List Mail User wrote:
Of course, the originals transmogrify quite quickly and the '/?'
was posted a couple of days ago.
Actually it was posted a couple weeks ago. About two or three days
later I started to get spams without the query string. The rule worked
well for a few weeks befo
I have used spamassassin for a few years installing it with cpan and really
not running into any problems with installation etc.
I was trying to install via CPAN again, and received the following errors:
---
/bin/tar: Read 6656 bytes from -
Removing previously used /root/.cpan
>...
>> Unfortunately, I've had plenty of FPs with the basic *.geocities.com.. A
>lot of
>> "enthusiast" websites of various sorts are hosted there and my users like
>to
>> forward around links to them.
>
>I wonder what the effect of listing /\w\.\w\w\.geocities\.com\b/ would be?
>That would only c
At 03:36 PM 11/15/2005, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Andy Jezierski wrote:
> How are you invoking SA? In my setup, I'm calling SA via a milter, so
> when I want to whitelist a host, I do it at the milter level, this way SA
> never even sees the message.
I'm running it th
Andrzej Adam Filip a écrit :
John Woolsey wrote:
I tried to install one of the ones out there under Linux and I found
that it didn't work properly. I then took a quick look inside the
code and it seems that the person who wrote it used windows slashes
in the unix script etc.
After a bit of
Matt Kettler wrote:
> mouss wrote:
>
>>Matt Kettler a écrit :
>>
>>
>>>mouss wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
They used other geocities sites since a long time. I just score 4 for
any "*.geocities.com/*/?" URLs. for now, I have no FN, no FP.
>>>
>>>
>>>Unfortunately, I've had plenty of FPs with
mouss wrote:
> Matt Kettler a écrit :
>
>> mouss wrote:
>>
>>
>>> They used other geocities sites since a long time. I just score 4 for
>>> any "*.geocities.com/*/?" URLs. for now, I have no FN, no FP.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Unfortunately, I've had plenty of FPs with the basic *.geocities.com..
>
> Y
Matt Kettler a écrit :
mouss wrote:
They used other geocities sites since a long time. I just score 4 for
any "*.geocities.com/*/?" URLs. for now, I have no FN, no FP.
Unfortunately, I've had plenty of FPs with the basic *.geocities.com..
You may have missed the "/?" part. I don't
> Unfortunately, I've had plenty of FPs with the basic *.geocities.com.. A
lot of
> "enthusiast" websites of various sorts are hosted there and my users like
to
> forward around links to them.
I wonder what the effect of listing /\w\.\w\w\.geocities\.com\b/ would be?
That would only catch the non-
mouss wrote:
>
> They used other geocities sites since a long time. I just score 4 for
> any "*.geocities.com/*/?" URLs. for now, I have no FN, no FP.
Unfortunately, I've had plenty of FPs with the basic *.geocities.com.. A lot of
"enthusiast" websites of various sorts are hosted there and my use
Evan Platt a écrit :
I run my own site, so my site, my rules... But looking through my
archived mail for uk.geoc1ties.com, I see NO legit mail.
I'm at the point of adding a body_check rule in postfix to /dev/null
anything with the above in the body. I see now they've started to use
de.geoc
At 12:43 PM 11/15/2005, you wrote:
This is a collection of various geocities rules that I've been
using. You might
want to run them by a corpus to see what their FPs are like for you,
but this is
a good starting point. These are based on rules posted by others on the list,
with a few limited ha
Jeff Chan wrote:
> Does anyone have a geocities rule that catches most of the spams
> and has few FPs?
This is a collection of various geocities rules that I've been using. You might
want to run them by a corpus to see what their FPs are like for you, but this is
a good starting point. These are
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Andy Jezierski wrote:
> How are you invoking SA? In my setup, I'm calling SA via a milter, so
> when I want to whitelist a host, I do it at the milter level, this way SA
> never even sees the message.
I'm running it through procmail, otherwise that's a good idea.
