On Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 3:37:05 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 02:56 PM 2/8/2005, Shane Metler wrote:
>>debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x898ffe4)
>>implements 'check_tick'
>>debug: URIDNSBL: query for broadcastemail.us took 1 seconds to look up
>>(auth2.homes.com.:br
At 02:56 PM 2/8/2005, Shane Metler wrote:
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x898ffe4)
implements 'check_tick'
debug: URIDNSBL: query for broadcastemail.us took 1 seconds to look up
(auth2.homes.com.:broadcastemail.us)"
debug: URIDNSBL: domain "broadcastemail.us" listed (UR
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 2:14 pm, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Tuesday, February 08, 2005 11:14 AM -0700 Brian Godette
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > care must be taken to have the expiry times
> > reasonable or the iptables rule lists becomes much too large and
> > eventually chews up all
Does anyone know the email address of the correct person to report problems
with the Apache mailing list archives? The mailing list archives have been
sick for over a week. Fortunately the MARC archives have come back to life.
I tried sending a report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] some 3 days ago, but not
RH 9.0 SA 3.02
what is the correct way to install SHA1 on perl
5.8.0, where do I get it from and how to install it. My sa-learn is stopping at
sha1 and I believe this module may not be installed correctly.
--On Tuesday, February 08, 2005 1:14 PM -0800 Kenneth Porter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have you seen the "ipset" stuff on the netfilter-devel list? This is a
new set of modules that works with sets of addresses. It should allow you
to have a much larger rejection list.
Just checked, this project
Michael Parker wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:28:51PM -0300, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
2) Throttle the calls to spamd to reduce lock contention.
Sorry to ask this again, but I'm not native English speaker :-P
Did you mean to increase the number of spamd children processes, like
spamd -m x? I
--On Tuesday, February 08, 2005 11:14 AM -0700 Brian Godette
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
care must be taken to have the expiry times
reasonable or the iptables rule lists becomes much too large and
eventually chews up all available CPU.
Have you seen the "ipset" stuff on the netfilter-devel list?
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:28:51PM -0300, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
>
> >2) Throttle the calls to spamd to reduce lock contention.
>
> Sorry to ask this again, but I'm not native English speaker :-P
> Did you mean to increase the number of spamd children processes, like
> spamd -m x? I have cu
Michael Parker wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:37:50PM -0300, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
I'm seeing a lot of messages about and version error in the bayes db in
my log file:
spamd[6562]: bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting!
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAss
From: Arvinn Løkkebakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> >From: Arvinn Løkkebakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>jdow wrote:
> >>
> >>>Do not disable it. Fix the cause.
> >>>
> >>>It's time to hit the wiki and learn how.
> >>>{^_^}
> >>
> >>I hit the wiki and found this
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:37:50PM -0300, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
> I'm seeing a lot of messages about and version error in the bayes db in
> my log file:
>
> spamd[6562]: bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting!
> at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesS
Title: Message
Hi SA
Users,
I have a question
for anyone who may have added their own custom URIDNSBL
lookups.
I have set up
RBLDNSD (successfully as far as I can see) to support both IPs and
URIs.
A command line DNS
call returns the expected results, but SA 3.0.0 and URIDNSBL do not
ClamAV is running and the amavis log_level=5 setting shows it scanning very
very fast. It is whatever takes place next that is boggin things down.
- Gary
Richard Ozer wrote:
Is clamd running? Is clamav.conf set up to scan via a tcp socket? If
neither of those are happening, then you may be expe
Is clamd running? Is clamav.conf set up to scan via a tcp socket? If
neither of those are happening, then you may be experiencing an amavis
timeout while it tries to communicate with clamd.
RO
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 11:23 AM
Subject: Incredibly slow SA checks
What process takes
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:55:38AM -0700, Jason Bennett wrote:
>
> I had to change to the user I actually run as and it removed fine. Is
> there a spamassassin command line option to specify a whitelist database
> file when I use the --remove... option?
>
Check out auto_whitelist_path in perldo
Hi all,
I'm new to this mailling lists and to SpamAssassin too.
