You may be up a creek, or there may be a way to snaggle past the little
annoyances. You are certainly in a case where you don't have a shell, so
don't have stdin/stdout/stderr available normally. However, I suspect that
stdin/stdout have been remapped, since that is how most web page things
work,
In an older episode (Friday 20 May 2005 18:07), Jake Colman wrote:
> When my server is up, all email is processed by my SA. If my server is
down,
> my email is held for me at the backup MX. When my server comes back, the
> backup MX sends me all my email. It appears to me that when my email is
Thanks for the response.
Well, I am calling the SA classes directly as perl via "PerlScript"...
Similar to VB and how an ASP page is called from IIS (but by
perlse.dll).
EX:
use Mail::SpamAssassin;
Etc, etc.
Namely, the SMTP Exchange interface ('Simple Mail Transfer Protocol'
service) allow
At 08:05 AM 5/21/2005, Raphael Clifford wrote:
I have what appears to be a fully functional spamassassin 3.0.3 set up
with all network tests working. However,
spamassassin -r samplespam.txt
gives me
razor2 report failed: No such file or directory Razor2 report requires
authentication at
/u
At 10:20 AM 5/21/2005, Tieum wrote:
I use spamassain behind amavisd-new. I get two prblems with BAYES:
1) my imap folders are scanned everyday some for HAM some for SPAM, everyda=
y=20
ssa-learn tells it learned from all messages although some are not new
That's weird. Is your bayes_seen file
> I understand that this has to be done by something outside of SA, but
> I'm not sure what would work with sendmail to do this, and the
Procmail will do this trivially; but of course that might not be part of
your setup.
Loren
I'm sorry, I shoudln't post late at night. I am running SA as a
sendmail milter. And of course SA is happy to filter again mail which
has been filtered once - but I would love some way to tell it NOT to.
I have an external relay running SA, and I can guarantee that any mail
sent from the external
> relay hosts, but nothing from the external would get filtered by the
> internal (since it's already been through the filter on the
> external...) sounds like you've accomplished that!
Eh? SA is perfectly happy to filter mail that has been through some version
of SA before. After all, you may ha
If you figure it out I'd love to know how you did it - I have been
wanting to set SA up so that it is running on my external and internal
relay hosts, but nothing from the external would get filtered by the
internal (since it's already been through the filter on the
external...) sounds like you've
> This one is missing the 'From:', 'Date:', 'Subject:', 'Message-Id:',
> and even the message body; ... and has a forged HELO ...
>
> How could something that badly formatted get a SPAMassassin
> score as low as 3.1? ... well below my threshold of 4.7.
Simple - SA scores based on what it finds in
> I find it odd that MS would not give my access to STDERR, but it looks
> to be the case. :(
You do usually have have access to stderr on a Windows platform. However,
it is entirely possible that it has been hijacked by whatever the process is
that is calling SA and doesn't end up where you thin
Tim Jackson wrote:
On Fri, 20 May 2005 20:48:26 -0400
"Eric Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[on Fedora Core 1]
2. What is the easiest way to update Net::DNS to 0.34 ?
This was very easy:
perl -MCPAN -e shell[as root]
o conf prerequisites_policy ask
On Fri, 20 May 2005 20:48:26 -0400
"Eric Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[on Fedora Core 1]
> > 2. What is the easiest way to update Net::DNS to 0.34 ?
> This was very easy:
>perl -MCPAN -e shell[as root]
>o conf prerequisites_policy ask
>install Net::
At 09:27 AM 5/22/2005, guenther wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 07:03 -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> How can one use user_prefs to tell spamassassin to reject spam
> tagged at level N at just send it back to them?
You can't.
SA is not designed to delete, deliver or bounce mail. It is designed to
scan
Greetings,
I have been noticing some incomplete SPAM messages.
This one is missing the 'From:', 'Date:', 'Subject:', 'Message-Id:',
and even the message body; ... and has a forged HELO ...
How could something that badly formatted get a SPAMassassin
score as low as 3.1? ... well below my thresho
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:21:24AM +0100, Raphael Clifford wrote:
Does this mean that I need to make a separate installation of razor
using the instructions at
http://razor.sourceforge.net/docs/doc.php?type=text&name=INSTALL ? The
spamassassin spam reporting docs are no
List Mail User wrote:
Follow the trail; Chris Terrebonne's "NFP Inc." - snakeoil and
spam/scammers of Slidell, LA - (985) 726-0928. They've been around a very
long time (domains change weekly, but a few constants like remain
conradpromotions. com, rednecks. com and myownemail.com). Th
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:21:24AM +0100, Raphael Clifford wrote:
> Does this mean that I need to make a separate installation of razor
> using the instructions at
> http://razor.sourceforge.net/docs/doc.php?type=text&name=INSTALL ? The
> spamassassin spam reporting docs are not clear on this at
Is there any way that something like this could be inserted/changed into
the Mail::SpamAssassin module... Or is this just something that I
should implement as there's no other need for it?
sub dbg {
if (!defined($dbg->{foo}) {
warn "debug: $msg\n";
} else {
push (@{$Mail::SpamAssas
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 07:03 -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> How can one use user_prefs to tell spamassassin to reject spam
> tagged at level N at just send it back to them?
You can't.
SA is not designed to delete, deliver or bounce mail. It is designed to
scan and identify SPAM only. Any action taken
How can one use user_prefs to tell spamassassin to reject spam
tagged at level N at just send it back to them?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
insert you thought here.
On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 22:24 -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> Move aside/delete the default rule files. There's no point in a config
> option to ignore other config options. ;)
I think there is: default config goes in /usr/share/spamassassin, site
local in /etc/mail/spamassassin and user specific i
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:05:04PM +0100, Raphael Clifford wrote:
razor2 report failed: No such file or directory Razor2 report requires
authentication at
What can I do to fix it?
Read the Razor docs. In this case, SA is telling you that Razor requires you
to have
Raphael Clifford wrote:
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Actually, SpamAssassin 3.0.3 can't parse the first received header
either, due to the @ in front of the IP. Even if you were to set
trusted_networks all trusted would fire and there'd be no RBL lookups
etc.
Daryl
I think that is exactly r
Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Loren Wilton wrote:
I am not NAT'ed so I can see no reason why it is ALL_TRUSTED
I think I can:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 19588 invoked from network); 20 May 2005 22:45:07 +0100
Received: from 82-35-6-77.cable.ubr01.hari.blueyonder.co.uk
(@
Just a quick note that the SARE header files have been updated.
Updates include 16 new rules, 14 archived rules, 6 archived rules
reactivated, 100 rules moved from one file to another, and one
modified rule.
Download information available at
http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm#header
Bob Mens
26 matches
Mail list logo
