Hi,
IIRC the way atomic indexing works under the hood is by indexing stored
values of all fields again. Is there a way to intercept that and change the
value of some field that I want?
Which operators are supported in weightExpression field for Solr suggester.
e.g. if I want to use power function, should I use pow?
First I thought, it uses function queries. But it does not seem like that.
Following example shows that it is using the ln function.
https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_
I am using solr 8.5.2. I am trying to configure multiple suggester
definition in Solr search component and got error information like:
{
"responseHeader":{
"status":500,
"QTime":1718343},
"error":{
"msg":"Invalid reference 'link_score'",
"trace":"java.lang.IllegalArgumentExcept
Hi,
I have a field value as bim.ClassUnderlying and a search query as
classunderlying does not return any results. If I search for
classUnderlying, it works.What can I change so that it works for
classunderlying query too? If I change splitOnCaseChange value from 1 to 0
in index time analyzer chai
Hi,
I intermittently face this issue sometimes while running the unit tests.
SecureRandom algorithm 'NativePRNG' is in use by your JVM, which is a
potentially blocking algorithm on some environments. Please report the
details of this failure (and your JVM vendor/version) to
solr-u...@lucene.apach
One more thing, -Dtest.solr.allowed.securerandom=NativePRNG doesn't seem
to help and I haven't tried the other option yet.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 8:41 PM gnandre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intermittently face this issue sometimes while running the unit tests.
>
> SecureRan
Hi,
I am using Solr 8.5.2 (non-SolrCloud) mode. It is a non-sharded scenario. I
am trying to collapse the resultset based on one of the string fields (say
X). Collapse query works as expected. It collapses the result set by
excluding the documents that have the same field X and retains only the to
> Did you try expand.rows parameter for how many items to include in each
> group?
> > https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_7/collapse-and-expand-results.html
> >
> > Regards,
> >Alex.
> >
> > On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 13:02, gnandre wrote:
> > >
> > >
Hi,
I am using Solr 8.5.2 with the LTR feature enabled. I have successfully
uploaded a trained model to Solr. When I add rq={!ltr model=model
efi.query=$q reRankDocs=100} param to my regular search query, it works.
But when I pass a shards param with a list of shards then I run into the
following
Please ignore, this was an issue with the incorrect values I was passing to
shards param.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 12:52 PM gnandre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Solr 8.5.2 with the LTR feature enabled. I have successfully
> uploaded a trained model to Solr. When I add rq={!ltr
Usually, I would end my solr related search query with keyword nabble to
see lot of useful results from this mailing list in Google. What
alternative do you suggest now for similar search workflow through Google.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021, 8:22 AM Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Nabble is not managed by Apache.
Is there a way to get suggester index replicated to all search nodes from
index node? Do I need to build suggester index for each search node
separately?
I have a search interface that searches for videos. There is a filter there
that can sort the results based on views for last hour, last day,
last week, last month and last year. Is there a way to achieve this sorting
without always needing to update the index? E.g. After each specific
duration exp
> >
> https://solr.apache.org/guide/8_11/working-with-external-files-and-processes.html
> > >
> > > wunder
> > > Walter Underwood
> > > wun...@wunderwood.org
> > > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> > >
> > > > On
IIRC, under the hood, atomic indexing indexes the whole document again even
if you might be updating just one field of that document. This costs hugely
in terms of indexing performance because the other fields might be
requiring some significant heavy tokenization. Is there any way around this?
hich is not going to be
> fast.
>
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> wun...@wunderwood.org
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>
> > On Mar 30, 2022, at 9:34 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> >
> > On 3/30/22 10:27, gnandre wrote:
> >> IIRC, under the ho
-place updates still not
working?
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 12:33 PM gnandre wrote:
> Thanks, this is what I was looking for. Although, when I am experimenting
> with them now, I see no performance improvement. I suspect that it is still
> doing atomic updates and not in-place updates.
