Re: score changes in local.cf not recognized.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting snowjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: ...Did you restart amavisd-new after making the change? Yes. :-) Is there any evidence that local.cf is getting read at all?

Re: score changes in local.cf not recognized.

Quoting snowjack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > ...Did you restart amavisd-new after making the change? Yes. :-) -- Sahil Tandon

Re: score changes in local.cf not recognized.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/07/2004 03:35:07 PM: > I am running Postfix 2.1 with a content_filter (latest amavisd-new) which sends > all mail through SA 2.64. I understand *some* variables that are defined > explicitly in amavisd-new are "special", and thus have no effect when defined > (di

Re: score changes in local.cf not recognized.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running Postfix 2.1 with a content_filter (latest amavisd-new) which sends all mail through SA 2.64. I understand *some* variables that are defined explicitly in amavisd-new are "special", and thus have no effect when defined (differently) in local.cf. AFAIK, scores

score changes in local.cf not recognized.

I am running Postfix 2.1 with a content_filter (latest amavisd-new) which sends all mail through SA 2.64. I understand *some* variables that are defined explicitly in amavisd-new are "special", and thus have no effect when defined (differently) in local.cf. AFAIK, scores are not included in this

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

It works great.  Thank you very, very much   Slava MadritGlobal Network ManagerS A L A N S[EMAIL PROTECTED]+1.212.632.8311>>> "Dallas L. Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 10/7/2004 10:07:18 AM -Original Message-> From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday,

Obvious spam gets a score of 0.0???

Here is an odd spam header: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,CLICK_BELOW, DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,DATE_SPAMWARE_Y2K,DCC_CHECK,FORGED_MUA_THEBAT_BOUN, FORGED_THEBAT_HTML,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_SUBJ_REMOVE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_

Re: Memory footprint of spamd 3.0

On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Michael Parker wrote: On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:53:30AM -0600, Jon Trulson wrote: FWIW, in our case a child would go to 320MB and just stay there until the child was terminated (even after finishing a message). We do use AWL and bayes. Is it possible to try and find the ms

RE: bug? 'bayes_path ~user/something' doesn't work?

It works if the user's profile is loaded. Usually sa is run from some startup daemon. Daemons are usually started with a very minimal environment - maybe a little bit of path, and some OS type settings and they rarely execute some .login/.cshrc script to load the environment. With no true user p

Razor service down?

I'm getting connection refused on port 2703 for all the cloudmark.com servers. Oct 07 10:28:47.241994 check[8774]: [ 3] Unable to connect to thrill.cloudmark.com:2703; Reason: Connection refused. Oct 07 10:28:47.264952 check[8774]: [ 3] Unable to connect to wonder.cloudmark.com:2703; Reason: Conn

All_Spam_to question

Thanks to all who helped me. Matt : You are right, the problem isnt with the S.A. ; but with the implemention we have chosen. I will follow your advices and when find a solution I?ll put it here. See ya, Daniel. -Mensagem original- De: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviada em:

Re: RES: All_Spam_to question

TECTED]" account. I configured another user ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to block anything above a 3.0. Here's my test message as it went through amavis: Oct 7 13:06:36 IGMVmg004 amavisd[9073]: (09073-06) Passed, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Odd syslog errors.

Keith Hackworth wrote: Even though you run this in mysql now, it still DOES matter who you run it as. I found out the hard way that it records the user that is logged in as the user the bayes applies as in the database. I had to actually set the bayes_sql_override_username in my local.cf. I trai

Re: Memory footprint of spamd 3.0

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:53:30AM -0600, Jon Trulson wrote: > > FWIW, in our case a child would go to 320MB and just stay there > until the child was terminated (even after finishing a message). We do > use AWL and bayes. > Is it possible to try and find the msgs that was being scanned

Re: Memory footprint of spamd 3.0

On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Michael Parker wrote: On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:19:17AM -0300, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: In my specific case, the ponit isn't only woth the big memory usage jumps, but with SA keeping the memory, and never releasing it. Highwater marks, common in most perl applicatios, don't co

Re: Memory footprint of spamd 3.0

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Michael Parker wrote: On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 10:22:42AM -0700, Morris Jones wrote: I watched a spamd child grow to 250MB yesterday on a single message. I have a suspicion that the memory usage growth is happening on a whitelist or bayes database maintenance event of some sort.

Re: SA 3.0 is eating up all my memory!!!

