Hi ,
I am using spamassassin with sendmail and
spamassassin-milter. I want to know how I can customize the message rapports
which can be sent to the sender of the spam generator.
I am getting the following error:
“reason: 550 5.7.1 Blocked by SpamAssassin.
even if email was
Depending upon what MTA you're using, I have used the Spamass-Milter
successfully to block emails that rate at or above the required_hits
level (now named required_score).
Though I'm having some trouble with SA as per my last post ;-)
jdow wrote:
From: "suresh kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "suresh kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hi,
Thanks for the response for my earlier question.
I don't want the spam mails to be delivered to my
mailbox and to block from the mailclient using the
filters . I want to discard those spam mails when they
are identified as spam by spamassassi
That is the same thing I observed here after adding that plugin. I
am not sure if it is in the dnsbl code or the way ClamAV-plugin
uses the dnsbl code. Regardless it would be nifty were it to be
fixed.
{^_-}
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yes, in fact an
Yes, in fact and that is part of it. But, in the process of
investigating, I do think I found a bug (or at least an "issue") in
the uridnsbl code.
There is a check inside an inner loop there to see if any progress
has been made reading the results of lookups and if nothing changes
for 2
hi,
Thanks for the response for my earlier question.
I don't want the spam mails to be delivered to my
mailbox and to block from the mailclient using the
filters . I want to discard those spam mails when they
are identified as spam by spamassassin or to move them
to a common place other t
You added ClamAV plugin?
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SA seems unusually slow today and I'm trying to figure out if I've
done something to my configuration that is causing the problem or if
it is just slow rbl lookups or something.
I ran spa
I just moved over to a new system, FreeBSD-6.0, and am using a fresh
install of SpamAssassin-3.0.4, but the same configuration.
I also use Spamass-Milter to interface into sendmail.
Its not blocking any SPAM, and I can't seem to figure out why.
I took an accumilated "corpus" of spam messages (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
fyi --
- --- Forwarded Message
> Date:Sun, 14 Aug 2005 03:09:07 +0800
> From:Federico Sevilla III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: Junta Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Searchable Mail
SA seems unusually slow today and I'm trying to figure out if I've
done something to my configuration that is causing the problem or if
it is just slow rbl lookups or something.
I ran spamassassin with -t and -D and this output looks like it may
be problematic, but I'm not sure what to look
Hello Burton,
Monday, August 22, 2005, 1:29:48 PM, you wrote:
BW> Once a piece of spam has been shown to sa-learn as spam, is there any real
BW> use in the user keeping it around? I know that sa-learn will skip over it
BW> if shown it again, so I'm thinking "no" (unless you lose your bayes db and
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:39:40PM -0700, Anthony McCarthy wrote:
> meta TOO_MANY_URIBLS URIBL_OB_SURBL && URIBL_JP_SURBL
> describe TOO_MANY_URIBLS On too many URIBLs
> score TOO MANY_URIBLS2 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3
^ ^-- not the same as the rulename above
Is there something special about meta rules?
Could someone explain what appear to be anomolies between the assigned
score and the actual score?
1. I tried the following rule on some test emails:
meta TOO_MANY_URIBLS URIBL_OB_SURBL && URIBL_JP_SURBL
describe TOO_MANY_URIBLS On too many URIBLs
On 8/22/2005 4:14 PM, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
>>IP::Country use Whois lookups instead though
> Hrmm? Where does it say it uses Real-Time Whois lookups?
The docu for IP::Country::Fast is empty and refers to IP::Country, which
describes the use of whois.
See my follow-up post though
--
Eric
On 8/22/2005 3:50 PM, Eric A. Hall wrote:
> IP::Country use Whois lookups instead though, and UDP/DNS lookups are
> going to be faster than chained TCP/Whois queries.
> I'll play with the plugin and see what kind of times and load I get
Some poking around, IP::Country::Fast uses a pre-built map
Burton Windle wrote:
> Once a piece of spam has been shown to sa-learn as spam, is there any
> real use in the user keeping it around? I know that sa-learn will skip
> over it if shown it again, so I'm thinking "no" (unless you lose your
> bayes db and want to train it again quickly, but that's wha
Once a piece of spam has been shown to sa-learn as spam, is there any real
use in the user keeping it around? I know that sa-learn will skip over it
if shown it again, so I'm thinking "no" (unless you lose your bayes db and
want to train it again quickly, but that's what backups are for).
