ApacheCon SpamAssassin BOF 11/16 9pm

Hi All, If you're traveling to ApacheCon next week be sure to come by the SpamAssassin BOF session. It is currently scheduled for November 16th from 9-10pm, not sure on the physical location, so be sure check the session schedule. Michael -- ApacheCon November 13-17 2004 http://www.apachecon.c

Re: Clam AntiVirus plugin for SpamAssassin 3.x

Justin Mason wrote: I was going to, but then I found Bug #3389: "Request for ability to add arbitrary headers from plugins" I think that covers it pretty well..? yep; noted. I've added a note. Thanks. Also, putting the plugin code i

Re: Clam AntiVirus plugin for SpamAssassin 3.x

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Troels Walsted Hansen writes: > Justin Mason wrote: > > >>I was expecting a $permsgstatus->add_header() function or similar, and > >>when I didn't find I grepped the SA source until I found an alternative > >>way to add headers to the mail. > >>

Re: Clam AntiVirus plugin for SpamAssassin 3.x

Justin Mason wrote: I was expecting a $permsgstatus->add_header() function or similar, and when I didn't find I grepped the SA source until I found an alternative way to add headers to the mail. This is definitely an interesting feature idea. Could you open a bug on the bugzilla for that?

RE: SPF fails now

|-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: 10 November 2004 19:42 |To: Raymond Dijkxhoorn |Cc: marti; Spamassassin |Subject: Re: SPF fails now | |-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- |Hash: SHA1 | | |Raymond Dijkxhoorn writes: |> Hi! |> |> > Since I have

Re: sa-learn

>> >> I want to integrate sa-learn to learn what is spam and what is non spam. >> I use SA 2.64 and procmail. >> >> Is it OK if I have two users that each move there SPAM and HAM to >> local IMAP folders ?. >> >> Like FALSE-SPAM and SPAM >> How do I specfy to sa-learn to go look in a certain ima

Re: Clam AntiVirus plugin for SpamAssassin 3.x

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Troels Walsted Hansen writes: > Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > > > Well sort of. The headers only get set if the message ends up being > > classified as spam. If you receive a virus from a whitelisted user, or > > in a message that would otherwise s

Re: non-dns based load balancing spamd

On Wednesday 10 November 2004 13:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am looking for some help finding a proxy/load balancer that will work > with spamc->group of spamd machines > > Does anyone have any tips on what to use? > > I tried balance (http://www.inlab.de/balance.html) and pen > (http://sia

Re: Clam AntiVirus plugin for SpamAssassin 3.x

Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: Well sort of. The headers only get set if the message ends up being classified as spam. If you receive a virus from a whitelisted user, or in a message that would otherwise score less than -5.0 (at least with the default score CLAMAV 10), the X-Spam-Virus: Yes ($virus

Re: not scanning for virus after spamscan

At 04:46 AM 11/10/2004, Roel Bindels wrote: Hello List I'm using amavis (old version) wich does the spam scanning and I'm using amavis for virus scan. When a virus is marked as spam no virusscan takes place. Does anyone kwon why this is and how this can be fixed greetings Roel Bindels (config files

Re: non-dns based load balancing spamd

At 01:33 PM 11/10/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking for some help finding a proxy/load balancer that will work with spamc->group of spamd machines Does anyone have any tips on what to use? May I ask why you don't want to do a DNS based load balancing and spamc -H? Quite frankly, it sounds

Re: SPF fails now

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Raymond Dijkxhoorn writes: > Hi! > > > Since I have moved my mailserver/spamassassin onto my gateway, SPF now fails > > on most messages, of which most are forwarded from my ISP's mailerver. Mail > > sent direct to my mailserver get SPF_PASS. > > > >

non-dns based load balancing spamd

I am looking for some help finding a proxy/load balancer that will work with spamc->group of spamd machines Does anyone have any tips on what to use? I tried balance (http://www.inlab.de/balance.html) and pen (http://siag.nu/pen/) both return identical results, spamc sending to machine directly

Re: SPF fails now

Hi! Since I have moved my mailserver/spamassassin onto my gateway, SPF now fails on most messages, of which most are forwarded from my ISP's mailerver. Mail sent direct to my mailserver get SPF_PASS. E.g. marti.mine.nu saw a message coming from the IP address 62.253.162.47 which is mta07-svc.ntlwor

SPF fails now

Since I have moved my mailserver/spamassassin onto my gateway, SPF now fails on most messages, of which most are forwarded from my ISP's mailerver. Mail sent direct to my mailserver get SPF_PASS. E.g. marti.mine.nu saw a message coming from the IP address 62.253.162.47 which is mta07-svc.ntlworld.

