FYI, I just saw this message after upgrading to Sarge. The solution is to use
db4.2_upgrade on your bayes and AWL dbs.
I'd be happy to beta that one.. :)
Steven
I've got something like that in the works. :)
Hopefully I can get a beta release put out soon, management has OK'ed us
to release
it as GPL software, so I need to do a little documentation and get my
dev to clean
up a few errors and build a vanilla .
>...
>
>went to this barn on the weekend and was shocked by what goes on inside
>http://kwiktera.com/maui/five/oh.html its pretty messed up
>
>
>
>
>I'm running sa with amavis-new
>Thanks a lot
>
>
Don't even have to check - kwiktera. com - Brazilian porn - name
servers currently in foracy
Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
I'm running a more recent snapshot and URI's that are dotted-decimal are
not being reversed and checked properly against uridnsbl lists. For
example, a test on '202.99.223.139'.
You mean they ARE being lookup up, right? Not are not?
Daryl
Irina said:
Hi Irina,
> Thank you all for answering me.
>
> I found one link that may be very interesting
> (http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets)
>
> Next, I thought if there is a place for automatic uploading rules, then may
> be notifying me and I would reload SA. That is what I
>
> It wants to query the domain: 212.203.31.2 It does so here:
>
> debug: URIDNSBL: query for 212.203.31.2 took 1 seconds to
> look up (sbl.spamhaus.org.:2.31.203.212)
> debug: URIDNSBL: queries completed: 1 started: 0
> debug: URIDNSBL: queries active: at Tue Jun 7 18:10:32 2005
>
> So, why
Steven Dickenson said:
> Vadym Chepkov wrote:
>> I have read ResendingMailWithHeaders document and I couldn't find is there a
>> plug-in available for
>> Outlook so you can provide a feedback to Bayes just by pressing 'Spam' or
>> 'Ham'
>> buttons? Thank
>> you.
>
> Nothing I've found yet.
>
> Thi
Hallo und guten Morgen jdow,
Heute (am 08.06.2005 - 03:42 Uhr)
schriebst Du:
> I think it comes from Yiddish.
maybe ;) ... long time ago
kiebitzen = in German = ueber die Schulter schauen - jemand was
abgucken
--
Viele Grüße, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ #277289867
P
From: "Irina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello Joanne,
> I am not really sure what you meant by
> kibitz the SARE process
>
> Sorry, English is not my native language and some words don't go together.
Kibitz is what onlookers do behind the chess player's backs second
guessing their efforts. I thi
I keep getting spam with url's of know spammers but i never see the email
tagged or blocked.
i'm running sa 2.63(yeah, i know i gotta upgrade) and i block the mail with a
score of 4 and tag at 3.
spamcop_uri's score is 4 by default and yet nothing gets blocked or even tagged.
here's a sample ema
Vadym Chepkov wrote:
I have read ResendingMailWithHeaders document and I couldn't find is there a
plug-in available for
Outlook so you can provide a feedback to Bayes just by pressing 'Spam' or 'Ham'
buttons? Thank
you.
Nothing I've found yet.
This page comes close:
http://www.peculiarities.
Hi
It's Outlook XP. FreeBSD server runs SpamAssassin-3.0.1, access to the
mailboxes through
qpopper-4.0.5 (POP).
--- Matt Yackley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Vadym Chepkov said:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have read ResendingMailWithHeaders document and I couldn't find is there
> > a plug-in
> > avail
Vadym Chepkov said:
> Hi,
>
> I have read ResendingMailWithHeaders document and I couldn't find is there a
> plug-in
> available for
> Outlook so you can provide a feedback to Bayes just by pressing 'Spam' or
> 'Ham'
> buttons? Thank
> you.
>
> Sincerely,
> Vadym Chepkov
Hi Vadym,
What version
Irina wrote:
We don't use SURBL network tests because we use RBL lists from mail server
itself.
SURBL works differently. Most RBLs are designed to check the sending
server (usually by IP address). SURBLs look at links embedded in the
messages themselves.
For example, if I include a link t
Irina wrote:
I also have NOT used Bayes. Don't know how safe it is. Would I just submit
a spam message and I don't have to anything else, or ham the same way? Not
sure.
Some people have problems with Bayes, but many find that it does help a
lot. It does require you to train it with both sp
Hello Joanne,
I am not really sure what you meant by
kibitz the SARE process
Sorry, English is not my native language and some words don't go together.
