Re: problem with simscan / sa3.1 revrite tag

Hello ADMIN_miki, Wednesday, October 12, 2005, 5:20:48 AM, you wrote: A> rewrite_header Subject #_SPAM_# have you tried --lint on this? I'm thinking that the first "#" in that header might be seen as beginning a comment, giving you an empty spam prefix. Bob Menschel

Re: Debug help!

joe wrote: I am running SpamAssassin version 3.1.0 running on Perl version 5.8.5 When I run the spamassassin -D --lint, I am receiving an error but I can not find the reason in the debug. Can someone point out my error? Thank you, Joe Young --snip--- [17344] warn: config: failed to par

Debug help!

I am running SpamAssassin version 3.1.0 running on Perl version 5.8.5 When I run the spamassassin -D --lint, I am receiving an error but I can not find the reason in the debug. Can someone point out my error? Thank you, Joe Young [17344] dbg: logger: adding facilities: all [17344] dbg: lo

Re: spamassassin less effective after upgrade to 3.1.0: some checks no longer executed ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi, > > in directory (/usr/perl5/5.6.1/etc/mail/spamassassin) , i have these > files: > > init.pre local.cf local.cf.040605 v310.pre > > contents (for brevity, i'll only put the uncommented lines): > >

Re: not found

Good evening, Jean-Paul, On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Jean-Paul Natola wrote: Hi all I just did a portupgrade on my system and now I'm trying to start SA And this is what I get milter# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd.sh restart spamd not running? Starting spamd. eval: /usr/local/bin/spamd: not found Bu

Re: not found

Jean-Paul Natola wrote: > Hi all > I just did a portupgrade on my system and now I'm trying to start SA > > And this is what I get > > milter# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd.sh restart > spamd not running? > Starting spamd. > eval: /usr/local/bin/spamd: not found > > But it IS there > > Any th

not found

Hi all I just did a portupgrade on my system and now I'm trying to start SA And this is what I get milter# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd.sh restart spamd not running? Starting spamd. eval: /usr/local/bin/spamd: not found But it IS there Any thoughts PLEASE FREEBSD 5.4 SA CLAM EXIM

Re: spamassassin less effective after upgrade to 3.1.0: some checks no longer executed ?

Hi, in directory (/usr/perl5/5.6.1/etc/mail/spamassassin) , i have these files: init.pre         local.cf         local.cf.040605  v310.pre contents (for brevity, i'll only put the uncommented lines): bash-2.05# grep -v ^# init.pre loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL loadplugin M

Re: Bayes works when run manually, but not under procmail

Dave Mabe wrote: > I'm storing my Bayes config in mysql and it works as expected when I > manually run spamassassin on a mail message. > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=17.9 required=5.0 > tests=BAYES_99,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, > FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,

Re: OT: marketing service?

what about ipost.com .. anyone seen any issues with them? -Matthew On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 18:07 -0400, Christopher X. Candreva wrote: > On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Matthew Lenz wrote: > > > The company I work with would like to start sending out a monthly flier > > to our business contacts. We've found

Re: spamassassin less effective after upgrade to 3.1.0: some checks no longer executed ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hi Jim, > > I suppose you're not referring to the fact that razor2 and dcc is > commented by default ? because i wrote in mail that i did uncomment them. Tom -- doh! my mistake. Sorry about that. I don't think anyth

Bayes works when run manually, but not under procmail

I'm storing my Bayes config in mysql and it works as expected when I manually run spamassassin on a mail message. X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=17.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,     FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,FORGED_OUTLOOK_TAGS,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,     MSGID_FROM_MTA_ID,RC

Re: spamassassin less effective after upgrade to 3.1.0: some checks no longer executed ?

Hi Jim, I suppose you're not referring to the fact that razor2 and dcc is commented by default ? because i wrote in mail that i did uncomment them. gr, tom --- Tom Van Overbeke - ABSI Unix System Engineer email: [EMAIL PROT

Re: SA stopped working for some reason

Frank Luedke wrote: > Hi there. > > I have a RHEL-3 machine running here as a mail > relay. ClamAV and SA are working with sendmail > via milter to clean up all incoming emails. The > last two weeks this worked without any problems. > > Today I saw that no spam was filtered out, only >

Re: spamassassin less effective after upgrade to 3.1.0: some checks no longer executed ?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A tip: when the documentation says you need to read the "UPGRADE" document, you really *do* need to read that document ;) First item in http://spamassassin.apache.org/dist/UPGRADE will tell you what you need to know. - --j. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wr

Re: Spam Assasin rule details

Blake Gilchrist wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I'm new to the list, so please be gentle ;) > > I work for a marketing company (I feel those groans, believe me) who only > send 100% opt-in emails to our existing users. We're currently using > SpamAssasin internally for pre-checking our email communic

Re: AWL annoyance

At 10:27 AM 10/12/2005, Leandro \(uyuyuy\) wrote: How I can unsubscribe this list ?! Read the message headers: list-unsubscribe: In the future, check for that header on messages from other lists. This is the RFC standard way for lists to advertise how to unsubscrib

Re: AWL annoyance

At 09:46 AM 10/12/2005, mouss wrote: now that you say it! I have checked my awl and found an entry with ip='none'. (running sa with -D -t showed this). This entry had a very negative score. where do such entries come from (I mean IP='none')? I had a missing entry in my trust path that I fixed l

Re: AWL annoyance

How I can unsubscribe this list ?! - Original Message - From: "mouss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 10:46 AM Subject: Re: AWL annoyance Matt Kettler a écrit : mouss wrote: some spams use the recipient address as

Re: spamassassin less effective after upgrade to 3.1.0: some checks no longer executed ?