In the past mounths, i have built severals smtp gatewas using the followings :
- Postfix 2.13
- Amavisd-new (The lastest Stable Version)
- Clamav (0.80)
- Mail::SpamAssassin (Lastest Version)
Every works great, no crash,
Hi
I'm seeing a lot of messages about and version error in the bayes db in
my log file:
spamd[6562]: bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting!
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm
line 160.
I'm using SA 3.0.2.
The output of sa-learn show a bay
What process takes place during the "Calling SA checks" routine? I have amavis-new and
spamassassin 3.02 running, with SA configured to use SQL. I cranked up the amavis log_level to 5
and watched the logs. They show a message coming in at what I guess to be acceptable speed until
just after the
Actually, I just figured it out. The database for my autowhitelist was
not in root's home directory. I didn't realize the
"--remove-from-whitelist" option was trying to remove it from a
.spamassassin/auto-whitelist from the current user's home directory.
I had to change to the user I actually
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:46:33AM -0700, Jason Bennett wrote:
>
> Any other help would be greatly appreciated.
>
Do you by chance have a sitewide auto-whitelist setup? If so, are you
sure that you are reading the correct database with check_whitelist?
Run with -D and see if that gives you any
Thanks!
Ok, I used the check-whitelist tool and sure enough, my entry that I'm
trying to remove is:
16.5 (329.3/20) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=142.179
So I still have the same problem - I run:
# spamassassin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re-check with the "check-whitelist" and I get:
16.5
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
From: Arvinn Løkkebakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdow wrote:
Do not disable it. Fix the cause.
It's time to hit the wiki and learn how.
{^_^}
I hit the wiki and found this patch:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2508
Is
Jason Bennett wrote:
> I'm having a little trouble with my Spamassassin v3 and the
> autowhitelist. I'm trying to remove an email address from the list,
> but it is not working. If anyone has any ideas, please let me know.
>
> Here is what I'm doing:
>
> #cat auto-whitelist | strings | grep jas
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Dennis Davis wrote:
While I like the idea of using an RBL for these types of things, since in
theory it would save a lot of load if these emails never even hit
spamassassin...my custom rule mentality was more or less for *submitting*
to that RBL.
This is outside the scope of
Bowie Bailey wrote:
From: Arvinn Løkkebakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdow wrote:
Do not disable it. Fix the cause.
It's time to hit the wiki and learn how.
{^_^}
I hit the wiki and found this patch:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2508
Is it the fix you were thi
On Thursday 03 February 2005 4:22 pm, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 06:13 PM 2/3/2005, Brian Godette wrote:
> >Those sorts of mail servers end up in my firewall rules till some point in
> >the
> >future.
>
> I started off using a shun on them as a short-term fix, but then went to a
> 500 error message f
Hi all,
I'm having a little trouble with my Spamassassin v3 and the
autowhitelist. I'm trying to remove an email address from the list, but
it is not working. If anyone has any ideas, please let me know.
Here is what I'm doing:
#cat auto-whitelist | strings | grep jason
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=14
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Rich Puhek wrote:
> From: Rich Puhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:29:57 -0600
> Subject: Re: detecting brute-force spams
>
> Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> > Hey al
From: Arvinn Løkkebakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> jdow wrote:
>
> >Do not disable it. Fix the cause.
> >
> >It's time to hit the wiki and learn how.
> >{^_^}
>
> I hit the wiki and found this patch:
>
> http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2508
>
> Is it the fix you were thi
jdow wrote:
Do not disable it. Fix the cause.
It's time to hit the wiki and learn how.
{^_^}
I hit the wiki and found this patch:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2508
Is it the fix you were thinking about?
Can anyone advice me on how to apply the patch correctly?
Thanks.
Arvi
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey all,
I host about 500 domains, and every once in a while I see something
where a domain gets hammered for a bunch of non-existent users (in my
setup, this results in all the emails going to the same place).
