Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

SA 3.0.1, yes. So, because I see 11-12 processes, even with -m 3, what should I do about it? jay Rick Macdougall wrote: jplesset wrote: Hopefully . . . I'm still hovering around 11 spamd processes. it goes up to 15, drops to 9, but seems to stay around 11 or so. My server is much smaller th

Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

jplesset wrote: Hopefully . . . I'm still hovering around 11 spamd processes. it goes up to 15, drops to 9, but seems to stay around 11 or so. My server is much smaller than yours, and has only 256 megs of ram, so it's kind of important to keep these things in line. . . Sparc RAM is so expens

Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

Oban Lambie wrote: jplesset wrote: Ok, this seems to be a *lot* more stable from a memory standpoint: "spamd -m 3 --max-conn-per-child=3" But now I'm seeing this in my mail logs every few seconds: Nov 3 15:46:58 mail spamd[18881]: s

Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

jplesset wrote: Oban, I'm having a somewhat similar issue, though a different environment. SpamAssassin 3.0.1, Solaris 9, and iPlanet Messaigng 5.2p2. I find that when I started spamd,with no special flags, other than -d, I got a large number of spamd processes running. This number increased ov

Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

Hopefully . . . I'm still hovering around 11 spamd processes. it goes up to 15, drops to 9, but seems to stay around 11 or so. My server is much smaller than yours, and has only 256 megs of ram, so it's kind of important to keep these things in line. . . Sparc RAM is so expensive... jay Oban L

Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

Rick Macdougall wrote: Oban Lambie wrote: The good news was that 3.01 was really, really good at tagging spam and I'd love to get back to it. The bad news was that no matter what I did I could not stop the memory problems and the resulting lock-ups with 3.0 AND 3.01. I've been reading and sea

RE: URIDNSBL

From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I don't have any of those tests showing up in the tagged spam. > > I did notice a -2.4 for not passing through untrusted hosts. > I am going to have to change that score I think. I dont think > I am going to give spam credit for not being sent t

Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

Oban, I'm having a somewhat similar issue, though a different environment. SpamAssassin 3.0.1, Solaris 9, and iPlanet Messaigng 5.2p2. I find that when I started spamd,with no special flags, other than -d, I got a large number of spamd processes running. This number increased over about 20 min

Re: Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

Oban Lambie wrote: The good news was that 3.01 was really, really good at tagging spam and I'd love to get back to it. The bad news was that no matter what I did I could not stop the memory problems and the resulting lock-ups with 3.0 AND 3.01. I've been reading and searching this group from

Questions on Spamassassin deployment

Greetings all: I am looking for feedback and constructive criticism on how our organization is looking to deploy SpamAssassin. The solution we are looking for will only need to filter e-mail for virus and spam because all user mailboxes are currently stored on an Exchange 2000 server. Here is

Re: Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screwing messages up

Yeah that views the headers.. the problem is that to get the un-munged message in raw format you can't touch the header/body combo and need to get it as is. On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 12:46:59 -0800, Raquel Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:58:10 -0500 > > > Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: {SPAM} SA 3.01 scoring very low

At 04:40 PM 11/3/2004, Dave Goodrich wrote: Good afternoon, I just finished testing an upgrade of SA to 3.01 and my scores fell through the floor. Read the docs, tried to use the Wiki, followed everyone else's upgrade on the list. Not sure just what went wrong. DAve Here is a sample output of sp

Memory issues have forced me back to 2.64

The good news was that 3.01 was really, really good at tagging spam and I'd love to get back to it. The bad news was that no matter what I did I could not stop the memory problems and the resulting lock-ups with 3.0 AND 3.01. I've been reading and searching this group from the moment that I u

SA 3.01 scoring very low

Good afternoon, I just finished testing an upgrade of SA to 3.01 and my scores fell through the floor. Read the docs, tried to use the Wiki, followed everyone else's upgrade on the list. Not sure just what went wrong. DAve Here is a sample output of spamassassin -D < test_spam (a known spam tha

Re: Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screwing messages up

On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 13:58:10 -0500 Matt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > As much as I hate Outlook, I have to support it.. ugh.. > > Is there anyway to get the full source and message, from outlook > without having to view source, then view headers? I want the full > untainted source as I can g

RE: Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screwing messages up

> -Original Message- > From: Dan Barker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 2:03 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; Matt > Subject: RE: Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screwing > messages up > > > Closest you can get is Open the message (ugh!), Ac

Re: Spamd broken since 3.0.x

Your the man, i found the spamassassin conf in /etc/mail/spamassassin moved it to old and copyed the config from another server onto it and it's working now. Thanks.

t-shirts!

hey all -- I've revived http://www.cafepress.com/spamassassin just in time for ApacheCon, with the new logo. (I think long-term we should try to have a higher-quality t-shirt shop, but temporarily this should do ;) --j.

