Chris Santerre a écrit :
I understand that. But his reason is because surbl isn't catching
everything. Using the two lists he will catch a lot more. And with URIBL he
can contribute domains missed and have them added in minutes. Helping the
entire community. No sense in him reinventing the whee
> No index found for ruleset named SARE_SPAMCOP_TOP200. Check that this
ruleset is still valid.
You should do exactly what the error message recommends.
Loren
Thanks for the info!
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Mark London wrote:
Mark London wrote:
Mark London wrote:
Hi - We are receiving mail from a site that includes the headers:
This causes spamassassin to flag it with:
HELO_DYNAMIC_DHCP HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR
Received: fro
Mark London wrote:
Mark London wrote:
Mark London wrote:
Hi - We are receiving mail from a site that includes the headers:
This causes spamassassin to flag it with:
HELO_DYNAMIC_DHCP HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR
Received: from mail1.easyasphosting.com (mail.easyasphosting.c
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
Well you need to call spamassassin (or spamc, that's a better option)
somehow. You'll need amavis, mail-scanner, procmail or some other
method of calling SA.
Can't be much more help than that I'm afraid as I don't run sendmail.
Ah, OK. I'll look into those thi
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:14:46PM -0500, Liam-PrintingAutomation,Inc. wrote:
How are you calling spamassassin (or spamc)? What mail server
software are you using ?
we're using the FC3 "out of the box," so I guess it's using Sendmail.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:14:46PM -0500, Liam-PrintingAutomation,Inc. wrote:
> >How are you calling spamassassin (or spamc)? What mail server
> >software are you using ?
>
> we're using the FC3 "out of the box," so I guess it's using Sendmail.
So the question still remains -- how are you havin
Liam-PrintingAutomation,Inc. wrote:
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
How are you calling spamassassin (or spamc)? What mail server
software are you using ?
More details required please.
spamassassin, not spamc.
Sorry, I thought I'd mentioned it earlier.
We're using Sendmail.
Actually, we are
Rick Macdougall wrote:
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
Another question I have is on configuration.
I ran
$ man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
and that's all real interesting, but I don't know Perl at all. How
do I actually make the configuration changes, like the sc
Mark London wrote:
Mark London wrote:
Hi - We are receiving mail from a site that includes the headers:
Received: from mail1..com (mail..com [xx.xx.xx.xx])
by psfcsv1.psfc.mit.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
j9IM7qTG018418
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 1
Hi - spamassassin is running on psfcsv1.psfc.mit.edu (has been for
several years, with same configuration)/ I don't use
trusted_networks.
If I change the 2nd received line to:
Received: from adsl-xx-xx-xx-xx.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net ([xx.xx.xx.xx]) by
> mail1..com with SMTP; Tue, 18
Mark London wrote:
> Hi - We are receiving mail from a site that includes the headers:
>
> Received: from mail1..com (mail..com [xx.xx.xx.xx])
> by psfcsv1.psfc.mit.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
> j9IM7qTG018418
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:07:52 -0400
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
But I'm still wondering why the e-mails coming in still aren't getting
checked through SpamAssassin, and curious as to how badly a bad install
could hurt the mail reception process.
Thanks!
You're probably not piping the mails to SpamAssassin for them to be chec
Mark London wrote:
Hi - We are receiving mail from a site that includes the headers:
Received: from mail1..com (mail..com [xx.xx.xx.xx])
by psfcsv1.psfc.mit.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id
j9IM7qTG018418
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:07:52 -0400
Receive
Liam-PrintingAutomation wrote:
Another question I have is on configuration.
I ran
$ man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
and that's all real interesting, but I don't know Perl at all. How do
I actually make the configuration changes, like the score level and
how it tags the e-mail? Am I missing it in
Hi - We are receiving mail from a site that includes the headers:
Received: from mail1..com (mail..com [xx.xx.xx.xx])
by psfcsv1.psfc.mit.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j9IM7qTG018418
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:07:52 -0400
Received: from adsl-xx-xx-xx-
Hi, I have a couple of questions.
I just installed SpamAssassin on one of our servers through:
$ perl -MCPAN -e shell
> install (the mod for Razor)
which automatically installed SpamAssassin.
After which I ran the test as suggested on the FAQ:
$ spamassassin -tD < ./sample-spam.txt
and I get page
On Tuesday 18 October 2005 22:41, Justin Mason wrote:
> Tomasz Grobelny writes:
> > On Saturday 15 October 2005 20:51, Tomasz Grobelny wrote:
> > > When I try to start amavis with spam checking code enabled I get the
> > > following error:
> > > Oct 12 21:26:22 oswiecenia.net /usr/sbin/amavisd[2930
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tomasz Grobelny writes:
> On Saturday 15 October 2005 20:51, Tomasz Grobelny wrote:
> > When I try to start amavis with spam checking code enabled I get the
> > following error:
> > Oct 12 21:26:22 oswiecenia.net /usr/sbin/amavisd[29305]: SpamControl:
> -Original Message-
> From: Dhawal Doshy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 4:34 PM
> To: Spamassassin
> Subject: Re: Managing a personal SURBL list
>
>
> Chris Santerre writes:
>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Ramprasad A Padmanabhan [mailto:[EMA
Chris Santerre writes:
-Original Message-
From: Ramprasad A Padmanabhan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Managing a personal SURBL list
Hi all,
We are running spamassassin 3.1 with Mailscanner. The SURBL
checks are
very efficient in catching spams ( without risk of FP's).