> H
ass","org.apache.solr.common.SolrException"],
"msg":"ERROR: [doc=answers:question:8029] unknown field 'asset_type'",
"code":400}}
So, I believe that it is still trying to index other fields as well from
their stored values and it is not a
:53, gnandre wrote:
> > Hi, here are the relevant fields from the schema.
> >
> >
> > docValues
> > ="true" multiValued="false" />
> > > docValues="true" multiValued="false"/>
> >
> > There are n
our Solr
> version did not yet have the fix for SOLR-13081
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13081>.
>
> Matthew
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 2:39 PM gnandre wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Shawn.
> >
> > I conducted the test that you mentioned.
> >
w
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 3:43 PM gnandre wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Matthew.
> >
> > I tried debugging as you suggested. It seems that it is still doing
> atomic
> > update instead of in-place update.
> > I am not using SolrCloud, so I don't think
To illustrate the issue I am running into:
In the following bash program, I execute 2 suggester index building
requests simultaneously with 1 process assigned to each call for a same
Solr node:
for i in {0..1}
do
curl "
http://solr:8983/solr/books/books_suggest_en?wt=json&q=DUMMY_SUGGESTER_TERM&
Documentation lists only building and reloading parameters for suggest
request handler. How to delete suggester index through API?
Hi,
I am using Solr 8.5.2
I made a simple in-place update request to Solr. This request has two
fields, one is the unique field and the other one is a field that returns
true for AtomicUpdateDocumentMerger.isSupportedFieldForInPlaceUpdate.
When I intercept this request during the debugging proce
mod function is not returning correct values when applied to ms(NOW) or
_version_ fields.
"_version_":1697770046865014784, "ms(NOW)":1661979881038, "mod(ms(NOW),10)":
0.0, "mod(_version_,10)":6.0
It should return 8 and 4 respectively. Am I missing something?
t; Mike
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 4:07 PM gnandre wrote:
>
> > mod function is not returning correct values when applied to ms(NOW) or
> > _version_ fields.
> >
> > "_version_":1697770046865014784, "ms(NOW)":1661979881038,
> > "m
Is there a way to make atomic indexing default?
Say, even if some clients send non-atomic indexing requests, it should get
converted to atomic indexing requests on Solr end, is that possible?
I am asking because we usually run into the following issue:
1. Client A is the major contributor of almo
Hi,
I have implemented LTR (LambdaRank) functionality but there are some search
cases where the relevancy is actually getting worse. I am trying to
understand why some results are ranked over the others. Naturally, I am
using a debug query to understand what is going on.
e.g. here is the explain
e.g. /solr/admin/cores request works without specifying specific core in
the request.
I took a look at the code of such request handlers (e.g. LoggingHandler)
but they simply extend to RequestHandlerBase just like any other core-level
request handler. What makes them special so that they do not re
Hi,
I am writing a custom Solr plugin and I need to add a check to make sure
that all the cores in the node are loaded before proceeding with later code
execution.
Following is what the code looks like. What I am observing though is that
the later code gets executed even if all the cores are not
Thanks, Shawn. I think what you propose there will be very helpful. There
are definitely usecases where we want to work at the solr node level and
not core level. Fieldcache is one other example.
In my case, I am trying to write a simple health check request handler that
makes sure that all cores
question to consider when choosing is whether you want the end point
> to
> >> be protected by authentication. If so then you're going to want to do it
> >> Shawn's way. If you want something publicly visible (say to
> infrastructure
> >> systems without log
Also, is this supported only in SolrCloud mode?
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:42 PM gnandre wrote:
> Thanks, Ishan. Is this available only in Solr 8.6+? I am using 8.5.0 :(
>
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 2:19 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
> ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
/api/cores or /solr/admin/cores return very useful information about the
current status of all the cores for the solr instance against which they
are invoked.
However, if Solr instance has just rebooted then these calls come back with
empty responses like below or contain only the cores loaded so
veloper
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 2:02 PM gnandre wrote:
>
> > /api/cores or /solr/admin/cores return very useful information about the
> > current status of all the cores for the solr instance against which they
> > are in
6/11/2022 11:52, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> > Yes
> >
> > Seehttps://
> solr.apache.org/guide/solr/latest/configuration-guide/cluster-plugins.html
> for the docs.