If you mean I would share my rules? I don't mind at all. But first I would
like to rewrite them as I mentioned in my previous email, so rule
Rick, nice to hear good words about NetAccess. I will definitely say hello
to Gary and Tim. You must have left long ago (I have been with NetAccess
with more than for 5 years).
As of SA we use.
I will look into using RDJ rulesets since nobody minds :-) And Bayes as
well.
We don't use SURBL ne
Vadym Chepkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have read ResendingMailWithHeaders document and I couldn't find is there a
> plug-in available for
> Outlook so you can provide a feedback to Bayes just by pressing 'Spam' or
> 'Ham' buttons? Thank
> you.
Not that I'm aware of.
jdow wrote:
From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Irina wrote:
Thank you all for answering me.
I found one link that may be very interesting
(http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets)
I first should mention, I am a new SUBSCRIBER, not a new user to SA. I
h
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 01:39:46AM +0200, wolfgang wrote:
> thanks. I understand this
> - was only a "labelling" problem
> - has been fixed in 3.0.4.
Yes.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
No, I do not know what the Schadenfreude is. Please tell me, because
I'm dying to know.
--
From: "Rick Macdougall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Irina wrote:
>
> >Thank you all for answering me.
> >
> >I found one link that may be very interesting
> >(http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets)
> >
> >
> >
> >I first should mention, I am a new SUBSCRIBER, not a new user to SA. I
have
>
Kern, Tom wrote:
> I keep getting spam with url's of know spammers but i never see the email
> tagged or blocked.
>
> i'm running sa 2.63(yeah, i know i gotta upgrade)
Yeah, really soon. You've got a remote DoS vulnerability in your mime parser.
(2.64 and higher are immune)
and i block the mai
Hi,
I have read ResendingMailWithHeaders document and I couldn't find is there a
plug-in available for
Outlook so you can provide a feedback to Bayes just by pressing 'Spam' or 'Ham'
buttons? Thank
you.
Sincerely,
Vadym Chepkov
In an older episode (Wednesday 08 June 2005 00:54), Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 12:50:59AM +0200, wolfgang wrote:
> Per the Changes file, the full information is in Bugzilla bug 4367:
>
> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4367
>
> The short version is that the
I keep getting spam with url's of know spammers but i never see the email
tagged or blocked.
i'm running sa 2.63(yeah, i know i gotta upgrade) and i block the mail with a
score of 4 and tag at 3.
spamcop_uri's score is 4 by default and yet nothing gets blocked or even tagged.
here's a sample ema
Irina wrote:
Thank you all for answering me.
I found one link that may be very interesting
(http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets)
I first should mention, I am a new SUBSCRIBER, not a new user to SA. I have
been using it for a couple of years. Over that period I have created
t
Thank you all for answering me.
I found one link that may be very interesting
(http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/CustomRulesets)
I first should mention, I am a new SUBSCRIBER, not a new user to SA. I have
been using it for a couple of years. Over that period I have created
thousands of LOCA
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 12:50:59AM +0200, wolfgang wrote:
> sorry, not being an native english speaker, Isimply don't understand what
> this
> is about, could someone re-phrase that?
Per the Changes file, the full information is in Bugzilla bug 4367:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cg
In an older episode (Tuesday 07 June 2005 22:17), Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:13:48PM -0400, Pete O'Hara wrote:
> > I ran a diff on the scores between 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 and it looks like
> > RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS and RCVD_IN_SORBS_SMTP scores
> > played so
Irina wrote:
> Hello at SA list.
>
> I am a new subscriber - don't get angry if I did something wrong :-)
>
>
> 1. Is there any place and/or are there any tools that are available
> for updating SA rules automatically (on FreeBSD)?
http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
Note:
Hello at SA list.
I am a new subscriber - don't get angry if I did
something wrong :-)
1. Is there any place and/or are there
any tools that are available for updating SA rules automatically (on
FreeBSD)?
2. What can I use to check on SA
configuration from a Perl program (spamass
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:13:48PM -0400, Pete O'Hara wrote:
> I ran a diff on the scores between 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 and it looks like
> RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS and RCVD_IN_SORBS_SMTP scores
> played some musical chairs or am I not seeing this correctly?
Yes, they did. The SORBS r
Hi,
I ran a diff on the scores between 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 and it looks like
RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SOCKS and RCVD_IN_SORBS_SMTP scores
played some musical chairs or am I not seeing this correctly?
