> Quoted from Vernon Schryver[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> The "write(MTA socket,4)" messages suggest that spamassassin has closed
> the socket to dccifd when dccifd gets around to answering.
>
> The "continue not asking greylist" messages suggest that dccifd is
> trying to contact a greylist server wi
At 01:03 AM 11/22/2005, Christopher Brower wrote:
Can anyone recommend a good setup for running Sapmassassin and an open
source antivirus solution on a SMTP gateway infront of an Exchange box?
Suggestions: use amavis, MailScanner or mimedefang as a MTA integration.
Use clamav as an antivirus p
Can anyone recommend a good setup for running Sapmassassin and an open source antivirus solution on a
SMTP gateway infront of an Exchange box? Also could
you point me to some guides? It’s been awhile since I setup spam assassin
and last time I did I think it was version 2.0. Is it possible
On 11/22/05, Spamassassin List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am trying to enable DCC support but as far as I can see no >DCC_CHECK
>is being involved. Your advise would be greatly appreciated.
Did you enable local, -L? Remove this when you call spamd
No, spamd is called without -L:
spamd_flag
On 11/22/05, Spamassassin List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I am trying to enable DCC support but as far as I can see no >DCC_CHECK
> >is being involved. Your advise would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Did you enable local, -L? Remove this when you call spamd
No, spamd is called without -L:
spamd_
I am trying to enable DCC support but as far as I can see no >DCC_CHECK
is being involved. Your advise would be greatly appreciated.
Did you enable local, -L? Remove this when you call spamd
Dear all,
I am trying to enable DCC support but as far as I can see no DCC_CHECK
is being involved. Your advise would be greatly appreciated.
FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE, qmail 1.03, SA 3.1.0 used with qmail-scanner 1.25,
dcc 1.3.16 - all installed from ports.
local.cf:
add_header all Status DCC _DCCB_
On 11/21/05, Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> detect it, then yes your IPs can get blacklisted. The best way
> to solve that is to stop the emission of spam from your network.
It's easier to do when the source is identified.
> As was already suggested, one good way to do that is to block
>
jdow wrote:
From: "Steven Stern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jason Kratzer wrote:
Do I need to install the module or can I run it from the install
directory. I was unable to find the documentation for it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tools]# ./sa-stats.pl
Can't locate Parse/Syslog.pm in @INC (@INC con
Hello everyone,
This is my first post to the SA mailing list. I hope I'm proceeding
correctly. I noticed that my mail server seems to be running slow. I
tailed the syslog and found the error below. I included the syslog
entry for the test message I sent to my email server.
I'm hoping someone c
From: "Steven Stern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jason Kratzer wrote:
Do I need to install the module or can I run it from the install
directory. I was unable to find the documentation for it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tools]# ./sa-stats.pl
Can't locate Parse/Syslog.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
pe
Jason Kratzer wrote:
Do I need to install the module or can I run it from the install
directory. I was unable to find the documentation for it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tools]# ./sa-stats.pl
Can't locate Parse/Syslog.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
perl -MCPAN -e shell
install Parse::Syslog
SpamCop simply notes what addresses appear to be emitting spam.
If your network is emitting spam and SpamCop users or traps
detect it, then yes your IPs can get blacklisted. The best way
to solve that is to stop the emission of spam from your network.
As was already suggested, one good way to do
Please note that I have not blocked all brazil as tempting as that might
be from time to time, Carlos. I have blocked uol.com.br simply because it
is very annoyingly broken and offers a DoS magnifier tool in their stupid
anti spam challenge response. I am blocking this ONLY for myself. And for
the
Title: Message
First, fix your trusted hosts. You shoudln't be trusting a DSL line
on some other system.
Second, you don't mention what version of SA you are using, nor what rules
files you are using. It looks like you don't have antidrug rules, which
would imply 2.6x. In any case some
Have you done a find for Syslog.pm ?
find /usr -name Syslog.pm
- Original Message -
From:
Jason Kratzer
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:18
PM
Subject: Error when attempting to run
sa-stats
Do I need to ins
Do I need to install the module or can I run it from the
install directory. I was unable to find the documentation for it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] tools]# ./sa-stats.pl
Can't locate Parse/Syslog.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0
/
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 09:44:41PM +0200, Jyri Korhonen wrote:
> But then I tried to use live data and found out
> that SA doesn't like at all the internal GroupWise
> header format (this is the same message as above
> using the internal header format):
>
> MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> SIZE=1741
> >[1452] dbg: dns: launching DNS A query for
> >8.147.220.193.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org. in background
> >[1452] dbg: dns: name server: 193.220.91.200, LocalAddr: 0.0.0.0
> >[1452] error: Error creating a DNS resolver socket: Operation not
> >permitted at
> >/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8/Mail/SpamAssas
Jyri Korhonen wrote:
> If I run SA to a message with the internal GroupWise
> headers I'll get something like the example below.