On Nov 15, 2005, at 11:33 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simon Butler wrote:
read this link for more info on apple mail spam filtering
http://www.macdevcenter.com/pub/a/mac/2004/05/18/spam_pt2.html
Sounds like per-user Bayes to me.
actually if you search for bayes
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 11:51:34AM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
> Pretty similar, alright. It's another probabilistic classifier, like our
> BAYES_* rules. It uses a fancier algorithm (LSA), but research hasn't
> really proven if that helps in real-world use; some reviews have said our
> results ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Simon Butler wrote:
> > read this link for more info on apple mail spam filtering
> >
> > http://www.macdevcenter.com/pub/a/mac/2004/05/18/spam_pt2.html
>
> Sounds like per-user Bayes to me.
Pretty similar, alright. It'
Simon Butler wrote:
i've noticed however that my mac os 10.4.3 mail program catches all of
the stuff spam assassin doesn't. i've done no custom rule setup on my
powerbook. how do i get the apple mail spam filter intelligence into
spam assassin.
Wasn't is just yesterday that someone was saying
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Martin [iso-8859-1] Schröder wrote:
On 2005-11-08 17:37:01 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
Actually, more to the point.. Habeas doesn't use or support
plain-SWE anymore.
Thanks. Habeas didn't bother to tell their "customers".
http://www.habea
Simon Butler wrote:
> read this link for more info on apple mail spam filtering
>
> http://www.macdevcenter.com/pub/a/mac/2004/05/18/spam_pt2.html
Sounds like per-user Bayes to me.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com
"Christopher X. Candreva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 11/15/2005 01:03:22 PM:
>
> I have one user that needs to whitelist a particular host. It is a
web site
> that is doing something silly, forwarding leads from forms people
fill out,
> but with an envelope sender set to the e-mail address o
Hallo und Guten Abend Gary,
Heute (am 15.11.2005 - 20:05 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
> And outlook catches some that SA misses as well. But I think
> the question that needs to be asked is how aggressive apple
> mail is. SA can be taught to be more aggressive and you can
> also put harsher rules int
I have one user that needs to whitelist a particular host. It is a web site
that is doing something silly, forwarding leads from forms people fill out,
but with an envelope sender set to the e-mail address of the person making
the request. I want to make sure we prevent any problems with SPF/Do
Matthew Yette wrote:
On 11/11/05 1:35 PM, "Matthew Yette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I currently am using SA 3.1.0 with ClamAV 0.87.1 and Qmail-scanner 1.25st.
I use SQL for my bayes as well as my user scores preferences databases. When
testing the whitelist_from preference, mail comes throu
John Woolsey wrote:
I tried to install one of the ones out there under Linux and I found that it
didn't work properly. I then took a quick look inside the code and it seems
that the person who wrote it used windows slashes in the unix script etc.
After a bit of fooling around I now have a work
I tried to install one of the ones out there under Linux and I found that it
didn't work properly. I then took a quick look inside the code and it seems
that the person who wrote it used windows slashes in the unix script etc.
After a bit of fooling around I now have a working Pop3 client that u
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>
>
> Hi all, I *believe* I have applied the following rule correctly,
>
> To verify I ran the --lint , it all checked out ok BUT its giving
> some errors with respect to the whitelisted entries I have in the
> local.cf that resides in the SA directory
>
> I know my whi
I've installed SpamAssassin 3.1.0 into a postfix mail server running on suse 8.2 Incoming emails are been passed through SA and SA appears to be deciding whether an email is spam or not. However, SA is not modifying the email headers for any emails regardless of whether it thinks they are spam or
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Martin [iso-8859-1] Schr?der wrote:
On 2005-11-08 17:37:01 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
Actually, more to the point.. Habeas doesn't use or support plain-SWE anymore.
Thanks. Habeas didn't bother to tell their "customers".
http://www.habeas.com/en-US/FAQ_Miscellaneous.php#
29 matches
Mail list logo