RE: Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screwing messages up

|-Original Message- |From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: 03 November 2004 18:58 |To: users@spamassassin.apache.org |Subject: Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screwing messages up | |Hi, |As much as I hate Outlook, I have to support it.. ugh.. | |Is there anyway to get the f

RE: URIDNSBL

I don't have any of those tests showing up in the tagged spam. I did notice a -2.4 for not passing through untrusted hosts. I am going to have to change that score I think. I dont think I am going to give spam credit for not being sent through a known spam host. --Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTE

Question about a custom rule

I'm working up a rule (for 2.64) to try to increase the score of HTML messages that contain a 1x1 pixel image which references an ASP script. I've come up with this: rawbody LR_IMAGE_TAGGED_ASP =~ /\

RE: Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screwing messages up

Closest you can get is Open the message (ugh!), Actions, Resend this message, Yes, change to your sa-learn mailbox (I guess that's where you want it), and hit send, then delete the original. That's supposed to retain as much of the headers as possible. You can get the same effect without opening i

Re: URIDNSBL

Heh, that's easy: 99% of your spam will score on either of these tests: 5.0 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist 5.0 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL blocklist 5.0 URIBL_JP_SURBL

Re: Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screwing messages up

You might be able to extract an original message from your mail server, depending on what that is. One of the reasons I installed iPlanet Messaging Server is so I can do exactly that. jay Craig W. Shaver wrote: You can import a .pst to outlook express and then export it to netscape. Then

URIDNSBL

How do I know if SA is using URIDNSBL? I am running SA 3.0 on FreeBSD with MimeDefang and now emails are scoring very very low and some users are getting a ton of spam through. I want to make use of URIDNSBL if I can, but I am not sure if it is working or not. --Mike Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screwing messages up

You can import a .pst to outlook express and then export it to netscape. Then it will be in a normal mailbox format. However, you can never get the identical headers back after outlook/exchange munges it. Jason J Ellingson wrote: >You cannot retrieve the original email from Outlook. Once Outlook

=?utf-7?q?RE: Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screwing messages up?=

You cannot retrieve the original email from Outlook. Once Outlook receives the email, it parses it into its database (.pst / Exchange) and is not reversable. - Jason - Original Message - From:Matt +ADw-mhoppes+AEA-gmail.com+AD4- Subject: Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screw

Slightly OT: How to get Outlook To stop screwing messages up

Hi, As much as I hate Outlook, I have to support it.. ugh.. Is there anyway to get the full source and message, from outlook without having to view source, then view headers? I want the full untainted source as I can get from other quality mail programs like mozilla, and thunderbird.

RE: Problems with SURBL and catching stuff..

Hi Matt, I've mentioned this before as well. This spammer is really good at not hitting most of the stock rules. We get hit with about a dozen of them before the SURBL's catch on. To catch them all the time, make sure you are using 70_sare_html1.cf from rulesemporium.com. Add to your local.cf

handle_user error

Hi all, I've just tried upgrading an old SA install to the latest version but ran into difficulties with user preference files not being used. In the log I get: Oct 27 13:57:39 MAIL vpopmail[6878]: vchkpw-smtp: (PLAIN) login success [EMAIL PROTECTED]:217.106.106.171 Oct 27 13:57:44 MAIL spamd[55

Re: Does (Unix sockets) spamd still pipe the mail message?

On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 03:12:47PM +1300, Jason Haar wrote: > It seems to me that could improve performance (a little bit) - a whole > bunch of I/O could be skipped... It's the whole message. Most of the time spamc gets data from STDIN, so there's no filename to pass. That also means no dealing

RE: Missing subjects on 3.0x

-Original Message- From: Rick Beebe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 10:37 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Missing subjects on 3.0x Recently upgraded from 2.63 to 3.0.1 and there's a behavior change I don't see documented. When spam comes in wi

Re: Missing subjects on 3.0x

At 10:36 AM 11/3/2004, Rick Beebe wrote: Recently upgraded from 2.63 to 3.0.1 and there's a behavior change I don't see documented. When spam comes in without a subject header, and the user has requested subject tagging, SA no longer adds one to put the tag in. Is this a bug or feature? Is there

Does (Unix sockets) spamd still pipe the mail message?

