On Friday 13 May 2005 23:51, Ryan L. Sun wrote:
> If an incomming email is from a IP listed in IP whitelist, we don't
> need to check it at all.
> The whitelist I mentioned here is a large-scale one. Say Microsoft and
> Yahoo's IPs should be added to IP whitelist since we suppose they
> won't send
jdow wrote:
> From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>That said, C/R is really annoying and IMO not worth the effort. YMMV. :)
>
>
> Anybody who does that to me ends up in my .procmailrc file redirected
> to /dev/null. C/R is an example of that with which I will not put.
>
> {^_^}
>
From: "jdow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > That said, C/R is really annoying and IMO not worth the effort. YMMV.
:)
>
> Anybody who does that to me ends up in my .procmailrc file redirected
> to /dev/null. C/R is an example of that with which I will not p
Quick question for anyone who may know -- is a .po (gettext-style)
file more usable for translators out there?
In particular, Ubuntu's Rosetta -- https://launchpad.ubuntu.com/rosetta/
-- uses this format. That looks cool, but I'm curious about other
tools that can be used to edit .po files as wel
Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
Try adding the "Return-Path:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" address and see if thats
it.
Oddly enough, that worked. Hrm. I wonder why
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> That said, C/R is really annoying and IMO not worth the effort. YMMV. :)
Anybody who does that to me ends up in my .procmailrc file redirected
to /dev/null. C/R is an example of that with which I will not put.
{^_^}
***This now works (with minor mods to the SA distro files [SQL.pm] and
the creation of an additional MS SQL User defined function)
I've mocked up an MS SQL Version of RPAD that could be easily introduced
into the readme code that creates the bayes tables, and sets the
version. (please correct the
I don't expect I'll get a reply quick enough to help. It's been strongly
suggested that I switch our mail server over to ANYTHING other than what we
have before the weekend is out.
I've been bouncing around the web and digging through documentation trying to
figure out how to do SA + virus scannin
Michael Parker wrote:
debug: bayes: tok_get_all: Token Count: 302
debug: bayes: tok_get_all: SQL Error: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Se
rver]'RPAD' is not a recognized function name. (SQL-42000)
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Statement(s) could not be prepare
d. (SQL-4200
If an incomming email is from a IP listed in IP whitelist, we don't
need to check it at all.
The whitelist I mentioned here is a large-scale one. Say Microsoft and
Yahoo's IPs should be added to IP whitelist since we suppose they
won't send spams.
Currently I am maintaining a RBL list, and hopefull
Ryan L. Sun wrote:
> Do you guys have any idea how to build up an effective and accurate IP
> whitelist?
> Since IP always cause false positive and I believe IP whitelist may be
> a good idea.
>
> Thanks.
> -Ryan
>
What do you use to call SA?
While the idea is good, any whitelisting at all done
Do you guys have any idea how to build up an effective and accurate IP
whitelist?
Since IP always cause false positive and I believe IP whitelist may be
a good idea.
Thanks.
-Ryan
jdow wrote:
From: "Thomas Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thu, 2005-05-12 at 08:31 -0700, Loren Wilton wrote:
Usually a high load average means that a spamd child suddenly
(or possibly slowly) got fat, and you are out of memory and
thrashing to beat the band.
[snip]
Again, study what causes the p
Hmmm.. I can't believe I missed that.. Thanks for the info.
If it's a matter of creating a function in SQL to replicate spaces (or
something else) at the end of the string, I can code that easily enoug
(called RPAD).
Wouldn't varchar types probably be a better usage in this scenario.
I'll play
Matt Kettler wrote:
Brian Godette wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] appears to be not only running this mailing
list thru spamassassin (bad idea) but also auto-reporting any positive hits
(incredibly bad idea).
Agreed... SA ditched the "auto_report_threshold" feature back in 2.30
back in 2002. If it was
I'm running spamassassin 3.0.3 as a "proxy" on three mail servers. This
morning at 2am one of the three (but not the other two) started spewing
a lot of
spamc[8000]: connect(AF_INET) to spamd at 127.0.0.1 failed, retrying (#1
of 3)
and did not identify any messages as spam until a user compl
> debug: bayes: tok_get_all: Token Count: 302
> debug: bayes: tok_get_all: SQL Error: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL
> Se
> rver]'RPAD' is not a recognized function name. (SQL-42000)
> [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Statement(s) could not be
> prepare
> d. (SQL-42000)(DBD
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 01:28:08PM -0600, The Doctor wrote:
> IS there a good package that one can plug into Spam Assassin for C-r?
I doubt there's one you plug into SA, since SA doesn't stop mail from being
delivered. You're likely looking for one that uses SA as a possible flag to
go c-r.
That
IS there a good package that one can plug into Spam Assassin for C-r?
--
Member - Liberal International
This is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ici [EMAIL PROTECTED]
God Queen and country! Beware Anti-Christ rising!
BC, Vote Liberal!!