> Could somebody give me a hint what I shoud do to
> make SA understand GroupWise headers?
>
Extensive code-rewrite (preferably of GroupWise, but alternatively of SA).
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Knuth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:44 PM
> To: SpamAssassin Users
> Subject: Re: SpamAssassin: how to generate stats
>
> Hallo und Guten Abend Dallas,
>
> Heute (am 21.11.2005 - 20:31 Uhr)
>schriebst Du:
>
> >> -
Hello,
I'm trying to test SA with Novell GroupWise 6.5,
but I'm not using anything in front of GroupWise
or behind GroupWise. I'm checking the emails
"in between" - that's after SMTP daemon and
before GroupWise MTA. We are running GroupWise
on a Netware server so I need a workstation to
do the job
Hallo und Guten Abend Dallas,
Heute (am 21.11.2005 - 20:31 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:05 PM
>> To: Jeferson Pessoa Santana
>> Cc: SpamAssassin Users
>> Subject: Re: SpamAssassin: how to
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:05 PM
>> To: Jeferson Pessoa Santana
>> Cc: SpamAssassin Users
>> Subject: Re: SpamAssassin: how to generate stats
>>
>> Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
>> > Hi guys,
>> >
>> > I'm usi
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 1:05 PM
> To: Jeferson Pessoa Santana
> Cc: SpamAssassin Users
> Subject: Re: SpamAssassin: how to generate stats
>
> Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I'm using SpamAs
Jeferson Pessoa Santana wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm using SpamAssassin 3.1.0 and I don't know how to generate stats
> about the number of Spam, Non-Spam received, and Top Rules used. Can you
> guys know how to do this?
>
This depends a lot on HOW you're using SpamAssassin 3.1.0. However, assuming
> Seems to me like setting up a firewall or network logger should make it
pretty
> easy to see what is sending out inordinate amounts of traffic on port 25.
Or
> you could just block port 25 outgoing as a matter of policy and force
people
> to go out through the university mail servers. No one
Hi guys,
I'm using SpamAssassin 3.1.0 and I don't know how to generate stats
about the number of Spam, Non-Spam received, and Top Rules used. Can you
guys know how to do this?
Thanks
Jeff
I recently upgraded from SA 2.64 to 3.1.0 and one thing I've noticed is bayes
operations are inordinately slower than they used to be. Especially expiry runs,
which often take in excess of 15 minutes to complete.
I've tried changing the lock_method to flock, but things are still slow.
Even just d
jdow wrote:
From: "Craig White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 05:37 -0800, jdow wrote:
From: "Kai Schaetzl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jdow wrote on Thu, 17 Nov 2005 22:22:40 -0800:
> >> curmudgeon
> > I learned a new word :-)
> > My stance on this is that the list-admin should pleas
Amavis-new could acomplish that ?
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Enviado el: Lunes, 21 de Noviembre de 2005 02:08 p.m.
> Para: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Asunto: RE: Just scan one e-mail address
>
>
> From: M Bernasconi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amos wrote:
Just recently we discovered we've been tagged by spamcop. Since the
spamtrap is "secrete", there's no way to know what incident triggered
this event, which makes it pretty damn difficult to track it down to
try to deal with it. Furthermore, a site has only one chance to delist
their s
I found it. It was being forwarded to a public folder. Thanks!
Thank you,
Jason Kratzer
Network Administrator
Cuhaci & Peterson Architects L.L.C.
1220 Alden Road
Orlando, FL 32803
(407) 228-4220 Ext. 1444 (Office)
(407) 228-4219 (Fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (email)
www.c-p.com (Web)
-O
Amos wrote:
I must say I'm not particularly thrilled about the tactics employed by
SpamCop. At a university it is sometimes difficult to control every
single thing that everybody does on campus, unless of course perhaps
if this was a complete authoritarian state. We try hard to control and
mini
On Monday 21 November 2005 10:11, Amos wrote:
> I must say I'm not particularly thrilled about the tactics employed by
> SpamCop. At a university it is sometimes difficult to control every
> single thing that everybody does on campus, unless of course perhaps
> if this was a complete authoritarian
Amos wrote:
> I must say I'm not particularly thrilled about the tactics employed by
> SpamCop. At a university it is sometimes difficult to control every
> single thing that everybody does on campus, unless of course perhaps
> if this was a complete authoritarian state. We try hard to control and
Amos wrote:
> I must say I'm not particularly thrilled about the tactics employed by
> SpamCop. At a university it is sometimes difficult to control every
> single thing that everybody does on campus, unless of course perhaps
> if this was a complete authoritarian state. We try hard to control and
I am not a fan myself and do not use them. However, you should have received a
mailing to postmaster (or abuse) due to
Spamcop complaints. Did you get these?