I see that the site rules dir is "/usr/perl5/5.6.1/etc/mail/spamassassin" according to the debug output, maybe you should check that your local.cf v310.pre and sare-rules exist in that directory. Regards Menno van Bennekom > Hi, > > I recently upgraded our mail relay software: > > (sendmail is 8.

Re: i always get score 0.0

On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 10:51:47AM +0200, Eric Persson wrote: > That was actually the case, I started spamd with -C > /etc/mail/spamassassin/ -q -d -m5 -x -u spamd Why do you specify -C ? > So, I solved this by doing ln -s /usr/share/spamassassin/* > /etc/mail/spamassassin/ and it started to w

Re: AWL annoyance

Matt Kettler a écrit : mouss wrote: some spams use the recipient address as their From header. This causes AWL to put a significant negative score. It shouldn't. Is your trusted_networks set correctly? In general the AWL should look at the first-untrusted IP address for the message i

Re: i always get score 0.0

jdow wrote: Copy the /usr/share/spamassassin directory to your -C directory. Do not use -C /etc/mail/spamassassin. That upsets the whole ballgame. (IMAO -C was arguably done wrong. I suspect two options were needed, one to redirect /etc/mail/spamassassin and the other to redirect the default rule

problem with simscan / sa3.1 revrite tag

Hello , I switched qmailscanner to simscan 1.2 and upgraded SA to 3.1 mail is coming correctly tagged, but not in Subject line. YES I CHANGED IT TO NEW VERSION ;)) sa is running under daemontools local.cf required_score 5.0 rewrite_header Subject #_SPAM_# dns_available yes skip_rbl_check

Re: How can i block this?

* mouss wrote (10/12/05 13:13): > Chris Lear a écrit : > >>* Matt Kettler wrote (10/11/05 19:37): >> >> >>>Alessio wrote: >>> >>> I have received this mail, the heading "from" is blank! Is possible? >>>Yes, it's quite normal and is called a message with a "null return pa

Re: How can i block this?

Chris Lear a écrit : * Matt Kettler wrote (10/11/05 19:37): Alessio wrote: I have received this mail, the heading "from" is blank! Is possible? Yes, it's quite normal and is called a message with a "null return path". Is it? I thought the return path (or envelope sender)

Re: Odd SPF Query Error

Chris wrote: On Tuesday 11 October 2005 09:14 pm, David Gibbs wrote: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4541#c5 Thanks David, I see that it only applies to Microsoft caller-id and not an SA bug. It relates to the missing perl module which is used by SPF, which is used by SA

Spam Assasin rule details

Hi everyone. I'm new to the list, so please be gentle ;) I work for a marketing company (I feel those groans, believe me) who only send 100% opt-in emails to our existing users. We're currently using SpamAssasin internally for pre-checking our email communications to avoid common problems of f

SA stopped working for some reason

Hi there. I have a RHEL-3 machine running here as a mail relay. ClamAV and SA are working with sendmail via milter to clean up all incoming emails. The last two weeks this worked without any problems. Today I saw that no spam was filtered out, only the ClamAV was still running. Accordi

spamassassin less effective after upgrade to 3.1.0: some checks no longer executed ?

Hi, I recently upgraded our mail relay software: (sendmail is 8.13.3, but I didn't upgrade this) mimedefang from 2.51 to 2.53 razor2 from 2.67 to 2.77 dcc from 1.2.71 to 1.3.18 spamassassin from 3.0.2 to 3.1.0 we executed spamassassin via mimedefang's mimedefang-filter file (and accompanying s

Re: Problems with sa-learn and Fetchmail

On Dienstag, 11. Oktober 2005 22:51 Nels Lindquist wrote: > Any ideas? I use: sudo -H -u $user fetchmail -a -s -n -p IMAP --folder 'SPAM_yes' --auth 'password' -m "formail -d -I \"From \" -a \"From \" -s >>$checkspam" $imapserver Possibly you need the "From " Header? Anyway, afterwards I do: s

Re: i always get score 0.0

From: "Eric Persson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bret Miller wrote: It looks to me like SA isn't finding the /share/spamassassin folder where all the rules and scores are defined. That was actually the case, I started spamd with -C /etc/mail/spamassassin/ -q -d -m5 -x -u spamd But the default rul

Re: How can i block this?

* Matt Kettler wrote (10/11/05 19:37): > Alessio wrote: >> I have received this mail, the heading "from" is blank! Is possible? > > Yes, it's quite normal and is called a message with a "null return path". Is it? I thought the return path (or envelope sender) was quite distinct from the From: he

Re: i always get score 0.0

Bret Miller wrote: It looks to me like SA isn't finding the /share/spamassassin folder where all the rules and scores are defined. That was actually the case, I started spamd with -C /etc/mail/spamassassin/ -q -d -m5 -x -u spamd But the default rules, *.cf files where located in /usr/share/