On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Luis Hernán Otegui wrote: In my setup this is not an option, because I run SA as a milter, via spamass-milter. If every process has to die after the scan, it cannot pass the results of the scan to Sendmail (at least, this is what happened after I tried this option, so I kept on

RE: All_Spam_to question

At 12:08 PM 10/7/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SMTP conversation goes like this - server responses in parentheses (ESMTP spam-server.example.org - welcome!) EHLO spam-server.example.com (OK) MAIL FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OK) RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OK) RCPT TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (OK) DATA Subj

Re: RES: All_Spam_to question

At 12:01 PM 10/7/2004, Daniel A. de Araujo wrote: Matt : I use the postfix(MTA)+ amavisd+ S.Assassin solution. If I understood what you wrote its impossible to block it (based in my solution), is it ? Pretty much. Unless amavisd has some clever tricks up it's sleeve to split the message into multi

RE: All_Spam_to question

Daniel A. de Araujo wrote: > Matt : > > I use the postfix(MTA)+ amavisd+ S.Assassin solution. If I understood > what > you wrote its impossible to block it (based in my solution), is it ? > > Ps. If your answer is yes; could we consider it a S.Assassin?s flaw ? SMTP conversation goes like this

RES: All_Spam_to question

Matt : I use the postfix(MTA)+ amavisd+ S.Assassin solution. If I understood what you wrote its impossible to block it (based in my solution), is it ? Ps. If your answer is yes; could we consider it a S.Assassin?s flaw ? -Mensagem original- De: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Env

Re: more spam since upgrade

Vivek Khera said: > I'm not using Bayes since the filtering is site-wide at the smtp server > level. I use bayes sitewide for 600 users, and have processed a few million messages. Bayes sitewide works well, as the spam email is obviously unlike the normal mail anyone receives. I would enable baye

Re: All_Spam_to question

At 11:36 AM 10/7/2004, Daniel A. de Araujo wrote: We are having a problem using the all_spam_to option. When a message is sent to a list of users and at CCO field has a user included at all_spam_to option, ALL users listed in the message, not only the white-listed user will receive it. Its very bad

Re: How to rewrite spamc in Perl

>> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:11:19PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> wrote: >> > >> > Is there any documentation for the spamd client interface? >> > MIMEDefang can talk to clamd.sock directly, using the commands in man >> > clamd, rather than spawning `clamdscan` processes. I checked man >> > spam

Re: dnsbl lookups slow due to "sleep 1" in code, plus patch

Jan-Pieter Cornet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > OK, done, bug #3881. Thanks. >> My secondary concern is that you'll never almost get responses from >> other blacklists and this might result in a lower hit rate (since a >> negative response is still a response). That should probably be >> addres

RE: bug? "bayes_path ~user/something" doesn't work?

Matthew.van.Eerde wrote: > I don't think it's a bug... > > what does ~spamd/ mean? I'm not familiar with that kind of syntax. > ~ usually means "home directory of the calling user"... and that's > expanded for you... > There's an idiom in the web world of calling personal user folders > /~user (

RE: bug? "bayes_path ~user/something" doesn't work?

Jakob Hirsch wrote: > Hi, > > I had "bayes_path ~spamd/bayes" in my local.cf until I noticed, that > the part between ~ and / is ignored, resulting in a bayes_path of > ~/bayes. It's not a big deal to give the full path, but that should > be in the docs. I don't think it's a bug... what does ~s

All_Spam_to question

Hi, We are having a problem using the all_spam_to option. When a message is sent to a list of users and at CCO field has a user included at all_spam_to option, ALL users listed in the message, not only the white-listed user will receive it. Its very bad, because a Spammer who knows that a xxx@ use

Re: How to find out installed modules?

The SPF information in the debug output says that the SPF *plugin* was loaded. The SPF plugin requires the Mail::SPF::Query module be installed. The module is checked for and used if it is installed, only when the plugin wants to do a query. In the above debug output, since the message is not se

Re: Odd syslog errors.

Even though you run this in mysql now, it still DOES matter who you run it as. I found out the hard way that it records the user that is logged in as the user the bayes applies as in the database. I had to actually set the bayes_sql_override_username in my local.cf. I trained a bunch of messages

Re: How to find out installed modules?

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:03:33AM -0400, Brett Romero wrote: > >>However, when I analyze a file with > >>spamassassin -tD < filename.html > >> > >>I get these lines: > >>debug: config: read file C:\Perl\site/share/spamassassin/25_spf.cf > >> > >>debug: SPF: message was delivered entirely via trust

Re: How to find out installed modules?

"Brett Romero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/07/2004 09:27:10 AM: > > - Original Message - > From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "'Brett Romero'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:03 AM > Subject: RE: How to find out installed modules? > > > >

Re: How to find out installed modules?

- Original Message - From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Brett Romero'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:59 AM Subject: RE: How to find out installed modules? -Original Message- From: Brett Romero [mail

RE: How to find out installed modules?

>-Original Message- >From: Brett Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:27 AM >To: Chris Santerre; users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: Re: How to find out installed modules? > > > >- Original Message - >From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

bug? "bayes_path ~user/something" doesn't work?