Is there a custom rule that can be kicked in to dete
MCI 'makes $5m a year from spam gangs'
By John Leyden
Published Monday 7th February 2005 18:29 GMT
Spamhaus has slammed MCI for hosting a website selling spamming software
that is allegedly integral to the illegal trade in compromised PCs. The site
- send-safe.com - sells spamware called Send Safe
> $ host -t txt belfin.ch
> belfin.ch text "v=spf1 mx:mx.seaan.net -all"
> belfin.ch text "v=spf1 a:mx.seaan.net -all"
>
> There's only supposed to be 1 record, but there are 2. Since
> there are no MX RRs for mx.seaan.net, the message fails.
>
> I think you want the single:
>
> v=spf1 a:mx
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 07:32:44AM +0100, Philipp Snizek, seaan.net ag wrote:
> mx.seaan.net is approved for belfin.ch, so that mail should have been
> accepted.
> What should I do?
>
> Well, I did wait a while but I just got back NDRs. Could you please
> investigate that?
From a quick check, bel
Hrm, this may be a reason to upgrade to 3.0
then
From: Ben Story [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 February 2005 13:55To: Gray, Richard;
users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: RE: Tracking Rule
Hits
I believe you could do this using the information that SA
puts in syslog now. It lists e
I believe you could do this using the information that SA
puts in syslog now. It lists each rule hit for a spam as well as the
score.
--Benjamin Story, CCNA CCDAClient Server Technical
Analystwww.dotfoods.comIT Helpdesk x2312
From: Gray, Richard
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesd
Thanks for the feedback loren. We do use a *lot* of
custom rules, so I'll make it a more long term target I
think.
Richard
From: Loren Wilton
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 February 2005
11:10To: users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: Re:
Upgrading to 3.0
Certainly better spam catch
Is
there a way to log the number of times a specific rule has hit within
spamassassin. Ideally I'd like to see how often a rule hits, and the average
score of the messages that it hit on, but anything along those lines would help
At
the minute the best idea I have come up with is to use an
On Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 5:08:32 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
> Please complain to Barak that their customer walla.com is sending
> spam. The problem is not really with SpamHaus but that Barak
> apparently continues to allow walla.com to be mentioned in
> thousands of reported spam (and probably many
On Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 2:58:32 AM, Eli Yukelzon wrote:
> http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL22121
> The problem is - barak.net.il is one of the MAJOR Israel's ISPs,
> and since MANY hosts have NS record matching it, this SBL record
> block ALL sites hosted on it.
Please compla
Good day.
I've been having some problems with URIDNSBL plugin for Spam Assassin.
One of blocked mail came from emailframer.com .
After investigating issue this came up:
host -t ns emailframer.com
emailframer.com name server ns1.barak.net.il.
emailframer.com name server ns.barak.net.il.
host -t
Certainly better spam catching if you aren't using addon
rules.
Probably better spam catching if you are.
Gives you a chance to tell your boss you need to upgrade all
the email servers to 3GHz/4GB, and thus you need a pay raise!
Version is supported.
Basically, 2.64 is now old and dead, and
Apologies for asking this if the answer is obvious, but I couldn't see it
anywhere in the wiki
we
currently use 2.64
What
are the reasons for upgrading to 3.0?
TIA
R
---
This email from dns has been validated by dnsMSS Managed Email Sec
Hi,
is there already a list of dead statesmen - there are occasional messages from
people
who claim to be widows, sons or whatever.
The last two I saw were from Daniel Arap Moi's son and Yassir Arafat's widow :)
Wolfgang Hamann
Hi all,
I'm having a little trouble with my Spamassassin v3 and the
autowhitelist. I'm trying to remove an email address from the list, but
it is not working. If anyone has any ideas, please let me know.
Here is what I'm doing:
#cat auto-whitelist | strings | grep jason
[EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=14
Hi
Yesterday I tried to post from my general mailinglist account
(mailinglists -at- belfin.ch) a question to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got back a NDR saying:
< mx.seaan.net #5.0.0 X-SecureMail; host
mail.apache.org[209.237.227.199] said: 550SPF forgery: Please see
http://spf.pobox.com/why.html?send
47 matches
Mail list logo