Pete
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff -u Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.3/rules/50_scores.cf
Mail-SpamAs
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 12:49 -0500, David B Funk wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Raul Dias wrote:
>
> > SPF would never work if not there, right?
> > Note that it does work, but not always.
> >
> > I have never see it fail from calling the spamassassin form the command
> > line, just as spamd.
> > It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
JamesDR wrote:
> Kevin Marvin wrote:
>
>> HELP! I cant get this figured out for the life of me. Here is
>> what I have...
>>
>> I have SA 3.0.2, using a Postgres database to store user
>> preferences. When I run a test instance and pass a test message
JamesDR wrote:
Kevin Marvin wrote:
Sorry list,
Michael set me straight on allow_user_rules :-D
--
Thanks,
James
Hi
Sometimes, don't know exactly when... When people receive email through our
mail mta Linux Redhat AS 3.0 Taroon update 3 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp (Postfix +
Trend(IMSS 5.5) + SA 3.0.3 then third party mail server with attachment of
about 2Mo, the attachment is "destroyed" when passed over spamassass
Kevin Marvin wrote:
HELP! I cant get this figured out for the life of me. Here is what I
have...
I have SA 3.0.2, using a Postgres database to store user preferences. When
I run a test instance and pass a test message to it (using spamc and spamd)
and the blacklist_from entries never get read
You, sir, are a GENIUS!
That fixed it perfectly. Thank you very much! Name the brand of e-beer and
I will send it your way.
- Kevin
On 6/7/05 1:00 PM, "Michael Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Kevin Marvin wrote:
>
>> spamd -x -q -C /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Marvin wrote:
> spamd -x -q -C /etc/mail/test/ --siteconfigpath=/etc/mail/test -p
Are you sure you mean -C /etc/mail/test/? Normally that would be
something like /usr/share/spamassassin, which is where all of the
default .cf/rules files are ins
Ok..
preference| value
-+
required_score | 4.0
blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
score USER_IN_BLACKLIST | 100
required_score | 3.0
report_safe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Marvin wrote:
> preference | value
> -+ required_score
> | 4.0 blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED] score USER_IN_BLACKLIST |
> 100 required_score | 3.0 report_sa
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Raul Dias wrote:
> SPF would never work if not there, right?
> Note that it does work, but not always.
>
> I have never see it fail from calling the spamassassin form the command
> line, just as spamd.
> It has enough permission for spamd to read it.
>
> Could it be that it hap
preference| value
-+
required_score | 4.0
blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
blacklist_from | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
score USER_IN_BLACKLIST | 100
required_score | 3.0
report_safe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin Marvin wrote:
> debug: Conf::SQL: executing SQL: SELECT preference, value FROM
> userpref WHERE username = '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' OR username =
> '$GLOBAL' OR username = '%'||'architel.com' ORDER BY username ASC
If you run the query above in psql
HELP! I cant get this figured out for the life of me. Here is what I
have...
I have SA 3.0.2, using a Postgres database to store user preferences. When
I run a test instance and pass a test message to it (using spamc and spamd)
and the blacklist_from entries never get read...
Here is my local.
Paul Porter wrote:
Hello,
I have just installed a mail gateway box to soften the load on our
internal mail server. Both servers are running SpamAssassin (details
below) and I noticed that the internal mail server is scanning messages
from our mail gateway eventhough they have already been sca
Hello,
I have just installed a mail gateway box to soften the load on our
internal mail server. Both servers are running SpamAssassin (details
below) and I noticed that the internal mail server is scanning messages
from our mail gateway eventhough they have already been scanned and
marked up.
On 6/7/2005 6:13 PM +0200, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
The debug output specified what happened. The domains were all in the
skip list, and SURBL and such doesn't have IPs looked up. SBL does do
IPs, so it was queried.
debug: uri found: http://pics.ebaystatic.com/aw/pics/x.gif
debug: uri found: ht
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:42:07AM -0400, Mike Schrauder wrote:
> > pardon my complete unix ignorance, I have been trying to figure
> > out how to get debug output to a file so I can go back and look
[snip..]
> > i've also tried spamassassin -D -t < tes
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham
version=3.0.3
Shouldn't I have a Bayes entry for every mail? I've never really had any
issues with Bayes - It's always worked, and worked well for me. I use
Postfix and call spamc using procmail, so the setup is very simple.
thanks to all
>& test.debug spamassassin -D -t < test.txt > test.out
AND
spamassassin -D -t < test.txt > test.out 2> test.debug
both do exactly what I need. Thanks!
