Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My guess is that your cron job is running as a different user than is used to
> scan your mail. So you're training into one database, but scanning using a
> different database.
Or the cron job is only learning spam and the auto-learn has not yet
learnt e
Charles Read wrote:
> Hey everybody!
>
> I am using Spamassassin with Bayes with Postfix via procmail. I use the
> sa-learn script nightly on a folder where my users put their spam, when
> cron sends me the email telling me the results it does say X messages
> examined X messages learned from. B
Mike Pepe wrote:
> I'm getting more and more spams sneaking through lately.
>
> I'm running SA 3.0.4 on Fedora Core 3.
>
> In analyzing the ones that make it through, I see that other users in my
> domain are CC, which causes the auto-whitelist to score the spam lower
> than if I run it through m
On Jun 22, 2005, at 9:36 PM, Mike Pepe wrote:
In analyzing the ones that make it through, I see that other users
in my domain are CC, which causes the auto-whitelist to score the
spam lower than if I run it through manually without that test.
I'm sure others may chime in to say that auto-whi
Hey everybody!
I am using Spamassassin with Bayes with Postfix via procmail. I use
the sa-learn script nightly on a folder where my users put their spam,
when cron sends me the email telling me the results it does say X
messages examined X messages learned from. But when an email IS
labeled
I'm getting more and more spams sneaking through lately.
I'm running SA 3.0.4 on Fedora Core 3.
In analyzing the ones that make it through, I see that other users in my
domain are CC, which causes the auto-whitelist to score the spam lower
than if I run it through manually without that test.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Catherine Hampton of SpamBouncer got in touch with something
that might be useful for rule developers:
> Check out the "Standalone Recipes' page for some stuff that SA users
> might want to use after SpamAssassin:
>
> http://www.spambouncer.org/down
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 19:42, Matt Kettler wrote:
Thanks
I understood (from docs) that I should copy .cf files
from /usr/share/sspamassassin to /etc/mail where local.cf is.
That is probably why received emails with drugs ( cialis, viagra, etc ) are
not being tagged.
If SA parses both direc
Daniel Geldres wrote:
> hello to all, it is the first time that I subscribe to the list and I
> have the following question.
>
> As I can filter subject VIAGRA. it is the first time that I install
> spamassassing and single I have managed to filter encoding. Thanks and
> good luck
This would be a
Helio Nunes wrote:
> I have installed the last version 3.04 using Linux Qmail Toaster (Bill Shupp)
> version 0.7.12 together clamav, ripmime, and simscan 1.1. Linux distr. is
> Suse 9.2.
>
>
>
> Actually I expected these filterings being done through 20_drugs.cf and
> 20_porn.cf that I have p
hello to all, it is the first time that I subscribe to the list and I
have the following question.
As I can filter subject VIAGRA. it is the first time that I install
spamassassing and single I have managed to filter encoding. Thanks and
good luck
my ingles is not very good, is translated ;)
--
I have installed the last version 3.04 using Linux Qmail Toaster (Bill Shupp)
version 0.7.12 together clamav, ripmime, and simscan 1.1. Linux distr. is
Suse 9.2.
simscancontrol file is as follow:
:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=20.0,regex=levitra:penis:.*viagra.*:VIAGRA:cialis:.*c.i.a.l.i.s\..*,att
> Hi Joe,
I have seen this problem on Ex2K and Ex2K3, I don't remember if it was
an issue
under 5.5 or not. I have a copy of a test-imap-header.pl script written
by Nick
Burch that can be used to see what the headers look like after you pull
a message
from an IMAP folder... let me know if you w
You need to set the option in MIMEDefang to allow network tests to run in
SpamAssassin. I'm fairly sure it's in your mimedefang-filter file. Check
with the MIMEDefang folks if you need more help.
Montse Seisdedos wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I use mimedefang+spamassassin+clanv kit.
>
> I can't get these
Kang, Joseph S. said:
> [snip]
>
>> From what I've seen the raw headers are not changed with the
>> exception of the MailScanner spamassassin score which may be
>> different because of RBL-SURBL's that have picked up on it.
>> This doesn't appear to be a problem because sa-learn ignores
>> the spam
Greg Earle wrote on Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:24:44 -0700:
> Why do I only get one SPAMCOP_URI_RBL_* hit when it's fed to "spamd"
> as it comes in, yet I get 5 of them when I run it manually?
Your spamd either uses different rules or gets a different message (from
whatever feeds the message to it).
