On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:28:51PM -0300, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
2) Throttle the calls to spamd to reduce lock contention.
Sorry to ask this again, but I'm not native English speaker :-P
Did you mean to increase the number of spamd children processes, like spamd -m x? I have currently set spamd -m 10.
No, it means to slow/reduce the calls to spamd. Increasing the number of children will probably make the problem get worse.
OK, I'm using milter-spamc to talk with sendmail milter and pass the messages to spamd. For what I know, there is no way to control the calls to spamd from the milter-spamc command.
I would have to reduce the spamd child processes or increase the milter timeout in order to reduce the calls to spamd right?
3) Switch to SQL based bayes which won't (well shouldn't) have that issue.
That's an interesting idea. I'm going to keep that in mind :)
You can view the notes/slides from my ApacheCon presentation on Storing SpamAssassin User Data in SQL Databases here: http://www.apache.org/~parker/presentations/
Hopefully it will help move things along.
That's good, Thank you very much Michael.
BR, Matías.