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob McClure Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:53 AM
> To: users
Ronny Nussbaum wrote:
> Hello,
> I've tried to find an answer to this, but couldn't.
>
> I'm using SA 3.0.3, invoked by Amavisd-New (latest version), on Fedora
> Core 3.
>
> I've installed the Mail::SPF::Query module, and it works fine.
>
> My question is, how can I disable it from being used
Ronny Nussbaum wrote:
Hello,
I've tried to find an answer to this, but couldn't.
I'm using SA 3.0.3, invoked by Amavisd-New (latest version), on Fedora
Core 3.
I've installed the Mail::SPF::Query module, and it works fine.
My question is, how can I disable it from being used by SA?
I'm l
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 06:11:18PM +0200, Niek wrote:
> On 6/7/2005 5:39 PM +0200, Chris Santerre wrote:
> >URIBL has not officially requested to be included yet. We are doing some
> >behind the scenes beef ups. Our front end seems to be ever improving. :)
>
> I know, but that doesn't matter in t
On 6/7/2005 5:39 PM +0200, Chris Santerre wrote:
URIBL has not officially requested to be included yet. We are doing some
behind the scenes beef ups. Our front end seems to be ever improving. :)
I know, but that doesn't matter in this case.
The ip listed in multi.surbl.org too, but SA seems to
Hello,
I've tried to find an answer to this, but couldn't.
I'm using SA 3.0.3, invoked by Amavisd-New (latest version), on Fedora Core 3.
I've installed the Mail::SPF::Query module, and it works fine.
My question is, how can I disable it from being used by SA?
I'm looking for another way be
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:42:07AM -0400, Mike Schrauder wrote:
> pardon my complete unix ignorance, I have been trying to figure
> out how to get debug output to a file so I can go back and look
> at it. I also want to look at the marked up email w/ report so
> I am using this:
>
> spamassassin
>-Original Message-
>From: Niek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:48 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: uridnsbl only spamhaus in 3.0.4 ?
>
>
>Hi,
>
>I just downgraded from a svn version to 3.0.4
*snip*
>
>And that's it, no surbl.org or uribl.com lo
> Would this make sense? Can this be included into spamassassin, or
> are the current internals structured in way that makes the introduction
> of such plugins hard/impossible?
The concept of normalization has been discussed under various names over
time. My personal impression is nobody really k
> pardon my complete unix ignorance, I have been trying to figure
> out how to get debug output to a file so I can go back and look
> at it. I also want to look at the marked up email w/ report so
> I am using this:
>
> spamassassin -D -t < test2.txt > test2.out
>
> How could I also redirect the
> But I'm not so sure yet so my question is do you know of any HAM that uses
> receive lines like this?
Not sure, but running some mass-checks now to see.
Loren
Spamassassin -D -t test2.out would work. In *nix
environments you just choose the level by putting the number in front of
the redirect.
This should help you get up to speed on Linux I/O redirection:
http://www.cpqlinux.com/redirect.html
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Mike Schrauder [mail
> Or one could do like Theo, and strip all HTML content from
> the emails. :)
Or do that. I'd love to do that. But unfortunately, some users
actually like html mails. No accounting for taste :)
> The problem with the normalization, is like anything else.
> One mans ham,
> anothers spam. Repetit
Hi,
I just downgraded from a svn version to 3.0.4
I've noticed SA only utilized spamhaus for uridnsbl's.
I check my /usr/share/spamassassin/25_uribl.cf it has all the surbl.org
zones listed + I enabled multi.uribl.com in local.cf.
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL is turn on in ini
>&test2.out spamassassin -D.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Schrauder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:42 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: debug output to file?
pardon my complete unix ignorance, I have been trying to figure
out how to get debug o
pardon my complete unix ignorance, I have been trying to figure
out how to get debug output to a file so I can go back and look
at it. I also want to look at the marked up email w/ report so
I am using this:
spamassassin -D -t < test2.txt > test2.out
How could I also redirect the debug output to
Vivek Khera wrote:
> and the idiot mail system that did such neutering should be banned
> from the earth. there's absolutely no reason to strip a virus from
> an email then let the rest of the message through.
Actually, it's occasionally the virus itself that misfires and forgets
to attach a copy
>-Original Message-
>From: Sven Riedel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:58 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>Subject: Would a normalization plugin make sense?