Hi there I was wondering if spamd in Unix socket mode is still piped the whole message by spamc - or if it just passes the filename, and then spamd opens that/etc. It seems to me that could improve performance (a little bit) - a whole bunch of I/O could be skipped... -- Cheers Jason Haar Infor

Missing subjects on 3.0x

Recently upgraded from 2.63 to 3.0.1 and there's a behavior change I don't see documented. When spam comes in without a subject header, and the user has requested subject tagging, SA no longer adds one to put the tag in. Is this a bug or feature? Is there a way to get the old behavior back? No

Re: SpamAssassin AWL SQL redundancy

On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 09:50:07AM -0500, Mark Hennessy wrote: > Is there a way to have SpamAssassin read/write AWL records through more > than one MySQL DB connection at a time? Also, if one of those DBs stops > responding, is there a way to have SpamAssassin only read from/write to > the MySQL D

Re: {SPAM} [SA-List] Zero score emails

At 09:50 AM 11/3/2004, Carnegie, Martin wrote: I am not sure what happened here, but one of my clients got 6 spam messages last night and only one was detected as spam. Three had a score of 0.0, one with 0.5 and one with 4.2 (close enough) More important than sending us the emails is to tell us

[SA-List] Zero score emails

Title: [SA-List] Zero score emails I am not sure what happened here, but one of my clients got 6 spam messages last night and only one was detected as spam.  Three had a score of 0.0, one with 0.5 and one with 4.2 (close enough) Here are the messages <> << Nothing easier - meds onIntern

SpamAssassin AWL SQL redundancy

Is there a way to have SpamAssassin read/write AWL records through more than one MySQL DB connection at a time? Also, if one of those DBs stops responding, is there a way to have SpamAssassin only read from/write to the MySQL DB connection that is still available? I have found that MySQL circular

Re: Problem with SQL-based AWL

On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 03:22:29PM +0100, Vidar Tyldum Hansen wrote: > >Go back and read sql/README.awl the above is not a correct config for > > Since I installed using CPAN and didn't posess the source tree I > relied on http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/, which for > some reason i

Re: Problem with SQL-based AWL

Michael Parker, 03.11.2004 15:01: On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 12:02:41PM +0100, Vidar Tyldum Hansen wrote: --- SA config --- auto_whitelist_db_modules Mail::SpamAssassin::SQLBasedAddrList user_awl_dsn DBI:mysql:spamassassin:localhost user_awl_sql_username spamassassin user_awl_sql_password ** user_

Re: This is driving me NUTS

Hi, Thanks for the explaination, one last question, this might be better suited for MIMEDefang, but since we are on the topic, how do I tell MIMEDefang to bypass/ignore SpamAssassin? I tried to delete the sa-mimedefang.cf file, but that didn't seem to do anything. Many thanks, Yang

Re: Problem with SQL-based AWL

On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 12:02:41PM +0100, Vidar Tyldum Hansen wrote: > > --- SA config --- > auto_whitelist_db_modules Mail::SpamAssassin::SQLBasedAddrList > user_awl_dsn DBI:mysql:spamassassin:localhost > user_awl_sql_username spamassassin > user_awl_sql_password ** > user_awl_sql_table awl >

Re: Spamassassin

On Wednesday 03 November 2004 13:20, Gary Manigault might have typed: > I am new and working on setting up Spamassasin 2.64 with Postfix. I > would like to know if you can point me to the right site and directions > to setup spamassassin to work with postfix. I would like to configure it > the most

Re: Spamassassin

> I am new and working on setting up Spamassasin 2.64 with Postfix. I > would like to know if you can point me to the right site and directions > to setup spamassassin to work with postfix. I would like to configure it > the most efficient way. Can you lead me to any docs to help me. Can you > also

Re: Problems with SURBL and catching stuff..

On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 5:30:08 AM, Matt Matt wrote: > Right.. and rightly they are.. What I'm wondering is.. is there anyway > to get spamassassin to detect characteristics of these spams so as to > mark them when we are the 'first hit' before they get into the > SURBLs... obviously someon

Re: Problems with SURBL and catching stuff..

Right.. and rightly they are.. What I'm wondering is.. is there anyway to get spamassassin to detect characteristics of these spams so as to mark them when we are the 'first hit' before they get into the SURBLs... obviously someone has to be first, so spamassassin may not mark them as spam. That's

Spamassassin

Title: Message I am new and working on setting up Spamassasin 2.64 with Postfix. I would like to know if you can point me to the right site and directions to setup spamassassin to work with postfix. I would like to configure it the most efficient way. Can you lead me to any docs to help me.

Re: Problems with SURBL and catching stuff..

On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 5:09:24 AM, Matt Matt wrote: > I'll be more then h appy to report them, but is there anything we can > do to get spamassassin to detect them more? I'm not sure I understand what you mean by more. If they get into SURBLs, they will be detected by SpamAssassin insta

Re: Problems with SURBL and catching stuff..

I'll be more then h appy to report them, but is there anything we can do to get spamassassin to detect them more? On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 04:51:21 -0800, Jeff Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 4:45:24 AM, Matt Matt wrote: > > > > I figured as much (that the messages j

Re: Problems with SURBL and catching stuff..