RE: Sitewide SA implementation question

From: Kang, Joseph S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > At this point, I've made scanning of messages for my users to be > entirely opt-in. All mail users (about 30 total) have local server > accounts but the messages get sent on to an internal MS Exchange > server via .forward files. So, those user

Sitewide SA implementation question

All: It's been awhile since I actually had a question about SA. Also, I'm not sure if this is a SA question or more a Procmail question. I think it's a bit of both... So, I'm running sendmail and have implemented SA 2.64 (spamc/spamd) via procmail. SA is set up with sitewide Bayes and NO per u

Re: not scanning for virus after spamscan

Roel, Roel Bindels wrote: > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org, Bob Proulx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Hello List I am NOT the mailing list! This is a great example of why doing a group reply to a message and just changing the subject is not good. You replied to my last message about "Badly formatted

Beeing nice to Chinese Mails

Hello all We have got some customers who want to get their mails in Chinese. Now the bayes filter happened to block them because the only Chinese mails it ever saw where spam (Chinese customers, but no Chinese employees...). Now I am looking for a way to control the treatment of Chinese mails (a b

Re: whitelist_from not working, sometimes

I use : whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it works good. /Hitete

Re: whitelist_from not working, sometimes

At 10:53 AM 11/10/2004, Michael Weber wrote: I have a file, local-names.cf, in the /etc/mail/spamassassin directory which is a list of addresses I need to whitelist. It seems to work, except for one sender. Here is the line from the .cf file: whitelist_from LABONE.com This never trigger

Sa-LEARN error, and no debuggibg messages.

I have 2 users which classify their messages a ham and spam. Two new directories have been created : SPAM-NON-DETECTED HAM The non detected spam is transfered (no bounce no forward) to SPAM-NON-DETECTED The detected spam which isn't in fact SPAM is transfered (no bounce no forward) to HAM What

whitelist_from not working, sometimes

Greetings! I have a file, local-names.cf, in the /etc/mail/spamassassin directory which is a list of addresses I need to whitelist. It seems to work, except for one sender. Here is the line from the .cf file: whitelist_from LABONE.com This never triggers when I receive mail with a he

Re: Clam AntiVirus plugin for SpamAssassin 3.x

Troels Walsted Hansen wrote: You're perfectly right, of course. I did notice this problem, but I wasn't aware of headers_ham so I didn't find a way to fix it. In fact I was wondering about the legality of manipulating $permsgstatus->{main}->{conf} from a plugin. Is it considered bad practice? A

Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Probable new data source: DNS queries hittingspamhaus lists

On Wednesday, November 10, 2004, 5:25:43 AM, Rob McEwen wrote: > 1st, if you are converting domains to IPs and then checking these IPs > against spamhaus, you may have to make sure your system can whitelist the > domains **before** conversion to IP since the IPs can change without notice. Interest

Fwd: [SURBL-Discuss] Probable new data source: DNS queries hitting spamhaus lists

This is a forwarded message From: Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: SURBL Discuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2004, 11:34:19 PM Subject: [SURBL-Discuss] Probable new data source: DNS queries hitting spamhaus lists ===8<==Original message text=== At Danie

IMAP folder with sa-learn

Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > I want to integrate sa-learn to learn what is spam and what is non spam. > I use SA 2.64 and procmail. > > Is it OK if I have two users that each move there SPAM and HAM to > local IMAP folders ?. > > Like FALSE-SPAM and SPAM > How do I specfy to sa-learn to go look in

Re: sa-learn

I want to integrate sa-learn to learn what is spam and what is non spam. I use SA 2.64 and procmail. Is it OK if I have two users that each move there SPAM and HAM to local IMAP folders ?. Like FALSE-SPAM and SPAM How do I specfy to sa-learn to go look in a certain imap folder ?. /Hitete

not scanning for virus after spamscan

Hello List I'm using amavis (old version) wich does the spam scanning and I'm using amavis for virus scan. When a virus is marked as spam no virusscan takes place. Does anyone kwon why this is and how this can be fixed greetings Roel Bindels (config files can be send on request)

Re: Badly formatted HTML- best practices?