Greg Earle wrote:
> (I'm still using 2.63 on my production mail server, btw. Please don't
> shoot
> me.)
I'll avoid shooting you, but I will warn you that you have a DoS vulnerability.
2.64 and higher are immune to this particular DoS.
3.0.1-3.0.3 are also subject to a separate DoS that's fixe
Greg Earle wrote:
> it finds
> "Display:" and "none" just fine when it's in the body as Plain Text
> ... so why doesn't it find them when they're inside HTML?)
"body" rules don't look at HTML tags, they look at an html-to-text'ified
version.
You can look at the raw HTML by using "rawbody" r
I keep getting these Via*/Cial*/Val* "and many other" SPAMs (you know
the ones,
they start with "Hello, Welcome to " and have all
those
obfuscating "DISPLAY:" "none"s embedded in them).
(I'm still using 2.63 on my production mail server, btw. Please don't
shoot
me.)
What I don't understand
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Goods [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 11:58 AM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Exchange/Outlook - how do you learn spam?
>
[snip]
> From what I've seen the raw headers are not changed with the
> exception of
Steven Dickenson wrote:
> Matt Yackley wrote:
>> 1. Email that has only been stored in user mailbox and then pulled
>> from a mailbox via IMAP/POP3 will retain the full headers of the
>> email.
>
> What happens if a user moves the mail item to another folder in their
> mailbox, and is then extrac
"Matt Yackley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> What I've resorted to doing is to archive all incoming e-mail in my
>> front-end MTA (exim on linux). I have a script that extracts the
>> message-ids of the spam in the Exchange public mail box and then
>> extracts the
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> According to Camel book 2nd edition page 39,
>
> "The underscore only works within literal numbers specified in your
> program, not for strings functioning as numbers or data read from
> somewhere else."
>
> I suspect that when Perl processes rule files, the scores ar
According to Camel book 2nd edition page 39,
"The underscore only works within literal numbers specified in your
program, not for strings functioning as numbers or data read from
somewhere else."
I suspect that when Perl processes rule files, the scores are not
processed like "literal numbers".
Hallo und guten Tag Matt,
Heute (am 22.06.2005 - 16:21 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
>>what means "tests=[PRIORITY_NO_NAME=X]" (X as example) in the
>>header exactly?
> First, it means that SA matched the message against the PRIORITY_NO_NAME
> rule, and gave it x points as a result.
> As for what PRIO
At 05:31 AM 6/22/2005, Adrian Cooper wrote:
Hi,
I have been using Spamassassin for over a year now, until recently with
great success in blocking almost all spam.
For the last few weeks however a large amount of spam has been arriving
even though I set to filter on a score of -2. Previously
At 10:10 AM 6/22/2005, Jim Knuth wrote:
Hello @all ,
what means "tests=[PRIORITY_NO_NAME=X]" (X as example) in the
header exactly?
First, it means that SA matched the message against the PRIORITY_NO_NAME
rule, and gave it x points as a result.
As for what PRIORITY_NON_NAME does, the describ
Does anyone have an old copy of milter-spamc ( the 0.25 or higher
"free" versions" ) lying about they could email as a zipped attachment
along with its associated files?
I was looking to "try it out" w/ spamassassin, but the latest version
from snertsoft must be licensed and costs $$$. I woul
Hello @all ,
what means "tests=[PRIORITY_NO_NAME=X]" (X as example) in the
header exactly?
--
Viele Grüße, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ #277289867
PGP Fingerprint:
54C9 1A46 D3B2 95B6 454D
74FA AC73 773E 1F78 066F
--
Zufalls-Zitat
--
Gary Lineker: "Fußba
Title: Mensagem
Hi,
I have these
headers:
-
Received: from
qmail.domain3.com
Received: from
phpmailer by
srv01.dinamize.com with local (PHPMailer);To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]From:
I've been running it with -s 'midnight' -e 'now'(At 11:59 - I'm
aware that I might lose a minute each day, but...)
Tried -s today-24 -e today and still get lots of zeros.
Ben (Hanson)
Ben O'Hara wrote:
On 6/22/05, Ben O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just realised its defaulting
Anyone have any insight on this?
Sa-stats.pl seems to be the only SA stats script I can find - I would
think there has to be more out there...
