Hello to everybody.
I've been trying to get Spamassassin + razor working but I'm a bit lost
at linking spamassassin to the MTA.
I've tried the documentation on the website, but it is a bit confusing
for me. Perhaps too much information?
I've tried the FAQ but I'm not able to find my answer.
SITU
At 06:44 AM 10/16/2004 -0700, you wrote:
When you want to block an email address which one would be more effective?
To black list the email address in the local.cf file for SA? Or the
badmailfrom for qmail? Or do you suggest putting them in both?
badmailfrom.
If you're going to block an address out
Laurent Luyckx wrote:
Are you sure you're using a recent version of Net::DNS module (>= 0.34)?
Indeed.
#pkg_info | grep p5-Net-DNS
p5-Net-DNS-0.48 Perl5 interface to the DNS resolver, and dynamic updates
I'm still baffled as to why this still doesn't work.
--
Sahil Tandon
On Sat, 2004-10-16 at 19:35, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Everything else (i.e. my rules) seem to be working fine. However, I had
> two problems.
>
> Not so bad: check_mx_attempts and one other variable which now slips my
> mind kept spitting out an 'unable to parse' error. I don't get that -
> it w
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 01:53:21PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> This file does not exist on my box. Without the loadplugin line, --lint
It should exist in /etc/mail/spamassassin, or wherever your local.cf file
lives. If not, your installation is incomplete.
> >As usual, run with -D and see wha
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
this should already be in the default init.pre file.
This file does not exist on my box. Without the loadplugin line, --lint
spits out errors; with it, it exits quietly. My machine is FreeBSD
4.10-STABLE and I'm using t
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 01:35:38PM -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote:
> Very bad: SURBLs don't work. I have the following in local.cf:
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
this should already be in the default init.pre file.
> http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point-MUNGED.com/ (obvio
Everything else (i.e. my rules) seem to be working fine. However, I had
two problems.
Not so bad: check_mx_attempts and one other variable which now slips my
mind kept spitting out an 'unable to parse' error. I don't get that -
it was EXACTLY the same as with 2.64, with which --lint didn't co
When you want to block an email address which one would be more effective?
To black list the email address in the local.cf file for SA? Or the
badmailfrom for qmail? Or do you suggest putting them in both?
Thanks
Robert
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 07:56:51AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 09:46 AM 10/16/2004 +0200, Nicolas wrote:
> >This morning I made a mistake with spamassassin. I manually learnt
> >(/usr/bin/sa-learn --spam) an IMPORTANT message as SPAM. I immediately
> >learnt it as HAM, but is that sufficient?
>
At 09:46 AM 10/16/2004 +0200, Nicolas wrote:
This morning I made a mistake with spamassassin. I manually learnt
(/usr/bin/sa-learn --spam) an IMPORTANT message as SPAM. I immediately
learnt it as HAM, but is that sufficient?
Yes.. SA uses the bayes_seen database to understand it needs to flip
comp
Hey,
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 09:46:36 +0200, Nicolas wrote:
N> This morning I made a mistake with spamassassin. I manually learnt
N> (/usr/bin/sa-learn --spam) an IMPORTANT message as SPAM. I
N> immediately learnt it as HAM, but is that sufficient?
N> Do I have to delete all of the bayes tokens I acc
> Normally spamassassin works great.. but this one e-mail seems to cause
> it to take forever (600 seconds?) and then get passed through with a
> score of (?/?) <-- I assume that is because something timedout and
It isn't claer to me if you included the whole email or just the headers.
In any case
At 02:22 PM 10/15/2004, Johannes Rumpf wrote:
i'm runing xfilter "spamassassin" in my procmail rules. Thats the
second time the server runs spamassassin. First with spamd with an
other points and bayes filter, second via xfilter. The mails are
detected correctly as spam, but there are no x-spam*
> Thanks so much. Unfortunately, I don't see much change in my CPU usage by
spamd. I am
> at a loss, as I've spent almost an entire day reading old mailing list
threads and the
> wiki, but no one has seemed to post anything concrete as to why spamd
would eat so much
> CPU (in my case, it spikes t
Hi to all again,
please read till the end. There I show some of the results I get from the
autowhitelist. Just for you to which kind of information I get from it :-).
> >In fact he is right in the fact that the autowhitelist is kept in memory.
> >However, it keeps only the e-mail addres and two
Hello,
This morning I made a mistake with spamassassin. I manually learnt
(/usr/bin/sa-learn --spam) an IMPORTANT message as SPAM. I immediately
learnt it as HAM, but is that sufficient?
Do I have to delete all of the bayes tokens I accumulated for over 1
year?
Thanks.
Nicolas.
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Roger Taranto wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-10-10 at 20:04, jdow wrote:
>
> > Well, a new variant of 419 has hit my mailbox. Someone named Allan Hofer
> > died in Nigeria. And he left a big estate. The "barrister" wants to take
> > 70%, reserve 5% for expenses, and give me 25%. I am S
18 matches
Mail list logo