Hi, I had "bayes_path ~spamd/bayes" in my local.cf until I noticed, that the part between ~ and / is ignored, resulting in a bayes_path of ~/bayes. It's not a big deal to give the full path, but that should be in the docs. Regards, Jakob

RE: Book has gone to press

>-Original Message- >From: Shaun T. Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:39 AM >To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) >Subject: Re: Book has gone to press > > >Chris Santerre wrote: > >>http://www.packtpub.com/book/spamassassin >> >> >> >How does this book co

Re: Book has gone to press

On 2004-10-07 10:48:53 -0400, Shaun T. Erickson wrote: > Hmm. When I go to that link, it says the release date is October 2004. > What are you looking at? An older version. :-) Best regards Martin -- Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ArtCom GmbH, Lise-Meitner-Str 5,

Re: Book has gone to press

Martin Schröder wrote: On 2004-10-07 10:37:32 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: http://www.packtpub.com/book/spamassassin "Release date November 1999" Yes, it should be at the press by now. :-) Best regards Martin PS: If it applies to SA3, the description should mention that. Hmm. When

Re: Book has gone to press

On 2004-10-07 10:37:32 -0400, Chris Santerre wrote: > http://www.packtpub.com/book/spamassassin "Release date November 1999" Yes, it should be at the press by now. :-) Best regards Martin PS: If it applies to SA3, the description should mention that. -- Martin Schröder,

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

> > > > The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is > a feature, > > not a bug. > > > > -Jim > > > Just out of curiosity, what benefit is provided by this feature? > You could flat out reject mail without a subject header. -- Dallas Engelken NMGI

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

>-Original Message- >From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:34 AM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed > > >Jim Maul wrote: > >> >> The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is >a feature,

Re: Book has gone to press

Chris Santerre wrote: http://www.packtpub.com/book/spamassassin How does this book compare to the O'Reilly book, by Schwartz? -ste

Book has gone to press

http://www.packtpub.com/book/spamassassin Chris Santerre System Admin and SARE Ninja http://www.rulesemporium.com http://www.surbl.org 'It is not the strongest of the species that survives, not the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.' Charles Darwin

Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

Jim Maul wrote: The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is a feature, not a bug. -Jim Just out of curiosity, what benefit is provided by this feature? -tom

Re: How to find out installed modules?

- Original Message - From: "Chris Santerre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Brett Romero'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:03 AM Subject: RE: How to find out installed modules? -Original Message- From: Brett Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, O

Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

Carnegie, Martin wrote: Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick :-) --Chris So this would be expected that the subject would not get changed? I must be missing something. Martin Carnegie The subject is not changed if there is no subject. This is a feature, not a bug

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

> -Original Message- > From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:04 AM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed > > > > >Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick > :-) > > > >-

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

There was no subject on the original; so the header couldn't be "rewritten." Dallas posted a patch on Bugzilla: 3605. -Original Message- From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:42 AM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: [SA-LIST] Subject

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

> >Bwahahahahah, I can't believe I missed that!!! Doh!!! Nice catch Rick :-) > >--Chris So this would be expected that the subject would not get changed? I must be missing something. Martin Carnegie

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

>-Original Message- >From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 10:00 AM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed > > > > >Carnegie, Martin wrote: >> We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working >grea

RE: How to find out installed modules?

>-Original Message- >From: Brett Romero [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:37 AM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: How to find out installed modules? > > >How do I find out which modules are installed for SA on my server? > >Where do I find a list of

Re: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

Carnegie, Martin wrote: We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had a message this morning that I do not understand why the subject was not changed. Here is the header info. X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=16.9 required=5.0 tests=MISSING_DATE, MISSING_SUBJECT,RCVD_BY_

RE: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed

>-Original Message- >From: Carnegie, Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 9:42 AM >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org >Subject: [SA-LIST] Subject not changed > > >We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had a >message this morning tha

[SA-LIST] Subject not changed

We just upgraded to SA 3 and so far it has been working great. I had a message this morning that I do not understand why the subject was not changed. Here is the header info. Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from atcoinss.

How to find out installed modules?

How do I find out which modules are installed for SA on my server? Where do I find a list of all available modules I can install with links to those modules? Thanks, Brett

Re: Level _STARS(*)_

Hi Jean. The default setup for Qmail-Scanner is to send the email to SA and ask back *only* for the status: is spam? yes or no? score?. End. This is much more efficient than ask back for the full email rewriten by SA. But of course, any change to the email you have configured in SA will just be

Re: Level _STARS(*)_

I resolved my issue. The problem was related to qmail-scanner and not spamassassin (--scanner=verbose VS. fast spamassassin). Sorry about that. Jean Jean Caron writes: I read everything I could find... still doesn't work. I don't get it. I want to enable the header Level _STARS(*)_. The c

Antwort: Re: How to rewrite spamc in Perl

-Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: -MichaelPS ignore the learn method for now, that's from something else I'mworking on. Hello Michael,how far is your engagement in enhance the learn method to spamc/spamd?As i stated here http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201 i wou

Re: Rule for words with multiple punctuation characters?