>
>
>Hi,
>since a lot of spam nowadays tries to get past the filters
>by multiplying random letters,
At 09:44 AM 6/7/2005, Phibee Network operation Center wrote:
Ok i thinks that it's qmail-scanner for start with -u ... i put "verbose"
into the config .. if i put "Fast_SpamAssassin", only -u are removed ?
I don't know, I'm no expert on qmail-scanner.
However, it looks like trying to pass -u i
Matt Kettler a écrit :
At 04:13 AM 6/7/2005, Phibee Network operation Center wrote:
Hi
i small question on SPamAssassin 3.0.3:
Jun 7 10:07:07 gw spamd[3329]: connection from gw.srv2.schevingt.org
[127.0.0.1] at port 45929
Jun 7 10:07:07 gw spamd[3329]: handle_user: unable to find user
'[
> At 04:13 AM 6/7/2005, Phibee Network operation Center wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >i small question on SPamAssassin 3.0.3:
> >
> >Jun 7 10:07:07 gw spamd[3329]: connection from gw.srv2.schevingt.org
> >[127.0.0.1] at port 45929
> >Jun 7 10:07:07 gw spamd[3329]: handle_user: unable to find user
> >'[EMAI
At 04:13 AM 6/7/2005, Phibee Network operation Center wrote:
Hi
i small question on SPamAssassin 3.0.3:
Jun 7 10:07:07 gw spamd[3329]: connection from gw.srv2.schevingt.org
[127.0.0.1] at port 45929
Jun 7 10:07:07 gw spamd[3329]: handle_user: unable to find user
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'!
Jun 7
Hi,
since a lot of spam nowadays tries to get past the filters
by multiplying random letters, wouldn't it make sense to
introduce normalization plugins to spamassassin?
These would run over the mail once before the actual scanning
starts, and perform transformations on the decoded mail body.
Some
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:14:52AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/spamassassin//Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4.tar.bz2.md5
> > http://www.apache.org/dist/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4.tar.bz2.md5
> Yes, under source/ is the correct path. Is there something poin
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 01:07:49PM +0200, Maurice Lucas wrote:
> I'm unable to download/view the gpg/md5/sha1 signature from the website
> eg.
> http://www.apache.org/dist/spamassassin//Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4.tar.bz2.md5
> had to be
> http://www.apache.org/dist/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassi
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 09:12 +0200, Niek wrote:
> On 6/6/2005 10:50 PM +0200, Raul Dias wrote:
> > Ok, I findout some stuff here:
> >
> > 1 - This is not the only message this happens. Other messages that
> > should have triggered SPF rules did not.
> >
> > 2 - This is happening when using s
Yes multiple times.
-Original Message-
From: Vinayak Royadu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 8:38 AM
To: Proctor, Scott
Cc: Matt Kettler; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Local.cf settings seem to be ignored
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 17:52, Proctor, Scott wro
There is nothing is the qmail-scanner config file for this nor in the
documentation. The documentation does mention changing your local.cf
file.
Any other ideas?
Thanks!
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 2:45 PM
To: Proc
Hello,
I'm unable to download/view the gpg/md5/sha1 signature from the website
eg.
http://www.apache.org/dist/spamassassin//Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4.tar.bz2.md5
had to be
http://www.apache.org/dist/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4.tar.bz2.md5
With kind regards,
Met vriendelijke groet,
I get a lot of med-spams lately that look the same, short, 2 lines with
one url, below that some text (from a book?).
Often it gets marked as spam because of the url, but not always because
bayes has no real grip on this mail.
Maybe there is a way to recognise them in the second receive-line becaus
Hi
i small question on SPamAssassin 3.0.3:
Jun 7 10:07:07 gw spamd[3329]: connection from gw.srv2.schevingt.org
[127.0.0.1] at port 45929
Jun 7 10:07:07 gw spamd[3329]: handle_user: unable to find user
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'!
Jun 7 10:07:07 gw spamd[3329]: Still running as root: user not
spec
On 6/6/2005 10:50 PM +0200, Raul Dias wrote:
Ok, I findout some stuff here:
1 - This is not the only message this happens. Other messages that
should have triggered SPF rules did not.
2 - This is happening when using spamd.
3 - When running these messages by hand against spamassassin -D
Hi
Running SA 3.03-1
Sendmail 8.12.11-4
RHEL 3
Configured using MailScanner 4.41.3
Can anyone tell me the name of the SA test (if there is one) that can check for
a valid PTR in the sender IP? Sendmail can be configured to delay/reject sender
IP's with invalid/missing PTR's but this will reject
84 matches
Mail list logo