--
Matthew Yette
Senior Engineer - NOC/Operations
MA Polce Consulting, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
315-838-1644 (w)
315-356-0597 (f)
AIM/Yahoo: MAPolceNOC
MSN:
On 6/22/05, Ben O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just realised its defaulting to running 24 hours into the future
> rather than the past. Is this normal behaviour? should i be passing a
> -s of 24 hours ago to it?
>
Seems " -s today-24 -e today" does the trick!
Ben
--
"The Edge ... ther
On 6/22/05, Ben O'Hara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/22/05, Ben Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Timing:
> start = 1119444953 Wed Jun 22 13:55:53 +0100 2005
> end = 1119531353 Thu Jun 23 13:55:53 +0100 2005
>
> Report Title : SpamAssassin - Spam Statistics
> Report Date : 20
On 6/22/05, Ben Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Got my first nightly stats breakdown email this morning after starting
> testing the 3.10pre1 version. The report states zero spam, which is
> true (allright devs!) but then, zero mail as well. Did any log format
> change that I need to be aware
Steven Dickenson said:
comments inline
> Matt Yackley wrote:
>> 1. Email that has only been stored in user mailbox and then pulled from a
>> mailbox
>> via IMAP/POP3 will retain the full headers of the email.
>
> What happens if a user moves the mail item to another folder in their
> mailbox, an
John Hall said:
> "Matt Yackley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> MS is trying to come up with a work-around for the problem, also in
>> his spare time our developer at work is looking to see if he can come
>> up with a work-around. If I find a better way to pull messages out of
>> Exchang
Got my first nightly stats breakdown email this morning after starting
testing the 3.10pre1 version. The report states zero spam, which is
true (allright devs!) but then, zero mail as well. Did any log format
change that I need to be aware of? I didn't see any notes. I copied
over the sa-st
Hello:
I use mimedefang+spamassassin+clanv
kit.
I can't get these rules (25_uribl.cf) to work
properly.
In the command line it works ok, this is the
output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# spamassassin <
mail_test
X-Spam-Report: * 0.2
HTML_TEXT_AFTER_HTML BODY: HTML contains text
Matt Yackley wrote:
1. Email that has only been stored in user mailbox and then pulled from a
mailbox
via IMAP/POP3 will retain the full headers of the email.
What happens if a user moves the mail item to another folder in their
mailbox, and is then extracted via imap?
MS is trying to come
Roman Serbski wrote on Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:55:56 +0600:
> 1. sa-learn --backup > db.txt (on old server)
since you transferred the complete db I don't see a reason to import and
export the data. This is like backing up your notebook at home, take the
notebook and backup with you in the car to wo
Murty Rompalli wrote on Tue, 21 Jun 2005 06:59:27 -0400 (EDT):
> So ebay,paypal,
> amazon are not safe and not suitable for most ordinary people, only
> advanced users.
Well, I think, if one doesn't read email in HTML format those phish are
pretty safe to digest.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin,
Theo Van Dinter wrote on Tue, 21 Jun 2005 10:55:58 -0400:
> Can you open a ticket about this? We'll need to fix it before release.
following the conversation here and in "Subject: Problems after update SA
2.64 => 3.0.4" shall I still open a ticket on this or are you going to
fix/solve it anoth
Adrian Cooper wrote on Wed, 22 Jun 2005 10:31:13 +0100:
> For the last few weeks however a large amount of spam has been arriving even
> though I set to filter on a score of -2. Previously I was blocking most spam
> on a score of 1.0
>
> This is a very aggressive setting
Indeed, *both* setti
Hi,
I have been using Spamassassin for over a year now, until recently with
great success in blocking almost all spam.
For the last few weeks however a large amount of spam has been arriving even
though I set to filter on a score of -2. Previously I was blocking most spam
on a score of 1.0
"Matt Yackley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Here is what I know of the issue.
> 1. Email that has only been stored in user mailbox and then pulled
> from a mailbox via IMAP/POP3 will retain the full headers of the
> email.
> 2. Email that is moved into a public fo
Mike Jackson wrote:
I have SA 3.0.2 set up with vpopmail, using MySQL for user
preferences, auto whitelisting and bayesian storage.
It seems that with auto_learn turned on, SA is keeping a per-user
bayes DB in MySQL, which is great. However, I can't figure out how I
can teach SA about spam
It would be useful if you could run spamassassin -D --lint as
Kevin suggested.
See also:
http://www.surbl.org/faq.html#nettest
http://www.surbl.org/faq.html#test-uris
etc.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
48 matches
Mail list logo