On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 4:45:24 AM, Matt Matt wrote: > I figured as much (that the messages just weren't in the SURBL lists, > but I'd still like to find a way to mark them =) Here attached is one > that looks alot like the ones that come through (my apologies... clean > your eyes out with

Re: Problems with SURBL and catching stuff..

I figured as much (that the messages just weren't in the SURBL lists, but I'd still like to find a way to mark them =) Here attached is one that looks alot like the ones that come through (my apologies... clean your eyes out with soap afterwards). This account that received it is kinda a 'spam t

DB_File and Berkeley DB

Title: Message ï Hi All   Trying to upgrade to Spam Assassin 7 and having trouble with the perl module "DB_File" and installation BerkeleyDB.  I can't find any other instructions apart from "In these cases you must build DB_File with a compatible version of Berkeley DB".  It looks like it

Re: X-Spam report

On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 11:49:21AM +0100, Roel Bindels wrote: > use_terse_report I'm not 100% sure what you're asking, but the above option is invalid. You need to specify 0 or 1 after it depending on whether or not you want a terse report. -- Randomly Generated Tagline: >Ever heard of .cshrc?

Problem with SQL-based AWL

I am invoking SA through amavisd-new (thoug the problem is sill there standalone), and have configured SA to use SQL-based bayes. Trying to get AWL working with SQL proves to be a bit of a problem: debug: lock: 11090 created /var/spool/amavis/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.mutex debug: lock: 11090

X-Spam report

Hello Listers I have added the remove_header, and now the report only appears on a mail flagged as spam. But I do not want that report to be there. How can I fix this? Is my remove_header on the wrong place? I just want the mail to be flagged with spam or ham. rewrite_subject 0 report_safe 0 rem

Quick poll regarding allow_user_rules ...

Who out there currently uses allow_user_rules (aka: 'allow_user_rules 1' in their config)? I'm trying to find out how widely used the feature is (or not). Please respond to me off-list by 11/5. Thanks in advance. :) -- Randomly Generated Tagline: /* This bit of chicanery makes a unary function

Re: Per-user capabilities

> However you should examine what proportion of mail nowadays, arriving from > the internet, *is* addressed to multiple users in the one SMTP > transaction. This may appear to be a major failing, but in my experience > it's just not, in real-world use. In my experience, virtually all multi-addres

Increasing numbers of spamd processes? 3.0.1

Hello, all: I have just upgraded from 2.63 to 3.0.1.  Solaris 9, iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2p2. Everything appears to be working ok, except .. . On startup, I get 4 spamd processes.  This number increases with each message I receive.  I have set the max children to 2, and the max-conn-pe

Re: This is driving me NUTS

At 10:52 PM 11/2/2004 -0500, Yang Xiao wrote: I'm seeing different SpamAssassin spam scores being reported by MIMEDefang and MailScanner on the same message. NO. They are NOT the same message. MailScanner is seeing the message *after* mimedefang has modified it. This changes the message dramatica

Re: This is driving me NUTS

> For 2: can you be more specific about this? what kind of mismatch? Are you > getting an X-spam-status with a different score than the body report? If > so, make sure you're not scanning mail twice. (ie: make sure there's no SA > calls in procmail if you're using mimedefang) Hi, Thanks, I found t

Re: This is driving me NUTS

At 05:29 PM 11/2/2004 -0500, you wrote: 1. SpamAssassin noi longer Prepend Subject Line even though I told it to in local.cf 2. Spam score mismatch in headers. 3. Spam gets delivered as it is but Spamassassin report was send as an attachment instead of the other way around! for 1 and 3: You are usi

Re:

IF you need to unsubscribe, don't send mail to the list, send mail to: list-unsubscribe: At 12:59 PM 11/3/2004 +1300, Mike Stevenson wrote: unsubscribe -- "This communication, including any attac

Re: Problems with SURBL and catching stuff..

On Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 1:35:26 PM, Matt Matt wrote: > Perhaps someone can help here. I have recently added the SURBL > functionality to my SpamAssassin installation, and things seem to work > wonderfully. However, we do on a fairly regular basis seem to be the > "first" to get hit with t

Re: Spamd broken since 3.0.x

On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 04:46:53PM -0800, Shaun wrote: > Where is this conf? I know cpanel sets a .spamassassin dir for each user > (which contains there own whitelists, blacklists, scoresettings etc) but if > there a global conf some where? Typically it's /etc/mail/spamassassin, but you need to

Re: Spamd broken since 3.0.x

Where is this conf? I know cpanel sets a .spamassassin dir for each user (which contains there own whitelists, blacklists, scoresettings etc) but if there a global conf some where? "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

users@spamassassin.apache.org

unsubscribe -- "This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part o