- Original Message -
From: "Amos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "SpamAssassin"
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 11:11 AM
Subjec
I must say I'm not particularly thrilled about the tactics employed by
SpamCop. At a university it is sometimes difficult to control every
single thing that everybody does on campus, unless of course perhaps
if this was a complete authoritarian state. We try hard to control and
minimize spamming ev
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 12:00:57PM -0500, Jason Kratzer wrote:
> I am currently attempting to find the junk folder on my server. I am
> using SpamAssassin 3.x with postfix and AMAVISD. Earlier today an e-mail
> was blocked that was intended for the president of the company. I am
> currently trying
> -Original Message-
> From: John Hardin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 11:17 AM
> To: SpamAssassin list
> Subject: Re: Clever Spammers, Anything to catch this?
>
>
> On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 06:50, Rick Cooper wrote:
> > I have noted there are a lot of spams get
M Bernasconi wrote:
> The program calls "spamassassin". And in "spamassassin" has no user/domain
> capability (correct me if i'm wrong).
You are correct.
If you want to just scan one-user's mail, this is better handled by only calling
SA for the mail you want to scan.
This way you actually sav
From: M Bernasconi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I want use SA on one e-mail address and not the hole domain.
> Let's say [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be scanned through SA. I
> know I can give the all_spam_to parameter to the hole domain
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] But then also [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not g
Hello,
I am currently attempting to find the junk folder on my
server. I am using SpamAssassin 3.x with postfix and AMAVISD. Earlier today an
e-mail was blocked that was intended for the president of the company. I am
currently trying to find this e-mail. I am not sure if the consultant
The program calls "spamassassin". And in "spamassassin" has no user/domain
capability (correct me if i'm wrong).
And I thought it's just a piece of cake ...!
Thank you James for your reply!
sincerely
m.bernasconi
>>> JamesDR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 21.11.2005 17.40 Uhr >>>
M Bernasconi wrote:
M Bernasconi wrote:
Hello!
I want use SA on one e-mail address and not the hole domain. Let's say [EMAIL PROTECTED] should be scanned through SA. I know I can give the all_spam_to parameter to the hole domain [EMAIL PROTECTED] But then also [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not going to be checked for spam.
Hello!
I want use SA on one e-mail address and not the hole domain. Let's say [EMAIL
PROTECTED] should be scanned through SA. I know I can give the all_spam_to
parameter to the hole domain [EMAIL PROTECTED] But then also [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is not going to be checked for spam.
How can I make th
On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 06:50, Rick Cooper wrote:
> I have noted there are a lot of spams getting through that are using
> tags and spelling the drug workds in columns top to bottom then move a
> column right and repeat. An example would be
>
> size=3>LCXAVPV
> This eventually spells:
>
> Levitr
There are not any updates available yet, the SA
devs are working to make this feature available, at this time, everything is
still being setup and tested for when this goes live. The commands are
there but the back end isn't entirely ready yet. Other channels are if /
when other rule-write
The way I see it, there is no need to speak bad things about a country
based on bad customer support from one ISP.
Brazil is a big country(just look at google earth), and UOL is just one
big ISP in that country.
So, peace out and let SA do his job.
Oliver
Dan Hollis wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005
At 07:45 AM 11/21/2005, Paul Strebel wrote:
[1452] dbg: dns: launching DNS A query for
8.147.220.193.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org. in background
[1452] dbg: dns: name server: 193.220.91.200, LocalAddr: 0.0.0.0
[1452] error: Error creating a DNS resolver socket: Operation not
permitted at /usr/lib/perl
> -Original Message-
> From: List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2005 9:57 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; Matt Kettler
> Subject: Re: How can I test SURBL is working
>
> > This message should fire them off
> >
> > http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com
Hello,
I am running spamd under Cygwin (on WinXP Pro SP2) and use WinSpamC
to connect to it from another machine. --lint shows no problems. This
is the beginning of the output from --lint:
[3408] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all
[3408] dbg: logger: logging level is DBG
[3408] dbg: generic: S
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Carlos Zottmann wrote:
Just a little note on what has been written about Brazil ...
You guys surely must have heard about corruption here, but it doesn´t
mean that everyone is corrupt, and that every negotiation is a scam
here ...
Brazil is very serious about a lot of things,
OK, Folks ..
Just a little note on what has been written about Brazil ...
You guys surely must have heard about corruption here, but it doesn´t
mean that everyone is corrupt, and that every negotiation is a scam
here ...
Brazil is very serious about a lot of things, including our
participation i
55 matches
Mail list logo