--
B
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric A. Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2005 2:50 PM
> To: Derek Harding
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [SPAM] RE: GeoCities Link-only spam
>
>
> On 8/22/2005 3:34 PM, Derek Harding wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-08-21 a
On 8/22/2005 3:34 PM, Derek Harding wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 20:05 -0400, Eric A. Hall wrote:
>
>>What's the benefit of using this instead of the uridnsbl plugin? The code
>>below will look for the IP address behind a URI and then query the
>>cn-kr.blackholes.us RBL to see if that addr is i
On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 20:05 -0400, Eric A. Hall wrote:
> What's the benefit of using this instead of the uridnsbl plugin? The code
> below will look for the IP address behind a URI and then query the
> cn-kr.blackholes.us RBL to see if that addr is in China:
This one doesn't require a DNS lookup w
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 03:16:28AM -0700, jdow wrote:
> From: "suresh kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >hi,
> > I have installed spamassassin and when I tried to
> >start the spamd it says the following error message.
> >
> >Starting spamd: The -a option has been removed.
> >Please look at the us
Can anyone tell me
if this product is any good and how difficult is it to you?
thanks
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the
North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to third parties by an
authorized county official. If you have received this comm
Steve Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
on 08/20/2005 12:42:44 AM:
> Sat Aug 20 00:28:36 2005 [16014] info: spamd: processing message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for filter:88
> Sat Aug 20 00:28:42 2005 [16014] error: __alarm__
> Sat Aug 20 00:28:42 2005 [16014] error: __alarm__
> Sat Aug 20 00:28:49
Jason Humphrey wrote:
> Hey guys
> Thanks for your responses. I have spoken to afew guys on mailscanner mailing
> list and the said to run mailscanner in debug mode and got this error and
> the mailscanner dies.
> Can't locate object method "new" via package
> "Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit" ( pe
Hey guys
Thanks for your responses. I have spoken to afew guys on mailscanner mailing
list and the said to run mailscanner in debug mode and got this error and
the mailscanner dies.
Can't locate object method "new" via package
"Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit" ( perhaps you forgot to load
"Mail::Sp
At 08:07 AM 8/22/2005, Jason Humphrey wrote:
This showing that mailscanner just seems to stop after a few seconds.I have
tested spamassassin with non-spam.txt and spam.txt and it works fine.
Anybody know where I need to look next to find
where its going wrong?
That log looks somewhat normal t
Jason Humphrey wrote:
Hi,
I've put mailscanner and spamassassin on a raq350 today and run into a
little problem
Mailscanner can deliver mail fine on its own with spamassassin disabled but
when I enable spamassassin no mail is processed the output from
"/etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail restart; tail -f
Hi,
I've put mailscanner and spamassassin on a raq350 today and run into a
little problem
Mailscanner can deliver mail fine on its own with spamassassin disabled but
when I enable spamassassin no mail is processed the output from
"/etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail restart; tail -f /var/log/maillog" is:
Au
Warren Togami wrote:
Is anyone else seeing consistent hits of DNS_FROM_RFC_POST from
legitimate hotmail mail?
Warren Togami
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
most of us do since thats the correct behaviour.. check
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=hotmail.com
they've been listed in rfc_pos
Is anyone else seeing consistent hits of DNS_FROM_RFC_POST from
legitimate hotmail mail?
Warren Togami
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "suresh kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hi,
I have installed spamassassin and when I tried to
start the spamd it says the following error message.
Starting spamd: The -a option has been removed.
Please look at the use_auto_whitelist config option
instead.
I could not understand and
> Starting spamd: The -a option has been removed.
> Please look at the use_auto_whitelist config option
> instead.
>
> I could not understand and I don't know where
> and how to enable this option .If any body knows
> kindly help me. Thanks in advance
>Suresh
This inf
hi,
I have installed spamassassin and when I tried to
start the spamd it says the following error message.
Starting spamd: The -a option has been removed.
Please look at the use_auto_whitelist config option
instead.
I could not understand and I don't know where
and how to enable this o
33 matches
Mail list logo