> -Original Message-
> From: Ramprasad A Padmanabhan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 9:53 AM
> To: Spamassassin
> Subject: Managing a personal SURBL list
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> We are running spamassassin 3.1 with Mailscanner. The SURBL
> checks are
> very e
On Saturday 15 October 2005 20:51, Tomasz Grobelny wrote:
> When I try to start amavis with spam checking code enabled I get the
> following error:
> Oct 12 21:26:22 oswiecenia.net /usr/sbin/amavisd[29305]: SpamControl:
> initializing Mail::SpamAssassin
> Oct 12 21:26:22 oswiecenia.net /usr/sbin/am
Carl Chipman a écrit :
I haven't paid much attention of late, as my job has headed away from IT and back towards engineering, but ran into a problem today where a FVGT rule (to be specific the FVGT_u_BZ_TLD) caused a false positive due to a http://www.usps.com tracking URL included in the email.
Hi People,
I'm having some problems with the SpamAssassin Rules. I have to e-mails
server (Enchange and Exim) and another server with SpamAssassin and Exim
to delivery the messages. In my DNS server, I'd put the mx(10) poiting
to the SPamAssassin server and it's delivery the messages to the u
I haven't paid much attention of late, as my job has headed away from IT and
back towards engineering, but ran into a problem today where a FVGT rule (to be
specific the FVGT_u_BZ_TLD) caused a false positive due to a
http://www.usps.com tracking URL included in the email.
Has the 90_FVGT.cf
Ramprasad A Padmanabhan a écrit :
Hi all,
We are running spamassassin 3.1 with Mailscanner. The SURBL checks are
very efficient in catching spams ( without risk of FP's).
Sometimes we get a lot of spam with URI's not listed in SURBL's ,
probably because they are too specific to our domain
R. Scott Baer wrote:
>>
> Bowie,
> Thanks for your reply... I made the modification, though I'm still
> getting the same errors in my log file.
Wait a second... Going back to your first post, the messages you were
complaining about were:
Oct 6 08:57:57 localhost spamd[3014]: Creating default_p
From: R. Scott Baer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> >From: R. Scott Baer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >>I have modified /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf to use a shared
> >>database of tokens, by setting the 'bayes_path' setting to a path
> >>all users can read and w
Bowie Bailey wrote:
From: R. Scott Baer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have modified /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf to use a shared
database of tokens, by setting the 'bayes_path' setting to a path
all users can read and write to. I have also set the
'bayes_file_mode' setting to 0666 so that
From: R. Scott Baer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I have modified /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf to use a shared
> database of tokens, by setting the 'bayes_path' setting to a path
> all users can read and write to. I have also set the
> 'bayes_file_mode' setting to 0666 so that created files ar
I'm getting a missing SARE_URI2 error...
I'm using rules du jour 1.21.
- Original Message -
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:04:45 -0600
>No index found for ruleset named SARE_SPAMCOP_TOP200.
>Check that this ruleset is still valid. No index found for
>ruleset named SARE_WHITELIST. Check that t
From Matt Kettler,
> Depending on what MTA you use there will be a variety of MTA integration
> tools for you to choose from. Popular ones include qmail-scanner (for
> qmail), mimedefang (sendmail), exiscan (exim), MailScanner (multiple) and
> amavisd-new (multiple).
...
> For what it's worth, I us
No index found for ruleset named SARE_SPAMCOP_TOP200. Check that this ruleset
is still valid.
No index found for ruleset named SARE_WHITELIST. Check that this ruleset is
still valid.
No index found for ruleset named SARE_URI0. Check that this ruleset is still
valid.
Most of my rulesets work
Hi all,
We are running spamassassin 3.1 with Mailscanner. The SURBL checks are
very efficient in catching spams ( without risk of FP's).
Sometimes we get a lot of spam with URI's not listed in SURBL's ,
probably because they are too specific to our domain / locality.
To make sure that these
hi all,
I'm trying to set up spamassassin to have a central repository under
/var/spamassassin , so each user does not have a ~/$HOME/.spamassassin/
dir in there home dir. I know this is not the best solution, and can
potentially confuse SA, but under my circumstances, I think this will be
eas
36 matches
Mail list logo
