to. You should understand that we are talking of "identity"
here and not of some DNS resolution/searching rule. FQDN in this context
means "unique hostname identifying a machine". Just read RFC 2821 by it's
*meaning*. It
Do you know MAIA MAILGUARD ?
try it, http://www.maiamailguard.com/
i think that is better Mailscanner...
Em Dom, 2005-12-18 às 20:31 +0100, Kai Schaetzl escreveu:
> Chris wrote on Sun, 18 Dec 2005 10:44:47 -0600:
>
> > I considered Mailscanner
>
> Good step. Lots of options, nice web interfac
Philip S. Hempel wrote:
Did you copy'n'paste this or retype?
user_scores_dsn
ldap://locahost/dc=qmailldap,dc=lh,dc=com?spamassassin?sub?uid=__USERNAME__
locaLhost, perhaps?
Let us know...
pc
Hi,
Stab in the dark...
> I am looking at my logs as to the reason why ldap prefs are not
> loading
>
> I see this
> Can't call method "bind" on an undefined value at
> /usr/share/perl5/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf/LDAP.pm line 161,
> line 2 ldap: failed to load user scores from LDAP server, ignored
33 matches
Mail list logo
