Thanks Burton Windle . It's working now. I need
one more information. The suspected spam mails will be
moved to the SPAM file in the user's home directory
instead of going to the user's mailbox. The original
valid mails will be in the location /var/spool/mail as
in the user's name. We can d
> I have a motive for my madness. I installed the Clamav plugin for postfix
> and it works great. Only problem with it is that it can not dump viruses,
> it only tags them with a score. So, I want to tell SA to score any message
> tagged by Clamav for a score of 100 (or whatever) Then, when I dump
First time I've ever seen this, can someone explain what it means? Running SA
3.0.4
Parsing of undecoded UTF-8 will give garbage when decoding entities
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/Mail/SpamAssassin/HTML.pm line 182,
line 1117.
--
Chris
Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.or
You the man! My high score Spam and my Clamav Viruses are now gone, gone,
gone. And no milter/scanner front end software added! Now that is a good
deal.
Excellent!
So far so good. Just tested and worked like a charm. This is the way to go
with sitewide config IMO. No darn milter or scanner even n
> What version of Postfix are you using?
I am using the latest version 2.2 of Postfix
> What method of integration are
> you using for SA and Clamav?
SA is called similar to this.
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/IntegratedSpamdInPostfix
Clamav is called like this.
http://wiki.apache.org/sp
On 23 Aug 2005 at 15:20, Greg Allen wrote:
> Mailscanner and Amavis-new have way too much overhead IMO. For production,
> I already have to maintain latest SA releases and Postfix releases, and I
> know these programs very well. I would rather not put another complex
> layer that requires updates
Greg Allen wrote:
I have a motive for my madness. I installed the Clamav plugin for postfix
and it works great. Only problem with it is that it can not dump viruses,
it only tags them with a score. So, I want to tell SA to score any message
tagged by Clamav for a score of 100 (or whatever) Then,
Chris Santerre wrote:
-- Bizzaro-Chris (I know all of the real Chris's dark secrets!)
Bizarro! Bizarro! Bizarro!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I have a motive for my madness. I installed the Clamav plugin for postfix
and it works great. Only problem with it is that it can not dump viruses,
it only tags them with a score. So, I want to tell SA to score any message
tagged by Clamav for a score of 100 (or whatever) Then, when I dump high
sco
Mailscanner and Amavis-new have way too much overhead IMO. For production,
I already have to maintain latest SA releases and Postfix releases, and I
know these programs very well. I would rather not put another complex
layer that requires updates and seperate config over top of SA if I don't
have t
Hallo und Guten Abend email,
Heute (am 23.08.2005 - 21:47 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
> bump. can anyone answer at least the questions about dcc and razor?
you mean the problems with the zombies?
--
Viele Grüße, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ #277289867
PGP: 54C9 1A46 D3B2 95B6
I just changed my init.pre to include:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Razor2
and kept the pre 3.1.0 settings in the local.cf. It's working fine except
for some Razor _alarm_ messages once in a while...
At 12:51 PM Tuesday, 8/23/2005, Stuart
> > Might also be nice to see some pointers in the docs about how to
reenable
> > the
> > DCC and Razor plugins for those of us who will continue to use those
tools.
Look in init.pre or v310.pre for "loadplugin" calls to functions to perform
these actions. By default the loadplugin lines will be
As referenced in the UPGRADE file:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UpgradeTo310
email builder wrote:
bump. can anyone answer at least the questions about dcc and razor?
Exellent. This is the information I needed! Is there any chance of
getting
an updated release schedule (I checked t
bump. can anyone answer at least the questions about dcc and razor?
> Exellent. This is the information I needed! Is there any chance of
> getting
> an updated release schedule (I checked the wiki, but the schedule info for
> 3.1.0 seems out of date)?