> >
> > Jan
> >
> >> 16. nov. 2022 kl. 00:43 skrev gnandre:
> >>
> &g
00 AM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/17/22 22:05, gnandre wrote:
> > Unfortunately, I am still on legacy mode and not cloud mode.
> > So, I can't take advantage of this feature :(
> >
> > In the meantime, I have implemented the Solr plugin and it is working as
> > e
Thanks, Shawn. This is very helpful. I will use this solution!
On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 12:56 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/19/22 21:38, gnandre wrote:
> > Thanks, Shawn. I am a bit wary of creating a total core just for this
> > health check purpose.
> > Isn't it a
Hi,
I am using Solr 8.5.2 in legacy mode (non-cloud).
Some of the Solr nodes are automatically getting restarted after a few
days. There is no clear pattern to the rebooting time. Also, no pattern in
number of incoming queries or nature of those queries. No
particular pattern in errors found in S
it just feels like we are not getting to the root of the problem and it
might return again at some point.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 8:04 AM matthew sporleder
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 7:02 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> >
> > On 11/21/22 15:01, gnandre wrote:
> > > I am us
Hi,
I am using Solr 8.5.2 and when I use FileBasedSpellChecker, I
always get "correctlySpelled": false even if the spellcheck.q value exists
in the file.
Apart from that it is working as expected. When I give slightly misspelled
term to spellcheck.q param, it returns the valid suggestion present
Say I have 2 fields. x and y.
Following are their schema definitions:
Also, there is this copy field, that copies the values from y to x.
If I make the following indexing request (non-atomic regular indexing
request)
{
"id": "doc",
"x": ["a", "b"],
"y": ["c", "d"]
}
then I end u
Can anybody please answer this? Many thanks in advance!
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 12:52 AM gnandre wrote:
> Is there a way to get suggester index replicated to all search nodes from
> index node? Do I need to build suggester index for each search node
> separately?
>
I find this open source project very useful. Is there any way to donate
money for it?
Thanks!
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023, 1:02 PM Doug Turnbull
wrote:
> Not sure about Solr, but you can donate to the Apache Software Foundation:
>
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/contributing.html
>
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 12:04 PM gnandre wrote:
>
> > I find this open so
of the JSON.
>
> wunder
> Walter Underwood
> wun...@wunderwood.org
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
>
> > On Mar 2, 2023, at 9:03 AM, gnandre wrote:
> >
> > Can anybody please answer this? Many thanks in advance!
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022
roject for coordination of how
> to
> > channel solr-labeled donations.
> >
> > Jan
> >
> > > 2. mar. 2023 kl. 19:36 skrev gnandre :
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023, 1:02 PM Doug Turnbull
> > > wrot
This seems very trivial but it is not working for me and I am not able to
figure out why.
If I have multivalued field like below,
When I index a document, instead of creating an array of strings, it
creates just a string like "en,jp"?
How can I define the default values such that they show up a
Hi,
Is it possible to get a list of all the search instances that are polling a
particular index node in non-cloud mode?
I tried to use a call like below but it does not help in getting the above
information.
http://solr:8983/solr/collection1/replication?command=filecontent&file=replication.properties
On Tue, Mar 28, 2023 at 2:58 PM gnandre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to get a list of a
Hi,
I am running into the following issue while creating a custom docker image
on top of the official Solr docker image (9.2.1).
The key(s) in the keyring
/etc/apt/trusted.gpg.d/ubuntu-keyring-2012-cdimage.gpg are ignored as the
file is not readable by user '_apt' executing apt-key
Because of t
e public key is not
available: NO_PUBKEY 871920D1991BC93C
E: The repository 'http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-backports
InRelease' is not signed.
E: Problem executing scripts APT::Update::Post-Invoke 'rm -f
/var/cache/apt/archives/*.deb /var/cache/apt/archives/partial/*.deb
/var
Thanks for all the replies.