On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 09:42:48 -0700, Loren Wilton wrote: > Haven't seen these myself, but if they are drug spams, make sure you have > the obfu drug rules installed and maybe up the score on some of them. > Should have gotten about 4 hits in that first sentence. Yes, the drug rules are catching them

Re: dnsbl lookups slow due to "sleep 1" in code, plus patch

>If it's necessary then it should be added, but someone already >posted here that it works fine on Win2k (so I expect Win2k3 works too, >and it probably even works on older WinNT). It might still have issues >on Win98 (and derivatives like WinME) and possibly on WinXP. If it works on W2K it will

Re: [Fwd: Better check your sig now you are a spammer :-)]

On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 16:54, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 09:01 AM 10/6/2004, Ron McKeating wrote: > > >Nigel M kindly sent me this. we will have to think of new job titles > >unless SA can detect the difference between specialist and cialis. Ooops > >now nobody will see this email. > > SA can, does

Re: dnsbl lookups slow due to "sleep 1" in code, plus patch

>(FreeBSD 4.10 and Debian linux "unstable"), but this might have issues >on inferior OSes from the Evil Empire. I haven't checked this. If it >does, however, I suggest adding a test for $Config{'osname'} eq 'MSWin32', >and just calling "sleep" in that case. The changes work equally well on the sup

Re: 3.0.0 can't install on FreeBSD

Wayne M Barnes wrote: Dear SpamAssassinators, My spamassassin began to fail suddenly. I have been trying to update/fix it without success. I keep getting messages with --version in them, such below. Please help! version.h.pl: version.h.pl: Can't locate Digest/SHA1.pm in @INC (@INC You

3.0.0 can't install on FreeBSD

Dear SpamAssassinators, My spamassassin began to fail suddenly. I have been trying to update/fix it without success. I keep getting messages with --version in them, such below. Please help! --- . . . /usr/bin/perl build/preprocessor -M

Re: custom rule

At 07:26 AM 10/7/2004 +0700, Gian wrote: hill all, i'm using spamassassin 2.64, i want to reject body message like this : -- ÅóÓÑ£¡ÄãÓÐûÓÐÔÚÍøÉÏÏë¿´µçÓ°ÓÖÕÓ²»µ½ÕæÕýÃâ·ÑµÄÍøÕ¾µÄ¾­Àú£¿ºÃÈÝÓ×ÕÓµ½Ó»¸öºÅ³ÆÃâ·ÑµÄ¿Éµ½Í·À´ ²»ÊÇÈÃÄãÌîÊÖ»úºÅÂë¾ÍÊÇÈÃÄãÓʾּÄÇ®»òÍøÉÏÖ§¸¶£¬ÏÖÔÚºÃÀ²£¡ÓÐÁËÎÓÌṩµÄÈí¼þ£¬ -- i

Re: Is Spamassassin 3.00 SRC RPM available?

On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 07:23, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:28:01PM +0200, Overdijk, Harrie wrote: > > Is the SRC RPM of the released SpamAssassin 3.00 available already? > > I failed to find it on the SpamAssassin website, although I did find the > > previous versions includin

Re: How to rewrite spamc in Perl

John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1) make room for passing a reference to a message instead of the message > itself, to reduce network latency when it is not necessary (for example, > if the spamd chosen just happens to be on localhost (because it's part > of a list of servers that are being

Re: custom rule

Ever since signing up with AllofMP3.com (a Russian MP3 site), I've been getting tons of e-mail like that. --- Gian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hill all, > > i'm using spamassassin 2.64, i want to reject body > message like this : > > -- > ÅóÓÑ£¡ÄãÓÐûÓÐÔÚÍøÉÏÏë¿´µçÓ°ÓÖÕÒ²»µ½ÕæÕýÃâ·ÑµÄÍøÕ¾µÄ¾­À

custom rule

hill all, i'm using spamassassin 2.64, i want to reject body message like this : -- ÅóÓÑ£¡ÄãÓÐûÓÐÔÚÍøÉÏÏë¿´µçÓ°ÓÖÕÒ²»µ½ÕæÕýÃâ·ÑµÄÍøÕ¾µÄ¾­Àú£¿ºÃÈÝÒ×ÕÒµ½Ò»¸öºÅ³ÆÃâ·ÑµÄ¿Éµ½Í·À´ ²»ÊÇÈÃÄãÌîÊÖ»úºÅÂë¾ÍÊÇÈÃÄãÓʾּÄÇ®»òÍøÉÏÖ§¸¶£¬ÏÖÔÚºÃÀ²£¡ÓÐÁËÎÒÌṩµÄÈí¼þ£¬ -- is there custom rule for doing that? thx..