David B Funk said:
>geocities is pretty good about taking crap down once they're notified,
Yes... but it often takes them a couple of days to get this done... even
when kiddy pron is involved.
I wish geocities would respond faster to such complaints.
Also, much higher volumes of spam mail with g
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Jeff Chan wrote:
> Well when they can sell spams that don't advertise a web site
> for the same price as those that do, let us know. Until
> then SURBLs have them.
>
> Jeff C.
OK, how about 419'ers or stock scammers?
The child porn sites that use: http://beam.to/adultworld
Steve Lake wrote:
> Hi all. Just upgraded my copy of Spam Assassin to the latest
> build on Freebsd 4.10 and suddenly it's not filtering mail. It loads
> up fine, and I can see the child processes like what's supposed to be
> there, but nothing seems to get handed off to procmail. I'm not
>
Hi all. Just upgraded my copy of Spam Assassin to the latest build on
Freebsd 4.10 and suddenly it's not filtering mail. It loads up fine, and I
can see the child processes like what's supposed to be there, but nothing
seems to get handed off to procmail. I'm not totally sure what's up. I
Has any one heard of phishreport.net?
Joe
Hi -
Something odd just happened with my SA 3.0.2 setup -- I wonder if this
sounds like a recognizable symptom of something?
Ever since installation, my average scantime has been 15-45 seconds per
message. The scantime gradually increases, seeming like a memory leak,
until I restart spamd reset
One good redirector deserves Yet another.
http://cz7.clickzs. com/tn.php?carefullyacross&kza%2eiB%72s%6fft.%63Om
This one SURBL does not catch, except for the fact that 'clickzs. com'
is listed in WS. ;)
--
Dave Funk University of Iowa
College of Engine
From: Mathias Wrede [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi list,
>
> in wich way could I make the following line compatible to sa-learn?
> # sa-learn --ham `find /var/spool/imap/user \( -name '*.' -o -name Spam
> -prune -o -name System -prune -o -name Trash -prune -o -name Virus -prune
\)
> -type f`
>
At 07:11 AM 3/29/2005, Ben @ Wylie wrote:
My F:\Documents and Settings\User\.spamassassin folder contains my bayes
files. I back this whole folder up regularly.
Am I right in thinking that if I have backed it up already, I can delete all
the .expire files and all old_ files?
Yes
Also, I don't use a
I do what you said ... but I dont have spam in .spam folder ...
How can I test uf the maildrop ys working ?? How can I test the spamassassin
??
Thanx !
-Mensaje original-
De: CG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: Lunes, 28 de Marzo de 2005 03:01 p.m.
Para: Alan Glait; users@spamassassi
My F:\Documents and Settings\User\.spamassassin folder contains my bayes
files. I back this whole folder up regularly.
Am I right in thinking that if I have backed it up already, I can delete all
the .expire files and all old_ files?
Also, I don't use auto-whitelist, so can I delete that file?
Also
On Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 1:08:43 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 12:38:25 AM, Alex Broens wrote:
>> Good Morning!
>> New redir?
>> --
>> For more information or to have a broker contact you please visit:
>> http://g.msn.com/0MNBUS00/1?http://ok-ref-now .com
>> No future
From: "Robert Menschel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hello jdow,
>
> Friday, March 25, 2005, 3:29:04 AM, you wrote:
>
> j> It seems there are a lot of anti-spam headers which if they are seen
> j> on incoming email is a fairly good indication that the message is
> j> spam. Kaspersky Anti-Spam is one su
From: "Andy Jezierski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Chris Santerre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/28/2005
> 10:44:41 AM:
>
> >
> >
> > >-Original Message-
> > >From: jdow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 6:29 AM
> > >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > >Subject: SARE
Hi list,
in wich way could I make the following line compatible to sa-learn?
# sa-learn --ham `find /var/spool/imap/user \( -name '*.' -o -name Spam -prune
-o -name System -prune -o -name Trash -prune -o -name Virus -prune \) -type f`
My problem: There could be blanks in the pathnames.
Thanks f
Hi,
I have a few questuions regrding the benefit/use of SA fatures.
1.I would like to activate more features to SA (I currently use only SARE rules).
We are considering SURBL, DCC and Pyzor.
My question is - what are the preferable features that I can add to SA, that will result in better spam
I've got about a dozen spams that have that exact header pair. I've never seen
it anywhere else. It is a relatively recent thing to be seeing.
Loren
-Original Message-
From: Andy Jezierski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Mar 28, 2005 9:25 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subjec
On Monday 28 March 2005 21:20, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Monday 28 March 2005 20:26, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>>>bayes_file_mode
>>
>> I had that set for 0770, but the man pages says 0700 and a chmod
>> +x, so thats what it is now. We'll see how that works.
>>
>> You'll
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 28 March 2005 20:26, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
bayes_file_mode
I had that set for 0770, but the man pages says 0700 and a chmod +x,
so thats what it is now. We'll see how that works.
You'll recall from my first message that this is the file that
disappeared on me
Hello jdow,
Friday, March 25, 2005, 3:29:04 AM, you wrote:
j> It seems there are a lot of anti-spam headers which if they are seen
j> on incoming email is a fairly good indication that the message is
j> spam. Kaspersky Anti-Spam is one such puppy with its often appearing
j> X-Spamtest-Munged-Info
On Thursday 24 March 2005 01:07, Matt wrote:
>I am trying to get this "my_rules_du_jour" to work.
>
>http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
>
>After the scripts download the rules and try to merge them I get
> this error.
>
>>Lint output: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipp
On Monday 28 March 2005 20:26, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>bayes_file_mode
I had that set for 0770, but the man pages says 0700 and a chmod +x,
so thats what it is now. We'll see how that works.
You'll recall from my first message that this is the file that
disappeared on me & started this whol
Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 28 March 2005 15:01, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
Gene doesn't even need to do that. Just create another user, such
as 'rootsa' and call spamc with the option '-u rootsa'. Or, if
you'd like a more generic or global SA bayes database/etc,
something like 'spamd' would be
On Thursday 24 March 2005 01:07, Matt wrote:
>I am trying to get this "my_rules_du_jour" to work.
>
>http://www.exit0.us/index.php?pagename=RulesDuJour
>
>After the scripts download the rules and try to merge them I get
> this error.
>
>>Lint output: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipp
On Monday 28 March 2005 15:01, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
>Steve Prior wrote:
>> Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> The point being that under those conditions, root doesn't have
>>> any filtering. So, I located that section of code in
>>> /usr/bin/spamd, and commented it out. I believe its now working.
>>>
Menno van Bennekom wrote:
I can't see the incompatibility between the rate-limiting and the dummy
mx, but maybe if you turn the dummy mx into a tarpit you can make life too
difficult for legitimate (but very fast?) bouncers. Is that what you mean?
Yes, I meant compatibility in a general sense -- as
26 matches
Mail list logo
