Never mind - Earthlink had an email stick in its craw or else Fetchmail
did not like it at all.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 2005 July, 21, Thursday 23:16
Subject: Re: Procmail for site wide usage
> You are developing a severe stutter.
> {o.o}
>
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Loren Wilton wrote:
Sounds like an surbl problem if spamsite.com isn't listed.
That's just an example I made up... :)
The leading subdomains are supposed to be trimmed off, since they are
usually identifying strings for a given spam target rather than an
actual part of
You are developing a severe stutter.
{o.o}
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Arend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 2005 July, 21, Thursday 20:40
Subject: Re: Procmail for site wide usage
There generally is no specific procmail log file. It is generally in one
of the mail log files in /var/log/.
{^_^}
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Arend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Am Freitag, 22. Juli 2005 01:10 schrieb jdow:
> From: "Mark Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 7/21/05, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mark Williams wrote on Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:49:04 +0100:
> > > The issue is how I get
> > > procmail to put SPAM mail in $HOME/mail/spam for each of t
Sounds like an surbl problem if spamsite.com isn't listed. The leading
subdomains are supposed to be trimmed off, since they are usually
identifying strings for a given spam target rather than an actual part of
the target name. There are a few cases where things go to three levels
rather than jus
Hello,
I've been watching some of the misses that have passed through
spamassassin (3.0.4) lately and they are pretty clean; no DNS BL hits,
etc.
One thing I did notice is that many of them have a fairly contorted URL
for the spamvertized products, ie:
kjekliennxi&ffiennnkenc.spamsite.com
Hello Mark,
Thursday, July 21, 2005, 9:49:04 AM, you wrote:
MW> ... The issue is how I get procmail to put SPAM mail in
MW> $HOME/mail/spam for each of the users.
Can't help with that question, since I know nothing about procmail,
but...
Why not use POP? I see two options:
1) Don't reroute th
From: "Mark Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 7/21/05, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Mark Williams wrote on Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:49:04 +0100:
>
> > The issue is how I get
> > procmail to put SPAM mail in $HOME/mail/spam for each of the users.
>
> That should be explained in the spamassa
From: "Mark Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> See details:
>
> On 7/21/05, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mark Williams wrote on Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:45:30 +0100:
> >
> > > (Q) Given that this RH machine runs only POP3 (management will not
> > > allow anything else) how do I set up my /e
> http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm lists it as "Active", although it
> hasn't been updated in over a year.
Hum. I wonder why that is. Guess I'll go ask!
Loren
> From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Also, I'm pretty sure the 99_fraud file is very old. I believe we
dropped
> filenames outside the 7x series some time ago.
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm lists it as "Active", although it
hasn't been updated in over a year.
On 7/21/05, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark Williams wrote on Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:49:04 +0100:> The issue is how I get> procmail to put SPAM mail in $HOME/mail/spam for each of the users.
That should be explained in the spamassassin install readme, I'm sure.Apart from that:http://wiki
> I´m using SpamAssassin 3.0.4 with ´spamd´ / spamc and each process uses
about
> 20 MB + 14MB shared
This is not unusual for 3.0 with some SARE rules.
>From the look at your stats, you have too many spamd children - you should
cut back to 4 or 5 probably. While you don't seem to be swapping, yo
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Forrest Aldrich wrote on Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:19:33 -0400:
>
>
>>The older server is running SA-3, though the error I get complains about
>>database version 2
>
>
> The Bayes database version has no connection to the SA version. You missed
> to tell the exact error/proble
Forrest Aldrich wrote on Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:19:33 -0400:
> The older server is running SA-3, though the error I get complains about
> database version 2
The Bayes database version has no connection to the SA version. You missed
to tell the exact error/problem ;-)
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin,
Mark Williams wrote on Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:49:04 +0100:
> The issue is how I get
> procmail to put SPAM mail in $HOME/mail/spam for each of the users.
That should be explained in the spamassassin install readme, I'm sure.
Apart from that:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/FindPage?action=full
Am Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2005 18:49 schrieb Mark Williams:
[ .. ]
>
> Please don't get too hung up on the decisions that have been made -
> they are out of my control (hence my not going into depth on them). I
> only mentioned it to avoid people saying install this and install that
> or install IMA
I built a new server (FreeBSD-5.x) to which I want to migrate my
original SpamAssassin tokens, et al.
I found several gotchyas that don't appear to be properly addressed in
the Wiki (or elsewhere that I could locate).
The older server is running SA-3, though the error I get complains about
datab
See details:
On 7/21/05, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Williams wrote on Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:45:30 +0100:
>
> > (Q) Given that this RH machine runs only POP3 (management will not
> > allow anything else) how do I set up my /etc/procmailrc file such that
> > all mail that is marke
wrote on Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:33:07 +0200:
> I´m using SpamAssassin 3.0.4 with ´spamd´ / spamc and each process uses about
> 20 MB + 14MB shared
You wanted to say 40, did you? Looks like a normal size to me. You won't be
able
to get it much lower. It depends on the amount of rules you use and
Mark Williams wrote on Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:45:30 +0100:
> (Q) Given that this RH machine runs only POP3 (management will not
> allow anything else) how do I set up my /etc/procmailrc file such that
> all mail that is marked as SPAM is put into the users $HOME/mail/spam
> file (they can then log
Hi All (Thanks for the advice and support I have received so far),
I have just installed spamassassin v3.0.4 in a test environment (which
is a mirror of the live environment) and am need of some advice,
which I can not see within the manuals/support documentation.
Firstly, this is my configuratio
I´m just wondering if I could reduce the memory usage with some config
change.
I´m using SpamAssassin 3.0.4 with ´spamd´ / spamc and each process uses about
20 MB + 14MB shared
Also, the load on the machine is usually 30-60% and I can't seem to pinpoint
where that is coming from.
It doesn't look
24 matches
Mail list logo