Loren Wilton wrote: > > Should we inform them that their mails are likely to be caught be email > > filters or should we let them live on in blissful ignorance? > > I personally try to suggest ways to fix things occasionally. > It almost invariably has no results, but I figure it is worth trying n

Re: [SURBL-Discuss] Please test MailPolice Fraud list

On Monday, September 20, 2004, 3:20:52 PM, Jeff Chan wrote: > Please test the MailPolice Fraud list as Bill described earlier > (copied below). We would like to include this data in our > PH anti-phishing list, but request your help in testing it > first. > We're particularly interested in any fa

Re: Rules List

On Tuesday, November 9, 2004, 11:53:13 AM, Greg Earle wrote: > I've got Mail::SpamAssassin::SpamCopURI installed on 2.63 now. > But, since 2.63 didn't come with 3.01's rules like 25_uribl.cf, > there's nothing in my 2.63 setup to utilize SpamCopURI, as far > as I can tell. [...] > This won't work

Re: Clam AntiVirus plugin for SpamAssassin 3.x

Troels Walsted Hansen wrote: I created a small plugin using the new plugin API in SpamAssassin 3.x. The plugin connects to a local ClamAV server (through TCP) and checks the email for virus. If a virus is found, it returns a positive return code to indicate spam and sets the header "X-Spam-Virus

Rule hits entry in syslog

Is there currently a way to set SA 'not' to display the rules that were hit on a message in the syslog? Or could this possibly be coded into a future version? Running SA 3.0.1 -- Chris Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org 7:35pm up 6 days, 1 min, 1 user, load average: 0.64, 0.64

Re: New header rule syntax question

Hello Scot, Tuesday, November 9, 2004, 2:57:27 PM, you wrote: SH> I have a rule for a client that causes all of his Movable Type comment SH> emails NOT to be tagged as spam even if SA thinks they are: SH> # Allow blog comments to be delivered SH> header MT_SUBMISSION Subject =~ /somestring// SH

Proper config to handle idalup users?

What is the proper way to configure SpamAssassin (and/or sendmail for that matter, possibly) to handle dial-up users that use our machine as their primary SMTP server? Basically, I have some users that are on dialup (or, at least, dynamic) services out there now and then. They connect directly

Re: Question From A Newbie.

On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 19:51:21 -0500, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >At 07:39 PM 11/9/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>I have a question regarding installing additional rules. >>How to install the new rules? >> >>Do I just copy them to /etc/mail/spamassassin? > >Yep that's all. > >Well, I'

Re: Question From A Newbie.

At 07:39 PM 11/9/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a question regarding installing additional rules. How to install the new rules? Do I just copy them to /etc/mail/spamassassin? Yep that's all. Well, I'd also suggest running spamassassin --lint to check for parsing errors. If you used spamc/spa

Re: Question From A Newbie.

On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 19:49:48 -0500, Rick Macdougall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Newbie alert. >> >> I have successfully installed SpamAssassin 3.0.1 for Red Hat Linux 7.1 >> server that I was assigned to work on. >> >> >> >> I use SpamAssassin as a system wide

Re: Question From A Newbie.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Newbie alert. I have successfully installed SpamAssassin 3.0.1 for Red Hat Linux 7.1 server that I was assigned to work on. I use SpamAssassin as a system wide filter through procmail (small domain with less than 150 email boxes. ## Send to Spam Assassin :0fw | /usr/bin/

Question From A Newbie.

Newbie alert. I have successfully installed SpamAssassin 3.0.1 for Red Hat Linux 7.1 server that I was assigned to work on. I use SpamAssassin as a system wide filter through procmail (small domain with less than 150 email boxes. ## Send to Spam Assassin :0fw | /usr/bin/spamassassin I hav

Re: New header rule syntax question

On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 02:57:27PM -0800, Scot Hacker wrote: > header MT_SUBMISSION Subject =~ /somestring// > > This rule does not seem to be working in SA3 -- some comment emails are > being tagged as spammy and he's missing them. How would I rewrite this rule > to work under SA3? You have one