Alan Munday wrote the following on 13/05/2005 17:48:
Michael Parker wrote the following on 13/05/2005 17:32:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:28:14PM +0100, Alan Munday wrote:
Is it possible to move the awl data when migrating to SQL?
tools/convert_awl_dbm_to_sql
Michael
Michael
Ah ha, I did not have t
Brian Godette wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] appears to be not only running this mailing
>list thru spamassassin (bad idea) but also auto-reporting any positive hits
>(incredibly bad idea).
>
>
>
Agreed... SA ditched the "auto_report_threshold" feature back in 2.30
back in 2002. If it was a bad ide
Thanks for the quick response...
I'll be glad to help in any way I can.
Sorry for top-posting... Outlook doesn't thread very well for comments
nested in previous messages. (Or I haven't figured out how to.. :)
The sa-learn restore was done with the same override user name as the
production use
I would like for the rbl checking to happen for the connecting host
(just like if it was provisioned in sendmail), but I don't want it to
check each and every relay.
I find frequently that a user behind nat will get the nat address
blacklisted because of zombies behind the same address, but the le
At 06:59 PM 5.12.2005 -0700, Robert Menschel wrote:
>Hello Jack, Chris,
>
>Thursday, May 12, 2005, 8:46:40 AM, you wrote:
>
>JLS> At 09:19 AM 5.12.2005 +0100, Chris Russell wrote:
>>>Trying to Update this morning gives:
>>>Lint output: warning: description exists for non-existent rule
>JLS> SARE_OB
Michael Parker wrote the following on 13/05/2005 17:32:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:28:14PM +0100, Alan Munday wrote:
Is it possible to move the awl data when migrating to SQL?
tools/convert_awl_dbm_to_sql
Michael
Michael
Ah ha, I did not have the tools installed.
Maybe a reference to this could be
Fred wrote:
Ben Hanson wrote:
Shortly after the first of the year, I noticed the percentage of spam
messages for our organization dropped consistently by 10-15%.
Ben
I see between 83-85% spam.
We use SARE rules + my own home-brew rules + the new BLACK uribl lists +
unreleased SARE rules.
In the
Ben Hanson wrote:
> Shortly after the first of the year, I noticed the percentage of spam
> messages for our organization dropped consistently by 10-15%.
> Ben
I see between 83-85% spam.
We use SARE rules + my own home-brew rules + the new BLACK uribl lists +
unreleased SARE rules.
In the past 24
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alan Munday wrote:
|
| Is it possible to move the awl data when migrating to SQL?
|
Sounds like a job for convert_awl_dbm_to_sql which, here at least, is in:
/var/cpan/build/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.3/tools/
Then again, I might be talking out of my behind.
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:28:14PM +0100, Alan Munday wrote:
>
> Is it possible to move the awl data when migrating to SQL?
>
tools/convert_awl_dbm_to_sql
Michael
pgpLEE1vUbWPI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Is it possible to move the awl data when migrating to SQL?
Thanks
Alan
Shortly after the first of the year, I noticed the percentage of spam
messages for our organization dropped consistently by 10-15%. We had
been averaging 60 to 65% for the last year or so, ever since I began
with SA, right up until then, when it dropped consistently to just over
50%. I didn'
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 09:05:34AM -0700, Markus Hardiyanto wrote:
> Why Mail::SpamAssassin module always giving output
> spam score 0? while if i run spamassassin from console
> to check the same sample-spam file it give spam score
> 4?
Mail::SpamAssassin doesn't actually check your mail. Pleas
Why Mail::SpamAssassin module always giving output
spam score 0? while if i run spamassassin from console
to check the same sample-spam file it give spam score
4?
--- Markus Hardiyanto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> can i use Mail::SpamAssassin to setup
> required_score?
> i already read the manu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] appears to be not only running this mailing
list thru spamassassin (bad idea) but also auto-reporting any positive hits
(incredibly bad idea).
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 08:35:08AM -0700, Steven Manross wrote:
> On that same note,
>
> I was playing around with BAYES on a MS SQL Server...
> (I followed the directions in the readme files and tweaked the mysql.sql
> code to work for MS SQL in creation of the tables.)
Ahhh, most excellent, I d
So why do they work on one machine and not the other? Both machines are SA
3.0.0. and are virtually identical in setup.
>>> Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/13/05 09:34AM >>>
On Friday, May 13, 2005, 8:19:57 AM, Scott Schaffer wrote:
> SA 3.0.0 on both machines
One thing to note is that the URID
On that same note,
I was playing around with BAYES on a MS SQL Server...
(I followed the directions in the readme files and tweaked the mysql.sql
code to work for MS SQL in creation of the tables.)