>
> Might also be nice to see some pointer
At 12:07 PM Tuesday, 8/23/2005, Greg Allen wrote -=>
I find this one issue just about the most annoying 'non-feature' of SA. I
have a site-wide config (procmail does not work sitewide) and I don't want
the overhead and problems of a huge milter program laying in front of SA
just to block any emai
Have you looked at MailScanner? It integrates nicely with SpamAssassin and
your favorite MTA (sendmail / postfix / exim / zmailer) and can also call a
virus scanner. You can set SA score thresholds and delete, forward,
quarantine, mark, or just pass emails based on score. You can also block o
On Tuesday 23 August 2005 20:07, Greg Allen wrote:
> Do you have any links to a how-to for the Spamass-Milter? Or does it have
> good install info in the docs? If it does a good job and is relatively
> easy and light-weight, I would like to try it. I have spent days looking
> for something more si
At 12:07 PM 8/23/2005, you wrote:
I find this one issue just about the most annoying 'non-feature' of SA. I
have a site-wide config (procmail does not work sitewide) and I don't want
the overhead and problems of a huge milter program laying in front of SA
just to block any email over 15 stars. I
I find this one issue just about the most annoying 'non-feature' of SA. I
have a site-wide config (procmail does not work sitewide) and I don't want
the overhead and problems of a huge milter program laying in front of SA
just to block any email over 15 stars. I like to keep it simple stupid.
I am
From: "Andy Jezierski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/23/2005 08:55:26 AM:
Basically, sir, it is time to break down and read that f manual.
{^_^}
Potty mouth! Potty mouth! Surely you meant that FINE manual. :-D
I LOVE leaving things like that to other people
> >
> > meta TOO_MANY_URIBLS URIBL_OB_SURBL && URIBL_JP_SURBL
> ..^ Modifier missing?
Err...uhh...what the heck was I thinking? :) Disregard the above. I'm
pouring myself another cup of coffee.
>
> > describe TOO_MANY_URIBLS On too many URIBLs
> > score TOO MANY_URIBLS2
Chris Santerre wrote:
>>1. I tried the following rule on some test emails:
>>
>>meta TOO_MANY_URIBLS URIBL_OB_SURBL && URIBL_JP_SURBL
>
> ..^ Modifier missing?
Modifier? What's a modifier?
While it might be more common to see someone using parentheses, AFAIK they
aren't re
> -Original Message-
> From: Anthony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 6:40 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: question on meta rules
>
>
> Is there something special about meta rules?
> Could someone explain what appear to be anomolies be
You read the procmailex and procmailrc man pages. Then you install
something that does what you want. I do not have such a script so
I cannot help you. If you scan back in archives for this list you
will find several diversions based on the X-Spam-Level: *
header. Some others were based on
"jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 08/23/2005 08:55:26 AM:
> Basically, sir, it is time to break down and read that f
manual.
>
> {^_^}
Potty mouth! Potty mouth! Surely you meant
that FINE manual. :-D
Andy
I am using procmail with spamassassin for sendmail
MTA. Where I can get the procmail scripts for the mail
diversion? Or Is it a better choice to user milter and
mimedefang integrated with spamassassin for spam
handling and diversion.
Suresh.
--- jdow <[EMAIL
How are you running SpamAssassin? If you are calling it from procmail
then there are innumerable scripts floating around for doing the
bad message diversion. (If you are doing it on mail just before it
is fetched by your mail reader, say OutlookExpress, then "No way"
comes to mind. It becomes a se
I am using sendmail as my MTA. Is there any option
or additional packages to block the spam mails or to
move it some folder instead of user's mailbox when
identifying as spam mail.
Suresh
--- Forrest Aldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Depending upon what MTA you'
At 11:26 PM 8/22/2005, you wrote:
Hi ,
I am using spamassassin with sendmail and spamassassin-milter. I
want to know how I can customize the message rapports which can be
sent to the sender of the spam generator.
I am getting the following error:
"reason: 550 5.7.1 Blocked by SpamAssassin.
30 matches
Mail list logo