Hello guys,
I'm with a serious problem here, and I need some help, plz!
After the upgrade from version 2.64 to version 3.0.0, SA stopped to
work as before... the most of SPAM going to my server isn't marked as
SPAM... So I noticed that almost all headers had a "USER_IN_WHITELIST"
in it.
---
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Robin Lynn Frank wrote to users@spamassassin.apache.org:
>
> > We use SA 3.0.0 with MySQL so we can extract certain AWL data and use
> > it at the MTA level. However, since SA doesn't have an auto-blacklist
> > feature,
>
>
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 11:24:19PM +0100, Mike Zanker wrote:
> >There are no default blacklist entries in SpamAssassin.
> Exactly, so where did it come from?
Got me, you have to go hunting around and find out. I have no way to tell you
what's on your box, but I can tell you the entries aren't fro
On 09 October 2004 16:19 -0400 Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Well, yes you do. ;)
I do what?
There are no default blacklist entries in SpamAssassin.
Exactly, so where did it come from?
Mike.
Robin Lynn Frank wrote to users@spamassassin.apache.org:
We use SA 3.0.0 with MySQL so we can extract certain AWL data and use
it at the MTA level. However, since SA doesn't have an auto-blacklist
feature,
Hi Robin,
Actually, "AutoWhiteList" (AWL) is a bit of a misnomer. AWL maintains
average mess
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 12:04 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Can anyone explain these e-mails (and how to stop them)?
>
>
> Uggg.. that didn't come through right.. let me try this again.. they lo
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 09:09:12PM +0100, Mike Zanker wrote:
> scored over 100 because of USER_IN_BLACKLIST. Now, I don't have any
> blacklists defined anywhere
> So, this seems to be a false positive. Anyone else seen it happening?
Well, yes you do. ;) There are no default blacklist entries in
Today I received a virus (Gibe-F) from an unknown e-mail address - it
scored over 100 because of USER_IN_BLACKLIST. Now, I don't have any
blacklists defined anywhere - in fact, SA is run only by MailScanner as
user mail.
So, this seems to be a false positive. Anyone else seen it happening?
Than
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 06:56:03PM +0200, Marco Supino wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am tring to make the AWL and Bayes work with SQL , on a Oracle 8.1.7
> database, AWL works fine, but i have some problems with the bayes
> interface, make test gives out this errors :
>
> t/bayessql..ok 16
I have setup SpamAssassin 2.64, and qmail-scanner 1.23 on FreeBSD with
perl-5.8.4 and have been using them separately with great success.
However, I have decided to use qmail-scanners ability to run
SpamAssassin as the mail is processed. And, I have this working to a
point (i.e. the mail is fl
Hi,
I am tring to make the AWL and Bayes work with SQL , on a Oracle 8.1.7
database, AWL works fine, but i have some problems with the bayes
interface, make test gives out this errors :
t/bayessql..ok 16/44# Failed test 17 in t/bayessql.t at
line 133
t/bayessql..
We use SA 3.0.0 with MySQL so we can extract certain AWL data and use it
at the MTA level. However, since SA doesn't have an auto-blacklist
feature, I'd like to find a relatively simple way to extract IP
addresses from emails that contain spam. If it is of any importance, we
invoke SA via amavisd
At 10:26 PM 10/8/2004 -0700, Jerry wrote:
I am using the command:
spamassassin --add-to-blacklist (message filename)
For it to scan the filename and add the senders email address to the black
list.
That's largely worthless.. It's not entirely worthless, but it's really
only useful if the spammer i
Evan Platt wrote on Sat, 09 Oct 2004 06:56:32 -0700:
> I'm curious if others are doing this? In all honestly, I don't think you'll
> see spam from the same "person" twice.
>
I absolutely agree. "blacklisting" doesn't do much good. The only blacklisting
which makes sense in general is at the MTA
Justin Mason wrote on Fri, 08 Oct 2004 09:39:15 -0700:
> So you wind up with a very big, but unexpirable, db?
yes. I can expire it with the trick mentioned, but then it blows most of
the db. And the next expire fails again until I play other tricks or wait
long enough. F.i. I can dump the stuff
--On Friday, October 08, 2004 10:26 PM -0700 Jerry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I am using SA 3.00. I want to setup a mailbox with an odd name and post
this to certain guest books etc on the web so it can be added to a
mailing
list. This email account will only be used to trap spam messages, an
> The differences in the mail-headers are tiny:
> Englisch:
> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:48:21 +0200
> German:
> Date: Do, 07 Okt 2004 10:19:30
I wonder if part of the problem might be the missing timezone info on the
end of the German timestamp.
Loren
Hi,I am using SA 3.00. I want to setup a
mailbox with an odd name and post this to certain guest books etc on the web
so it can be added to a mailing list. This email account will only be
used to trap spam messages, and won't be used for valid emails.I am
running Win32 with VOPMail. I have
Justin Mason wrote:
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 H1 H2 H3 H4 H5
RULE1: x x x x
RULE2: x x x x
RULE3: x x x
RULE4: x
(S1-S5 = 5 spam mails; H1-H5
On Friday, October 8, 2004, 8:01:44 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 08:43 AM 10/8/2004, Matt wrote:
>>I have a question on the new(ish) scanning that spamassassin does on
>>URI's.It seems to be working very well for us here, but I have a
>>question..
>>WIll it catch:
>>
>>http://www.blah.com/?jj38
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 09:23:34PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I took out the custom query, it's still choosing user 'nobody' when I
> send an email to my address.
>
> logmsg: connection from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] at port 46482
> debug: Conf::SQL: executing SQL: select preference
I took out the custom query, it's still choosing user 'nobody' when I
send an email to my address.
logmsg: connection from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] at port 46482
debug: Conf::SQL: executing SQL: select preference, value from userpref
where u
sername = 'nobody' or username = '@GLOBAL' ord
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 08:51:46PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm having problems getting sa 3.0 to get user pref's from the mysql
> database. I'm using Exim 4.43 with the latest exiscan patch compiled
> into it fyi. I've entered @GLOBAL and my email address into the
> database, @GLOBAL is
I'm having problems getting sa 3.0 to get user pref's from the mysql
database. I'm using Exim 4.43 with the latest exiscan patch compiled
into it fyi. I've entered @GLOBAL and my email address into the
database, @GLOBAL is set to 5.2 required_hits and my email address et to
5.4. I can't seem to
24 matches
Mail list logo