The import worked fine (no errors that I could see).
sa-learn --D --backup >bayes-backup.txt)
Mod
On Friday, May 13, 2005, 8:19:57 AM, Scott Schaffer wrote:
> SA 3.0.0 on both machines
One thing to note is that the URIDNSBL rules in 3.0.0 are type
"header" while they're type "body" in later versions. If you're
using rules quoted for URIDNSBL for example on the SURBL site,
they usually mention
SA 3.0.0 on both machines
>>> Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/13/05 08:06am >>>
At 06:14 PM 5/12/2005, Scott Schaffer wrote:
>I am migrating spamassassin from my perimeter firewall to another server
>to lighten the load on the firewall. I have installed SA3.0 on the new
>machine and have don
At 02:38 AM 5/13/2005, Geoff Sweet wrote:
2005-05-12 23:30:33.432514500 2005-05-13 06:30:33 [88906] i: result: Y 23
-
BAYES_99,FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN,FORGED_THEBAT_HTML,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,HEAD_ILLEGAL_CHARS,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI,MSGID_RANDY,NORMAL_H
At 06:14 PM 5/12/2005, Scott Schaffer wrote:
I am migrating spamassassin from my perimeter firewall to another server
to lighten the load on the firewall. I have installed SA3.0 on the new
machine and have done some testing. I am getting different results on each
SA install.
Which EXACT version
Bowie Bailey wrote:
From: Ben Wylie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Currently I am running my mailserver on a windows box. I have just bought
a new server and will probably be running CentOS on it. I would like to
migrate my mailserver onto this linux box so that hopefully I will be able
to get a fas
From: Ben Wylie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Currently I am running my mailserver on a windows box. I have just bought
> a new server and will probably be running CentOS on it. I would like to
> migrate my mailserver onto this linux box so that hopefully I will be able
> to get a faster, more st
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm interested in using SpamAssassin and would like to know if anyone
has used it for
outbound filtering.
For example:
I would like the ability to filter messages by domain. To prevent being
blacklisted by
AOL or such companies, I would like to filter outbound email des
Nina
depends on how you are calling SA.
I use MailScanner and it's perfectly possible to get MailScanner to scan
outbound email for spam only for certain domains.
BUT as most spammer infected machines have their MTA, you'll prob need a
firewall rule to redirect all outbound SMTP messages to the
I'm interested in using SpamAssassin and would like to know if anyone has
used it for
outbound filtering.
For example:
I would like the ability to filter messages by domain. To prevent being
blacklisted by
AOL or such companies, I would like to filter outbound email destined to
AOL for spam
an
On Thu, 12 May 2005 09:14:18 -0400
Dimitri Yioulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am, indeed, using the latest incarnation of RDJ.
Show the output from your latest RDJ run then. It should be using the
rulesemporium.com URL. It certainly won't have a timj.co.uk 500 error.
If you're still having pr
can the moderator please unsubscribe me off this list.
i've already sent 5 mails to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> without success, i keep
receiving the mails of this list.
Please unsubscribe me
thank you
--
kmd
On 5/12/05, kmd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/12/05, kmd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/11/05, kmd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > today i spent many hours building SA on perl 5.8.6, instead of the
> > > 5.8.1 perl that is default installed on the mdk 9.2 linux box (it's
> > > very diffic
In an older episode (Friday 13 May 2005 12:26), Joe Zitnik wrote:
> Yes, but his scoring list BAYES_99 as one of the scores, which means
> bayes is active, which means it has been fed the necessary 200 spam and
> 200 ham. If it hadn't been fed the necessary spam and ham, it would not
> have been g
On Thursday, May 12, 2005, 3:14:13 PM, Scott Schaffer wrote:
> Machine behind the firewall results
> -
> debug: bayes: score = 0.505530427067805
> debug: bayes: 276 untie-ing
> debug: bayes: 276
Yes, but his scoring list BAYES_99 as one of the scores, which means bayes is active, which means it has been fed the necessary 200 spam and 200 ham. If it hadn't been fed the necessary spam and ham, it would not have been given a BAYES score at all. The fact that the mail was not autolearned co
James R wrote:
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
James R wrote:
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
How can that happen? Anybody else here with the same experience?
Are we talking about a bug here? I would really like to know if
this is a problem in my setup or if others are experien
On 5/12/05, kmd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/11/05, kmd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > today i spent many hours building SA on perl 5.8.6, instead of the
> > 5.8.1 perl that is default installed on the mdk 9.2 linux box (it's
> > very difficult to upgrade perl with rpm, it breaks things). so,
In an older episode (Friday 13 May 2005 08:38), Geoff Sweet wrote:
> I would like to enable the Bayes system with auto-learning. I thought
> that I had my config setup correctly but apparently I don't. My config
> looks like this:
>
> ##
> # How we want to modify the email
> rewrite_he
I can swear I saw this question in at least 20 different messages, not to
mention the website
I really recommend you research your question before asking it.
autolearn=no means that it didn't 'learn' this message.
Other possible states are 'spam, 'ham' and ... 'DISABLED'
If autolearn were to be
56 matches
Mail list logo
