Hello,
I just migrated successfully from 2.64 to 3.0.0
I log SA with multilog.
Multilog adds its own time stamp infront of every line.
I've noticed that SA 3 now also adds a time stamp in UTC format
to every log line.
Can SA be configured not to write timestamps to log output ?
Regards,
Niek Baakma
Thanks.
So 0.2.1 should have the fix?
> It works with one slight problem fixed in CVS already.
> If set, the reject threshold (-r ) in 0.2.0 looks for "hits" instead of
> "score".
>
> If you set to -1 (reject anything tagged as spam), 0.2.0 works fine.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
I use ok_locales es en
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 22:03:21 -0700 (PDT), Jerry Glomph Black
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the default /usr/share/spamassasin/10_misc.cf file, I have
>
> ok_locales all
> ok_languagesall
>
> Nothing related in the personalized files in /etc/mail/
Hi guys, I am using a plesk VPS server (7.1.4) and
am looking at updating to SA3. There are SA3 rpm's out there for plesk so
I guess it is compatable. My main question is on general setup. I
have read the docs but couldn't find a real answer to my question.
I was wondering first, how acc
Marcos Saint'Anna wrote on Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:44:01 -0300:
> As you may see... the configuration files are the same, also the
> binaries are using the same version.
>
So, you are getting slightly different results with spamc and spamassassin
plus the main difference about the USER_IN_WHIT
It works with one slight problem fixed in CVS already.
If set, the reject threshold (-r ) in 0.2.0 looks for "hits" instead of
"score".
If you set to -1 (reject anything tagged as spam), 0.2.0 works fine.
-Original Message-
From: Randall Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, Oc
Hi all,
I'm trying to implement SQL Bayes and I need a little help. I have
the bayes database set up and it does seem to work properly. However,
sa-learn seems to be placing the ham and spam into the database for
the user the command is run as. How do I override the username so
that the ham/spa
I'm not sure I quite understand the rule ALL_TRUSTED, could someone
enlighten me on this as it scored -2.9 on messages that are spam in turn
some of these messages are barely getting through with my reqired_hits
setting. If not for the ALL_TRUSTED rule these messages would be
getting tagged as spa
Do these 2 work together?
Checked the spamass-milter site and docs and couldn't find any ref to
spamassasin 3.0.
--
Randall Perry
sysTame
Xserve Web Hosting/Co-location
Website Design/Development
WebObjects Hosting
Mac Consulting/Sales
http://www.systame.com/
Hello Kai,
Thanks for your reply!
I've made the tests you recommended, but got no positive results at
all.
---
These are the installed software versions:
# /usr/bin/spamc -V
SpamAssassin Client version 3.0.0
# /usr/bin/spamd -V
Sp
On 10 October 2004 20:44 +0200 Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
It does not relate to SURBL. It relates to rules, no matter in which
*.cf file they are in /etc/mail/spamassassin. The rulename is
relevant, not the filename.
Ah, OK.
Thanks,
Mike.
Mike Zanker wrote on Sun, 10 Oct 2004 17:52:36 +0100:
> Yes, I am using that, but I thought USER_IN_BLACKLIST related to
> personal blacklists, not SURBL stuff.
>
It does not relate to SURBL. It relates to rules, no matter in which *.cf
file they are in /etc/mail/spamassassin. The rulename is r
It's been mentioned several times in the past to limit f.i. memory usage
of spamd, so that it cannot run "out of control". But without any
real-world examples. How do I do this?
There is an /etc/security/limits.conf file one my Suse Linux systems which
purports to be for this kind of thing. But
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Marcos Saint'Anna wrote on Sun, 10 Oct 2004 02:18:19 -0300:
>
> > I've already tried to run SA with -D option, but got no answer at
> > all...
> >
>
> So, if you pipe one of those messages with USER_IN_WHITELIST thru
> spamassassin -D (not spamd!)
On 10 October 2004 11:24 -0400 Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Are you sure you're not using sa-blacklist.cf from SURBL?
Yes, I am using that, but I thought USER_IN_BLACKLIST related to
personal blacklists, not SURBL stuff.
Mike.
At 07:56 AM 10/10/2004 +0100, Mike Zanker wrote:
On 09 October 2004 18:40 -0400 Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Got me, you have to go hunting around and find out. I have no way to
tell you what's on your box, but I can tell you the entries aren't
from SpamAssassin itself. ;)
I believe
Marcos Saint'Anna wrote on Sun, 10 Oct 2004 02:18:19 -0300:
> I've already tried to run SA with -D option, but got no answer at
> all...
>
So, if you pipe one of those messages with USER_IN_WHITELIST thru
spamassassin -D (not spamd!) it is *not* marked with USER_IN_WHITELIST? If
so, I'd th
Hello Mike,
Almost the same thing here... but it's the USER_IN_WHITELIST that's
making me nuts.
My configuration files have no whitelist_from... but in the detection
description the USER_IN_WHITELIST is always there...
Best regards
--
Marcos Saint'Anna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You wrote:
MZ>
On 09 October 2004 18:40 -0400 Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Got me, you have to go hunting around and find out. I have no way to
tell you what's on your box, but I can tell you the entries aren't
from SpamAssassin itself. ;)
I believe that it is a bug in SA 3.0. This is a fresh ins
Hello Matt,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
I've removed all whitelist_from entries from configuration files, even
those from user_prefs files.
I've already tried to run SA with -D option, but got no answer at
all...
This start happening just after the upgrade. Please note that I've
read
In the default /usr/share/spamassasin/10_misc.cf file, I have
ok_locales all
ok_languagesall
Nothing related in the personalized files in /etc/mail/spamassassin, or
elsewhere.
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Michael Parker wrote:
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 12:25:45PM -0500, Michael Park
At 08:42 PM 10/9/2004 -0300, Marcos Saint'Anna wrote:
SPAM... So I noticed that almost all headers had a "USER_IN_WHITELIST"
in it.
---
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-88.6 required=5.0 tests=BR_RECEIVED_SPAMMER,
FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK,FORGED_OUTLOOK_HTML,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_MESSAGE,
HTML_TAG_E
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 15:41:37 -0600 (CST)
Ryan Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robin Lynn Frank wrote to users@spamassassin.apache.org:
>
> > We use SA 3.0.0 with MySQL so we can extract certain AWL data and
> > use it at the MTA level. However, since SA doesn't have an
> > auto-blacklist fe
23 matches
Mail list logo