FWIW, if I just replace FROM solr:9.2.1 with FROM solr:8.5.2, I do not run
into these issues.
8.5.2 is our current prod version.
That is why I was thinking maybe there is something in the base image that
is causing this.
Few things I will try next are:
1. Try to build
Ok, I tried direct docker build and am still running into the same issue.
01:58:26 |base|gnandre@ah-gnandre-l docker ±|solr_9-2-1 ✗|→ docker build
-t test/test:9.2.1-SNAPSHOT -f Dockerfile .
[+] Building 33.1s (6/23)
=> [internal] load build definition from Dockerf
Thanks, Chris. I tried this workflow with Debian 11 and I can confirm that
I am no longer running into this issue anymore
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 6:36 PM Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : FWIW, if I just replace FROM solr:9.2.1 with FROM solr:8.5.2, I do not
> run
> : into these issues.
> : 8.5.2 is o
Hi,
I am using Solr 9.2.1 (official docker image).
When I try to index a document, I get the error shown at the bottom of this
email.
Here is my corresponding filter setting
n
into
\# is
it
no
\# not
of
on
\# or
s
such
t
that
the
their
then
there
these
they
this
to
was
will
with
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:06 PM gnandre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using Solr 9.2.1 (official docker image).
>
> When I try to index a document, I get the error shown at th
Hi,
I am trying to use the knn parser in Solr 9.2.1 as follows:
curl -X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{
"params": {
"q": "{!knn f=dense_vector
topK=1}[0.06525743007659912,0.015727980062365532,0.003069591475650668,-0.016254400834441185,0.003478930564597249,-0.02475954219698906
e"
}
}' http://localhost:8983/solr/doc/select
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 3:25 AM Matthias Krüger <
mkrue...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> The query format looks correct. You can add "debug": true to the posted
> JSON to verify whether your suspicion about Solr n
But the q parameter is still not working. I am stumped.
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 1:43 AM gnandre wrote:
> Thanks. If I move the knn parser syntax and value to fq param and make q
> as *:*, it works and starts giving relevant results instantly.
>
> curl -X POST -H "Content-Type:
Any pointers where should I look to resolve this issue? Thanks!
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 9:25 PM gnandre wrote:
> But the q parameter is still not working. I am stumped.
>
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 1:43 AM gnandre wrote:
>
>> Thanks. If I move the knn parser syntax and val
3,0.06110243499279022,-0.04396197944879532,0.021046791225671768,-0.04995771124958992,0.09614221751689911,-0.03452020138502121,-0.07397083938121796]"],
"parsed_filter_queries":["KnnVectorQuery(KnnVectorQuery:dense_vector[0.06525743,...][1])"]}}
On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 12:
> Joel Bernstein
> > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 12:09 PM gnandre wrote:
> >
> >> Also, here is the debug output for that workaround with fq I mentioned.
> >> This debug output is not big.
&g
I have a simple Solr query component that does some exact match processing
by replacing qf and pf params in incoming search requests with new values
that point to the fields that do not do stemming, synonymization etc.
This works as expected. However in a distributed context (not using
SolrCloud,
Hi,
I am running into a conflict between two constraints.
Atomic updates require copy-field destinations to be stored=false. However,
if we want to use these copy-field destination fields in highlighting then
they need to be stored=true.
How to resolve this conflict?
I resolved this issue by extending the class to SearchComponent instead of
QueryComponent. It seems that SearchComponent sits at a higher level of
abstraction than QueryComponent and is useful when you want to work on a
layer above shards.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 8:05 PM gnandre wrote:
> I h
inkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 12:32 PM gnandre wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am running into a conflict between two constraints.
> >
> > Atomic updates require copy-field destinations to be stored=false.
> However,
> > if we w
While performing atomic indexing, I run into an error which says 'unknown
field X' where X is not a field specified in the schema. It is a
discontinued field. After deleting that field from the schema, I have
restarted Solr but I have not re-indexed the content back, so the deleted
field data stil
68 matches
Mail list logo
